Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory

Bolhuis, Johan J., Gahr, Manfred·2006·Nature Reviews Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/nrn1904
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1904

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 128

  1. Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium. Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 151–159 (2005). An important review on the implications of the new nomenclature of the avian brain for our understanding of the evolution of brain and behaviour, and our view of the 'birdbrain'. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414, 443–446 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vignal, C., Mathevon, N. & Mottin, S. Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice. Nature 430, 448–451 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306, 1903–1907 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London, 1882). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Doupe, A. J. & Kuhl, P. K. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 567–631 (1999). A detailed review of the many parallels between birdsong learning and the acquisition of speech in humans. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fitch, W. T. The evolution of speech: a comparative review. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 258–267 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Funabiki, Y. & Konishi, M. Long memory in song learning by zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 23, 6928–6935 (2003). · DOI
  9. Nottebohm, F. in The Design of Animal Communication (eds Hauser, M. D. & Konishi, M.) 63–110 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000). An excellent review by one of the leaders in the field that highlights our lack of knowledge of the neural substrate of tutor song memory.
  10. Bolhuis, J. J. & Macphail, E. M. A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 426–433 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Macphail, E. M. & Bolhuis, J. J. The evolution of intelligence: adaptive specialisations versus general process. Biol. Rev. 76, 341–364 (2001). · DOI
  12. Bolhuis, J. J. Function and mechanism in neuroecology: looking for clues. Anim. Biol. 55, 457–490 (2005). · DOI
  13. Sherry, D. F. Neuroecology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 167–197 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gahr, M. Hormones make songs sexually attractive: hormone-dependent neural changes in the vocal control system of songbirds. Zoology 100, 260–272 (1997).
  15. Nottebohm, F. & Arnold, A. P. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. Science 194, 212–213 (1976). · DOI · Paper page
  16. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A. & Ball, G. F. Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 22, 432–436 (1999). · DOI
  17. Nottebohm, F. A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain. Science 214, 1368–1370 (1981). The first demonstration that seasonal changes occur in the volume of nuclei in the song system of songbirds. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Tramontin, A. D. & Brenowitz, E. Seasonal plasticity in the adult brain. Trends Neurosci. 23, 251–258 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Nottebohm, F., Kasparian, S. & Pandazis, C. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 213, 99–109 (1981). · DOI · Paper page
  20. DeVoogd, T. J., Krebs, J. R. Healy, S. D. & Purvis, A. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254, 75–82 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ward, B. C., Nordeen, E. J. & Nordeen, K. W. Individual variation in neuron number predicts differences in the propensity for avian vocal imitation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1277–1282 (1998). · DOI
  22. Airey, D. C., Buchanan, K. L., Szekely, T., Catchpole, C. K. & DeVoogd, T. J. Song, sexual selection, and song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J. Neurobiol. 44, 1–6 (2000). · doi:10.1002/1097-4695(200007)44:1<1::aid-neu1>3.0.co;2-v
  23. Kirn, J. R., Clower, R. P., Kroodsma, D. E. & DeVoogd, T. J. Song-related brain regions in the red winged blackbird are affected by sex and season but not repertoire size. J. Neurobiol. 20, 139–163 (1989). · DOI
  24. Bernard, D. J., Eens, M. & Ball, G. F. Age and behavior-related variation in the volume of song control nuclei in male European starlings. J. Neurobiol. 30, 329–339 (1996). · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(199607)30:3<329::aid-neu2>3.0.co;2-6
  25. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Hulse, S. H. & Ball, G. F. Neural correlates of singing behavior in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Neurobiol. 36, 421–430 (1998). · DOI
  26. Gahr, M., Sonnenschein, E. & Wickler, W. Sex difference in the size of the neural song control regions in a dueting songbird with similar song repertoire size of males and females. J. Neurosci. 18, 1124–1131 (1998). · DOI
  27. Leitner, S., Voigt, C., Garcia-Segura, L.-M., Van't Hof, T. & Gahr, M. Seasonal activation and inactivation of song motor memories in wild canaries is not reflected in neuroanatomical changes of forebrain song areas. Horm. Behav. 40, 160–168 (2001). · DOI
  28. Leitner, S. & Catchpole, C. K. Syllable repertoire and the size of the song control system in captive canaries (Serinus canaria). J. Neurobiol. 60, 21–27 (2004). · DOI
