Cited by 1,806Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity

Papalexi, Efthymia, Satija, Rahul·2018·Nature Reviews Immunology

Abstract

Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have allowed for comprehensive analysis of the immune system. In this Review, we briefly describe the available scRNA-seq technologies together with their corresponding strengths and weaknesses. We discuss in depth how scRNA-seq can be used to deconvolve immune system heterogeneity by identifying novel distinct immune cell subsets in health and disease, characterizing stochastic heterogeneity within a cell population and building developmental 'trajectories' for immune cells. Finally, we discuss future directions of the field and present integrated approaches to complement molecular information from a single cell with studies of the environment, epigenetic state and cell lineage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nri.2017.76

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • scRNA-seq has been used to deconvolve immune cell type heterogeneity by identifying novel distinct immune cell subsets in health and disease.

    “scRNA-seq has been used to deconvolve immune cell type heterogeneity by identifying novel distinct immune cell subsets in health and disease”

    From Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Divergence of the Primate Microglia Program (2019) · cites this paper as Papalexi and Satija, 2018

  • Venus protein expression correlates mostly with RNA findings, except weak acinar expression around E18.5 which appears underestimated in scRNA sequencing data.

    “These patterns correlate mostly with the RNA findings, except the weak but robust acinar expression around E18.5 which appears underestimated in scRNA sequencing data potentially attributed to technical limitations for weakly expressed genes [50–54].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papalexi, E., & Satija, R.
Affiliations
New York Genome Center (US)
Corresponding author
Satija, Rahul
Venue
Nature Reviews Immunology
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 1474-1733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1741
OpenAlex
W2743416243
Cited by
1,806
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 274 · 2024: 269 · 2023: 244 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, immune cell heterogeneity, immune cell subsets, stochastic heterogeneity, cell lineage, epigenetic states, single-cell multi-omics
MeSH terms
Animals, B-Lymphocytes, Cell Differentiation, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Killer Cells, Natural, Lymphocytes, Macrophages, Monocytes, T-Lymphocytes, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Cell Lineage, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenomics, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review