Cited by 445Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons

Open access
Krishnaswami, Suguna Rani, Grindberg, Rashel V, Novotny, Mark, Venepally, Pratap, Lacar, Benjamin, Bhutani, Kunal, Linker, Sara B, Pham, Son +15 more·2016·Nature Protocols

Abstract

A protocol is described for sequencing the transcriptome of a cell nucleus. Nuclei are isolated from specimens and sorted by FACS, cDNA libraries are constructed and RNA-seq is performed, followed by data analysis. Some steps follow published methods (Smart-seq2 for cDNA synthesis and Nextera XT barcoded library preparation) and are not described in detail here. Previous single-cell approaches for RNA-seq from tissues include cell dissociation using protease treatment at 30 °C, which is known to alter the transcriptome. We isolate nuclei at 4 °C from tissue homogenates, which cause minimal damage. Nuclear transcriptomes can be obtained from postmortem human brain tissue stored at -80 °C, making brain archives accessible for RNA-seq from individual neurons. The method also allows investigation of biological features unique to nuclei, such as enrichment of certain transcripts and precursors of some noncoding RNAs. By following this procedure, it takes about 4 d to construct cDNA libraries that are ready for sequencing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2016.015

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central nervous system of older mice is more complex than that of younger mice, making it harder to dissociate it into single cells, and as a result some cell types can get over- or underrepresented.

    “The central nervous system of older mice is more complex than that of younger mice, making it harder to dissociate it into single cells, and as a result some cell types can get over-or underrepresented (Darmanis et al., 2015;Grindberg et al., 2013;Krishnaswami et al., 2016;Lake et al., 2016;Lake et al., 2017;Tasic et al., 2018).”

    From Single-cell resolution analysis of the crosstalk between chemogenically activated astrocytes and microglia (2020) · cites this paper as Krishnaswami et al., 2016

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that CNS cells are difficult to isolate intact because neurons are highly interconnected. It does not compare older and younger mice or say that dissociation causes cell types to be over- or underrepresented. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Hashimshony T Wagner F Sher N Yanai I CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-seq by multiplexed linear amplification Cell Rep 2 666 673 2012 22939981
  2. [2]Kurimoto K Yabuta Y Ohinata Y Saitou M Global single-cell cDNA amplification to provide a template for representative high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis Nat Protoc 2 739 752 2007 17406636
  3. [3]Picelli S Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2 Nat Protoc 9 171 181 2014 24385147
  4. [4]Ramskold D Full-length mRNA-seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells Nat Biotechnol 30 777 782 2012 22820318 PMC3467340
  5. [5]Tang F RNA-seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell Nat Protoc 5 516 535 2010 20203668 PMC3847604
  6. [7]Citri A Pang ZP Sudhof TC Wernig M Malenka RC Comprehensive qPCR profiling of gene expression in single neuronal cells Nat Protoc 7 118 127 2012 22193304 PMC4377330
  7. [8]Qiu S Single-neuron RNA-seq: technical feasibility and reproducibility Front Genet 3 124 2012 22934102 PMC3407998
  8. [9]Lovatt D Bell T Eberwine J Single-neuron isolation for RNA analysis using pipette capture and laser capture microdissection Cold Spring Harb Protoc 10.1101/pdb.prot072439 2015 25561613 · DOI
  9. [10]Darmanis S A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112 7285 7290 2015 26060301 PMC4466750
  10. [11]Zeisel A Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq Science 347 1138 1142 2015 25700174
  11. [12]Huang HL Trypsin-induced proteome alteration during cell subculture in mammalian cells J Biomed Sci 17 36 2010 20459778 PMC2873939
  12. [13]Grindberg RV RNA-sequencing from single nuclei Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110 19802 19807 2013 24248345 PMC3856806
  13. [14]Barthelson RA Lambert GM Vanier C Lynch RM Galbraith DW Comparison of the contributions of the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments to global gene expression in human cells BMC Genomics 8 340 2007 17894886 PMC2048942
  14. [15]Cheng J Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5-nucleotide resolution Science 308 1149 1154 2005 15790807
  15. [16]Schwanekamp JA Genome-wide analyses show that nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA levels are differentially affected by dioxin Biochim Biophys Acta 1759 388 402 2006 16962184
  16. [17]Trask HW Microarray analysis of cytoplasmic versus whole cell RNA reveals a considerable number of missed and false positive mRNAs RNA 15 1917 1928 2009 19703940 PMC2743046
  17. [18]Jiang Y Matevossian A Huang HS Straubhaar J Akbarian S Isolation of neuronal chromatin from brain tissue BMC Neurosci 9 42 2008 18442397 PMC2377267
  18. [19]Birnie GD Isolation of nuclei from animal cells in culture Methods Cell Biol 17 13 26 1978 703610
  19. [21]Dounce AL Witter RF Monty KJ Pate S Cottone MA A method for isolating intact mitochondria and nuclei from the same homogenate, and the influence of mitochondrial destruction on the properties of cell nuclei J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1 139 153 1955 14381436 PMC2223770
  20. [22]Hymer WC Kuff EL Isolation of nuclei from mammalian tissues through the use of Triton X-100 J Histochem Cytochem 12 359 363 1964 14193857
  21. [24]Li B Dewey CN RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome BMC Bioinformatics 12 323 2011 21816040 PMC3163565
  22. [25]Macosko EZ Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets Cell 161 1202 1214 2015 26000488 PMC4481139
  23. [26]Usoskin D Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing Nat Neurosci 18 145 153 2015 25420068
  24. [30]DeLuca DS RNA-SeQC: RNA-seq metrics for quality control and process optimization Bioinformatics 28 1530 1532 2012 22539670 PMC3356847
  25. [31]Wang L Wang S Li W RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments Bioinformatics 28 2184 2185 2012 22743226
  26. [33]Trapnell C Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks Nat Protoc 7 562 578 2012 22383036 PMC3334321

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishnaswami, S. R., Grindberg, R. V., Novotny, M., Venepally, P., Lacar, B., Bhutani, K., Linker, S. B., Pham, S., Erwin, J. A., Miller, J. A., Hodge, R., McCarthy, J. K., Kelder, M., McCorrison, J., Aevermann, B. D., Fuertes, F. D., Scheuermann, R. H., Lee, J., Lein, E. S., Schork, N., McConnell, M. J., Gage, F. H., & Lasken, R. S.
Affiliations
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Grindberg, Rashel V
  • Lasken, Roger S
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
499-524
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2279350325
Cited by
445
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH095741)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003647, RC1HG005471)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA014195)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
single-nucleus RNA sequencing, nuclear transcriptome, postmortem brain, neurons, nuclei isolation, SmartSeq2, cDNA library construction
MeSH terms
Autopsy, Brain, Cell Fractionation, Cell Nucleolus, Humans, Neurons, RNA, Tissue Preservation, Gene Library, Sequence Analysis, RNA, DNA, Complementary, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review