  29. Gahr, M. Delineation of a brain nucleus: comparisons of cytochemical, hodological, and cytoarchitectural views of the song control nucleus HVc of the adult canary. J. Comp. Neurol. 294, 30–36 (1990). · DOI
  30. Gahr, M. How should brain nuclei be delineated? Consequences for developmental mechanisms and for correlations of area size, neuron numbers and functions of brain nuclei. Trends Neurosci. 20, 58–62 (1997). · DOI
  31. Solis, M. M., Brainard, M. S., Hessler, N. A. & Doupe, A. J. Song selectivity and sensorimotor signals in vocal learning and production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11836–11842 (2000). · DOI
  32. Margoliash, D. & Konishi, M. Auditory representation of autogenous song in the song system of white-crowned sparrows. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 5997–6000 (1985). · DOI
  33. Margoliash, D. Preference for autogenous song by auditory neurons in a song system nucleus of the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci. 6, 1643–1661 (1986). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Volman, S. F. Development of neural selectivity for birdsong during vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 13, 4737–4747 (1993). An important electrophysiological study showing that in the memorization phase in juvenile white-crowned sparrows, neurons in the song system nucleus HVC do not preferentially respond to the tutor song, whereas they develop preferential responsiveness to the BOS once the bird starts singing itself. · DOI
  35. Nick, T. A. & Konishi, M. Neural song preference during vocal learning in the zebra finch depends on age and state. J. Neurobiol. 62, 231–242 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Aamodt, S. M., Nordeen, E. J. & Nordeen, K. W. Early isolation from conspecific song does not affect the normal developmental decline of NMDA receptor binding in an avian song nucleus. J. Neurobiol. 27, 76–84 (1995). · DOI
  37. Heinrich, J. E., Singh, T. D., Nordeen, K. W. & Nordeen, E. J. NR2B downregulation in a forebrain region required for avian vocal learning is not sufficient to close the sensitive period for song learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 79, 99–108 (2003). · DOI
  38. Livingston, F. S., White, S. A. & Mooney, R. Slow NMDA-EPSCs at synapses critical for song development are not required for song learning in zebra finches. Nature Neurosci. 3, 482–488 (2000). · DOI
  39. Nordeen, K. W. & Nordeen, E. J. Synaptic and molecular mechanisms regulating plasticity during early learning. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016, 416–437 (2004). · DOI
  40. Aamodt, S. M., Nordeen, E. J. & Nordeen, K. W. Blockade of NMDA receptors during song model exposure impairs song development in juvenile zebra finches. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 65, 91–98 (1996). · DOI
  41. Basham, M. E. Nordeen, E. J. & Nordeen, K. W. Blockade of NMDA receptors in the anterior forebrain impairs sensory acquisition in the zebra finch (Poephila guttata). Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 66, 295–304 (1996). · DOI
  42. Jeffery, K. J. LTP and spatial learning — where to next? Hippocampus 7, 95–110 (1997). · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1997)7:1<95::aid-hipo10>3.0.co;2-d
  43. Bolhuis, J. J. & Reid, I. C. Effects of intraventricular infusion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist AP5 on spatial memory of rats in a radial arm maze. Behav. Brain Res. 47, 151–157 (1992). · DOI
  44. Saucier, D. & Cain, D. P. Spatial learning without NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation. Nature 378, 186–189 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Otnæss, M. K., Brun, V. H., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Pretraining prevents spatial learning impairment after saturation of hippocampal long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 19, RC49, 1–5 (1999). · DOI
  46. Marler, P. & Doupe, A. Singing in the brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2965–2967 (2000). · DOI
  47. Nottebohm, F., Stokes, T. & Leonard, C. M. Central control of song in the canary. J. Comp. Neurol. 165, 457–486 (1976). The first detailed study showing the involvement of nuclei in the 'song system' in birdsong. · DOI · Paper page
  48. DeVoogd, T. J. in Causal Mechanisms of Behavioural Development (eds Hogan, J. A. & Bolhuis, J. J.) 49–81 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994). · DOI
  49. Brenowitz, E. A. & Beecher, M. D. Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends Neurosci. 28, 127–132 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Nordeen, K. W., Marler, P. & Nordeen, E. J. Addition of song-related neurons in swamp sparrows coincides with memorization, not production, of learned songs. J. Neurobiol. 20, 651–661 (1989). · DOI
  51. Jarvis, E. D. & Nottebohm, F. Motor-driven gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4097–4102 (1997). Shows a clear dissociation between song production (which involved increased neuronal activation in nuclei in the 'song system') and song perception (which involved increased neuronal activation in the NCM and CMM, but not the song system). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mello, C. V., Vicario, D. S. & Clayton, D. F. Song presentation induces gene-expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6818–6822 (1992). The first study to apply the IEG technique to birdsong, showing that exposure of male zebra finches or canaries to conspecific song led to increased IEG expression in brain regions outside the conventional 'song system'. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Bolhuis, J. J., Zijlstra, G. G. O., Den Boer-Visser, A. M. & Van der Zee, E. A. Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2282–2285 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Bolhuis, J. J., Hetebrij, E., Den Boer-Visser, A. M., De Groot, J. H. & Zijlstra, G. G. O. Localized immediate early gene expression related to the strength of song learning in socially reared zebra finches. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 2165–2170 (2001). · DOI
