Cited by 47Muscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and Training

Chocolate milk for recovery from exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials

Amiri, Mojgan, Ghiasvand, Reza, Kaviani, Mojtaba, Forbes, Scott C., Salehi-Abargouei, Amin·2019·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives Chocolate milk (CM) contains carbohydrates, proteins, and fat, as well as water and electrolytes, which may be ideal for post-exercise recovery. We systematically reviewed the evidence regarding the efficacy of CM compared to either water or other "sport drinks" on post-exercise recovery markers.Subjects/methods PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar were explored up to April 2017 for controlled trials investigating the effect of CM on markers of recovery in trained athletes.Results Twelve studies were included in the systematic review (2, 9, and 1 with high, fair and low quality, respectively) and 11 had extractable data on at least one performance/recovery marker [7 on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), 6 on time to exhaustion (TTE) and heart rate (HR), 4 on serum lactate, and serum creatine kinase (CK)]. The meta-analyses revealed that CM consumption had no effect on TTE, RPE, HR, serum lactate, and CK (P > 0.05) compared to placebo or other sport drinks. Subgroup analysis revealed that TTE significantly increases after consumption of CM compared to placebo [mean difference (MD) = 0.78 min, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 1.29, P = 0.003] and carbohydrate, protein, and fat-containing beverages (MD = 6.13 min, 95% CI: 0.11, 12.15, P = 0.046). Furthermore, a significant attenuation on serum lactate was observed when CM was compared with placebo (MD = -1.2 mmol/L, 95% CI: -2.06,-0.34, P = 0.006).Conclusion CM provides either similar or superior results when compared to placebo or other recovery drinks. Overall, the evidence is limited and high-quality clinical trials with more well-controlled methodology and larger sample sizes are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-018-0187-x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amiri, M., Ghiasvand, R., Kaviani, M., Forbes, S. C., & Salehi-Abargouei, A.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Acadia University (CA)
  • Brandon University (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2018-06-19
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
835-849
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2808874951
Cited by
47
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
chocolate milk, post-exercise recovery, sports drinks, time to exhaustion, rating of perceived exertion, serum lactate, creatine kinase, trained athletes, fluid replacement
MeSH terms
Chocolate, Animals, Beverages, Humans, Milk, Physical Endurance, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review