Cited by 181Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Insula and drug cravings

Garavan, Hugh·2010·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

This paper reviews the role of the insula in drug craving. Evidence is presented that drug craving may be a particular instance of the anterior insula's broader role in interoception and subjective feeling states similar, for example, to thirst and hunger. An important role for the insula in craving is supported by evidence of insular activity changing with satiety and with the top-down cognitive modulation of cravings. Cognitive processes involving the insula's role in awareness of one's own behaviour may also contribute to craving insofar as the avoidance of craving might require subjective awareness of the endogenous and exogenous cues that initiate it. Finally, some consideration is given to sex differences and developmental processes in craving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-010-0259-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insula is implicated in diverse functions relevant to adolescent decision making, including attention, sexual attraction or romance, language, social experiences, and motivation or reward.

    “yet it is implicated in a markedly diverse range of functions that are relevant to current theories of adolescent decision making, such as attention [7], sexual attraction/romance [29], language [30], social experiences [31] and motivation/reward [8], among others [for review, see 32].”
  • Activity in the anterior insular cortex is common in studies of cognitive control and inhibitory processing and in studies of reward sensitivity.

    “Indeed, activity in the AIC is a common feature in studies of cognitive control and inhibitory processing [7, 46–50] and reward sensitivity [8, 9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garavan, H.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Garavan, Hugh
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2010-05-29
Volume
214
Issue
5-6
Pages
593-601
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2123705561
Cited by
181
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
insula, drug craving, anterior insula, interoception, satiety, top-down cognitive control, self-awareness, sex differences, developmental processes
MeSH terms
Animals, Awareness, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Cues, Drive, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review