The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 57 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust
Open accessAbstract
In an influential paper, Kosfeld et al. (2005) showed that intranasal administration of oxytocin (OT) increases the transfers made by investors in the trust game-suggesting that OT increases trust in strangers. Subsequent studies investigating the role of OT in the trust game found inconclusive effects on the trusting behaviour of investors but these studies deviated from the Kosfeld et al. study in an important way-they did not implement minimal social contact (MSC) between the investors and the trustees in the trust game. Here, we performed a large double-blind and placebo-controlled replication study of the effects of OT on trusting behaviour that yields a power of more than 95% and implements an MSC condition as well as a no-social-contact (NoC) condition. We find no effect of OT on trusting behaviour in the MSC condition. Exploratory post hoc analyses suggest that OT may increase trust in individuals with a low disposition to trust in the NoC condition, but this finding requires confirmation in future research. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 19 October 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11980368.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This registered replication protocol proposes a large, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2×2 experiment (oxytocin vs. placebo × minimal social contact vs. no contact) to test whether intranasal oxytocin increases trust in the trust game, and whether minimal social contact moderates that effect. No results are reported; the paper presents the rationale, design, hypotheses, and a priori power analysis.
Key findings
- The paper reports no empirical results; it states three a priori hypotheses: H1, OT has a positive influence on trust in the minimal social contact (MSC) condition (β1 + β3 > 0), replicating Kosfeld et al.; H2, the OT effect on trust is larger in MSC than in no contact (NoC) (β3 > 0); H3, under placebo, trust is higher in MSC than NoC (β2 > 0).
- Planned sample of n = 704 (352 in Antwerp, 352 in Magdeburg) is stated to provide statistical power of more than 95% for all main hypotheses, and 99.65% based on the Kosfeld et al. effect size d = 0.514; a Simonsohn "small telescopes" robustness check indicates n = 488 already yields an adequate replication.
- The authors cite prior evidence that intranasal OT significantly increased coordination on a mutually beneficial strategy only when participants first introduced themselves to the group (N = 254 study), while without prior contact OT significantly reduced coordination.
- The paper notes that of six studies in Nave et al.'s meta-analysis (besides Kosfeld et al.), four used fictional partners, one had no human contact, and one was likely confounded by a preceding dictator game.
Methods
- Design: 2×2 between-subjects factorial (OT/placebo × minimal social contact/no contact), double-blind, with randomization stratified on social value orientation (SVO) measured two weeks prior; participants self-administer 24 IU OT or placebo and wait 50 minutes before the trust game.
- Sample: 704 male students aged 18–25 recruited at two sites; exclusion criteria include psychiatric disorders, nasal surgery or severe NOSE scores, VAS nasal obstruction ≥ 8, non-compliance with spray administration, and failure to solve trust game payoff examples.
- Trust game and analysis: investors receive a 12 euro endowment and can send 0, 4, 8, or 12 euros to a trustee (tripled by the experimenter); each participant plays twice (once as investor, once as trustee). Main analysis is OLS regression with generalized trust and risk attitude as covariates, with Bayesian hypothesis testing (Bayes Factor R package, JZS/Cauchy prior r = 0.354) if results are non-significant.
Limitations
- Stated by the paper: the design "does not allow us to make broad conclusions about the general effects of OT on social cognition, empathy or behavior in other experimental paradigms."
- Stated by the paper: the original Kosfeld et al. effect may be overstated due to publication bias and other reasons, which motivated the "small telescopes" robustness check.
