The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 24 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Diverse subsets of cortical interneurons have vital roles in higher-order brain functions. To investigate how this diversity is generated, here we used single-cell RNA sequencing to profile the transcriptomes of mouse cells collected along a developmental time course. Heterogeneity within mitotic progenitors in the ganglionic eminences is driven by a highly conserved maturation trajectory, alongside eminence-specific transcription factor expression that seeds the emergence of later diversity. Upon becoming postmitotic, progenitors diverge and differentiate into transcriptionally distinct states, including an interneuron precursor state. By integrating datasets across developmental time points, we identified shared sources of transcriptomic heterogeneity between adult interneurons and their precursors, and uncovered the embryonic emergence of cardinal interneuron subtypes. Our analysis revealed that the transcription factor Mef2c, which is linked to various neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, delineates early precursors of parvalbumin-expressing neurons, and is essential for their development. These findings shed new light on the molecular diversification of early inhibitory precursors, and identify gene modules that may influence the specification of human interneuron subtypes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
57 Own result · 16 Not checked yet · 14 Own interpretation · 5 Own method · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Heterogeneity within mitotic progenitors in the ganglionic eminences is driven by a highly conserved maturation trajectory, alongside eminence-specific transcription factor expression that seeds the emergence of later diversity.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Within mitotic progenitors, we found a highly conserved maturation trajectory, accompanied by eminence-specific transcription factor expression that seeds the emergence of later cell diversity.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Upon becoming postmitotic, progenitors diverge and differentiate into transcriptionally distinct states, including an interneuron precursor state.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our analysis revealed that the ASD-associated transcription factor Mef2c delineates early Pvalb-precursors, and is essential for their development.”
- Also stated in: § Diversity emerges from a common precursor state · plain
“the transcription factor Mef2c was among the genes discriminating early Pvalb-precursors from other MGE-derived interneuron types”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Diversity emerges from a common precursor state · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“conditional deletion of Mef2c in inhibitory neurons led to a specific loss of Pvalb-interneurons by P20 in cortical layers 2-6”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when we performed the unsupervised branching analysis only in mitotic progenitors, we found no evidence for the specification of distinct interneuron fates”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a second group of branches (i.e. precursor state 2) expressed known projection neuron marker genes (i.e. Isl1, Ebf1; Fig. 3E; Supplementary Table 4)”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we performed a differential expression analysis and found a small number of transcription factors enriched in mitotic progenitors within particular eminences”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, neurons born at these sequential timepoints were distributed progressively along the MT timeline (Fig. 1H, Extended Data Fig. 1).”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“we found that, as expected20, more than 80% of Dlx6a-Cre fate mapped cortical cells at E18.5 mapped to precursor state 1, based on their expression of canonical regulators of interneuron development”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Wichterle, H ., Turnbull, D. H ., Nery, S ., Fishell, G. & Alvarez-Buylla, A. In utero fate mapping reveals distinct migratory pathways and fates of neurons born in the mammalian basal forebrain. Development 128, 3759–3771 (2001) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“even though branched trajectories for each eminence were calculated independently, branch gene expression markers were highly correlated across eminences”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
- Probably not a substantial claim. 9
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The trend overall shows that genes with peak expression at low MS tend to have higher expression in the VZ, and as MS rank increases the expression pattern shifts to the subventricular zone (SVZ) and then to the MZ”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [31] Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results sections on Cre recombination patterns and fluorescent labeling discuss reporter-gene expression in mouse brain regions, not gene expression ranked by maturation score. Searches for maturation score and the ventricular, subventricular, and mantle zones found no passage addressing the claimed VZ-to-SVZ-to-MZ shift. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By integrating datasets across developmental timepoints, we identified shared sources of transcriptomic heterogeneity between adult interneurons and their precursors, revealing the embryonic emergence of interneuron cardinal subtypes.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the number of conserved DE genes grow over time. Same analysis for Pvalb vs. Sst subsets (Middle), and Vip vs. Id2 subsets (Right).”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Developmental progression and cell cycle were the primary sources of transcriptional variance in these progenitors (Supplementary Methods), with maturation proportionally explaining six-fold more variance compared to eminence-of-origin”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genetic fate mapping using Lhx8-Cre/cerulean demonstrates that MGE branch three precursors give rise to the entire breadth of cholinergic projection (Globus Pallidus and Nucleus Basalis) and interneuron (striatum) populations.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mitotic cells fall within a homogeneous point cloud, with low variance on PC1 and PC2, showing no evidence of fate bifurcation.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the vast majority of Dlx6a-Cre;RCEloxP positive E18.5 cortical cells map to the interneuron precursor state, and are split between MGE and CGE-derived precursors.