Transcriptomic and morphophysiological evidence for a specialized human cortical GABAergic cell type
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We describe convergent evidence from transcriptomics, morphology, and physiology for a specialized GABAergic neuron subtype in human cortex. Using unbiased single-nucleus RNA sequencing, we identify ten GABAergic interneuron subtypes with combinatorial gene signatures in human cortical layer 1 and characterize a group of human interneurons with anatomical features never described in rodents, having large ‘rosehip’-like axonal boutons and compact arborization. These rosehip cells show an immunohistochemical profile (GAD1+CCK+, CNR1–SST–CALB2–PVALB–) matching a single transcriptomically defined cell type whose specific molecular marker signature is not seen in mouse cortex. Rosehip cells in layer 1 make homotypic gap junctions, predominantly target apical dendritic shafts of layer 3 pyramidal neurons, and inhibit backpropagating pyramidal action potentials in microdomains of the dendritic tuft. These cells are therefore positioned for potent local control of distal dendritic computation in cortical pyramidal neurons. The authors use single-nucleus RNA-seq to identify 10 GABAergic interneuron subtypes in human cortex layer 1. Molecular, morphological, and physiological evidence points to an emerging human cell type, the rosehip cell, not found in other species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Rosehip cells in layer 1 form homotypic gap junctions.
“Rosehip cells in layer 1 make homotypic gap junctions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cell somata and dendrites are confined to layer 1, with only distal dendrites occasionally penetrating layer 2.
“Somata and dendrites of RCs were confined to layer 1 with only distal dendrites occasionally penetrating layer 2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cells predominantly target apical dendritic shafts of layer 3 pyramidal neurons.
“predominantly target apical dendritic shafts of layer 3 pyramidal neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Proximal dendrites and somata of rosehip cells are decorated with stub-like spines.
“Proximal dendrites and somata of RCs were decorated with stub-like spines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unbiased recordings of layer 1 cell types yielded 76 interneurons with complete axo-somato-dendritic recovery.
“Unbiased recordings of layer 1 cell types yielded a set of interneurons with complete axo-somato-dendritic recovery (n=76).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The layer 1 MTG transcriptomic clusters expressed either SST (i1,i2), VIP (i6,i9,i10), or neither marker.
“The layer 1 MTG transcriptomic clusters expressed either SST (i1,i2), VIP (i6, i9, i10), or neither marker”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cells inhibit backpropagating pyramidal action potentials in microdomains of the dendritic tuft.
“inhibit backpropagating pyramidal action potentials in microdomains of the dendritic tuft”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The specific molecular marker signature of the rosehip cell type is not seen in mouse cortex.
“whose specific molecular marker signature is not seen in mouse cortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unbiased single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human cortical layer 1 identified ten GABAergic interneuron subtypes with combinatorial gene signatures.
“Using unbiased single nucleus RNA sequencing, we identify ten GABAergic interneuron subtypes with combinatorial gene signatures in human cortical layer 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Each cluster showed highly selective expression of known and previously uncharacterized individual marker genes.
“Furthermore, each cluster showed highly selective expression of known and previously uncharacterized individual marker genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Layer 1 clusters express different combinations of known layer 1 interneuron markers including CCK, RELN, NDNF, and LAMP5, many confirmed by ISH.
“These clusters in layer 1 express different combinations of known markers of layer 1 interneurons, including cholecystokinin (CCK), reelin (RELN), neuron derived neurotrophic factor (NDNF), and lysosomal associated membrane protein family member 5 (LAMP), many of which were confirmed to have expression in layer 1 by ISH”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Iterative clustering identified a robust set of transcriptomic-defined cell types.
“Iterative clustering was used to group nuclei with similar transcriptional profiles, thereby identifying a robust set of transcriptomic-defined cell types”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The immunohistochemical profile of rosehip cells aligns closely with transcriptomic cell type i5, which is GAD1/CCK-positive and CNR1/SST/CALB2/PVALB-negative.
“Remarkably, this immunohistochemical profile aligned closely with a single transcriptomic cell type, i5, which was similarly GAD1/CCK-positive but CNR1/SST/CALB2/PVALB-negative (Fig.3B, red box).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cells were involved in single-cell activated ensembles detected through disynaptic IPSPs triggered by layer 2 and layer 3 pyramidal cells and polysynaptic EPSPs triggered by an axo-axonic cell.
“We found that RCs were involved in single cell activated ensembles detected through disynaptic IPSPs triggered by layer 2 (n=1) and layer 3 (n=2) pyramidal cells and polysynaptic EPSPs triggered by an axo-axonic cell, respectively (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The putative rosehip transcriptomic type i5 expresses many genes highly specifically or coexpressed in only one other layer 1 cell type.
“This putative rosehip transcriptomic type, one of the most distinctive layer 1 GABAergic transcriptomic types, expresses many other genes either highly specifically or coexpressed in only one other layer 1 cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The size of active zones in rosehip cells is not correlated with bouton volumes.
“The size of active zones in RCs (0.11±0.03 µm2, n=11) was not correlated to bouton volumes (rho=0.34, p=0.29, Spearman correlation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cell bouton volume is approximately four times larger than neurogliaform cell bouton volume.
“Measurements based on serial section electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions revealed that the volume of boutons of RCs (0.37±0.18 µm3, n=31) was approximately four times larger (p<0.001; MW U-test) compared to that of NGFCs (0.08±0.06 µm3, n=24, Fig.2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IPSPs elicited by rosehip cells were mediated by GABAA receptors based on blockade by gabazine.
“IPSPs elicited by RCs were mediated by GABAA receptors based on experiments showing blockade of IPSPs by application of the GABAA receptor antagonist gabazine (n=4, 10 µM, Fig.5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changes in ΔF/F in distal branches of apical dendrites in layer 1 were consistently detected at multiple locations on postsynaptic neurons, confirming action potential backpropagation into distal apical dendritic branches of human pyramidal cells.
“Changes in ΔF/F (17.2±7.3%) in distal branches of the apical dendrites in layer 1 were consistently detected at multiple (17±8) locations on the postsynaptic neurons confirming action potential backpropagation into distal apical dendritic branches of human pyramidal cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inputs from rosehip cells simultaneous with backpropagating action potentials suppressed the amplitude of Ca2+ signals relative to control.
“Inputs from RCs simultaneous with backpropagating action potentials were effective in suppressing the amplitude of Ca2+ signals relative to control (n=6, 12.8±4.6% vs. 18.8±5.7% ΔF/F, p<0.02, Wilcoxon-test, Fig.6C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Amplitudes of rosehip-triggered IPSPs arriving to interneurons were larger than those targeting layer 3 pyramidal cells.
“Amplitudes of RC triggered IPSPs arriving to interneurons (0.428±0.370 mV) were larger compared to those targeting layer 3 pyramidal cells (0.087±0.059 mV, p<0.05, MW U-test)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The amplitude of IPSPs triggered by the first action potential of rosehip cells and evoked on distal dendrites of the postsynaptic pyramidal cell was 35.6±24.7 μV at the soma.
“The amplitude of the IPSPs triggered by the first action potential of RCs and evoked on distal dendrites of the postsynaptic pyramidal was (35.6±24.7 µV) at the soma”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Impedance at the lowest frequency (0.2 Hz) was similar among layer 1 interneurons (rosehip, neurogliaform, unclassified).
“Impedance at the lowest frequency (Z0.2Hz) was similar in layer 1 interneurons (rosehip, 258±81 MΩ, neurogliaform, 279±128 MΩ, unclassified, 261±133 MΩ, Lillefors test followed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The sag amplitude in rosehip cells exceeded that of neurogliaform and unclassified interneurons.
“However, the amplitude of the sag measured in anatomically classified RCs (1.73±0.30, n=55) exceeded that of interneurons morphologically identified as NGFCs (1.19±0.12, n=16, p<0.001, Wilcoxon-test) or unclassified interneurons (1.29±0.28, n=36, p<0.001, Wilcoxon-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The output of rosehip cells was predominantly directed towards layer 3 pyramidal cells (n=16, CR 46%) with somata >70 μm below the layer 1/2 border.
“the output of RCs were predominantly directed towards layer 3 pyramidal cells (n=16, CR 46%) having somata >70 µm below the layer 1/2 border.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All fully reconstructed rosehip boutons formed single synapses targeting dendritic shafts.
“All fully reconstructed boutons (n=31) formed single synapses targeting dendritic shafts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Power of averaged FFT of subthreshold membrane potential oscillations was higher between 3.8 and 80 Hz in rosehip cells than in neurogliaform and other interneurons.
“The power of averaged fast Fourier transforms (FFT) of subthreshold membrane potential oscillations27 was higher between 3.8 and 80 Hz in RCs compared to neurogliaform and other interneurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The diversity of GABAergic neuron types in human layer 1 is higher than that described for mouse layer 1.
“This diversity also appears to be higher than described for layer 1 in mouse4, although by covering all layers that study likely underrepresented layer 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Membrane oscillations and firing of rosehip cells are tuned to beta and gamma frequencies.
“Analysis of silent and suprathreshold periods during rheobasic firing of RCs indicated that membrane oscillations and firing of RCs were tuned to beta and gamma frequencies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences were found between neurogliaform and unclassified interneurons in impedance parameters.
“We did not find significant differences between NGFCs and unclassified interneurons in impedance parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The proportion of GAD1+ cells that are PDGFRA+/TRPC3+ was ~10%, a lower bound for rosehip proportion.
“The proportion of GAD1+ cells that are PDGFRA+/TRPC3+ was ~10%, therefore a lower bound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many other rosehip-selective genes had no evidence of expression in mouse layer 1 interneurons based on single-cell transcriptomics.
“Many other rosehip-selective genes had no evidence of expression in layer 1 interneurons in mouse based on single cell transcriptomics (Fig.3B, Suppl. Fig.5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Axon tortuosity of rosehip cells is similar to that of neurogliaform and basket cells.
“Axon tortuosity (see Methods) of RCs (1.42±0.05) was similar to that of neurogliaform (1.54±0.15) and BCs (1.31±0.10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Intraburst frequency of stuttering firing in rosehip cells peaked in the beta-gamma range.
“intraburst frequency of stuttering firing also peaked in the beta-gamma range”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many rosehip marker genes are not expressed in Smad3 or other Pvalb/Sst/Vip-negative mouse cell types or in the complete set of mouse GABAergic types.
“Many rosehip marker genes are not expressed in Smad3 or other Pvalb/Sst/Vip-negative mouse cell types (Fig.3B, right panel) or the complete set of mouse GABAergic types (Suppl. Fig.5B, right panel).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Presynaptic layer 1 interneurons were connected to rosehip cells with an overall coupling ratio of 45%.
“Presynaptic layer 1 interneurons were connected to RCs with an overall coupling ratio (CR) of 45%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Serial electron microscopic sampling of rosehip output found that axon terminals (n=64) exclusively targeted dendritic shafts.
“when randomly sampling the output formed by RCs (n=6) using serial electron microscopic sections, we found that axon terminals (n=64) exclusively targeted dendritic shafts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cell axons branch more frequently than neurogliaform and basket cell axons.
“RC axons branched more frequently, with RCs, NGFCs and BCs having 1.52±0.45, 0.61±0.21 and 0.52±0.10 nodes along 100 µm length of their axons (p<0.005 for both, MW U-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Anatomically identified rosehip cells respond to long suprathreshold current injections with stuttering or irregular spiking from resting membrane potential of -61.34±5.8 mV.
“Anatomically identified RCs responded to long (800 ms) suprathreshold current injections with stuttering or irregular spiking firing patterns2 when activated from resting membrane potential (-61.34±5.8 mV, Fig.4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Very large unitary EPSPs that drive human basket and axo-axonic cells to suprathreshold postsynaptic responses were not encountered on rosehip cells.