  55. Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. What songbirds teach us about learning. Nature 417, 351–358 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Bottjer, S. W. & Arnold, A. P. Developmental plasticity in neural circuits for a learned behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 459–481 (1997). · DOI
  57. Mello, C. V. & Clayton, D. F. Song-induced ZENK gene expression in auditory pathways of songbird brain and its relation to the song control system. J. Neurosci. 14, 6652–6666 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  58. Bolhuis, J. J. in Causal Mechanisms of Behavioural Development (eds Hogan, J. A. & Bolhuis, J. J.) 16–46 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994). · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511565120.004
  59. Terpstra, N. J., Bolhuis, J. J. & den Boer-Visser, A. M. An analysis of the neural representation of bird song memory. J. Neurosci. 24, 4971–4977 (2004). · DOI
  60. Mello, C. V., Nottebohm, F. & Clayton, D. F. Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon. J. Neurosci. 15, 6919–6925 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  61. Chew, S. J., Vicario, D. S. & Nottebohm, F. A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1950–1955 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Phan, M. L., Pytte, C. L. & Vicario, D. S. Early auditory experience generates long-lasting memories that may subserve vocal learning in songbirds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1088–1093 (2006). Electrophysiological demonstration of differential neuronal habituation to familiar and novel songs, correlated with the strength of song learning, that is consistent with earlier findings using expression of IEGs. · DOI · Paper page
  63. Eda-Fujiwara, H., Satoh, R., Bolhuis, J. J. & Kimura, T. Neuronal activation in female budgerigars is localized and related to male song complexity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 149–154 (2003). · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02414.x
  64. Sockman, K. W., Gentner, T. Q. & Ball, G. F. Recent experience modulates forebrain gene-expression in response to mate-choice cues in European starlings. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2479–2485 (2002). · DOI
  65. Bolhuis, J. J. & Eda-Fujiwara, H. Bird brains and songs: neural mechanisms of birdsong perception and memory. Anim. Biol. 53, 129–145 (2003). · DOI
  66. Miller, D. B. Long-term recognition of father's song by female zebra finches. Nature 280, 389–391 (1979). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Riebel, K. Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2553–2558 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  68. Riebel, K., Smallegange, I. M., Terpstra, N. J. & Bolhuis, J. J. Sexual equality in zebra finch song preference: evidence for a dissociation between song recognition and production learning. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 729–733 (2002). · DOI
  69. Riebel, K. Developmental influences on auditory perception in female zebra finches — is there a sensitive phase for song preference learning? Anim. Biol. 53, 73–87 (2003). · DOI
  70. Brenowitz, E. A. Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science 251, 303–304 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  71. Del Negro, C., Gahr, M., Leboucher, G. & Kreutzer, M. The selectivity of sexual responses to song displays: effects of partial chemical lesion of the HVC in female canaries. Behav. Brain Res. 96, 151–159 (1998). · DOI
  72. Halle, F., Gahr, M., Pieneman, A. W. & Kreutzer, M. Recovery of song preferences after excitotoxic HVC lesion in female canaries. J. Neurobiol. 52, 1–13 (2002). · doi:10.1002/neu.10058
  73. Del Negro, C., Kreutzer, M. & Gahr, M. Sexually stimulating signals of canary (Serinus canaria) songs: evidence for a female-specific auditory representation in the HVc nucleus during the breeding season. Behav. Neurosci. 114, 526–542 (2000). · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.114.3.526
  74. Leitner, S. & Catchpole, C. K. Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. J. Neurobiol. 52, 294–301 (2002). · DOI
  75. Hamilton, K. S., King, A. P., Sengelaub, D. R. & West, M. J. A brain of her own: a neural correlate of song assessment in a female songbird. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 68, 325–332 (1997). · DOI
  76. MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Hulse, S. H. & Ball, G. F. Neural bases of song preferences in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Neuroreport 9, 3047–3052 (1998). · DOI
  77. Duffy, D. L., Bentley, G. E. & Ball, G. F. Does sex or photoperiodic condition influence ZENK induction in response to song in European starlings? Brain Res. 844, 78–82 (1999). · DOI
  78. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Duffy, D. & Ball, G. F. Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. J. Neurobiol. 46, 48–58 (2001). · DOI