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The cumulative longitudinal use of a constitutive Cre driver also results in extensive labeling of cortical interneurons due to transient expression within this population.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By E18, all cardinal types of interneurons could be identified, and additional subtypes appeared to be transcriptionally specified as well”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In-situ hybridization (ISH) confirmed that these waves describe the sequential expression of stem-cell (e.g. Nes), proneural (e.g., Ascl1), and neurogenic genes (e.g. Dcx; Fig. 2C), roughly correlating with the spatiotemporal progression from the VZ to the mantle zone (MZ)”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of all cells, 3,432 GABAergic interneurons were easily identified by the expression of Gad1 and depletion of Slc17a7, and were selected for downstream analysis.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The third group of branches (i.e. precursor state 3) exhibited weaker correlation across eminences, with the transcription factor Lhx8 representing a marker gene for the MGE Branch 3”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integrated analysis with the P56 dataset results in clearer separation, and enables us to map developmental precursors to adult subtypes.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on this alignment, P10 cells exhibited strong evidence of transcriptomic separation beyond cardinal types, (Fig. 4B), including clear segregation between Sst Martinotti versus non-Martinotti (X94), Vip bipolar versus multipolar, and Id2 neurogliaform versus non-neurogliaform interneuron subtypes”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We first observed evidence of clear fate bifurcations as cells become postmitotic, and precursors from all GEs branched into distinct precursor states”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified rare populations that did not express canonical interneuron (IN) markers, likely representing false positives from FACS.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“tSNE visualization and graph-based clustering of the 3,432 GABAergic cells reveals 14 clusters, which could be broadly grouped into cardinal types based on the expression of canonical markers”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While we did observe computational evidence of branching, this does not represent fate bifurcations as we observed in postmitotic cells.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed a separation of Pvalb- and Sst-precursor cells within the E13.5 postmitotic populations (Fig. 4D), and identified transcriptomic markers that were conserved into adulthood”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“branching trajectories represented the most significant source of variation in these cells, with an increasing contribution attributable to eminence of origin compared to mitotic progenitors”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A minority of E13.5 cells also mapped to Vip and Id2 subsets, but conserved transcriptomic markers did not pass statistical significance until E18.5”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Genetic ‘fate-mapping’ using Lhx8-Cre suggested that these neurons account for the majority, if not all of the cholinergic projection and interneuron populations within the nucleus basalis, medial septum, and striatum, respectively, as well as the majority of Pvalb-positive projection neurons in the globus pallidus5,6”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Nóbrega-Pereira, S . et al. Origin and molecular specification of globus pallidus neurons. J. Neurosci. 30, 2824–2834 (2010) source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Zhao, Y . et al. The LIM-homeobox gene Lhx8 is required for the development of many cholinergic neurons in the mouse forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9005–9010 (2003) source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These components reflect our previously defined maturation trajectory, with DMC1 separating mitotic cells (left).”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our Lhx6-GFP-negative dataset contains both mitotic and postmitotic cells from the CGE and diffusion map analysis shows our previously defined maturation trajectory.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the clear emergence of Sst, Vip and Id2 subtypes was apparent for a subset of cells at E18.5 (Extended Data Figure 8), but we were unable to clearly subdivide Pvalb neurons by P10, in accordance with their late maturation28.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Harrington, A. J . et al. MEF2C regulates cortical inhibitory and excitatory synapses and behaviors relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders. eLife 5, 140 (2016) source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diffusion map analysis of these cells returned only two significant principal components, with no evidence of further structure.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“observed that MT recapitulated known dynamics associated with neuronal maturation (Fig. 1E) while also segregating GE cells into ‘mitotic’ and ‘postmitotic’ phases”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This diverse group of neurons is developmentally derived from progenitors residing in embryonic proliferative zones known as the medial, caudal and lateral ganglionic eminences (MGE, CGE, LGE, respectively)1.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Kepecs, A. & Fishell, G. Interneuron cell types are fit to function. Nature 505, 318–326 (2014) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The MGE and CGE are known to produce non-overlapping types of cortical interneurons16.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Rudy, B ., Fishell, G ., Lee, S. & Hjerling-Leffler, J. Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocortical GABAergic neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 45–61 (2011) source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Supplementing these more general programs are the eminence-specific genes that, for example, may direct the axons of parvalbumin cortical interneurons to form perisomal baskets and the efferents of somatostatin cortical interneurons to reliably target dendrites.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cells expressing both genes are likely projection neuron precursors that have recently been described in the CGE21, but whose progeny is not captured in the mouse visual cortex dataset.