“Very large unitary EPSPs, described to drive human basket and axo-axonic cells to suprathreshold postsynaptic responses10,11,14, were not encountered on RCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Molnár, G. et al. Complex events initiated by individual spikes in the human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e222 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Molnár, G. et al. Human pyramidal to interneuron synapses are mediated by multi-vesicular release and multiple docked vesicles. eLife 5, e18167 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Szegedi, V. et al. Plasticity in single axon glutamatergic connection interneurons regulates complex events in the human neocortex to GABAergic. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000237 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Coupling coefficients for gap junctions between rosehip cells were similar to those found earlier between human and rodent interneurons.
“coupling coefficients for gap junctions (0.05±0.05) were similar to those found earlier between human and rodent interneurons23.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Oláh, S. et al. Output of neurogliaform cells to various neuron types in the human and rat cerebral cortex. Front. Neural Circuits 1, 4 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Resonance magnitude Q of rosehip cells was significantly higher than neurogliaform and unclassified interneurons.
“Resonance magnitude (Q, see methods) of RCs (1.77±0.34) was significantly higher compared to NGFCs (1.31±0.07; p<0.021, Lillefors test followed by one way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction) and unclassified interneurons (1.37±0.19; p<0.049).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Rosehip cells established 2.6±1.5 close appositions on dendrites of layer 3 pyramidal cells at distances 290±98 μm from the somata of postsynaptic pyramidal cells (n=5).
“RCs established 2.6±1.5 (range, 1-4) close appositions on dendrites of layer 3 pyramidal cells at distances 290±98 µm (range, 94-455 µm) from the somata of postsynaptic pyramidal cells (n=5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Monosynaptic output connections triggered by rosehip cells rarely innervated postsynaptic interneurons (overall CR 8%).
“In turn, monosynaptic output connections triggered by anatomically (n=49) and SVM (n=13) identified RCs rarely innervated postsynaptic interneurons (overall CR 8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a correlation between rise times of IPSPs arriving to postsynaptic pyramidal cells and distances of close axo-dendritic appositions from the somata.
“We found correlation between the rise times of IPSPs arriving to the postsynaptic pyramidal cells (n=5, 7.3±2.4 ms, range 3.8-10.1 ms) and the distances of close axo-dendritic appositions from the somata (ρ=0.90, P= 0.037, Spearman correlation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Standard deviation of interspike intervals was higher in rosehip cells than in neurogliaform or unclassified interneurons.
“The standard deviation of interspike intervals was higher in RCs (87±64 ms, n=55) compared to neurogliaform (41±34 ms, n=16, p<0.001, Wilcoxon-test) or unclassified (47±41 ms, n=36, p<0.001, Wilcoxon-test) interneurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GAD1+ cells expressing rosehip marker genes with low or absent CNR1 are present in layer 1 of BA9 and BA40.
“We found that GAD1+ cells expressing rosehip marker genes with low or absent expression of CNR1 were present in layer 1 of both BA9 and BA40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The optimal feature set that distinguished rosehip cells from other cells contained two features: the maximal standard deviation of interspike intervals and the sag amplitude elicited by a -100 pA hyperpolarizing step.
“The best feature set consisted of 2 features, the maximal standard deviation of interspike-intervals (ISI SD) and the amplitude of sag in response to hyperpolarization (-100 pA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cells classified as positive and negative by the 2 AU fluorescence threshold differed significantly in fluorescence intensity (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test).
“The fluorescence intensity of cells measured positive and negative with this method were significantly different (p<0.01, MW U-test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Rosehip cells are positioned for potent local control of distal dendritic computation in cortical pyramidal neurons.
“These cells are therefore positioned for potent local control of distal dendritic computation in cortical pyramidal neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Interneurons with the rosehip phenotype have not been identified previously in layer 1 of cerebral cortex.
“To our knowledge, interneurons having the phenotype of RCs detailed below have not been identified previously in layer 1 of the cerebral cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Single-cell transcriptomics enables unbiased, high-throughput quantitative surveys of molecularly defined cell types across species including human.
“Single cell transcriptomics enables unbiased, high-throughput quantitative surveys of molecularly defined cell types4–6 that can be applied to any species including human.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4] Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Zeisel, A. et al. Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
To the authors' knowledge, a similar anatomical cell type has not been described in rodent.
“To our knowledge a similar anatomical cell type has not been described in rodent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
SVM-based feature selection ranked sag amplitude and standard deviation of interspike intervals as the two best delineators out of 200 measured electrophysiological parameters for separating rosehip, neurogliaform, and unclassified layer 1 interneurons.
“Support vector machine (SVM)-based wrapper feature selection of electrophysiological parameters ranked the amplitude of the sag and the standard deviation of interspike intervals as the two best delineators out of n=200 measured electrophysiological parameters for separating anatomically identified rosehip, neurogliaform and unclassified interneurons in layer 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The RC appears similar to other highly specialized and distinctive cortical cell types such as chandelier cells.
“In this respect, it appears similar to other highly specialized and distinctive cortical cell types such as chandelier cells39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Somogyi, P. A specific ‘axo-axonal’ interneuron in the visual cortex of the rat. Brain Res. 136, 345–350 (1977). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The unique combinatorial expression of many marker genes defines rosehip cells.
“Importantly, it is the unique combinatorial expression of many marker genes that defines RCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results indicate that rosehip cells in layer 1 might preferentially target pyramidal cells sending terminal branches of their apical dendrites to layer 1.
“The results above indicate that RCs in layer 1 might preferentially target pyramidal cells sending terminal branches of their apical dendrites to layer 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The higher GABAergic diversity found in human layer 1 compared to previous whole-cortex studies is likely due to improved sequencing technique and increased sampling in a GABAergic-enriched anatomical domain.
“This difference is likely due to a combination of improved sequencing technique and increased sampling in a targeted anatomical domain enriched in GABAergic neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The authors' results are consistent with the neuronal diversity described in rat cortex layer 1 using other methods.
“Indeed, a recent characterization of rat cortex3 described 6 morphological and 17 morpho-electric types in layer 1, so our results are consistent with the neuronal diversity described using other methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Markram, H. et al. Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry. Cell 163, 456–492 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The combined approach of single-nucleus transcriptomics and human slice physiology is a strong method applicable to postmortem and neurosurgical human tissues.
“Here we demonstrate the strength of a modern version of this approach that can be applied to human postmortem and neurosurgical tissues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The best SVM hyperplane separating rosehip cells from other interneuron types had a false positive rate of 0% for identifying rosehip cells (n=37) in the total population of anatomically recovered layer 1 interneurons (n=107).
“the best hyperplane separating RCs from other interneuron types according to SVM analysis had a false positive rate of 0% for identifying RCs (n=37) in the total population of anatomically recovered layer 1 interneurons (n=107).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Lake et al. identified cluster IN4, the best match to rosehip cluster i5, in all six cortical areas sampled.
“Furthermore, Lake et al.22 identified cluster IN4 (the best match to rosehip cluster i5) in all six cortical areas sampled (frontal, temporal, and visual cortex).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lake et al.22 Lake, B. B. et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586–1590 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Preferential placement of output synapses on distal dendritic shafts of pyramidal cells reaching layer 1 suggests that rosehip cells might specialize in controlling dendritic signal processing.
“Preferential placement of output synapses on distal dendritic shafts of pyramidal cells reaching layer 1 suggest that RCs might specialize in the control of dendritic signal processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The rosehip molecular marker signature appears highly distinctive from any published rodent data.
“Similarly, the rosehip molecular marker signature appears highly distinctive from any published data from rodent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
RCs may be particularly important in compartmental control of backpropagating action potentials and their pairing with incoming excitatory inputs.
“RCs may be of particular importance in compartmental control of backpropagating action potentials and their pairing with incoming excitatory inputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The monosynaptic pyramidal cell-preferring pathway initiated by RCs does not appear to have a homologue in the rodent layer 1 circuit.
“Thus, the monosynaptic pyramidal cell-preferring pathway initiated by RCs does not appear to have a homologue in the rodent layer 1 circuit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The nuclei collected from the two donors came from high-quality specimens that satisfied stringent quality-control metrics.
“This allowed us to collect nuclei from high quality specimens that met stringent quality control metrics”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Using the Random Forest model on the entire layer 1 dataset, 79% of 1154 single nuclei samples passed quality control.
“Using this Random Forest model applied to the entire layer 1 dataset including contaminating layer 2 excitatory and inhibitory nuclei, 79% of 1154 single nuclei samples passed quality control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 59
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThere appear to be ten inhibitory cell types within layer 1, although it is not clear whether any are completely restricted to layer 1.
“Therefore, there appear to be ten inhibitory cell types within layer 1, although it is not clear whether any of these types are completely restricted to layer 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVoltage-gated ion channels and GABA and glutamate receptor subunits show diverse expression patterns among interneurons, including cell type-specific expression of CACNA2D1, GABRG1, KCNH5, and SCN5A.
“voltage-gated ion channels and GABA and glutamate receptor subunits show diverse expression patterns among interneurons, including highly cell type-specific expression of CACNA2D1, GABRG1, KCNH5, and SCN5A”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLight microscopic examination identified neurogliaform cells (n=16, 21%) and a novel group of rosehip cells (n=10, 13%) among recovered layer 1 interneurons.
“Light microscopic examination of these cells identified neurons with previously described morphological features, e.g. neurogliaform cells (NGFCs, n=16, 21%; Fig.2C,D)1,21,24 as well as a novel group of interneurons having large, rosehip-shaped axonal boutons forming very compact, bushy arborizations (rosehip cells, RCs, n=10, 13%; Fig.2A,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBouton density decreased with distance from soma; it was lower in basket cells at 30-50 μm and higher in neurogliaform cells at 70-220 μm and basket cells at 130-220 μm.
“The bouton density of rosehip, neurogliaform and BCs almost monotonously decreased with increasing distances from the soma; however, bouton densities were lower in BCs 30-50 µm (p<0.04 for 30-50, MW U-test) and higher in NGFCs 70-220 µm (p<0.02, MW U-test) and in BCs 130-220 µm (p<0.03) from the soma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have significantly different total dendritic length and dendritic node frequency from basket cells and similar values to neurogliaform cells.
“Total dendritic length (1.96±0.90 mm) and dendritic node frequency per 100 µm (0.66±0.21) of RCs were significantly different from those of BCs (3.41±0.58 mm, p<0.031; 0.29±0.10, p<0.009, respectively, MW U-test) and were similar to those of NGFCs (2.62±1.08 mm, 1.50±1.47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have significantly smaller maximal radial axon extent than basket cells but not different from neurogliaform cells.
“Maximal radial extent of axon of RCs (263.42±69.09 µm) was significantly smaller than that of BCs (713.22±124.87 µm, p<0.005, MW U-test), but were not different from those of NGFCs (323.18±49.60 µm).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have fewer primary dendrites than neurogliaform cells but similar numbers to basket cells.
“The number of primary dendrites of RCs (5.50±1.87) was similar to that of BCs (6.2±2.17, n=5) and was significantly fewer compared to NGFCs (8.6±2.19, n=5, p<0.04, Mann-Whitney (MW) U-test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have an immunohistochemical profile that is GAD1/CCK-positive and CNR1/SST/CALB2/PVALB-negative, matching a single transcriptomically defined cell type.
“These rosehip cells show an immunohistochemical profile (GAD1/CCK-positive, CNR1/SST/CALB2/PVALB-negative) matching a single transcriptomically-defined cell type”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have longer interbouton intervals than neurogliaform cells and shorter intervals than basket cells.
“RCs had longer interbouton intervals compared to NGFCs (3.97±0.49 and 3.10±0.32 µm, respectively, p<0.038, MW U-test) and shorter compared to BCs (5.63±0.51 µm, p<0.024) measured as linear distances between neighboring boutons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn human MTG layer 1, SST and VIP but not PVALB are seen by in situ hybridization.
“Interestingly, both SST and VIP (but not PVALB) are seen in human MTG layer 1 by ISH”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA novel group of human layer 1 interneurons has large rosehip-like axonal boutons and compact arborization, anatomical features not described in rodents.
