Cited by 160Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Brain activity during cocaine craving and gambling urges: an fMRI study

Open access
Kober, Hedy, Lacadie, Cheryl M, Wexler, Bruce E, Malison, Robert T, Sinha, Rajita, Potenza, Marc N·2016·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Although craving states are important to both cocaine dependence (CD) and pathological gambling (PG), few studies have directly investigated neurobiological similarities and differences in craving between these disorders. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess brain activity in 103 participants (30 CD, 28 PG, and 45 controls) while they watched videos depicting cocaine, gambling, and sad scenarios to investigate the neural correlates of craving. We observed a three-way urge type × video type × diagnostic group interaction in self-reported craving, with CD participants reporting strong cocaine cravings to cocaine videos, and PG participants reporting strong gambling urges to gambling videos. Neuroimaging data revealed a diagnostic group × video interaction in anterior cingulate cortex/ventromedial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), activating predominantly to cocaine videos in CD participants, and a more dorsal mPFC region that was most strongly activated for cocaine videos in CD participants, gambling videos in PG participants, and sad videos in control participants. Gender × diagnosis × video interactions identified dorsal mPFC and a region in posterior insula/caudate in which female but not male PG participants showed increased responses to gambling videos. Findings illustrate both similarities and differences in the neural correlates of drug cravings and gambling urges in CD and PG. Future studies should investigate diagnostic- and gender-specific therapies targeting the neural systems implicated in craving/urge states in addictions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2015.193

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, cue-induced craving involves activation of circuits similar to those in animals, with drug-associated and non-drug addiction cues activating the prefrontal cortex, including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, and medial orbitofrontal cortex.

    “In humans, cue-induced craving appears to involve activation of similar circuits, in which cues that are associated with drugs and elements of non-drug addictions produce activation of the prefrontal cortex, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, and medial orbitofrontal cortex.101–105”

    From Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [101]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]25. Klinger E, Cox WM (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concerns. In: Cox WM, Klinger E (eds), Handbook of Motiva- tional Counseling: Motivating People for Change. Wiley: Chiche- ster, England, pp 3-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kober, H., Lacadie, C. M., Wexler, B. E., Malison, R. T., Sinha, R., & Potenza, M. N.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Potenza, Marc N
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2015-06-29
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
628-637
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W855695916
Cited by
160
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA016556, K24DA017899, R01DA035058, R01DA019039, K12DA000167)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB006494)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024139)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cocaine craving, gambling urges, cocaine dependence, gambling addiction, anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior insula, caudate nucleus, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cocaine, Female, Gambling, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Perception, Neuropsychological Tests, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review