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Frazer, S . et al. Transcriptomic and anatomic parcellation of 5-HT3AR expressing cortical interneuron subtypes revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 8, 14219 (2017) source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To avoid the possibility of FACS false negative MGE cells contaminating our Lhx6-GFP-negative dataset, we clustered the postmitotic cells from this dataset, and filtered out three rare clusters where Lhx6 mRNA expression was detected in more than 20% of cells”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We manually dissected the embryonic day (E)13.5 MGE or E14.5 CGE and LGE from wild type mouse embryos, timepoints corresponding to peak neurogenesis in these structures7,8”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Inan, M ., Welagen, J. & Anderson, S. A. Spatial and temporal bias in the mitotic origins of somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing interneuron subgroups and the chandelier subtype in the medial ganglionic eminence. Cereb. Cortex 22, 820–827 (2012) source
- Not checked yetcites [8] Miyoshi, G . et al. Genetic fate mapping reveals that the caudal ganglionic eminence produces a large and diverse population of superficial cortical interneurons. J. Neurosci. 30, 1582–1594 (2010) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, our data reveal how postmitotic pan-eminence transcriptional programs (precursor states) emerge, and in parallel, eminence-specific transcriptional programs escalate.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Genome-wide association studies have linked mutations in this gene to Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, and other neurodevelopmental disorders29.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Diversity emerges from a common precursor state
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Habib, N . et al. Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 955–958 (2017) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These cells have been recently described as being present in the cortical white matter and likely represent projection neuron precursors21.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Frazer, S . et al. Transcriptomic and anatomic parcellation of 5-HT3AR expressing cortical interneuron subtypes revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 8, 14219 (2017) source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We performed latent variable regression to mitigate heterogeneity resulting from cell-cycle state10,11 (Extended Data Fig. 1), preventing subsequent analysis from being dominated by mitotic phase-specific gene expression”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > RESULTS > Transcriptional profiling of GE cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Buettner, F . et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015) source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Tirosh, I . et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189–196 (2016) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, our FlashTag maturation trajectory serves as complementary validation of our Drop-seq maturation trajectory, and exhibits strong association with biological time.”
§ Developmental diversification of cortical inhibitory interneurons > Extended Data
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The genetic programs that drive interneuron fate specification and maintenance are not well understood.
“the genetic programs driving interneuron fate specification and maintenance are not well understood”
The paper relies on this without support.
It remains unclear how early sources of heterogeneity generate the vast diversity of adult interneurons.
“it remains unclear how these early sources of heterogeneity generate the vast diversity of adult interneurons”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The cardinal identity of a cell is probably already instilled at the postmitotic stage during development9,61,62,63,64, and its subsequent phenotypic differentiation and expression are regulated by extrinsic signals such as cell interactions and neural activity.”
From The diversity of GABAergic neurons and neural communication elements (2019) · cites this paper as [61]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“a contemporaneous study based on a different scRNA-seq approach found no evidence for early embryonic specification of interneurons into specific cell types”
From Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons (2018) · cites this paper as Mayer et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Cortical excitatory neuron transcriptomes may be more heterogeneous due to their developmental origin spread across the dorsal telencephalon, compared with GABAergic populations that originate in the ganglionic eminences and migrate to cortex (Mayer et al., 2018).”
From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as Mayer et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“scRNA-seq reveals how neuronal and glial cell type identities emerge in developing mouse (Mayer et al., 2018; Telley et al., 2019; Tiklová et al., 2019) and human brain (Li et al., 2018; Nowakowski et al., 2017; Pollen et al., 2015), and even across whole organisms (Farrell et al., 2018).”
From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as Mayer et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Lhx6–a transcription factor–participates in cell fate determination of MGE types, whereas Lamp5+ neocortical interneurons come from the CGE35.”
From Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“(and both are expressed in the cortical Lamp5+ Lhx6+ type)”
From Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“In mouse mature cortical interneurons, Id2 and Lamp5 are expressed in nearly identical populations35”
From Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Developmentally, Sst+and Pavlb+ originate from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE), while the Vip+ originate from the caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)15.”
From Cell type-specific transcriptional programs in mouse prefrontal cortex during adolescence and addiction (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“and are likely the remaining non-MGE origin cells (arising from CGE and/or POA)14–16”
From Cell type-specific transcriptional programs in mouse prefrontal cortex during adolescence and addiction (2019) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“For example, Mayer et al (2018) fit a negative binomial model to count data, using technical covariates such as the read depth and the number of counts per gene to fit the model parameters.”
From Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial (2019) · cites this paper as Mayer et al, 2018
Citations
Cites
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 · Cited by 27,252
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424
Integrated analysis of single cell transcriptomic data across conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., & Satija, R. (2017) · doi:10.1101/164889 · Cited by 13,200
Self-citationIntegrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174
Self-citationTrapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110
Self-citationA robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain
Madisen, L., Zwingman, T. A., Sunkin, S. M., Oh, S. W., Zariwala, H. A., Gu, H., Ng, L. L., Palmiter, R. D., Hawrylycz, M. J., Jones, A. R., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2467 · Cited by 6,907
Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572
Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories
Qiu, X., Mao, Q., Tang, Y., Wang, L., Chawla, R., Pliner, H. A., & Trapnell, C. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4402 · Cited by 5,070
Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq
Tirosh, I., Izar, B., Prakadan, S. M., Wadsworth, M. H., Treacy, D., Trombetta, J. J., Rotem, A., Rodman, C., Lian, C., Murphy, G., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad0501 · Cited by 4,944
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 550
Shabani, K., Pigeon, J., Zariouh, M. B. T., Liu, T., Saffarian, A., Komatsu, J., Liu, E., Danda, N., Lefebvre, M., Limame, R., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.add5002 · Cited by 24
Transcriptomic and spatial organization of telencephalic GABAergic neurons
van Velthoven, C. T. J., Gao, Y., Kunst, M., Lee, C., McMillen, D., Chakka, A. B., Casper, T., Clark, M., Chakrabarty, R., Daniel, S. F., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09296-1 · Cited by 32
Generation of cerebral cortical GABAergic interneurons from pluripotent stem cells
Fitzgerald, M., Sotuyo, N. P., Tischfield, D. J., & Anderson, S. A. (2020) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.3252 · Cited by 20
Maturation Delay of Human GABAergic Neurogenesis in Fragile X Syndrome Pluripotent Stem Cells
Zhang, A., Sokolova, I., Domissy, A., Davis, J., Rao, L., Utami, K. H., Wang, Y., Hagerman, R. J., Pouladi, M. A., Sanna, P. P., et al. (2022) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.1093/stcltm/szac022 · Cited by 19
MTG8 interacts with LHX6 to specify cortical interneuron subtype identity
Asgarian, Z., Oliveira, M. G., Stryjewska, A., Maragkos, I., Rubin, A. N., Magno, L., Pachnis, V., Ghorbani, M., Hiebert, S. W., Denaxa, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32898-6 · Cited by 20
Involvement of myocyte enhancer factor 2c in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder
Chaudhary, R., Agarwal, V., Kaushik, A. S., & Rehman, M. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06854 · Cited by 21
Levenga, J., Wong, H., Milstead, R. A., LaPlante, L., & Hoeffer, C. A. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex Communications · doi:10.1093/texcom/tgab036 · Cited by 20
Single-cell RNA-sequencing of mammalian brain development: insights and future directions
Vinsland, E., & Linnarsson, S. (2022) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.200180 · Cited by 21
Manuel, M. N., Tan, K. B., Kozić, Z., Molinek, M., Marcos, T. S., Razak, F. M. A., Dobolyi, D., Dobie, R., Henderson, B. E. P., Henderson, N. C., et al. (2022) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001563 · Cited by 20
St18 specifies globus pallidus projection neuron identity in MGE lineage
Nunnelly, L. F., Campbell, M., Lee, D. I., Dummer, P. D., Gu, G., Menon, V., & Au, E. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35518-5 · Cited by 20
A mixed model of neuronal diversity
Telley, L., & Jabaudon, D. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02539-4 · Cited by 20
Clark, B. S., Stein-O’Brien, G., Shiau, F., Cannon, G. H., Davis-Marcisak, E. F., Sherman, T. D., Rajaii, F., James-Esposito, R. E., Gronostajski, R. M., Fertig, E. J., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/378950 · Cited by 20
Molecular Logic of Cellular Diversification in the Mammalian Cerebral Cortex
Di Bella, D. J., Habibi, E., Yang, S.-M., Stickels, R. R., Brown, J., Yadollahpour, P., Chen, F., Macosko, E. Z., Regev, A., & Arlotta, P. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.02.185439 · Cited by 20
Limoni, G., Murthy, S. S., Jabaudon, D., Dayer, A. G., & Niquille, M. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108644 · Cited by 21
ten Donkelaar, H. J., & Fritzsch, B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26098-8_2 · Cited by 20
Multimodal classification of neurons in the lateral septumPreprint