“characterize a novel group of human interneurons with anatomical features never described in rodents having large, “rosehip”-like axonal boutons and compact arborization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningSeveral layer 1 interneuron markers appear related to interaction with endothelia, including EDNRA and EGF.
“several of these markers appear to be related to interaction with endothelia, including endothelin receptor type A (EDNRA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe axon of rosehip cells usually emerges from the basal part of the soma and forms compact, dense axonal trees predominantly in layer 1, with tortuous collaterals and spindle-shaped boutons whose diameters are not seen in other human layer 1 interneurons in the sample.
“The axon of RCs usually emerged from the basal part of the soma and gave rise to very compact, dense axonal trees predominantly arborizing in layer 1 with tortuous collaterals having spindle-shaped boutons with diameters not seen in other types of human layer 1 interneurons in our sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster i2 is restricted to layer 2 because it expresses LHX6, which is not found in layer 1.
“cluster i2 represents a cell type restricted to layer 2 since it also expresses LHX6 which is not found in layer 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe clusters corresponded to major neural cell classes expected to be captured, including microglia, astrocytes, OPCs, oligodendrocytes, one excitatory neuron type from upper layer 2, and eleven GABAergic neuron subtypes.
“clusters corresponded to all major classes of neural cell types that were expected to be captured”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTargeted recordings increased the number of rosehip cells in the database to n=120.
“Targeted recordings increased the number of RCs in our database (n=120)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells have significantly smaller total axon length and maximal horizontal axon extent than neurogliaform and basket cells.
“Total length (11.13±1.99 mm) and maximal horizontal extent of axons (287.75±70.15 µm) of RCs were significantly smaller than those of NGFCs (24.74±8.90 mm, 648.68±202.60 µm, respectively; p<0.005 for both, MW U-test) and BCs (31.16±14.79 mm, p<0.009; 1102.76±296.99 µm, p<0.005, respectively, MW U-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells received local excitatory inputs from layer 2-3 pyramidal cells sporadically (n=8, CR 5%) with monosynaptic EPSP amplitudes of 3.357±1.458 mV and paired pulse ratios of 0.68±0.12.
“RCs received local excitatory inputs from layer 2-3 pyramidal cells sporadically (n=8, CR 5%) with monosynaptic EPSP amplitudes of 3.357±1.458 mV and paired pulse ratios of 0.68±0.12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe rosehip cell (RC) has a highly distinctive transcriptomic signature, a highly distinctive morphological, physiological and connectional phenotype, and a strong correspondence between these properties.
“The RC represents a type with highly distinctive transcriptomic signature, a highly distinctive morphological, physiological and connectional phenotype, and a strong correspondence between these properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells are immunopositive for CCK and negative for CNR1, SST, and CALB2.
“This revealed that RCs were immunopositive for CCK (n=10) but negative for CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CNR1, n=11), SST (n=9) and calretinin (CALB2; n=2; Fig.3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrequencies of maximal impedance in rosehip cells were significantly higher than in neurogliaform cells but not significantly different from unclassified interneurons.
“frequencies of maximal impedance (fmax) in RCs (4.17±1.1 Hz) were significantly higher than in NGFCs (1.98±1.04 Hz; p<0.045) but the difference was not significant compared to unclassified interneurons (2.47±1.47 Hz, p<0.142).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFast components of IPSPs arriving to rosehip cells from different presynaptic interneurons had similar amplitudes and showed paired pulse depression.
“Fast components of IPSPs arriving to RCs evoked by different presynaptic interneurons had similar amplitudes (0.982±0.705, 0.915±0.594 and 1.504±1.308 mV, respectively) and showed paired pulse depression with paired pulse ratios of (0.42±0.48, 0.27±0.04 and 0.71±0.26, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTime constants of rosehip cells were similar to neurogliaform cells and faster than other cells.
“time constants of RCs (7.3±3.7 ms) were similar to neurogliaform (8.9±2.4 ms, p<0.001) and faster compared to other cells (11.1±12.5 ms, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApplication of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was ineffective in modulating rosehip cell evoked IPSPs, supporting digital PCR, IHC, and ISH data.
“application of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was ineffective in modulating RC evoked IPSPs (n=4, Fig.5H), supporting our results of single cell digital PCR, IHC and ISH data (Fig.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSingle-nucleus sequencing of human cortical layer 1 identified 10 GABAergic neuron types, which is more than the 8 types previously described for the entire human cortex.
“The targeted application of single nucleus sequencing reported here has demonstrated a significantly higher degree of GABAergic neuron complexity in just one layer of the human cerebral cortex (10 types) than what has previously been described in all of the cortex (8 types22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Lake, B. B. et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 352, 1586–1590 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cluster i5 had a weak reciprocal best match to mouse cluster Smad3 (r=0.34), while several other human clusters matched Smad3 almost as well (r>0.3).
“The rosehip cluster i5 had a weak (r=0.34) reciprocal best match to mouse cluster Smad3, although several other human clusters (i7, i1, i4, i3) matched Smad3 almost as well (r>0.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells formed homologous electrical synapses between each other (n=5, CR 57%) and convergent heterologous electrical synapses with an unclassified layer 1 interneuron (n=2, CR 11%).
“RCs also formed homologous electrical synapses (n=5, CR 57%) between each other (Fig.5K) and established convergent heterologous electrical synapses (n=2, CR 11%) with an unclassified layer 1 interneuron.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInput resistances of rosehip cells were similar to neurogliaform cells and lower than other interneurons.
“Input resistances of RCs (139.6±54.1 MΩ) were similar to those of NGFCs (160.1±55.9 MΩ) and lower compared to other interneurons (216.3±84.4 MΩ, p<0.001, Wilcoxon-test)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDigital PCR on individual rosehip neurons showed positivity for CCK, CPLX3, SV2C, and TRPC3, and low CNR1 or absent NDNF.
“As predicted by the transcriptome data, RCs were positive for CCK, CPLX3, SV2C and TRPC3, and low (CNR1) or absent (NDNF) for genes not expressed by cells in that cluster”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataISH in human layer 1 shows expression of LAMP5, SV2C, EYA4, and CPLX3; in mouse layer 1, three of these four genes are also expressed, whereas Eya4-expressing cells are extremely rare.
“expression of LAMP5, SV2C, EYA4 and CPLX3 is seen by ISH in human layer 1 (Fig.3C); similarly, as predicted by transcriptomics three of these four genes are also expressed in mouse layer 1 whereas cells expressing Eya4 are extremely rare.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip inputs simultaneous with backpropagating pyramidal action potentials suppressed Ca2+ signals only at sites neighboring (8±5 μm) the putative synapses between the two cells, with no effect at dendritic sites one step further (21±14 μm).
“Rosehip inputs simultaneous with backpropagating pyramidal action potentials were effective in suppressing Ca2+ signals only at sites that were neighboring (8±5 µm) to the putative synapses between the two cells. No effect of RCs was detected at dendritic sites one step further in distance (21±14 µm, Fig.6D-F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTriple fluorescent ISH on human MTG tissue found cells with predicted rosehip profiles, including CCK+/CNR1-/LAMP5+, CCK+/PDGFRA+/SOX13+, and CCK+/TRPC3+/CPLX3+ cells.
“we observed CCK+/CNR1-/LAMP5+, CCK+/PDGFRA+/SOX13+, and CCK+/TRPC3+/CPLX3+ cells, as well as cells where CCK was swapped with other positive rosehip markers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCross-species expression correlations between mouse and human clusters were low (r<0.5), and clusters could only be reliably grouped into broad cell classes.
“Expression correlations were quite low (r < 0.5), and clusters could only be reliably grouped into broad classes of cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataBackpropagation of action potentials to dendrites of human neurons was confirmed by detecting dendritic Ca2+ responses following somatically elicited burst firing in layer 3 pyramidal cells.
“Backpropagation of action potentials to dendrites of human neurons has been shown in previous studies13,29 and we confirmed these results by detecting dendritic Ca2+ responses following somatically elicited burst firing (100 ms current injections, 4 spikes/burst) in layer 3 pyramidal cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Verhoog, M. B. et al. Mechanisms underlying the rules for associative plasticity at adult human neocortical synapses. J. Neurosci. 33, 17197–17208 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Kerekes, B. P. et al. Combined two-photon imaging, electrophysiological, and anatomical investigation of the human neocortex in vitro. Neurophotonics 1, 011013 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining n=5 (11%) dendrites had no spines and received asymmetric synapses on the shaft, likely formed by interneurons.
“The remaining n=5 (11 %) dendrites had no spines and received asymmetric synapses on the shaft were likely to be formed by interneurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGABAergic cells evoking IPSPs on rosehip cells included layer 1 NGFCs (n=10, CR 100%), rosehip cells (n=2, CR 17%), and unclassified interneurons (n=14, CR 40%); none of the tested layer 2 interneurons were connected to rosehip cells.
“GABAergic cells evoking IPSPs on RCs included layer 1 NGFCs (n=10, CR 100 %), RCs (n=2, CR 17%) and unclassified interneurons (n=14, CR 40%); however, none of the tested interneurons (n=9) having somata in layer 2 (defined as <70 µm below the layer 1/2 border) were connected to RCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUltrastructural analysis of postsynaptic dendrites (n=46) revealed dendritic spines and sparse innervation by symmetrical synapses on the shaft, suggesting that these dendrites belonged to pyramidal cells (n=41, 86%).
“further ultrastructural analysis of postsynaptic dendrites (n=46) revealed dendritic spines and sparse innervation by symmetrical synapses on the shaft, suggesting that these dendrites belonged to pyramidal cells (n=41, 86%, Fig.5J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTriple-positive cells for the GAD1/PDGFRA/TRPC3 combination were sparsely distributed across layer 1, though not restricted to this layer.
“The triple positive cells for this combination were sparsely distributed across layer 1, although not restricted to this layer (Suppl. Fig.5D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPDGFRA+ cells represent ~15% of GAD1+ cells, an upper bound for rosehip proportion.
“PDGFRA+ cells represent ~15% of GAD1+ cells, therefore an upper bound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRosehip cells are immunopositive for GABA and NR2F2 and negative for parvalbumin, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, neuropeptide Y, calbindin, and choline acetyltransferase.
“Furthermore, RCs were immunopositive for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA; n=2), for chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor II (NR2F2; n=2) and negative for parvalbumin (n=3), neuronal nitric oxide synthase (n=4), neuropeptide Y (n=2), calbindin (n=2), and choline acetyltransferase (n=3; Suppl. Fig.5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHuman clusters i5, i7, i1, i4, and i3 matched mouse Smad3+ and Ndnf+ clusters; i6, i8, i9, i11, and i10 matched mouse Vip+ clusters; and i2 matched mouse Sst+ clusters.
“Human clusters i5, i7, i1, i4, and i3 matched mouse Smad3+ and Ndnf+ clusters. Clusters i6, i8, i9, i11, and i10 matched mouse Vip+ clusters, and cluster i2 matched mouse Sst+ clusters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataHuman neuron membrane properties remained stable without significant changes for as long as 20 hours after slicing.
“Membrane properties of human neurons did not show significant changes for up to 20 h after slicing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRCs are CCK-positive but cannabinoid receptor-negative, and they appear to selectively target distal dendrites of pyramidal neurons.
“In contrast, RCs are CCK-positive but cannabinoid receptor-negative, and appear to selectively target distal dendrites of pyramidal neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe transcriptomic clusters were consistent across the two donors and were not attributable to technical artifacts.
“confirming that transcriptomic clusters were consistent between donors and not driven by technical artifacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataIn the multiplex FISH quantification, 408 GAD1-positive cells from two individuals were used to calculate the proportion of GAD1-positive cells that expressed PDGFRA and TRPC3.
“A total of 408 GAD1+ cells were identified from two individuals for this quantification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is evidence for significant neuronal differences between rodents and humans, including distinct membrane and synaptic properties and dendritic complexity of human neurons that might contribute to human-specific signal processing.
