Cited by 236Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

scSLAM-seq reveals core features of transcription dynamics in single cells

Open access
Erhard, Florian, Baptista, Marisa A. P., Krammer, Tobias, Hennig, Thomas, Lange, Marius, Arampatzi, Panagiota, Jürges, Christopher S., Theis, Fabian J. +2 more·2019·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has highlighted the important role of intercellular heterogeneity in phenotype variability in both health and disease 1. However, current scRNA-seq approaches provide only a snapshot of gene expression and convey little information on the true temporal dynamics and stochastic nature of transcription. A further key limitation of scRNA-seq analysis is that the RNA profile of each individual cell can be analysed only once. Here we introduce single-cell, thiol-(SH)-linked alkylation of RNA for metabolic labelling sequencing (scSLAM-seq), which integrates metabolic RNA labelling 2, biochemical nucleoside conversion 3 and scRNA-seq to record transcriptional activity directly by differentiating between new and old RNA for thousands of genes per single cell. We use scSLAM-seq to study the onset of infection with lytic cytomegalovirus in single mouse fibroblasts. The cell-cycle state and dose of infection deduced from old RNA enable dose-response analysis based on new RNA. scSLAM-seq thereby both visualizes and explains differences in transcriptional activity at the single-cell level. Furthermore, it depicts 'on-off' switches and transcriptional burst kinetics in host gene expression with extensive gene-specific differences that correlate with promoter-intrinsic features (TBP-TATA-box interactions and DNA methylation). Thus, gene-specific, and not cell-specific, features explain the heterogeneity in transcriptomes between individual cells and the transcriptional response to perturbations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1369-y

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most DEGs are primarily detectable in new RNA, eluding detection in analyses of old or total RNA.

    “The study highlighted a critical insight: most DEGs are primarily detectable in new RNA, eluding detection in analyses of old or total RNA.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erhard, F., Baptista, M. A. P., Krammer, T., Hennig, T., Lange, M., Arampatzi, P., Jürges, C. S., Theis, F. J., Saliba, A.-E., & Dölken, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Helmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Erhard, Florian
  • Saliba, Antoine-Emmanuel
  • Dölken, Lars
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-07-10
Volume
571
Issue
7765
Pages
419-423
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2957836762
Cited by
233
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HZI (Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft und Medien, Energie und Technologie (0703/89374/3/2017, 0703/68674/5/2017 and 0703/89374/3/2017, 0703/68674/5/2017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
transcriptional dynamics, single-cell transcriptomics, transcriptional bursts, cytomegalovirus infection, mouse fibroblasts, dose-response relationship, DNA methylation, TATA box, TATA-binding protein, intercellular heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Alkylation, Animals, Cell Cycle, Cytomegalovirus, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Kinetics, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Sulfhydryl Compounds, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, DNA Methylation, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review