Reid, C. M., Ren, Y., Simon, R., Xie, Y., Garcίa, M. T., Tran, D., Vu, S., Liu, J., Adam, M. A., Hanson, S. M., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.15.580381 · Cited by 20
Walsh, R. M., Crabtree, G. W., Kalpana, K., Jubierre, L., Koo, S. Y., Ciceri, G., Gogos, J. A., Kruglikov, I., & Studer, L. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.06.017 · Cited by 24
Genetic and activity dependent-mechanisms wiring the cortex: Two sides of the same coin
Bragg-Gonzalo, L., de León-Reyes, N. S., & Nieto, M. (2021) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.05.011 · Cited by 17
Malwade, S., Gasthaus, J., Bellardita, C., Andelic, M., Moric, B., Korshunova, I., Kiehn, O., Vasistha, N. A., & Khodosevich, K. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.012 · Cited by 18
Cortical interneuron specification and diversification in the era of big data
Kessaris, N., & Denaxa, M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2023.102703 · Cited by 21
Trudler, D., Ghatak, S., Bula, M., Parker, J., Talantova, M. V., Luevanos, M., Labra, S. R., Grabauskas, T., Noveral, S. M., Teranaka, M., et al. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02761-9 · Cited by 24
Implementation and validation of single-cell genomics experiments in neuroscience
Colonna, M., Konopka, G., Liddelow, S. A., Nowakowski, T. J., Awatramani, R. B., Bateup, H. S., Cadwell, C. R., Caglayan, E., Chen, J. L., Gillis, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01814-0 · Cited by 22
Development and function of the medial amygdala
Prakash, N., Irqeba, A. A., & Corbin, J. G. (2024) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2024.11.004 · Cited by 22
Subpopulation Detection and Their Comparative Analysis across Single-Cell Experiments with scPopCorn
Wang, Y., Hoinka, J., & Przytycka, T. M. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.05.007 · Cited by 17
Enterría‐Morales, D., del Rey, N. L., Blesa, J., López‐López, I., Gallet, S., Prévot, V., López‐Barneo, J., & de Tassigny, X. D. (2020) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa105 · Cited by 17
Ryner, R. F., Derera, I. D., Armbruster, M., Kansara, A., Sommer, M., Pirone, A., Noubary, F., Jacob, M. H., & Dulla, C. G. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0572-22.2022 · Cited by 16
Deep Survey of GABAergic Interneurons: Emerging Insights From Gene-Isoform Transcriptomics
Que, L., Winterer, J., & Földy, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00115 · Cited by 15
Dosage dependent requirements ofMagohfor cortical interneuron generation and survival
Sheehan, C. J., McMahon, J. J., Serdar, L. D., & Silver, D. L. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.182295 · Cited by 16
Scher, M. S. (2022) · Seminars in Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.spen.2022.100970 · Cited by 17
Mossink, B., van Rhijn, J.-R., Wang, S., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.05.07.082453 · Cited by 17
Early developmental origins of cortical disorders modeled in human neural stem cells
Mato-Blanco, X., Kim, S., Jourdon, A., Ma, S., Choi, S.-H., Giani, A. M., Paredes, M. I., Tebbenkamp, A. T. N., Liu, F., Duque, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61316-w · Cited by 19
Zfhx3 modulates retinal sensitivity and circadian responses to light
Hughes, S., Edwards, J. K., Wilcox, A. G., Pothecary, C. A., Barnard, A. R., Joynson, R., Joynson, G., Hankins, M. W., Peirson, S. N., Banks, G. T., et al. (2021) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.202100563r · Cited by 14
Borges, B. C., Meng, X., Long, P. T., Kanold, P. O., & Corfas, G. (2022) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24266 · Cited by 13
microRNA-dependent regulation of gene expression in GABAergic interneurons
Kołosowska, K., Schratt, G. M., & Winterer, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1188574 · Cited by 16
Zhao, T., Huang, C., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Chen, X., Wang, T., Shao, J., Meng, X., Huang, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202306294 · Cited by 14
Tao, G., Li, Z., Wen, Y. F., Song, X., Wei, S., Du, H., Yang, Z., Xu, Z., & You, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00075 · Cited by 13
Inferring TF activation order in time series scRNA-Seq studies
Lin, C. H., Ding, J., & Bar‐Joseph, Z. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007644 · Cited by 13
Spektor, R., Yang, J. W., Lee, S. Y., & Soloway, P. D. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/561191 · Cited by 12
Kanton, S., Boyle, M. J., He, Z., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/685057 · Cited by 15
Wu, S. J., Dai, M., Yang, S.-P., McCann, C., Qiu, Y., Kumar, V., Marrero, G. J., Tsyporin, J., Huang, S., Shin, D., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.20.604399 · Cited by 17