“Indeed there is evidence for significant neuronal differences between rodents and human; for example, distinct membrane8,9 and synaptic10–14 properties and dendritic complexity15–17 of human neurons might contribute to human specific signal processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [8] Eyal, G. et al. Unique membrane properties and enhanced signal processing in human neocortical neurons. eLife 5, e16553 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Wang, B. et al. A subtype of inhibitory interneuron with intrinsic persistent activity in human and monkey neocortex. Cell Rep. 10, 1450–1458 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Molnár, G. et al. Complex events initiated by individual spikes in the human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e222 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Molnár, G. et al. Human pyramidal to interneuron synapses are mediated by multi-vesicular release and multiple docked vesicles. eLife 5, e18167 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Testa-Silva, G. et al. Human synapses show a wide temporal window for spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2, 12 (2010).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Verhoog, M. B. et al. Mechanisms underlying the rules for associative plasticity at adult human neocortical synapses. J. Neurosci. 33, 17197–17208 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Szegedi, V. et al. Plasticity in single axon glutamatergic connection interneurons regulates complex events in the human neocortex to GABAergic. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000237 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Elston, G. N. Pyramidal cells of the frontal lobe: all the more spinous to think with. J. Neurosci. 20, RC95 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Morales, J. et al. Random positions of dendritic spines in human cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 10078–10084 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Mohan, H. et al. Dendritic and axonal architecture of individual pyramidal neurons across layers of adult human neocortex. Cereb. Cortex 25, 4839–4853 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent systematic efforts suggest several dozen inhibitory and excitatory cell types in rodent neocortical circuits.
“Recent systematic efforts have provided insight into the cellular composition and organization of rodent neocortical circuits, suggesting the presence of several dozen inhibitory and excitatory cell types3–5,7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [3] Markram, H. et al. Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry. Cell 163, 456–492 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Tasic, B. et al. Adult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 335–346 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Zeisel, A. et al. Brain structure. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 347, 1138–1142 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Jiang, X. et al. Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex. Science 350, aac9462 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe data strongly link the anatomically defined rosehip phenotype with a distinctive transcriptomic signature found in human but apparently not in mouse layer 1.
“Together, these data strongly link the anatomically-defined rosehip phenotype with a highly distinctive transcriptomic cell type signature that is found in human but apparently not in mouse layer 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRegional differences between human temporal cortex and mouse visual cortex are unlikely to account for the transcriptomic difference, because the anatomically defined rosehip type was found in multiple human regions.
“Although the transcriptomic comparison is between human temporal cortex and mouse visual cortex, regional differences seem unlikely to account for this difference as we found the anatomically defined rosehip type in multiple human regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataQuantification of cell proportions using marker expression is complicated because markers for one cell type are often expressed in others and individual markers are often not expressed in every cell in a cluster.
“Quantification of cell proportions using marker expression is complicated by two factors; first, markers for one cell type are often expressed in others, and second, individual markers are often not expressed in every cell in a cluster.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn rodents, CCK-positive cells selectively express high levels of cannabinoid receptors and are involved in perisomatic inhibition.
“It is widely accepted28 that CCK-positive cells in the rodent show selectively high expression of cannabinoid receptors and are involved in perisomatic inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Katona, I. & Freund, T. F. Multiple functions of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 529–558 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLocal inputs to rosehip cells appear predominantly GABAergic, with potential underrepresentation of pyramidal cell triggered EPSPs because some axon collaterals were cut during slicing.
“Thus, local inputs to RCs appear to be predominantly GABAergic, acknowledging that some axon collaterals of pyramidal cells were cut during the slicing procedure (Fig.5C) leading to a potential underrepresentation of pyramidal cell triggered EPSPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe combined single-nucleus transcriptomics and human slice physiology approaches provide convergent evidence for robust cell type identities and for species conservation or specialization.
“Together these approaches provide convergent evidence for robust cell type identities and concomitant evidence for species conservation or specialization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSpecimens used for RNA-sequencing were screened for RNA quality and had an RNA integrity number (RIN) of at least 7.
“Specimens were further screened for RNA quality and had an RNA integrity number (RIN) ≥7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningEvery human specimen was a nonpathological control and was assigned to the same experimental group.
“All human specimens were controls (nonpathological) and were therefore allocated into the same experimental group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPositive controls (10 nuclei pools and/or 10 pg and 1 pg total RNA) were included on every 96-well plate of sorted nuclei.
“Positive controls (10 nuclei pools and/or 10 pg and 1 pg total RNA) were included on every 96-well plate of sorted nuclei.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe Random Forest classification model correctly classified all 196 samples in the training set with high confidence scores.
“Using this Random Forest classification model, all 196 samples in the training set were classified correctly with high confidence scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFor the interspike-interval standard deviation calculation, sweeps containing fewer than five spikes were excluded.
“Sweeps were discarded with less than 5 spikes for the calculation of ISI SD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAction potentials backpropagate to distal dendrites of human pyramidal cells and can be attenuated by RC activation.
“Action potentials backpropagate to distal dendrites of human pyramidal cells and can be attenuated by RC activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe Random Forest model achieved a classification accuracy of 95% on an independent test set, with only 8 misclassifications (4.9%).
“Application of the random forest model to these test Pass and Fail samples resulted in only 8 misclassifications (4.9%), for a classification accuracy of 95%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe sample sizes used in this study are comparable to those in earlier publications.
“our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications10,11,14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Molnár, G. et al. Complex events initiated by individual spikes in the human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e222 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Molnár, G. et al. Human pyramidal to interneuron synapses are mediated by multi-vesicular release and multiple docked vesicles. eLife 5, e18167 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] Szegedi, V. et al. Plasticity in single axon glutamatergic connection interneurons regulates complex events in the human neocortex to GABAergic. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000237 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe bouton morphology and/or compact axonal field of RCs resembles that of cat cortex cell types (dendrite targeting and clutch cells) that innervate relatively proximal dendrites.
“The bouton morphology and/or the compact axonal field of RCs resembles that of cell types described in deeper layers of the cat cortex that innervate relatively proximal dendrites (dendrite targeting and clutch cells)40,41.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [40] Tamás, G., Buhl, E. H. & Somogyi, P. Fast IPSPs elicited via multiple synaptic release sites by different types of GABAergic neuron in the cat visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 500, 715–738 (1997). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Kisvárday, Z. F., Martin, K. A. C., Whitteridge, D. & Somogyi, P. Synaptic connections of intracellularly filled clutch cells: a type of small basket cell in the visual cortex of the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 241, 111–137 (1985). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study did not blind data collection or analysis to experimental conditions.
“Data collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.”
- Also stated in: § Statistics · plain
“data collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Statistics · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn total, 443 out of 470 nuclei (94.3%) were defined as core.
“In total, 443/470 (94.3%) of nuclei were defined as core.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationPositive control probes (POLR2A, UBC, PPIB) were applied to every tissue sample in the multiplex FISH experiments to ensure RNA quality.
“Positive controls (POLR2A, UBC and PPIB) were used on each tissue sample to ensure RNA quality (ACD Bio, 320861).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ACD Bio, 320861
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe tissue specimens were pre-screened for known neuropsychiatric and neuropathological history and underwent routine serological testing and toxicology screening.
“The tissue specimens used in this study were pre-screened for known neuropsychiatric and neuropathological history, and underwent routine serological testing and toxicology screening.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo data that passed quality control were excluded from the analyses.
“No data with successful quality control were excluded from the analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe sharp theta-range resonance detected in individual RCs and its potential spread through gap junctions to a rosehip network could phase-selectively interact with long-range inputs, similar to mechanisms suggested for oscillation-dependent memory consolidation.
“The sharp resonance in the theta-range detected in individual RCs and its potential spread through gap junctions to a rosehip network could phase-selectively interact with long range inputs similarly to mechanisms suggested for example in oscillation dependent memory consolidation30,46.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] Freund, T. F. & Buzsáki, G. Interneurons of the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6, 347–470 (1996). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Klausberger, T. & Somogyi, P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 321, 53–57 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe recordings that entered the analysis were stopped at 15 hours after slice preparation.
“recordings included in the analysis were arbitrarily terminated 15 h after slice preparation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTissue collection complied with the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act and other applicable laws and regulations.
“All tissue collection was performed in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act described in Health and Safety Code §§ 7150, et seq., and other applicable state and federal laws and regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA better understanding of human cellular and circuit organization may help counteract the current lack of success in translating promising rodent results to effective treatment against human neuropsychiatric disorders.
“A better understanding of human cellular and circuit organization may help counteract the current lack of success in translating promising rodent results to effective treatment against human neuropsychiatric disorders49,50.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Mak, I. W., Evaniew, N. & Ghert, M. Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am. J. Transl. Res. 6, 114–118 (2014).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [50] Cavanaugh, S. E., Pippin, J. J. & Barnard, N. D. Animal models of Alzheimer disease: historical pitfalls and a path forward. ALTEX 31, 279–302 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman pyramidal cells have uniquely small membrane capacitance, which promotes backpropagation of action potentials and increases excitability in human dendrites relative to rodent dendrites with larger capacitance.
“The uniquely small membrane capacitance (Cm) found in human pyramidal cells8 promotes backpropagation of action potentials and increases excitability in human dendrites13,29 relative to rodent dendrites having larger Cm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Eyal, G. et al. Unique membrane properties and enhanced signal processing in human neocortical neurons. eLife 5, e16553 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Verhoog, M. B. et al. Mechanisms underlying the rules for associative plasticity at adult human neocortical synapses. J. Neurosci. 33, 17197–17208 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Kerekes, B. P. et al. Combined two-photon imaging, electrophysiological, and anatomical investigation of the human neocortex in vitro. Neurophotonics 1, 011013 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe function of neuron types specific to the human circuit could be important for understanding pathological alterations of network functions.
“The function of neuron types specific to the human circuit could be important in understanding pathological alterations of network functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study did not perform a sample-size calculation.
“No sample-size calculation was performed”
- Also stated in: § Statistics · plain
“No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Statistics · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationA Random Forest machine learning classification approach was implemented to remove low-quality nuclei samples prior to downstream analysis.
“To remove data from low quality nuclei samples prior to downstream analysis, we implemented a Random Forest machine learning classification approach as described in detail in Aevermann et al. 58.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Aevermann, B. et al. Production of a preliminary quality control pipeline for single nuclei RNA-seq and its application in the analysis of cell type diversity of post-mortem human brain neocortex. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 22, 564–575 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo assess the robustness of clusters, the iterative clustering procedure was repeated 100 times for random subsamples of 80% of nuclei.
“To assess the robustness of clusters, the iterative clustering procedure described above was repeated 100 times for random subsamples of 80% of nuclei.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationLow-quality nuclei samples were removed before downstream analysis by a Random Forest machine-learning classification method.
“Data from low quality nuclei samples was removed prior to downstream analysis, using a Random Forest machine learning classification approach as described58.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Aevermann, B. et al. Production of a preliminary quality control pipeline for single nuclei RNA-seq and its application in the analysis of cell type diversity of post-mortem human brain neocortex. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 22, 564–575 (2017).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe addition of new human cell types, or specialization of existing types through major modification of cellular features, would be expected to alter circuit function and therefore cannot be studied in rodents.
“Addition of new human cell types, or specialization of existing types through major modification of cellular features, would be expected to alter circuit function3,43,44, and therefore cannot be studied in rodents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Markram, H. et al. Reconstruction and simulation of neocortical microcircuitry. Cell 163, 456–492 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Tremblay, R., Lee, S. & Rudy, B. GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 91, 260–292 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Gjorgjieva, J., Drion, G. & Marder, E. Computational implications of biophysical diversity and multiple timescales in neurons and synapses for circuit performance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 44–52 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the digital PCR analysis, reactions with CT values below 23 or above 33 were treated as primer dimers or background and removed from the dataset.
“reactions having CT values less than 23 or greater than 33 were considered primer dimers or background signals, respectively, and excluded from the data set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe Western Institutional Review Board determined that tissue collection processes did not constitute human subjects research requiring IRB review.
