Cited by 156Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Cooperation and competition in chimpanzees: Current understanding and future challenges

Mitani, John C.·2009·Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews

Abstract

Two goals in the study of evolutionary anthropology are to determine the factors that make humans unique and to reconstruct the evolution of our behavior. As humans' closest living relatives, chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) and bonobos ( Pan paniscus ) have always been of special interest in this regard. Because of their close evolutionary relationship to us, these animals provide the requisite comparative data to evaluate claims made about human uniqueness. In addition, knowledge of the differences among chimpanzees, bonobos, and us furnishes important insights into the changes that occurred during human evolution. Given these circumstances, studies of chimpanzees and bonobos remain high priorities for research. The volatile political situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, home to bonobos, has made long‐term study of their behavior difficult, if not impossible. In contrast, field research on chimpanzees, initiated by Jane Goodall 1 and Toshisada Nishida 2 nearly 50 years ago, continues to grow and thrive. While past and ongoing field work has added enormously to our understanding of the behavior of chimpanzees, 3–8 gaps in knowledge persist. In this paper, I summarize some of these gaps, giving special emphasis to male cooperation and female competition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/evan.20229

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Like humans, chimpanzee societies exhibit intragroup coordination and coalitionary support during violent intergroup conflicts.

    “Like humans, chimpanzee societies exhibit intragroup coordination and coalitionary support during violent intergroup conflicts.”
  • The fundamental need for within-group support in times of rising between-group conflict is not uniquely human but apparently also present in one of our closest living relatives, the chimpanzee.

    “The fundamental need for within-group support in times of rising between-group conflict is not uniquely human but apparently also present in one of our closest living relatives, the chimpanzee (11, 17).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 161 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitani, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Mitani, John C.
Venue
Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
215-227
ISSN
  • 1060-1538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6505
OpenAlex
W2043339913
Cited by
156
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leakey Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
chimpanzees, bonobos, cooperation, female competition, male cooperation, human uniqueness, evolution of human behavior, comparative primatology, primate social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review