  79. Ribeiro, S., Cecchi, G. A., Magnasco, M. O. & Mello, C. V. Toward a song code: evidence for a syllabic representation in the canary brain. Neuron 21, 359–371 (1998). · DOI
  80. Bailey, D. J., Rosebush, J. C. & Wade, J. The hippocampus and caudomedial neostriatum show selective responsiveness to conspecific song in the female zebra finch. J. Neurobiol. 52, 43–51 (2002). · DOI
  81. Terpstra, N. J., Bolhuis, J. J., Riebel, K., van der Burg, J. M. M. & den Boer-Visser, A. M. Localised brain activation specific to auditory memory in a female songbird. J. Comp. Neurol. 494, 784–781 (2006). · DOI
  82. Maney, D. L., MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Ball, G. F. & Hahn, T. P. Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 667–674 (2002). · DOI
  83. Leitner, S., Voigt, C., Metzdorf, R. & Catchpole, C. K. Immediate early gene (ZENK, Arc) expression in the auditory forebrain of female canaries varies in response to male song quality. J. Neurobiol. 64, 275–284 (2005). · DOI
  84. Gentner, T. Q. & Margoliash, D. Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 424, 669–674 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  85. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H. & Ball, G. F. Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds. J. Comp. Physiol. A 190, 1001–1010 (2004). · DOI
  86. Jarvis, E. D. et al. Behaviourally driven gene expression reveals song nuclei in hummingbird brain. Nature 406, 628–632 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  87. Terpstra, N. J., Bolhuis, J. J., den Boer-Visser, A. M. & ten Cate, C. Neuronal activation related to auditory perception in the brain of a non-songbird, the ring dove. J. Comp. Neurol. 488, 342–351 (2005). · DOI
  88. Horn, G. Memory, Imprinting, and the Brain (Clarendon, Oxford, 1985). A detailed review of pioneering research into the neural mechanisms of learning and memory in filial imprinting in chicks, put into a wider perspective of brain mechanisms of memory. · DOI · Paper page
  89. Horn, G. Visual imprinting and the neural mechanisms of recognition memory. Trends Neurosci. 21, 300–305 (1998). · DOI
  90. Patterson, T. A. & Rose, S. P. R. Memory in the chick: multiple cues, distinct brain locations. Behav. Neurosci. 106, 465–470 (1992). · DOI
  91. Bolhuis, J. J., Johnson, M. H., Horn, G. & Bateson, P. Long-lasting effects of IMHV lesions on social preferences in domestic fowl. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 438–441 (1989). · DOI
  92. Wise, R. J. Language systems in normal and aphasic human subjects: functional imaging studies and inferences from animal studies. Br. Med. Bull. 65, 95–119 (2003). · DOI
  93. Kaas, J. H. & Hackett, T. A. 'What' and 'where' processing in auditory cortex. Nature Neurosci. 2, 1045–1047 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  94. Kaas, J. H. & Hackett, T. A. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11793–11799 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  95. Romanski, L. M. et al. Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature Neurosci. 2, 1131–1136 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  96. Wan, H. et al. Fos imaging reveals differential neuronal activation of areas of rat temporal cortex by novel and familiar sounds. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14, 118–124 (2001). · DOI
  97. Poremba, A. et al. Species-specific calls evoke asymmetric activity in the monkey's temporal poles. Nature 427, 448–451 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  98. Colombo, M., D'Amato, M. R., Rodman, H. R. & Gross, C. R. Auditory association cortex lesions impair auditory short-term memory in monkeys. Science 247, 336–338 (1990). · DOI
  99. Colombo, M., Rodman, H. R. & Gross, C. R. The effects of superior temporal cortex lesions on the processing and retention of auditory information in monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Neurosci. 16, 4501–4517 (1996). · DOI
  100. Fritz, J., Mishkin, M. & Saunders, R. C. In search of an auditory engram. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9359–9364 (2005). · DOI
  101. Price, C., Thierry, G. & Griffiths, T. Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it? Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 271–276 (2005). · DOI
  102. Fadiga, L. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 399–402 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  103. Scoville, W. B. & Milner, B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 20, 11–21 (1957). · DOI · Paper page
  104. Brown, M. W. in Brain, Perception, Memory: Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience (ed. Bolhuis, J. J.) 185–208 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000). · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524823.003.0013
  105. Buckley, M. J. & Gaffan, D. in Brain, Perception, Memory: Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience (ed. Bolhuis, J. J.) 279–298 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000). · DOI
  106. Sherry, D. F. & Vaccarino, A. L. Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 308–318 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
  107. Bolhuis, J. J., Stewart, C. A. & Forrest, E. M. Retrograde amnesia and memory reactivation in rats with ibotenate lesions to the hippocampus or subiculum. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 47B, 129–150 (1994).