“The Western Institutional Review Board reviewed tissue collection processes and determined that they did not constitute human subjects research requiring IRB review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study did not use randomization.
“Randomization was not used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRCs may provide supplementary inhibitory control required to balance the potentially higher excitability in human dendrites and modulate interactions between long-range excitatory connections arriving to layer 1 and backpropagating action potentials.
“Thus, RCs may provide supplementary inhibitory control required to balance the potentially higher excitability in human dendrites8 and modulate interactions between long range excitatory connections arriving to layer 1 and backpropagating action potentials suggested to participate in interhemispheric modulation45.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] Eyal, G. et al. Unique membrane properties and enhanced signal processing in human neocortical neurons. eLife 5, e16553 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Palmer, L. M. et al. The cellular basis of GABA(B)-mediated interhemispheric inhibition. Science 335, 989–993 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral highly selective markers for RCs have been implicated as risk factors for neuropsychiatric disease, including netrin G1 (NTNG1) for Rett syndrome and neurotrypsin (PRSS12) for mental retardation.
“For example, several highly selective markers for RCs have been implicated as risk factors for neuropsychiatric disease, including netrin G1 (NTNG1) for Rett syndrome47 and neurotrypsin (PRSS12) for mental retardation48.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Borg, I. et al. Disruption of Netrin G1 by a balanced chromosome translocation in a girl with Rett syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13, 921–927 (2005). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Molinari, F. et al. Truncating neurotrypsin mutation in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic mental retardation. Science 298, 1779–1781 (2002). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn rodent layer 1, high-throughput electrophysiology found two interneuron types and two canonical pathways involving feedforward interneuron-to-interneuron connections.
“Moreover, when assessing layer 1 canonical inhibitory pathways in rodent with high throughput electrophysiology capable of sampling all cell types in layer 1, Lee at al.42 found two interneuron types and two canonical pathways involving feed forward interneuron-to-interneuron connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Lee, A. J. et al. Canonical organization of layer 1 neuron-led cortical inhibitory and disinhibitory interneuronal circuits. Cereb. Cortex 25, 2114–2126 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFocal intralayer inhibition restricted by the compact axonal arbor of RCs to distal dendrites of a column of pyramidal cells is missing from the rodent; instead, mouse feedforward inhibitory connections are vertically spread to all somatodendritic domains.
“Furthermore, focal intralayer inhibition restricted by the compact axonal arbor of RCs to distal dendrites of a column of pyramidal cells is also missing from the rodent; rather, mouse feedforward inhibitory connections are vertically spread to all somatodendritic domains42.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Lee, A. J. et al. Canonical organization of layer 1 neuron-led cortical inhibitory and disinhibitory interneuronal circuits. Cereb. Cortex 25, 2114–2126 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIndividuals with a history of epilepsy were excluded from the electrophysiological experiments.
“Patients with a history of epilepsy were excluded from this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Conservation of cellular and circuit principles in human cortex is assumed but largely untested.
“However, conservation of cellular and circuit principles in human cortex is assumed but largely untested to date.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Layer 1 of the middle temporal gyrus is expected to predominantly contain inhibitory neurons.
“microdissected layer 1 of the middle temporal gyrus, expected to predominantly contain inhibitory neurons”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cellular organization of interneuron diversity is remarkably similar between mouse and human, but there are important differences in morphology, gene expression, laminar distribution and proportions of certain interneuron types.
“The cellular organization of interneuron diversity is remarkably similar between mouse and human, but there are important differences in the morphology, gene expression, laminar distribution and proportions of certain types of interneurons (Boldog et al., 2018; DeFelipe, 1997; Hodge et al., 2018).”
From Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons (2018) · cites this paper as Boldog et al., 2018
These Nos1/Sst-labeled cells are expected to have the Sst-Chodl t-type, which is linked to deep long-range projecting interneurons.
“these cells are expected to have the Sst-Chodl t-type, linked to deep long-range projecting interneurons12,14,36,37 (Fig. 7h).”
From Classification of electrophysiological and morphological neuron types in the mouse visual cortex (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
The approach provides means to evaluate and compare circuit contributions and function of PV cINs across species regardless of genetic accessibility.
“Notably, this approach provides the means to evaluate and compare the circuit contributions and function of PV cINs across species, regardless of their genetic accessibility44,45.”
From Viral manipulation of functionally distinct interneurons in mice, non-human primates and humans (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
A small sample size in a single cell genomics study does affect statistical power, but does not preclude the possibility of drawing meaningful inferences of cell type gene expression in the human brain.
“A small sample size in a single cell genomics study does affect statistical power, but does not preclude the possibility of drawing meaningful inferences of cell type gene expression in the human brain (9,41) .”
From Single cell transcriptome profiling of the human alcohol-dependent brain (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Pyramidal-cell dendrite percentage does not match the counts
MinorOf 46 postsynaptic dendrites, 41 constitute about 89%, not 86%. The remaining five account for about 11%, as reported.
Reported 86 · recomputed 89.130435
“postsynaptic dendrites (n=46) revealed dendritic spines and sparse innervation by symmetrical synapses on the shaft, suggesting that these dendrites belonged to pyramidal cells (n=41, 86%, Fig.5J).”
Time constants are called similar despite a significant p-value
MinorThe RC-neurogliaform comparison is described as similar but assigned p<0.001. The paper's stated significance threshold is p<0.05.
“time constants of RCs (7.3±3.7 ms) were similar to neurogliaform (8.9±2.4 ms, p<0.001)”
“differences were considered significant if p<0.05.”
Digital PCR reaction volumes total 23 μl, not 20 μl
MinorThe listed components add to 23 μl, exceeding the stated reaction volume by 3 μl.
Reported 20 · recomputed 23
“Template cDNA was supplemented with nuclease free water to a final volume of 8 μl. 2 μl TaqMan Assays (Thermo Fisher), 10 μl OpenArray Digital PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Cat.No.: 4458095) and nuclease free water (3 μl) were mixed to obtain a total volume of 20 μl”
Impedance method claims four parameters but names three
MinorThe method says four parameters were considered, then lists only impedance at the lowest frequency, resonance magnitude, and frequency at maximum impedance.
“For statistical comparison of the impedance profiles, four parameters were considered:”
“impedance at lowest frequency (Z0.2Hz); resonance magnitude (Q, the impedance magnitude at the resonance peak i.e. maximal impedance value divided by the impedance magnitude at the lowest input frequency of 0.2 Hz); and the frequency at maximum impedance (fmax).”
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · Cited by 65,548 · see citing works
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458 · see citing works
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051 · see citing works
RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome
Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 · Cited by 22,179 · see citing works
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464 · see citing works
(1996) · Cited by 20,179 · see citing works
The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Konsman, J. (2003) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(03)00088-x · Cited by 16,796 · see citing works
The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G. (2001) · Cited by 12,859 · see citing works
Trapnell, C., Roberts, A., Goff, L. A., Pertea, G. M., Kim, D., Kelley, D. R., Pimentel, H., Salzberg, S. L., Rinn, J. L., & Pachter, L. S. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.016 · Cited by 11,930 · see citing works
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · see citing works
Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572 · see citing works
Self-citationSoftware for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges
Lawrence, M. F., Huber, W. K., Pagès, H., Aboyoun, P., Carlson, M. R. J., Gentleman, R. C., Morgan, M. T., & Carey, V. J. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 · Cited by 4,284 · see citing works
Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2
Picelli, S., Faridani, O. R., Björklund, Å. K., Winberg, G., Sagasser, S., & Sandberg, R. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.006 · Cited by 4,137 · see citing works
Interneurons of the hippocampus
Freund, T. F., & Buzsáki, G. (1998) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1996)6:4 · Cited by 3,423 · see citing works
Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq
Zeisel, A., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Codeluppi, S., Lönnerberg, P., La Manno, G., Juréus, A., Marques, S., Munguba, H., He, L., Betsholtz, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1934 · Cited by 3,124 · see citing works
An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome
Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11405 · Cited by 3,083 · see citing works
Self-citationRSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments
Wang, L., Wang, S., & Li, W. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts356 · Cited by 2,813 · see citing works
Neuronal Diversity and Temporal Dynamics: The Unity of Hippocampal Circuit Operations
Klausberger, T., & Somogyi, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149381 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits
Tremblay, R., Lee, S., & Rudy, B. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033 · Cited by 2,033 · see citing works
Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Graybuck, L. T., Smith, K. A., Nguyen, T. N., Bertagnolli, D., Goldy, J., Garren, E., Economo, M. N., Viswanathan, S., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 · Cited by 1,746 · see citing works
Self-citationAdult mouse cortical cell taxonomy revealed by single cell transcriptomics
Tasic, B., Menon, V., Nguyen, T. N., Kim, T. K., Jarsky, T., Yao, Z., Levi, B., Gray, L. T., Sorensen, S. A., Dolbeare, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4216 · Cited by 1,714 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry
Markram, H., Muller, E., Ramaswamy, S., Reimann, M. W., Abdellah, M., Sanchez, C. A., Ailamaki, A., Alonso-Nanclares, L., Antille, N., Arsever, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.029 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex
The Petilla Interneuron Nomenclature Group (PING) (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2402 · Cited by 1,491 · see citing works
GABAergic cell subtypes and their synaptic connections in rat frontal cortex
Kawaguchi, Y. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.6.476 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain
Miller, J. A., Ding, S.-L., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Royall, J. J., Aiona, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13185 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Self-citationLost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment.
