Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization

Open access
Ernst, Jason, Kellis, Manolis·2012·Nature Methods

Abstract

Chromatin state annotation using combinations of chromatin modification patterns has emerged as a powerful approach for discovering regulatory regions and their cell type specific activity patterns, and for interpreting disease-association studies1-5. However, the computational challenge of learning chromatin state models from large numbers of chromatin modification datasets in multiple cell types still requires extensive bioinformatics expertise making it inaccessible to the wider scientific community. To address this challenge, we have developed ChromHMM, an automated computational system for learning chromatin states, characterizing their biological functions and correlations with large-scale functional datasets, and visualizing the resulting genome-wide maps of chromatin state annotations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.1906

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Items 101–155 of 155

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, J., & Kellis, M.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2012-02-28
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
215-216
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1598350571
Cited by
2,475
References
2
FWCI
29.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.