Self-citationBRN2 as a key gene drives the early primate telencephalon development
Zhu, X., Guo, Y., Chu, C., Liu, D., Duan, K., Yin, Y., Si, C., Kang, Y., Yao, J., Du, X., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl7263 · Cited by 15
László, Z. I., Bercsényi, K., Mayer, M., Lefkovics, K., Szabó, G., Katona, I., & Lele, Z. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz168 · Cited by 13
A Spacetime Odyssey of Neural Progenitors to Generate Neuronal Diversity
Ge, M., Sheikhshahrokh, A., Shi, X., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., & Wu, Q. (2022) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-022-00956-0 · Cited by 13
Xing, Y., Zan, C., & Liu, L. (2023) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2023.1007755 · Cited by 14
Transcriptional maintenance of cortical somatostatin interneuron subtype identity during migration
Munguba, H., Nikouei, K., Hochgerner, H., Oberst, P., Kouznetsova, A., Ryge, J., Muñoz‐Manchado, A. B., Close, J., Batista‐Brito, R., Linnarsson, S., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.07.018 · Cited by 20
Self-citationWard, C., Nasrallah, K., Tran, D., Sabri, E., Vazquez, A., Sjulson, L., Castillo, P. E., & Batista‐Brito, R. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.05.021 · Cited by 15
Self-citationSong, C., Kang, X., Yang, F., Du, W., Zhang, J., Liu, L., Kang, J., Jia, N., Yue, H., Fan, L., et al. (2021) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2020-0134 · Cited by 15
Postmitotic Prox1 Expression Controls the Final Specification of Cortical VIP Interneuron Subtypes
Stachniak, T. J., Kästli, R., Hanley, O., Argunşah, A. Ö., van der Valk, E. G. T., Kanatouris, G., & Karayannis, T. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1021-21.2021 · Cited by 13
Lizbinski, K. M., Marsat, G., & Dacks, A. M. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0212-18.2018 · Cited by 15
Lessons from single cell sequencing in CNS cell specification and function
Li, Z., Tyler, W. A., & Haydar, T. F. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.043 · Cited by 14
Ou, Y., Che, M., Peng, J., Zhou, M., Wu, G., Gong, H., Li, K., Wang, X., Niu, P., Qi, S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2022.711138 · Cited by 13
Palantir characterizes cell fate continuities in human hematopoiesis
Setty, M., Kiseliovas, V., Levine, J., Gayoso, A., Mazutis, L., & Pe’er, D. (2018) · doi:10.1101/385328 · Cited by 836
Manukyan, A., Bahry, E., Wyler, E., Becher, E., Reguant, A. P., Plumbom, I., Dikmen, H. O., Elezkurtaj, S., Conrad, T., Altmüller, J., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.15.571667 · Cited by 14
Reichard, J., Wolff, P., Xie, S., Zuo, K., Fullio, C. L., Du, J., Graff, S., Linde, J., Yildiz, C. B., Pitschelatow, G., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62114-0 · Cited by 17
Dietschi, Q., Tuberosa, J., Fodoulian, L., Boillat, M., Kan, C., Codourey, J., Pauli, V., Feinstein, P. G., Carleton, A., & Rodríguez, I. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn7450 · Cited by 11
Single cell spatial biology over developmental time can decipher pediatric brain pathologies
Nussinov, R., Yavuz, B. R., & Jang, H. (2024) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106597 · Cited by 12
Differential behavioral engagement of inhibitory interneuron subtypes in the zebra finch brain
Hozhabri, E., Asensio, A. C., Elmaleh, M., Kim, J. W., Phillips, M. B., Frazel, P. W., Dimidschstein, J., Fishell, G., & Long, M. A. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.003 · Cited by 10
Self-citationA single-cell mass cytometry-based atlas of the developing mouse brain
Deusen, A. L. V., Kumar, S., Calhan, O. Y., Goggin, S. M., Shi, J., Williams, C. M., Keeler, A. B., Fread, K., Gadani, I. C., Deppmann, C. D., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01786-1 · Cited by 15
Kuerbitz, J. S., Madhavan, M., Ehrman, L. A., Kohli, V., Waclaw, R. R., & Campbell, K. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa323 · Cited by 12
ARX regulates cortical interneuron differentiation and migrationPreprint
Lim, Y., Akula, S. K., Myers, A. K., Chen, C., Rafael, K. A., Walsh, C. A., Golden, J. A., & Cho, G. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.31.578282 · Cited by 11
McCrimmon, C. M., Toker, D., Pahos, M., Cao, Q., Lozano, K., Lin, J. J., Parent, J. M., Tidball, A. M., Zheng, J., Molnár, L., et al. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116217 · Cited by 17
Shen, Y., Shao, M., Hao, Z.-Z., Huang, M., Xu, N., & Liu, S. (2024) · Neuroscience Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s12264-023-01160-4 · Cited by 11
Genetic approaches to elucidating cortical and hippocampal GABAergic interneuron diversity
