Cited by 788Spinal Cord Injury ResearchNerve injury and regenerationMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Implantation of stimulated homologous macrophages results in partial recovery of paraplegic rats

Rapalino, O., Lazarov-Spiegler, O., Agranov, E., Velan, G.J., Yoles, E., Fraidakis, M., Soloman, A., Gepstein, R. +4 more·1998·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Postinjury recovery in most tissues requires an effective dialog with macrophages; however, in the mammalian central nervous system, this dialog may be restricted (possibly due to its immune-privileged status), which probably contributes to its regeneration failure. We circumvented this by implanting macrophages, pre-exposed ex vivo to peripheral nerve segments, into transected rat spinal cord. This stimulated tissue repair and partial recovery of motor function, manifested behaviorally by movement of hind limbs, plantar placement of the paws and weight support, and electrophysiologically by cortically evoked hind-limb muscle response. We substantiated these findings immunohistochemically by demonstrating continuity of labeled nerve fibers across the transected site, and by tracing descending fibers distally to it by anterograde labeling. In recovered rats, retransection of the cord above the primary transection site led to loss of recovery, indicating the involvement of long descending spinal tracts. Injection of macrophages into the site of injury is relatively non-invasive and, as the cells are autologous, it may be developed into a clinical therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm0798-814

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapalino, O., Lazarov-Spiegler, O., Agranov, E., Velan, G. J., Yoles, E., Fraidakis, M., Soloman, A., Gepstein, R., Katz, A., Belkin, M., Hadani, M., & Schwartz, M.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Meir Medical Center (IL)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
1998-07
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
814-821
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2039334993
Cited by
788
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 35
FWCI
22.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
spinal cord transection, paraplegia, motor recovery, peripheral nerve stimulation, central nervous system regeneration, immune privilege, cell therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrophysiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Macrophages, Male, Motor Activity, Paraplegia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cell Transplantation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review