(2014) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex
Jiang, X., Shen, S., Cadwell, C. R., Berens, P., Sinz, F., Ecker, A. S., Patel, S., & Tolias, A. S. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9462 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
RNA-SeQC: RNA-seq metrics for quality control and process optimization
DeLuca, D. S., Levin, J. Z., Sivachenko, A., Fennell, T., Nazaire, M.-D., Williams, C., Reich, M., Winckler, W., & Getz, G. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts196 · Cited by 899 · see citing works
New insights into the classification and nomenclature of cortical GABAergic interneurons
DeFelipe, J., López-Cruz, P. L., Benavides-Piccione, R., Bielza, C., Larrañaga, P., Anderson, S., Burkhalter, A., Cauli, B., Fairén, A., Feldmeyer, D., et al. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3444 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Self-citationCanonical genetic signatures of the adult human brain
Hawrylycz, M., Miller, J. A., Menon, V., Feng, D., Dolbeare, T., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Jegga, A. G., Aronow, B. J., Lee, C.-K., Bernard, A., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4171 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citationOrigins of Cortical Interneuron Subtypes
Xu, Q., Cobos, I., De La Cruz, E., Rubenstein, J. L., & Anderson, S. A. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5667-03.2004 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Multiple Functions of Endocannabinoid Signaling in the Brain
Katona, I., & Freund, T. F. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150420 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
DeFelipe, J. (1997) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/s0891-0618(97)10013-8 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
A specific ‘axo-axonal’ interneuron in the visual cortex of the rat
Somogyi, P. (1977) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(77)90808-3 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Using single nuclei for RNA-seq to capture the transcriptome of postmortem neurons
Krishnaswami, S. R., Grindberg, R. V., Novotny, M., Venepally, P., Lacar, B., Bhutani, K., Linker, S. B., Pham, S., Erwin, J. A., Miller, J. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.015 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Self-citationZeng, H., Shen, E. H., Hohmann, J. G., Oh, S. W., Bernard, A., Royall, J. J., Glattfelder, K. J., Sunkin, S. M., Morris, J. A., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.052 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationRNA-sequencing from single nuclei
Grindberg, R. V., Yee-Greenbaum, J. L., McConnell, M. J., Novotny, M., O’Shaughnessy, A. L., Lambert, G. M., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Lee, J., Fishman, M., Robbins, G. E., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319700110 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Self-citationNuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation
Lacar, B., Linker, S. B., Jaeger, B. N., Krishnaswami, S. R., Barron, J. J., Kelder, M. J. E., Parylak, S. L., Paquola, A. C. M., Venepally, P., Novotny, M., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11022 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Characterizing transcriptional heterogeneity through pathway and gene set overdispersion analysis
Fan, J., Salathia, N. S., Liu, R., Kaeser, G. E., Yung, Y. C., Herman, J. L., Kaper, F., Fan, J., Zhang, K., Chun, J. J. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3734 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Regulation of cortical microcircuits by unitary GABA-mediated volume transmission
Oláh, S., Füle, M., Komlósi, G., Varga, C., Báldi, R., Barzó, P., & Tamás, G. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08503 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Pyramidal Cells of the Frontal Lobe: All the More Spinous to Think With
Elston, G. N. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-18-j0002.2000 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
The Cellular Basis of GABA <sub>B</sub> -Mediated Interhemispheric Inhibition
Palmer, L. M., Schulz, J. M., Murphy, S. C., Ledergerber, D., Murayama, M., & Larkum, M. E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217276 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Mohan, H., Verhoog, M. B., Doreswamy, K. K., Eyal, G., Aardse, R., Lodder, B. N., Goriounova, N. A., Asamoah, B., B. Brakspear, A. B. C., Groot, C., et al. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv188 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Tamás, G., Buhl, E. H., & Somogyi, P. (1997) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022054 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical Significance of Clustering for High-Dimension, Low–Sample Size Data
Liu, Y., Hayes, D. N., Nobel, A. B., & Marron, J. S. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000454 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Spindle neurons of the human anterior cingul. Ate cortex
Nimchinsky, E. A., Vogt, B. A., Morrison, J. H., & Hof, P. R. (1995) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903550106 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Kisvárday, Z. F., Martin, K. A. C., Whitteridge, D., & Somogyi, P. (1985) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902410202 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Complex Events Initiated by Individual Spikes in the Human Cerebral Cortex
Molnár, G., Oláh, S., Komlósi, G., Füle, M., Szabadics, J., Varga, C., Barzó, P., & Tamás, G. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060222 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationUnique membrane properties and enhanced signal processing in human neocortical neurons
Eyal, G., Verhoog, M. B., Testa-Silva, G., Deitcher, Y., Lodder, J. C., Benavides-Piccione, R., Morales, J., DeFelipe, J., de Kock, C. P., Mansvelder, H. D., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.16553 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Truncating Neurotrypsin Mutation in Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Mental Retardation
Molinari, F., Rio, M., Meskenaite, V., Encha-Razavi, F., Augé, J., Bacq, D., Briault, S., Vekemans, M., Munnich, A., Attié-Bitach, T., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076521 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Zemankovics, R., Káli, S., Paulsen, O., Freund, T. F., & Hájos, N. (2010) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.185975 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areasPreprint
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Smith, K. A., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/229542 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationAnimal models of Alzheimer disease: historical pitfalls and a path forward
Cavanaugh, S. E. (2014) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1310071 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Mechanisms Underlying the Rules for Associative Plasticity at Adult Human Neocortical Synapses
Verhoog, M. B., Goriounova, N. A., Obermayer, J., Stroeder, J., Hjorth, J. J. J., Testa-Silva, G., Baayen, J. C., de Kock, C. P. J., Meredith, R. M., & Mansvelder, H. D. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3158-13.2013 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Gjorgjieva, J., Drion, G., & Marder, E. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.008 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
y Cajal, S. R. (1988) · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Output of neurogliaform cells to various neuron types in the human and rat cerebral cortex
Oláh, S. (2007) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/neuro.04.004.2007 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Eine neue art spezialzellen des lobus cinguli und lobus insulae
von Economo, C. (1926) · Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie · doi:10.1007/bf02970950 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
SYNAPSES, AXONAL AND DENDRITIC PATTERNS OF GABA-IMMUNOREACTIVE NEURONS IN HUMAN CEREBRAL CORTEX
Kisvárday, Z. F., Gulyás, A. I., Beroukas, D., North, J. B., Chubb, I. W., & Somogyi, P. (1990) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/113.3.793 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Molnár, G., Rózsa, M., Baka, J., Holderith, N., Barzó, P., Nusser, Z., & Tamás, G. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18167 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationDisruption of Netrin G1 by a balanced chromosome translocation in a girl with Rett syndrome
Borg, I., Freude, K., Kübart, S., Hoffmann, K., Menzel, C., Laccone, F., Firth, H., Ferguson-Smith, M. A., Tommerup, N., Ropers, H.-H., et al. (2005) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201429 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Lee, A. J., Wang, G., Jiang, X., Johnson, S. M., Hoang, E. T., Lanté, F., Stornetta, R. L., Beenhakker, M. P., Shen, Y., & Julius Zhu, J. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu020 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Human synapses show a wide temporal window for spike-timing-dependent plasticity
Testa-Silva, G. (2010) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00012 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Revisiting enigmatic cortical calretinin-expressing interneurons
Cauli, B., Zhou, X., Tricoire, L., Toussay, X., & Staiger, J. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00052 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Szegedi, V., Paizs, M., Csakvari, E., Molnar, G., Barzo, P., Tamas, G., & Lamsa, K. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000237 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationKomlósi, G., Molnár, G., Rózsa, M., Oláh, S., Barzó, P., & Tamás, G. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2618-12.2012 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationA Subtype of Inhibitory Interneuron with Intrinsic Persistent Activity in Human and Monkey Neocortex
Wang, B., Yin, L., Zou, X., Ye, M., Liu, Y., He, T., Deng, S., Jiang, Y., Zheng, R., Wang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.018 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Varga, C., Tamás, G., Barzó, P., Oláh, S., & Somogyi, P. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv045 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Digital PCR to Determine the number of Transcripts from Single Neurons after Patch-Clamp Recording
Faragó, N., Kocsis, Á. K., Lovas, S., Molnár, G., Boldog, E., Rózsa, M., Szemenyei, V., Vámos, E., Nagy, L. I., Tamás, G., et al. (2013) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000114029 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationKerekes, B. P., Toth, K., Kaszás, A., Chiovini, B., Szadai, Z., Szalay, G., Palfi, D., Spitzer, K., Rózsa, B., Ulbert, I., et al. (2014) · Neurophotonics · doi:10.1117/1.nph.1.1.011013 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Random Positions of Dendritic Spines in Human Cerebral Cortex
Morales, J., Benavides-Piccione, R., Dar, M., Fernaud, I., Rodriguez, A., Anton-Sanchez, L., Bielza, C., Larranaga, P., DeFelipe, J., & Yuste, R. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1085-14.2014 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Subpial Fan Cell” — A Class of Calretinin Neuron in Layer 1 of Adult Monkey Prefrontal Cortex
Gabbott, P. L. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00028 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Aevermann, B. D., McCorrison, J., Venepally, P., Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Novotny, M. A., Tran, D. N., Díez‐Fuertes, F., Christiansen, L., et al. (2016) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) · doi:10.1142/9789813207813_0052 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationLacar, B., Linker, S. B., Jaeger, B. N., Krishnaswami, S. R., Barron, J. J., Kelder, M. J. E., Parylak, S., Paquola, A. C. M., Venepally, P., Novotny, M. A., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15047 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex
Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Smith, K. A., Barkan, E. R., Graybuck, L. T., Close, J. L., Long, B., Johansen, N., Penn, O., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1506-7 · Cited by 1,775 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse
Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., Crow, M., Hodge, R. D., Krienen, F. M., Sorensen, S. A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03465-8 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons
Lim, L., Mi, D., Llorca, A., & Marín, O. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.009 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons
Gidon, A., Zolnik, T. A., Fidzinski, P., Bolduan, F., Papoutsi, A., Poirazi, P., Holtkamp, M., Vida, I., & Larkum, M. E. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax6239 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Classification of electrophysiological and morphological neuron types in the mouse visual cortex
Gouwens, N. W., Sorensen, S. A., Berg, J., Lee, C., Jarsky, T., Ting, J., Sunkin, S. M., Feng, D., Anastassiou, C. A., Barkan, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0417-0 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment and arealization of the cerebral cortex
Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.009 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Innovations in Primate Interneuron Repertoire
Krienen, F. M., Goldman, M., Zhang, Q., del Rosario, R., Florio, M., Machold, R., Saunders, A., Levandowski, K., Zaniewski, H., Schuman, B., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/709501 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Innovations present in the primate interneuron repertoire
Krienen, F. M., Goldman, M., Zhang, Q., C. H. del Rosario, R., Florio, M., Machold, R., Saunders, A., Levandowski, K., Zaniewski, H., Schuman, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2781-z · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Madison, A. A., & Kiecolt‐Glaser, J. K. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.011 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
“However, humans diverge from rodents in many relevant ways, such as neuronal expression [56] and even gut microbiota [57], underscoring the need for more clinical research to replicate and extend preclinical research.”
Macroscopic gradients of synaptic excitation and inhibition in the neocortex
Wang, X. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0262-x · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Illuminating dendritic function with computational models
Poirazi, P., & Papoutsi, A. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0301-7 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Large-scale neural recordings with single neuron resolution using Neuropixels probes in human cortex
Paulk, A. C., Kfir, Y., Khanna, A. R., Mustroph, M. L., Trautmann, E. M., Soper, D. J., Stavisky, S. D., Welkenhuysen, M., Dutta, B., Shenoy, K. V., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00997-0 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“These results suggest that the ultra-high-density recording approach enabled by Neuropixels might enable an association of electrophysiologically identified units with specific neuronal subtypes 50,51 .”
ResultViral manipulation of functionally distinct interneurons in mice, non-human primates and humans
Vormstein-Schneider, D., Lin, J. D., Pelkey, K. A., Chittajallu, R., Guo, B., Arias-Garcia, M. A., Allaway, K., Sakopoulos, S., Schneider, G., Stevenson, O., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0692-9 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Connectomic comparison of mouse and human cortex
Loomba, S., Straehle, J., Gangadharan, V., Heike, N., Khalifa, A., Motta, A., Ju, N., Sievers, M., Gempt, J., Meyer, H. S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abo0924 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Herring, C. A., Simmons, R. K., Freytag, S., Poppe, D., Moffet, J. J. D., Pflueger, J., Buckberry, S., Vargas-Landín, D. B., Clément, O., Goñi, E., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.039 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
“Marker Genes - RELN (Overstreet-Wadiche and McBain, 2015), SV2C (Boldog et al., 2018), KIT (Mickelsen et al., 2019), CXCL14 (Boldog et al., 2018), LAMP5 (Mickelsen et al., 2019), CCK (Lake et al., 2018).”
BackgroundHuman brain organogenesis: Toward a cellular understanding of development and disease
Kelley, K. W., & Pașca, S. P. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.003 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
“Similarly, single-nucleus transcriptomics coupled with detailed morphological and electrophysiological analyses identified a ‘‘rosehip’’ shaped GABAergic interneuron located in human cortical layer 1 without a mouse homolog (Boldog et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMouse and human share conserved transcriptional programs for interneuron development
Shi, Y., Wang, M., Mi, D., Lu, T., Wang, B., Dong, H., Zhong, S., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Zhou, X., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj6641 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Rewiring of human neurodevelopmental gene regulatory programs by human accelerated regions
Girskis, K. M., Stergachis, A. B., DeGennaro, E. M., Doan, R. N., Qian, X., Johnson, M. B., Wang, P. P., Sejourne, G. M., Nagy, M. A., Pollina, E. A., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.005 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“Longer cell cycles are thought to reduce the rate of somatic mutation or maintain DNA quality control and may facilitate formation of the remarkable diversity of neuronal types that constitute the human brain (Boldog et al., 2018; Hodge et al., 2019), but they come at the potential cost of increasing heterochrony, a l…”
BackgroundInterneuron Types as Attractors and Controllers
Fishell, G., & Kepecs, Á. (2019) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050421 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
“In addition, recent work has started to examine the related questions of how interneuron identities vary across brain regions (Saunders et al. 2018), as well as across species ranging from reptiles to humans (Boldog et al. 2018, Tosches et al. 2018), to understand how they emerged through evolution.”