Machold, R. P., & Rudy, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2024.1414955 · Cited by 12
Self-citationTemporal control of progenitor competence shapes maturation in GABAergic neuron development in mice
Bright, A. R., Kotlyarenko, Y., Neuhaus, F., Rodrigues, D., Feng, C., Peters, C., Vitali, I., Dönmez, E., Myoga, M. H., Dvoretskova, E., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01999-y · Cited by 13
Self-citationKim, J. Y., Poddar, A., Sandoval, K., Chu, J. S. F., Horton, E. C., Cui, D., Nakamura, K. C., Lu, I.-L., Mui, M. H., Bartels, T., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01987-2 · Cited by 13
The cis-regulatory logic integrating spatial and temporal patterning in the vertebrate neural tubePreprint
Zhang, I., Boezio, G. L. M., Cornwall-Scoones, J., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.17.589864 · Cited by 11
Cellular complexity of the peripheral nervous system: Insights from single-cell resolution
Zhao, L., Huang, W., & Yi, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1098612 · Cited by 9
Zhang, X., Wu, M., Cheng, L., Cao, W., Liu, Z., Yang, S., & Kim, M. S. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02756-6 · Cited by 13
Feng, X., Gao, Y., Chu, F., Shan, Y., Liu, M., Wang, Y.-Y., Zhu, Y., Lu, Q. R., & Li, M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56058-8 · Cited by 10
Bershteyn, M., Zhou, H., Fuentealba, L. C., Chen, C., Subramanyam, G., Cherkowsky, D., Sevilla, E. S., Hampel, P., Salvatierra, J., Sezan, M., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.06.010 · Cited by 14
The cis-regulatory logic integrating spatial and temporal patterning in the vertebrate neural tube
Zhang, I., Boezio, G. L. M., Cornwall-Scoones, J., Frith, T. J. R., Finnie, E., Luo, J., Jiang, M., Howell, M. T., Lovell-Badge, R. H., Sagner, A., et al. (2025) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2025.06.029 · Cited by 17
Conservation of neural progenitor identity and the emergence of neocortical neuronal diversity
Shohayeb, B., Muzar, Z., & Cooper, H. M. (2021) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.05.024 · Cited by 10
Göngrich, C., Krapacher, F. A., Munguba, H., Fernández‐Suárez, D., Andersson, A. K., Hjerling‐Leffler, J., & Ibáñez, C. F. (2019) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201905002 · Cited by 7
Developmental Characterization of Schizophrenia-Associated Gene Zswim6 in Mouse Forebrain
Chang, C.-C., Kuo, H., Chen, S.-Y., Lin, W.-T., Lu, K.-M., Saito, T., & Liu, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2021.669631 · Cited by 9
Sensory Input, Sex, and Function Shape Hypothalamic Cell Type DevelopmentPreprint
Kaplan, H. S., Logeman, B. L., Zhang, K., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.23.576835 · Cited by 10
Cheng, B., Sharma, D. R., Kumar, A., Sheth, H., Agyemang, A. A., Aschner, M., Zhang, X., & Ballabh, P. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac271 · Cited by 10
The function of Mef2c toward the development of excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurons
Ward, C., Sjulson, L., & Batista‐Brito, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2024.1465821 · Cited by 8
Self-citationFate plasticity of interneuron specification
Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Mancia, W., Breevoort, A., Gonzalez-Ferrer, J., Schweiger, H. E., Lehrer, J., Zhou, L., Schmitz, M. T., Perez, Y., Mukhtar, T., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112295 · Cited by 9
The critical role of BMP signaling in gastric epithelial cell differentiation revealed by organoids
Hong, F., Wang, X., Zhong, N., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., Zhang, M., Li, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., et al. (2025) · Cell Regeneration · doi:10.1186/s13619-025-00237-x · Cited by 9
A house divided: A multilevel bibliometric review of the job search literature 1973–2020
Norder, K. A., Emich, K. J., Kanar, A. M., Sawhney, A., & Behrend, T. S. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.036 · Cited by 9
Dwivedi, D., Dumontier, D., Sherer, M., Lin, S., Mirow, A. M., Qiu, Y., Xu, Q., Liebman, S. A., Joseph, D., Datta, S. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49732-w · Cited by 10
Self-citationLoeliger, B. W., Hanu, C., Panyutin, I. V., Maass‐Moreno, R., Wakim, P., Pritchard, W. F., Neumann, R. D., & Panyutin, I. G. (2020) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr15535.1 · Cited by 8
Setting the programmatic agenda: A comprehensive bibliometric overview of team mechanism research
Lu, L., Norder, K. A., Sawhney, A., & Emich, K. J. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.09.002 · Cited by 10
Brain Theranostics and Radiotheranostics: Exosomes and Graphenes In Vivo as Novel Brain Theranostics
