Cited by 520Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Aging renders the brain vulnerable to amyloid β-protein neurotoxicity

Guela, Changiz, Wu, Chuang-Kuo, Saroff, Daniel, Lorenzo, Alfredo, Yuan, Menglan, Yankner, Bruce A.·1998·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The formation of fibrillar deposits of amyloid beta protein (Abeta) in the brain is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A central question is whether Abeta plays a direct role in the neurodegenerative process in AD. The involvement of Abeta in the neurodegenerative process is suggested by the neurotoxicity of the fibrillar form of Abeta in vitro. However, mice transgenic for the Abeta precursor protein that develop amyloid deposits in the brain do not show the degree of neuronal loss or tau phosphorylation found in AD. Here we show that microinjection of plaque-equivalent concentrations of fibrillar, but not soluble, Abeta in the aged rhesus monkey cerebral cortex results in profound neuronal loss, tau phosphorylation and microglial proliferation. Fibrillar Abeta at plaque-equivalent concentrations is not toxic in the young adult rhesus brain. Abeta toxicity in vivo is also highly species-specific; toxicity is greater in aged rhesus monkeys than in aged marmoset monkeys, and is not significant in aged rats. These results suggest that Abeta neurotoxicity in vivo is a pathological response of the aging brain, which is most pronounced in higher order primates. Thus, longevity may contribute to the unique susceptibility of humans to Alzheimer's disease by rendering the brain vulnerable to Abeta neurotoxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm0798-827

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aβ-42 is linked to genetic mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP), leading to excessive amyloid production.

    “Aβ-42, a key part of SPs, is linked to genetic mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP), leading to excessive amyloid production.”
  • The neurotoxicity of aggregated Aβ-42 and its role in tau phosphorylation prompts investigation into disease-modifying therapies.

    “The neurotoxicity of aggregated Aβ-42 and its role in tau phosphorylation prompts investigation into disease-modifying therapies.5”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guela, C., Wu, C.-K., Saroff, D., Lorenzo, A., Yuan, M., & Yankner, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
1998-07
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
827-831
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2606648674
Cited by
520
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
22.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 10282)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS30352)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, amyloid fibrils, neurotoxicity, Alzheimer's disease, brain aging, rhesus monkeys, marmoset monkey, species differences, tau phosphorylation, neuronal loss, microglial proliferation, cerebral cortex, longevity, neurodegeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review