BackgroundHuman Models Are Needed for Studying Human Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Zhao, X., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2018) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.10.009 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
“In fact, a new human interneuron subtype was recently identified with features never described in rodents.(80) Unique Genetics.”
BackgroundFunctional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex
Mich, J. K., Graybuck, L. T., Hess, E. E., Mahoney, J. T., Kojima, Y., Ding, Y., Somasundaram, S., Miller, J. A., Kalmbach, B. E., Radaelli, C., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108754 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell-resolution transcriptome map of human, chimpanzee, bonobo, and macaque brains
Khrameeva, E., Kurochkin, I., Han, D., Guijarro, P., Kanton, S., Santel, M., Qian, Z., Rong, S., Mazin, P., Sabirov, M., et al. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.256958.119 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“…sufficient to accurately examine expression evolution in specific neuronal subtypes, such as von Economo neurons, known to be overrepresented in human AC and the frontoinsular cortex (Yang et al. 2019), or the rosehip neurons present in human but not rodent cortical layer I (Boldog et al. 2018).”
BackgroundDevelopmental mechanisms underlying the evolution of human cortical circuits
Vanderhaeghen, P., & Polleux, F. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00675-z · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Single nucleus multi-omics identifies human cortical cell regulatory genome diversity
Luo, C., Liu, H., Xie, F., Armand, E. J., Siletti, K., Bakken, T. E., Fang, R., Doyle, W. I., Stuart, T., Hodge, R. D., et al. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100107 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationAstrocytes as Guardians of Neuronal Excitability: Mechanisms Underlying Epileptogenesis
Verhoog, Q. P., Holtman, L., Aronica, E., & van Vliet, E. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.591690 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
“Numerous studies have been performed showing a plethora of astrocytic released gliotransmitters: (1) amino acids including glutamate (177–179), D-serine (180, 181), GABA (182–184) and glycine (185–187), (2) nucleotides, such as adenosine 5triphosphate (ATP) (188–190), (3) organic acids including lactate (191–193), tau…”
InfluentialNeocortical Layer 1: an elegant solution to top-down and bottom-up integration
Schuman, B., Dellal, S., Prönneke, A., Machold, R., & Rudy, B. (2021) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-100520-012117 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Single-cell multi-cohort dissection of the schizophrenia transcriptome
Ruzicka, W. B., Mohammadi, S., Fullard, J. F., Dávila-Velderrain, J., Subburaju, S., Tso, D. R., Hourihan, M., Jiang, S., Lee, H.-C., Bendl, J. M., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg5136 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“[vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)+ and Reelin+], and two subpopulations of the recently described rosehip interneurons ( 32 ).”
BackgroundChang, C.-Y., Ting, H.-C., Liu, C.-A., Su, H., Chiou, T., Lin, S., Harn, H., & Ho, T. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25082000 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Cell type-specific epigenetic links to schizophrenia risk in the brain
Mendizabal, I., Berto, S., Usui, N., Toriumi, K., Chatterjee, P., Douglas, C., Huh, I., Jeong, H., Layman, T. S., Tamminga, C. A., et al. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1747-7 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Signature morphoelectric properties of diverse GABAergic interneurons in the human neocortex
Lee, B. R., Dalley, R., Miller, J. A., Chartrand, T., Close, J., Mann, R., Mukora, A., Ng, L., Alfiler, L., Baker, K., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf6484 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwarz, N., Uysal, B., Welzer, M., Bahr, J. C., Layer, N., Löffler, H., Stanaitis, K., Ashraf, H. P., Weber, Y. G., Hedrich, U. B. S., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48417 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Single cell transcriptome profiling of the human alcohol-dependent brain
Brenner, E., Tiwari, G. R., Kapoor, M., Liu, Y., Brock, A., & Mayfield, R. D. (2020) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddaa038 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Feng, G., Jensen, F. E., Greely, H. T., Okano, H., Treue, S., Roberts, A., Fox, J. G., Caddick, S. J., Poo, M.-M., Newsome, W. T., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2006515117 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Evolution of cortical neurons supporting human cognition
Galakhova, A. A., Hunt, S., Wilbers, R., Heyer, D. B., de Kock, C. P. J., Mansvelder, H. D., & Goriounova, N. A. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.012 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Mossink, B., Negwer, M., Schubert, D., & Nadif Kasri, N. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-020-03714-5 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“While mice have many advantages as model organisms and many features are conserved down to the cellular level [331], some features appear to be unique to the human lineage, for example specialized cell-types such as outer radial glia cells [448], subpial interlaminar astrocytes [449], or the recently described rosehip…”
BackgroundChameh, H. M., Rich, S., Wang, L., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Carlen, P. L., Tripathy, S. J., & Valiante, T. A. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22741-9 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Interneuron origin and molecular diversity in the human fetal brain
Yu, Y., Zeng, Z., Xie, D., Chen, R., Sha, Y., Huang, S., Cai, W., Chen, W., Li, W., Ke, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00940-3 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Hodge, R. D., Miller, J. A., Novotny, M. A., Kalmbach, B. E., Ting, J. T., Bakken, T. E., Aevermann, B. D., Barkan, E. R., Berkowitz-Cerasano, M. L., Cobbs, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14952-3 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationApplications of brain organoids in neurodevelopment and neurological diseases
Sun, N., Meng, X., Liu, Y., Song, D., Jiang, C., & Cai, J. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-021-00728-4 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Single-cell dissection of the human motor and prefrontal cortices in ALS and FTLD
Pineda, S. S., Lee, H., Fitzwalter, B. E., Mohammadi, S., Pregent, L., Gardashli, M., Mantero, J. C., Engelberg-Cook, E., DeJesus‐Hernandez, M., van Blitterswijk, M., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.031 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Strong and reliable synaptic communication between pyramidal neurons in adult human cerebral cortex
Hunt, S., Leibner, Y., Mertens, E. J., Barros-Zulaica, N., Kanari, L., Heistek, T. S., Karnani, M., Aardse, R., Wilbers, R., Heyer, D. B., et al. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac246 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Peng, Y., Mittermaier, F. X., Planert, H., Schneider, U. C., Alle, H., & Geiger, J. R. P. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48178 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Chartrand, T., Dalley, R., Close, J., Goriounova, N. A., Lee, B. R., Mann, R., Miller, J. A., Molnar, G., Mukora, A., Alfiler, L., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf0805 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“Forfurtheranalysisofthesereferencetrans-criptomicdatasets,datawasrestrictedtoonly L1 and the adjacent layer (L2 in human, L2/3 in mouse), to be as selective as possible while not riskingthe exclusion ofL1/2 border cells in case of imprecise dissections.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMaynard, K. R., Tippani, M., Takahashi, Y., Phan, B. N., Hyde, T. M., Jaffe, A. E., & Martinowich, K. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa312 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Common cell type nomenclature for the mammalian brain
Miller, J. A., Gouwens, N. W., Tasic, B., Collman, F., van Velthoven, C. T. J., Bakken, T. E., Hawrylycz, M., Zeng, H., Lein, E. S., & Bernard, A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59928 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Furthermore, functional properties observed in matched cell types may diverge across species (Bakken et al., 2020a; Berg et al., 2020; Boldog et al., 2018; Hodge et al., 2019) and as cells advance along trajectories of development (Nowakowski et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationEvolution of cellular diversity in primary motor cortex of human, marmoset monkey, and mouse
Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., Crow, M., Hodge, R. D., Krienen, F. M., Sorensen, S. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.03.31.016972 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
Self-citationShared and derived features of cellular diversity in the human cerebral cortex
Miller, D. J., Bhaduri, A., Šestan, N., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.005 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Neurons with Complex Karyotypes Are Rare in Aged Human Neocortex
Chronister, W. D., Burbulis, I. E., Wierman, M. B., Wolpert, M. J., Haakenson, M. F., Smith, A. C. B., Kleinman, J. E., Hyde, T. M., Weinberger, D. R., Bekiranov, S., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.107 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Single-cell transcriptomic approaches are beginning to comprehensively catalog human neuronal diversity (Lake et al., 2016; Nowakowski et al., 2017) and identify new subtypes of human neurons (Boldog et al., 2018).”
BackgroundA Tradeoff in the Neural Code across Regions and Species
Pryluk, R., Kfir, Y., Gelbard-Sagiv, H., Fried, I., & Paz, R. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.032 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Mouse models of neurodegeneration: Know your question, know your mouse
Fisher, E., & Bannerman, D. M. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaq1818 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Accelerated evolution of oligodendrocytes in the human brain
Berto, S., Mendizabal, I., Usui, N., Toriumi, K., Chatterjee, P., Douglas, C., Tamminga, C. A., Preuss, T. M., Yi, S. V., & Konopka, G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1907982116 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“We next compared the human-specific genes with single-cell transcriptome data from human brain (20).”
BackgroundX-chromosome regulation and sex differences in brain anatomy
Raznahan, A., & Distèche, C. M. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.024 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Leveraging the Cell Ontology to classify unseen cell types
Wang, S., Pisco, A. O., McGeever, A., Brbić, M., Žitnik, M., Darmanis, S., Leskovec, J., Karkanias, J., & Altman, R. B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25725-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“OnClass is a Python-based open source package able to compute cell type similarities between the hierarchical structure of existing cell ontologies, such as the Cell Ontology 25 and the Allen Ontology 20,33 .”
MethodAmyloid Cascade Hypothesis for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Challenges
Wu, T., Ding, L., Cheng, Y., Jiang, S., Riaz, M. W., Fu, N., Mou, C., Ye, M., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · Aging and Disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2022.0412 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Besides, some specialized features were confirmed in the human brain, such as the presence of interlaminar astrocytes and rosehip neurons and the expansion of superficial cortical layers [98-100].”
BackgroundCell type discovery using single-cell transcriptomics: implications for ontological representation
Aevermann, B. D., Novotny, M. A., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., Diehl, A. D., Osumi-Sutherland, D., Lasken, R. S., Lein, E. S., & Scheuermann, R. H. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy100 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“For one of the inhibitory interneuron cell types defined in this study (i5), we were able to connect the distinct transcriptional profile with a previous cell type defined based on its unique cellular morphology—the Rosehip cell (14).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerspectives on defining cell types in the brain
Mukamel, E. A., & Ngai, J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2018.11.007 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“In parallel, complementary data from human and non-human primates, though less comprehensive, will enable comparative and evolutionary perspectives on mammalian brain cell types [79,80].”
BackgroundThe Pediatric Cell Atlas: Defining the Growth Phase of Human Development at Single-Cell Resolution
Taylor, D. M., Aronow, B. J., Tan, K., Bernt, K. M., Salomonis, N., Greene, C. S., Frolova, A., Henrickson, S. E., Wells, A. D., Pei, L., et al. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.001 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
de Souza, D. G., Almeida, R. F., Souza, D. O., & Zimmer, E. R. (2019) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.04.002 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Bak, A., Koch, H., van Loo, K. M. J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.110055 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The cell-type underpinnings of the human functional cortical connectome
Zhang, X.-H., Anderson, K. M., Dong, H.-M., Chopra, S., Dhamala, E., Emani, P. S., Gerstein, M., Margulies, D. S., & Holmes, A. J. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01812-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“From technologies characterizing multimodal features of single cells, such as patch-seq 35 , transcriptionally defined cell types demonstrate electrophysiological and morphological distinction 36,37 .”