Suh, M., & Lee, D. S. (2018) · Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13139-018-0550-9 · Cited by 8
Transcriptional maintenance of cortical somatostatin interneuron subtype identity during migrationPreprint
Munguba, H., Nikouei, K., Hochgerner, H., Oberst, P., Kouznetsova, A., Ryge, J., Batista‐Brito, R., Muñoz‐Manchado, A. B., Close, J., Linnarsson, S., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/593285 · Cited by 9
Self-citationEmergence of neuronal diversity during vertebrate brain developmentPreprint
Raj, B., Farrell, J. A., McKenna, A., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/839860 · Cited by 9
Huang, A. Y., Li, P., Rodin, R. E., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.19.046904 · Cited by 9
Astrocytes and neurons share brain region-specific transcriptional signaturesPreprint
Herrero-Navarro, Á., Puche-Aroca, L., Moreno‐Juan, V., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.21.038737 · Cited by 9
Wang, Y., Chiola, S., Yang, G., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.25.428022 · Cited by 9
Herb, B. R., Glover, H. J., Bhaduri, A., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.20.453090 · Cited by 9
Differential Control of Inhibitory and Excitatory Nerve Terminal Function by MitochondriaPreprint
Bredvik, K. G., & Ryan, T. A. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.19.594864 · Cited by 9
Cho, J. Y., Rumschlag, J. A., Tsvetkov, E., Proper, D. S., Lang, H., Berto, S., Assali, A., & Cowan, C. W. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100289 · Cited by 10
Asenjo-Martínez, A., Dragičević, K., Hou, W., Ozsvár, A., Hansen, N. W., Pfisterer, U., Rydbirk, R., Demharter, S., Møller, B. E., Gasthaus, J., et al. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.08.028 · Cited by 9
Transcription factor encoding of neuron subtype: Strategies that specify arbor pattern
Pai, Y. J., & Moore, A. W. (2021) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.03.013 · Cited by 7
Using organoids to study human brain development and evolution
Chan, W. K., Fetit, R., Griffiths, R., Marshall, H., Mason, J. O., & Price, D. J. (2021) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.22819 · Cited by 8
Distinct hyperactive RAS/MAPK alleles converge on common GABAergic interneuron core programs
Knowles, S. J., Stafford, A. M., Zaman, T., Angara, K., Williams, M. R., Newbern, J. M., & Vogt, D. L. (2023) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.201371 · Cited by 14
Alpár, A., & Harkany, T. (2018) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12815 · Cited by 8
Chang, C.-C., Kuo, H., Chen, S., Lu, K.-M., Fong, W. L., Wu, H.-L., Saito, T., & Liu, F.-C. (2020) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24900 · Cited by 7
Neurogenesis in the basal ganglia
Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Campbell, K. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814405-3.00018-7 · Cited by 7
Kelly, N. H., Huynh, N. P. T., & Guilak, F. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/659656 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, C., Hafemeister, C., Bandler, R. C., Machold, R., Batista Brito, R., Jaglin, X., Allaway, K., Butler, A., Fishell, G., & Satija, R.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- New York Genome Center (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fishell, Gord
- Satija, Rahul
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-03-05
- Volume
- 555
- Issue
- 7697
- Pages
- 457-462
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6052457
- OpenAlex
- W2791731597
- Semantic Scholar
- 7450ce01a65bcf74dd0dabd3df9b6cf350b4401b
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 34
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1342536)
- Simons Foundation (P01 NS074972)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- National Institutes of Health (NIH DP2, 1dp2hg009623-01, MH071679, NS074972)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F30MH114462, R01MH111529, R01MH071679, R37MH071679)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (DP2-HG-009623)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007308)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS074972, F31NS103398, R01NS039007, R01NS081297)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- cortical interneurons, MEF2C, parvalbumin neurons, ganglionic eminence, transcriptional heterogeneity, interneuron subtypes, developmental trajectories, transcription factors, neuropsychiatric disorders, mouse embryo
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Differentiation, Embryo, Mammalian, Female, Ganglia, Humans, Interneurons, Male, Mitosis, Neural Inhibition, Parvalbumins, Visual Cortex, RNA, Small Cytoplasmic, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, MEF2 Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