  108. Murray, E. A. What have ablation studies told us about the neural substrates of stimulus memory? Semin. Neurosci. 8, 13–22 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  109. Corkin, S. et al. H. M.'s medial temporal lobe lesion: findings from magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 17, 3964–3979 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  110. Malkova, L. & Mishkin, M. One-trial memory for object-place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey. J. Neurosci. 23, 1956–1965 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  111. Knudsen, E. I., Zheng, W. & DeBello, W. M. Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11815–11820 (2000). · DOI
  112. Bailey, D. J. & Wade, J. Differential expression of the immediate early genes FOS and ZENK following auditory stimulation in the juvenile male and female zebra finch. Mol. Brain Res. 116, 147–154 (2003). · DOI
  113. Bailey, D. J. & Wade, J. FOS and ZENK responses in 45-day-old zebra finches vary with auditory stimulus and brain region, but not sex. Behav. Brain Res. 162, 108–115 (2005). · DOI
  114. Van Meir, V. et al. Spatiotemporal properties of the BOLD response in the songbirds' auditory circuit during a variety of listening tasks. Neuroimage 25, 1242–1255 (2005). · DOI
  115. Schregardus, D. S. et al. A lightweight telemetry system for recording neuronal activity in freely behaving small animals. J. Neurosci. Meth. (in the press, doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.028). · DOI
  116. Frankland, P. W., Bontempi, B., Talton, L. E., Kaczmarek, L. & Silva, A. J. The involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in remote contextual fear memory. Science 304, 881–883 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  117. Mooney, R. Synaptic mechanisms for auditory–vocal integration and the correction of vocal errors. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016, 476–494 (2004). · DOI
  118. Catchpole, C. K. & Slater, P. J. B. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  119. Marler, P. in Simpler Networks and Behavior (ed. Fentress, J.) 314–329 (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1976).
  120. Marler, P. & Peters, S. S. in The Comparative Psychology of Audition: Perceiving Complex Sounds (eds Hulse, S. & Dooling, R.) 243–273 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989).
  121. Clayton, D. F. in Brain, Perception, Memory: Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience (ed. Bolhuis, J. J.) 113–125 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000). · DOI
  122. Bottjer, S. W., Miesner, E. A. & Arnold, A. P. Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science 224, 901–903 (1984). · DOI · Paper page
  123. Akutagawa, E. & Konishi, M. Two separate areas of the brain differentially guide the development of a song control nucleus in the zebra finch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12413–12417 (1994). · DOI
  124. Kittelberger, J. M. & Mooney, R. Lesions of an avian forebrain nucleus that disrupt song development alter synaptic connectivity and transmission in the vocal premotor pathway. J. Neurosci. 19, 9385–9398 (1999). · DOI
  125. Goldman, S. A. & Nottebohm, F. Neuronal production, migration, and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult female canary brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 2390–2394 (1983). · DOI · Paper page
  126. Brenowitz, E. A., Nalls, B., Wingfield, J. & Kroodsma, D. Seasonal changes in avian song nuclei without seasonal changes in song repertoire. J. Neurosci. 11, 1367–1374 (1991). A clear demonstration that seasonal changes in the volume of song system nuclei are not related to song learning. · DOI
  127. Gahr, M., Leitner, S., Fusani, L. & Rybak, F. in Progress in Brain Research Vol. 138 (eds Hofman, M. A. et al.) 233–254 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2002).
  128. Gahr, M. Neural song control system of hummingbirds: comparison to swifts, vocal learning (songbirds) and nonlearning (suboscines) passerines, and vocal learning (budgerigars) and nonlearning (dove, owl, gull, quail, chicken) nonpasserines. J. Comp. Neurol. 426, 182–192 (2000). · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20001016)426:2<182::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-m

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Bolhuis, J. J., & Gahr, M.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
347-357
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
DOI
10.1038/nrn1904
OpenAlex
W2026234065
Cited by
374
References
13
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrn1904
The paper
Bolhuis, J. J., & Gahr, M. (2006). Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.