Cited by 474Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Lethal aggression in Pan is better explained by adaptive strategies than human impacts

Open access
Wilson, Michael L., Boesch, Christophe, Fruth, Barbara, Furuichi, Takeshi, Gilby, Ian C., Hashimoto, Chie, Hobaiter, Catherine L., Hohmann, Gottfried +22 more·2014·Nature

Abstract

Observations of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) provide valuable comparative data for understanding the significance of conspecific killing. Two kinds of hypothesis have been proposed. Lethal violence is sometimes concluded to be the result of adaptive strategies, such that killers ultimately gain fitness benefits by increasing their access to resources such as food or mates. Alternatively, it could be a non-adaptive result of human impacts, such as habitat change or food provisioning. To discriminate between these hypotheses we compiled information from 18 chimpanzee communities and 4 bonobo communities studied over five decades. Our data include 152 killings (n = 58 observed, 41 inferred, and 53 suspected killings) by chimpanzees in 15 communities and one suspected killing by bonobos. We found that males were the most frequent attackers (92% of participants) and victims (73%); most killings (66%) involved intercommunity attacks; and attackers greatly outnumbered their victims (median 8:1 ratio). Variation in killing rates was unrelated to measures of human impacts. Our results are compatible with previously proposed adaptive explanations for killing by chimpanzees, whereas the human impact hypothesis is not supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13727

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chimpanzee group defense is energetically costly in terms of reduced foraging and increased traveling, and risky, as it may lead to injury or death.

    “Chimpanzee group defense is energetically costly in terms of reduced foraging and increased traveling (14), and risky, as it may lead to injury or death (10).”
  • Wild chimpanzees in almost all long-term field sites engage in competitive intergroup conflicts.

    “Wild chimpanzees in almost all long-term field sites engage in competitive intergroup conflicts (10, 11), which are characterized by two sets of behavior (Movie S1), intergroup encounters and border patrols.”
  • Male chimpanzees are more likely to be the victims of lethal intergroup aggression.

    “Male chimpanzees are more likely to be the victims of lethal intergroup aggression (10).”
  • The risk of intergroup infanticide and female hostage taking by rival groups are substantial threats for females.

    “the risk of intergroup infanticide and female hostage taking by rival groups are substantial threats for females (10, 11)”
  • In the Taï Forest, rates of intergroup lethal violence are low in comparison with other chimpanzee field sites.

    “However, in the Taï Forest, rates of intergroup lethal violence are low in comparison with other chimpanzee field sites (10).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, M. L., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., Furuichi, T., Gilby, I. C., Hashimoto, C., Hobaiter, C. L., Hohmann, G., Itoh, N., Koops, K., Lloyd, J. N., Matsuzawa, T., Mitani, J. C., Mjungu, D. C., Morgan, D., Muller, M. N., Mundry, R., Nakamura, M., Pruetz, J., Pusey, A. E., Riedel, J., Sanz, C., Schel, A. M., Simmons, N., Waller, M., Watts, D. P., White, F., Wittig, R. M., Zuberbühler, K., & Wrangham, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp (BE)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The Jane Goodall Institute (US)
  • Lincoln Park Zoo (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Michael L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-09
Volume
513
Issue
7518
Pages
414-417
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2118761285
Cited by
474
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13
FWCI
59.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26257408, 24000001, 25304019)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI058715)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
chimpanzees, bonobos, adaptation strategies, intergroup conflict, food provisioning, sex differences in aggression
MeSH terms
Africa, Aggression, Animals, Animals, Wild, Behavior, Animal, Pan troglodytes, Female, Food, Humans, Human Activities, Male, Models, Biological, Population Density, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Pan paniscus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review