Ruzicka, W. B., Mohammadi, S., Dávila-Velderrain, J., Subburaju, S., Tso, D. R., Hourihan, M., & Kellis, M. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.11.06.20225342 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Gittings, L. M., Alsop, E. B., Antone, J., Singer, M., Whitsett, T. G., Sattler, R., & Keuren‐Jensen, K. R. V. (2023) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-023-02599-5 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Activity-dependent tuning of intrinsic excitability in mouse and human neurogliaform cells
Chittajallu, R., Auville, K., Mahadevan, V., Lai, M., Hunt, S., Calvigioni, D., Pelkey, K. A., Zaghloul, K. A., & McBain, C. J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57571 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Interestingly, even with the number of conditioning APs far exceeding that required to induce BF in NGFCs (800 - 1500 APs; 30Hz), BF could not be elicited in superficial cortical and hippocampal INs that were not NGFCs (non-NGFCs), including the recently described human rosehip cell(Boldog et al., 2018) (26 and 37 non…”
BackgroundInfluentialNests of dividing neuroblasts sustain interneuron production for the developing human brain
Paredes, M. F., Mora, C., Flores-Ramirez, Q., Cebrián‐Silla, A., Dosso, A. D., Larimer, P., Chen, J., Kang, G., González-Granero, S., Garcia, E., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abk2346 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
How can artificial neural networks approximate the brain?
Shao, F., & Shen, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970214 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Huang, A. Y., Li, P., Rodin, R. E., Kim, S. N., Dou, Y., Kenny, C. J., Akula, S. K., Hodge, R. D., Bakken, T. E., Miller, J. A., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2006163117 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“1H) shows that they identified similar major cell types, with cells clustering by cell type rather than by platform, although the SMART-seq dataset from MTG defined finer subdivisions of cell type, as expected, because of its larger sample size and deeper sequence depth.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationUnraveling mechanisms of human brain evolution
Lancaster, M. A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.052 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Szegedi, V., Paizs, M., Baka, J., Barzó, P., Molnár, G., Tamás, G., & Lamsa, K. P. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51691 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationMicroscale Physiological Events on the Human Cortical Surface
Paulk, A. C., Yang, J. C., Cleary, D. R., Soper, D. J., Halgren, M., O’Donnell, A. R., Lee, S., Ganji, M., Ro, Y. G., Oh, H., et al. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab040 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Apical amplification—a cellular mechanism of conscious perception?
Marvan, T., Polák, M., Bachmann, T., & Phillips, W. A. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab036 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Distinctive Structural and Molecular Features of Myelinated Inhibitory Axons in Human Neocortex
Micheva, K. D., Chang, E. F., Nana, A. L., Seeley, W. W., Ting, J. T., Cobbs, C., Lein, E. S., Smith, S. J., Weinberg, R. J., & Madison, D. V. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0297-18.2018 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“For example, recent studies revealed two new interneuron types in human cortex that are not present in mouse cortex, and both of these interneurons are enriched in layer 1 (Boldog et al., 2018; Hodge et al., 2018).”
Human Brain Organoid Models of Developmental Epilepsies
Nieto‐Estévez, V., & Hsieh, J. (2020) · Epiliepsy currents/Epilepsy currents · doi:10.1177/1535759720949254 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Moreover, specific interneuron subtypes can be observed only in humans.(30) Many of these aspects of brain development can be recapitulated in organoids.”
BackgroundLayer 1 neocortex: Gating and integrating multidimensional signals
Huang, S., Wu, S. J., Sansone, G., Ibrahim, L. A., & Fishell, G. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.041 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Kim, M.-H., Radaelli, C., Thomsen, E. R., Monet, D., Chartrand, T., Jorstad, N. L., Mahoney, J. T., Taormina, M. J., Long, B., Baker, K. S., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81863 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“…human neocortical slices derived from surgical resections ( Molnár et al., 2008 ; Jiang et al., 2012 ; Testa-Silva et al., 2014 ; Kalmbach et al., 2018 ; Beaulieu-Laroche et al., 2018 ; Boldog et al., 2018 ; Seeman et al., 2018 ; Peng et al., 2019 ; Planert et al., 2021 ; Campagnola et al., 2021 ).”
Self-citationA single-cell multi-omic atlas spanning the adult rhesus macaque brain
Chiou, K. L., Huang, X., Bohlen, M. O., Tremblay, S., DeCasien, A. R., O’Day, D. R., Spurrell, C. H., Gogate, A. A., Zintel, T. M., Andrews, M. G., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh1914 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Jouhanneau, J.-S., & Poulet, J. F. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2019.00015 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“For example using single-cell RNA sequencing (Jiang et al., 2015; Cadwell et al., 2016; Fuzik et al., 2016; Muñoz et al., 2017; Boldog et al., 2018) or higher resolution bright field (Feldmeyer et al.”
MethodCapogna, M., Castillo, P. E., & Maffei, A. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14907 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“This diversity is probably even more pronounced in the human cerebral cortex, where GABAergic cell types without apparent homology with rodent cortical cell types have been found (Boldog et al., 2018).”
BackgroundTai, D. J. C., Razaz, P., Erdin, S., Gao, D., Wang, J. P., Nuttle, X., de Esch, C. E., Collins, R. L., Currall, B., O’Keefe, K., et al. (2022) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.012 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Single-cell profiling of the human primary motor cortex in ALS and FTLD
Pineda, S. S., Lee, H., Fitzwalter, B. E., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.07.07.451374 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Comprehensive in situ mapping of human cortical transcriptomic cell types
Langseth, C. M., Gyllborg, D., Miller, J. A., Close, J., Long, B., Lein, E. S., Hilscher, M. M., & Nilsson, M. F. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02517-z · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationKeefe, F., Monzón‐Sandoval, J., Rosser, A., Webber, C., & Li, M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24098122 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Stephan, M., Volkmann, P., & Rossner, M. J. (2019) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/mrossner · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Cerebellar nuclei evolved by repeatedly duplicating a conserved cell type setPreprint
Kebschull, J. M., Ringach, N., Richman, E. B., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.25.170118 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Northcutt, A. J., Kick, D. R., Otopalik, A. G., Goetz, B. M., Harris, R. M., Santin, J. M., Hofmann, H. A., Marder, E., & Schulz, D. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911413116 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Species-Specific miRNAs in Human Brain Development and Disease
Prodromidou, K., & Matsas, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00559 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Similarly, a specialized GABAergic neuron subtype has recently been identified with a molecular and anatomical signature specific to humans (Boldog et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMedalla, M., Mo, B., Nasar, R. T., Zhou, Y., Park, J., & Luebke, J. I. (2023) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.25514 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“…profiles, extrinsic factors such as laminar location, connectivity,andactivityplayakeyroleindeterminingthefunctionofdistinct interneuron types, and ultimately shaping the cortical inhibitory circuits that underlie behavior (Boldog et al., 2018; Bugeon et al., 2022; Pouchelon et al., 2021).”
BackgroundLayer 1 NDNF interneurons are specialized top-down master regulators of cortical circuits
Hartung, J., Schroeder, A., Vázquez, R. A. P., Poorthuis, R. B., & Letzkus, J. J. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114212 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Trutzer, I. M., García‐Cabezas, M. Á., & Zikopoulos, B. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0684-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Machine learning for cell type classification from single nucleus RNA sequencing data
Le, H. Q., Peng, B., Uy, J., Carrillo, D., Zhang, Y., Aevermann, B. D., & Scheuermann, R. H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275070 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“For example, snRNA-seq allowed for the identification of a specialized “rosehip” GABAergic neuron in human cortical layer 1 of the middle temporal gyrus with gap junctions that target apical dendritic shafts of layer 3 pyramidal neurons to inhibit back propagation of action potentials [4].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHan, X., Guo, S., Ji, N., Li, T., Liu, J., Ye, X., Wang, Y., Yun, Z., Xiong, F., Rong, J., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf3771 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ritter, S., Zadik-Weiss, L., Almogi‐Hazan, O., & Or, R. (2020) · Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal · doi:10.5041/rmmj.10388 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Luo, C., Liu, H., Xie, F.-M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2019.12.11.873398 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“These major populations contain intermediate neuronal populations such as PVALB-expressing Basket Cell (BC) and Chandelier Cell (ChC), or the recently reported LAMP5-expressing Rosehip neurons (Boldog et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGene regulatory networks during the development of the Drosophila visual system
Chen, Y., & Desplan, C. (2020) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.02.010 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The nervous system is so sophisticated that even after more than one hundred years of vigorous interrogation, there are still many unknown types of neurons to be discovered (Boldog et al., 2018), which makes one wonder what underlies this enormous diversity.”
BackgroundBursting of excitatory cells is linked to interictal epileptic discharge generation in humans
Hofer, K. T., Kandrács, Á., Tóth, K., Hajnal, B., Bokodi, V., Tóth, E. Z., Erőss, L., Entz, L., Bagó, A. G., Fabó, D., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10319-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortexPreprint
Mich, J., Graybuck, L. T., Hess, E. E., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/555318 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Mouse and human neocortex have a remarkable diversity of cell types (Zeisel et al., 2015; Tasic et al., 2016, 2018; Boldog et al., 2018; Hodge et al., 2019, 2020; Bakken et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAurelian, L., & Balan, I. S. (2019) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05220-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Early maternal care restores LINE-1 methylation and enhances neurodevelopment in preterm infants
Fontana, C., Marasca, F., Provitera, L., Mancinelli, S., Pesenti, N., Sinha, S., Passera, S., Abrignani, S., Mosca, F., Lodato, S., et al. (2021) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01896-0 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A community-based transcriptomics classification and nomenclature of neocortical cell types
Yuste, R., Hawrylycz, M., Aalling, N., Aguilar-Valles, A., Arendt, D., Armañanzas, R., Ascoli, G. A., Bielza, C., Bokharaie, V., Bergmann, T. B., et al. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0685-8 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationLourenço, J., Koukouli, F., & Bacci, A. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.015 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Defining the nature of human pluripotent stem cell-derived interneurons via single-cell analysis
Allison, T. F., Langerman, J., Sabri, S., Otero‐García, M., Lund, A. J., Huang, J. C., Wei, X., Samarasinghe, R. A., Polioudakis, D., Módy, I., et al. (2021) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.08.006 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boldog, E., Bakken, T. E., Hodge, R. D., Novotny, M., Aevermann, B. D., Baka, J., Bordé, S., Close, J. L., Diez-Fuertes, F., Ding, S.-L., Faragó, N., Kocsis, Á. K., Kovács, B., Maltzer, Z., McCorrison, J. M., Miller, J. A., Molnár, G., Oláh, G., Ozsvár, A., Rózsa, M., Shehata, S. I., Smith, K. A., Sunkin, S. M., Tran, D. N., Venepally, P., Wall, A., Puskás, L. G., Barzó, P., Steemers, F. J., Schork, N. J., Scheuermann, R. H., Lasken, R. S., Lein, E. S., & Tamás, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Szeged (HU)
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
- HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont (HU)
- Illumina (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lein, Ed S.
- Tamás, Gábor
- ORCID
- Boldog, Eszter
- Bakken, Trygve E.
- Hodge, Rebecca D.
- Novotny, Mark
- Aevermann, Brian D.
- Baka, Judith
- Bordé, Sándor
- Close, Jennie L.
- Ding, Song-Lin
- Faragó, Nóra
- Kocsis, Ágnes K.
- Kovács, Balázs
- Maltzer, Zoe
- McCorrison, Jamison M.
- Miller, Jeremy A.
- Molnár, Gábor
- Oláh, Gáspár
- Ozsvár, Attila
- Rózsa, Márton
- Shehata, Soraya I.
- Smith, Kimberly A.
- Sunkin, Susan M.
- Puskás, László G.
- Barzó, Pál
- Schork, Nicholas J.
- Scheuermann, Richard H.
- Lein, Ed S.
- Tamás, Gábor
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2018-08-27
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1185-1195
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC6130849
- OpenAlex
- W2767443671
- Semantic Scholar
- 3ae2f32de897a98351ded7a44ee959ad0bc0de3d
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
- National Institutes of Health (5u01mh114812-03)
- National Research, Development and Innovation Office (14-1-2015-0155)
- National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH114812)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- GABAergic interneurons, human cortex, interneuron subtypes, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, axonal boutons, dendritic branching, dendritic computation, GAD1, cholecystokinin, CNR1, parvalbumin
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Axons, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Male, RNA, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gap Junctions, Presynaptic Terminals, Pyramidal Cells, Dendritic Spines, GABAergic Neurons, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review