Cited by 1,120Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans

Löken, Line S, Wessberg, Johan, Morrison, India, McGlone, Francis, Olausson, Håkan·2009·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Pleasant touch sensations may begin with neural coding in the periphery by specific afferents. We found that during soft brush stroking, low-threshold unmyelinated mechanoreceptors (C-tactile), but not myelinated afferents, responded most vigorously at intermediate brushing velocities (1-10 cm s(-1)), which were perceived by subjects as being the most pleasant. Our results indicate that C-tactile afferents constitute a privileged peripheral pathway for pleasant tactile stimulation that is likely to signal affiliative social body contact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2312

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C-tactile afferents are specially attuned to social touch, particularly affiliative touch such as gentle stroking, and have been found in all mammals studied.

    “Subsequent research on the importance of touch in mammals has discovered the existence of nerve fibres called C-tactile afferents that are specially attuned to social touch, particularly affiliative touch such as gentle stroking [62,63]. These have been found in all mammals studied, including primates, pigs, rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits and cats [64,65].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

  • CT-optimized touch is perceived as highly pleasant in healthy individuals.

    “Interestingly, while CT-optimized touch is perceived as highly pleasant in healthy individuals ( Löken et al., 2009 ), individuals with PTSD and/or history of trauma can report it as feeling unpleasant and intense ( Badura-Brack et al., 2015 ; Strauss et al., 2019 ; Maier et al., 2020 ).”

    From The brain-body disconnect: A somatic sensory basis for trauma-related disorders (2022) · cites this paper as Löken et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löken, L. S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., & Olausson, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Löken, Line S
  • Olausson, Håkan
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2009-04-12
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
547-548
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1975312927
Cited by
1,120
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 28
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wenner-Gren Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
C-tactile afferents, low-threshold mechanoreceptors, tactile coding, myelinated afferents, peripheral nerve fibers
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adaptation, Physiological, Affect, Afferent Pathways, Cerebral Cortex, Electrophysiology, Humans, Mechanoreceptors, Perception, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Receptor Cells, Reward, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Social Behavior, Touch, Hair Follicle, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Mechanotransduction, Cellular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review