Cited by 770Spinal Cord Injury ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsWound Healing and Treatments

Infiltrating Blood-Derived Macrophages Are Vital Cells Playing an Anti-inflammatory Role in Recovery from Spinal Cord Injury in Mice

Open access
Shechter, Ravid, London, Anat, Varol, Chen, Raposo, Catarina, Cusimano, Melania, Yovel, Gili, Rolls, Asya, Mack, Matthias +4 more·2009·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although macrophages (MPhi) are known as essential players in wound healing, their contribution to recovery from spinal cord injury (SCI) is a subject of debate. The difficulties in distinguishing between different MPhi subpopulations at the lesion site have further contributed to the controversy and led to the common view of MPhi as functionally homogenous. Given the massive accumulation in the injured spinal cord of activated resident microglia, which are the native immune occupants of the central nervous system (CNS), the recruitment of additional infiltrating monocytes from the peripheral blood seems puzzling. A key question that remains is whether the infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi contribute to repair, or represent an unavoidable detrimental response. The hypothesis of the current study is that a specific population of infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi is functionally distinct from the inflammatory resident microglia and is essential for recovery from SCI. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We inflicted SCI in adult mice, and tested the effect of infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi on the recovery process. Adoptive transfer experiments and bone marrow chimeras were used to functionally distinguish between the resident microglia and the infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi. We followed the infiltration of the monocyte-derived MPhi to the injured site and characterized their spatial distribution and phenotype. Increasing the naïve monocyte pool by either adoptive transfer or CNS-specific vaccination resulted in a higher number of spontaneously recruited cells and improved recovery. Selective ablation of infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi following SCI while sparing the resident microglia, using either antibody-mediated depletion or conditional ablation by diphtheria toxin, impaired recovery. Reconstitution of the peripheral blood with monocytes resistant to ablation restored the lost motor functions. Importantly, the infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi displayed a local anti-inflammatory beneficial role, which was critically dependent upon their expression of interleukin 10. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study attribute a novel anti-inflammatory role to a unique subset of infiltrating monocyte-derived MPhi in SCI recovery, which cannot be provided by the activated resident microglia. According to our results, limited recovery following SCI can be attributed in part to the inadequate, untimely, spontaneous recruitment of monocytes. This process is amenable to boosting either by active vaccination with a myelin-derived altered peptide ligand, which indicates involvement of adaptive immunity in monocyte recruitment, or by augmenting the naïve monocyte pool in the peripheral blood. Thus, our study sheds new light on the long-held debate regarding the contribution of MPhi to recovery from CNS injuries, and has potentially far-reaching therapeutic implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000113

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies suggest that infiltrating macrophages possess a greater ability than resident microglia to remove CNS plaques.

    “Some studies suggest that infiltrating macrophages possess a greater ability than resident microglia to remove CNS plaques,15–17”

    From TET2-mutant myeloid cells mitigate Alzheimer’s disease progression via CNS infiltration and enhanced phagocytosis in mice (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says infiltrating macrophages and resident microglia have different roles in recovery from spinal cord injury, and notes that macrophages can clear cell debris. It does not compare their ability to remove CNS plaques or report plaque removal. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A small number of blood-derived monocytes participate in default CNS tissue remodeling at late time points even without blood-brain barrier breach.

    “A small number of blood-derived monocytes have been observed to participate in the default tissue remodeling response in the CNS at late time points following injury, even in the absence of a breach of the blood–brain barrier [129,130].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shechter, R., London, A., Varol, C., Raposo, C., Cusimano, M., Yovel, G., Rolls, A., Mack, M., Pluchino, S., Martino, G., Jung, S., & Schwartz, M.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Jung, Steffen
  • Schwartz, Michal
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2009-07-28
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
e1000113
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2130529018
Cited by
770
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 65
FWCI
34.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cure Huntington's Disease Initiative
  • Minerva Foundation
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
spinal cord injury, infiltrating macrophages, monocyte-derived macrophages, anti-inflammatory macrophages, IL-10, monocyte recruitment, adaptive immunity, motor recovery, adoptive transfer, bone marrow chimeras, diphtheria toxin ablation, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Glycoproteins, Inflammation, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Monocytes, Ovalbumin, Peptide Fragments, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Interleukin-10, Adoptive Transfer, Mice, Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review