Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foreign DNA capture during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity

Nuñez, James K., Harrington, Lucas B., Kranzusch, Philip J., Engelman, Alan N., Doudna, Jennifer A.·2015·Nature

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature15760

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tyrosine residues (Tyr22) in Cas1 subunits bracket the foreign genetic material, acting as a ruler that limits the central dsDNA region of the protospacer to a length of 23 nucleotides.

    “Tyrosine residues (Tyr22) in Cas1 subunits bracket the foreign genetic material, acting as a ruler that limits the central dsDNA region of the protospacer to a length of 23 nucleotides (nt) [20,27].”
  • In E. coli, Cas1 and Cas2 form a symmetric heterohexameric protein complex (Cas1-Cas2) that is required for spacer acquisition, featuring two Cas1 dimers and a single Cas2 dimer.

    “In E. coli, the most widely studied adaptation model, Cas1 and Cas2 form a symmetric heterohexameric protein complex (Cas1-Cas2) that is required for spacer acquisition, featuring two Cas1 dimers (Cas1a, Cas1a’, Cas1b and Cas1b’) and a single Cas2 dimer [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Barrangou, R. et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315, 1709–1712 (2007) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mojica, F. J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Garcia-Martinez, J. & Soria, E. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J. Mol. Evol. 60, 174–182 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bolotin, A., Quinquis, B., Sorokin, A. & Ehrlich, S. D. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 151, 2551–2561 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Pourcel, C., Salvignol, G. & Vergnaud, G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology 151, 653–663 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Garneau, J. E. et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468, 67–71 (2010) · DOI
  6. van der Oost, J., Westra, E. R., Jackson, R. N. & Wiedenheft, B. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 12, 479–492 (2014)
  7. Yosef, I., Goren, M. G. & Qimron, U. Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli . Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 5569–5576 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  8. Datsenko, K. A. et al. Molecular memory of prior infections activates the CRISPR/Cas adaptive bacterial immunity system. Nature Comm. 3, 945 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  9. Swarts, D. C., Mosterd, C., van Passel, M. W. & Brouns, S. J. CRISPR interference directs strand specific spacer acquisition. PLoS ONE 7, e35888 (2012) · DOI
  10. Nuñez, J. K. et al. Cas1-Cas2 complex formation mediates spacer acquisition during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 528–534 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  11. Arslan, Z., Hermanns, V., Wurm, R., Wagner, R. & Pul, U. Detection and characterization of spacer integration intermediates in type I-E CRISPR–Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7884–7893 (2014) · DOI
  12. Nuñez, J. K., Lee, A. S., Engelman, A. & Doudna, J. A. Integrase-mediated spacer acquisition during CRISPR–Cas adaptive immunity. Nature 519, 193–198 (2015) · DOI · Paper page
  13. Rollie, C., Schneider, S., Brinkmann, A. S., Bolt, E. L. & White, M. F. Intrinsic sequence specificity of the Cas1 integrase directs new spacer acquisition. eLife 4, 10.7554/eLife.08716 (2015) · DOI
  14. Heler, R., Marraffini, L. A. & Bikard, D. Adapting to new threats: the generation of memory by CRISPR–Cas immune systems. Mol. Microbiol. 93, 1–9 (2014) · DOI
  15. Brouns, S. J. et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 321, 960–964 (2008) · DOI · Paper page
  16. Carte, J., Wang, R., Li, H., Terns, R. M. & Terns, M. P. Cas6 is an endoribonuclease that generates guide RNAs for invader defense in prokaryotes. Genes Dev. 22, 3489–3496 (2008) · DOI
  17. Haurwitz, R. E., Jinek, M., Wiedenheft, B., Zhou, K. & Doudna, J. A. Sequence- and structure-specific RNA processing by a CRISPR endonuclease. Science 329, 1355–1358 (2010) · DOI
  18. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012) · DOI · Paper page
  19. Levy, A. et al. CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA. Nature 520, 505–510 (2015) · DOI
  20. Wiedenheft, B. et al. Structural basis for DNase activity of a conserved protein implicted in CRISPR-mediated genome defense. Structure 17, 904–912 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
  21. Savilahti, H., Rice, P. A. & Mizuuchi, K. The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function. EMBO J. 14, 4893–4903 (1995) · DOI
  22. Scottoline, B. P., Chow, S., Ellison, V. & Brown, P. O. Disruption of the terminal base pairs of retroviral DNA during integration. Genes Dev. 11, 371–382 (1997) · DOI
  23. Katz, R. A., Merkel, G., Andrake, M. D., Roder, H. & Skalka, A. M. Retroviral integrases promote fraying of viral DNA ends. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 25710–25718 (2011) · DOI
  24. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  25. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
  26. Babu, M. et al. A dual function of the CRISPR–Cas system in bacterial antivirus immunity and DNA repair. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 484–502 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  27. Makarova, K. S. et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR–Cas systems. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 9, 467–477 (2011)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nuñez, J. K., Harrington, L. B., Kranzusch, P. J., Engelman, A. N., & Doudna, J. A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-10-21
Volume
527
Issue
7579
Pages
535-538
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
201
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review