Cited by 653Gene expression and cancer classificationBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Common markers of proliferation

Whitfield, Michael L., George, Lacy K., Grant, Gavin D., Perou, Charles M.·2006·Nature Reviews Cancer

Abstract

When normal tissue and tumour samples are compared by microarray analysis, the biggest differences most often occur in the expression levels of genes that control cell proliferation. However, this difference is detected whenever mRNA samples that are taken from two cell populations with different proliferation rates are compared. Although the exact genes that comprise this 'proliferation signature' often differ, they are almost always genes that are involved in the fundamental process of cell proliferation. Can the proliferation signature be used to improve our understanding of the cell cycle and cancer pathogenesis, as well as being used as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrc1802

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • H&E and KI67 staining of brainstem tumors from mice after 10 days of treatment confirmed a dramatic reduction in tumor burden compared with controls.

    “Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and KI67, a marker of cell proliferation22, staining of brainstem tumors from mice euthanized at the completion of 10 days treatment confirmed a dramatic reduction of tumor burden compared to controls (Fig. 4C).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitfield, M. L., George, L. K., Grant, G. D., & Perou, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Whitfield, Michael L.
Venue
Nature Reviews Cancer
Published
2006-02
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
99-106
ISSN
  • 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1768
OpenAlex
W2018173663
Cited by
650
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
cell proliferation, proliferation signature, gene expression profiling, tumor markers, cell cycle, carcinogenesis, cancer diagnosis, cancer prognosis
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Genetic Markers, Humans, Neoplasms, Prognosis, RNA, Messenger, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review