- Evident from the text: this is a preregistration/protocol with no data or outcomes reported, so no effect of OT on trust is yet established; the male-only sample (chosen to replicate Kosfeld et al. and avoid sex-specific variation) limits generalizability to females.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 Not checked yet · 19 Own method · 8 No basis given · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own result · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
In the paper
“Finally, in pilot studies (see Supplementary Table 3a) conducted to develop an appropriate minimal social contact condition that avoids ceiling effects, we noted that the gender composition of the social group had a significant impact on subsequent trusting behavior (Supplementary Table 3b).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Supplementary Table 3b
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, pilot studies conducted during the time span December 2017-March 2018 revealed very similar trusting behaviors between the two locations (Supplementary Table 3a and Supplementary Figure 2).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Hypothesis testing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The above table shows that in several of the first 6 sessions there were substantial gender differences in trust.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
plaincorrelationaln = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This led to very high trust levels.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
plaindirectn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While subsequent studies investigating the role of OT in the trust game found inconclusive effects on the trusting behavior of investors, they deviated from the Kosfeld et al. study in an important way as they did not implement a minimal social contact between the investors and the trustees in the trust game.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sample generates a power of more than 95% to detect a true effect of OT on trusting behavior in the trust game.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, the mounting popularity of studying OT in the social sciences is currently associated with waves of criticism, because papers often have suffered from small sample size, low statistical power, inflated effect sizes, inconsistent experimental procedures , and publication bias 18,19 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] Walum, H., Waldman, I. D. & Young, L. J. Statistical and methodological considerations for the interpretation of intranasal oxytocin studies. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 251–257 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [19] Lane, A., Luminet, O., Nave, G. & Mikolajczak, M. Is there a publication bias in behavioural intranasal oxytocin research on humans? Opening the file drawer of one Laboratory. J. Neuroendocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12384 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While subsequent studies investigating the role of OT in the trust game found inconclusive effects on the trusting behavior of investors, they deviated from the Kosfeld et al. study in an important way as they did not implement a minimal social contact between the investors and the trustees in the trust game.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Comparing a placebo and an OT group in a trust experiment with minimal social contact corresponded to an effect size d = 0.514 (r = 0.249 in a common effect size language).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Without this prior contact, OT significantly reduced coordination on the alternative strategy.31”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Kiyonari, T. Oxytocin and cooperation under conditions of uncertainty: the modulating role of incentives and social information. Horm. Behav. 57, 368–374 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 37
- It may state two separate claims as one. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A current leading theory to account for why OT can stimulate both prosocial and anti-social behaviors rests on neurological evidence that OT modulates mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons, thereby affecting both incentive motivation as well as attention re-orienting.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Parizel, P. M. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav. 94, 145–152 (2017). source
- Partly supportedcites [35] Love, T. M. Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 119, 49–60 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Final Comment (page not specified) proposes that oxytocin’s interaction with mesocorticolimbic dopamine circuits may alter motivational salience and value, potentially increasing attention to social stimuli and shifting behavior. The Introduction also links oxytocin to both positive and negative social behavior. But the paper calls this “another possibility,” not a leading theory, and presents the proposed mechanism more cautiously than the citing sentence does. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked yetcites [36] Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G. & Abu‐Akel, A. The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 194–202 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies were, however, not direct replications, i. e., they did not use the same methods and procedures as the original study.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Money transfers in the trust game indicate that investors are willing to tolerate a certain level of uncertainty.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The Kosfeld et al. study 8 already suggested this: OT increased trusting decisions in the trust game, but did not augment risk-taking in an identically framed risk game played against a computer.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435, 673–676 (2005). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In humans, OT is mostly known for its functions in childbirth and breastfeeding, but it can also alleviate social stress, for example, by lowering salivary cortisol levels 4 , increasing parasympathetic control of the heart 5 , and attenuating amygdala activation in response to seeing faces 6,7 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C. & Ehlert, U. Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 1389–1398 (2003). source
- Not checked yetcites [5] Norman, G. J. et al. Oxytocin increases autonomic cardiac control: moderation by loneliness. Biol. Psychol. 86, 174–180 (2011). source
- Not checked yetcites [6] Kirsch, P. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J. Neurosci. 25, 11489–11493 (2005). source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Parizel, P. M. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav. 94, 145–152 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This question has sparked more than a decade of research ever since the first report that administering a single dose of intranasal OT (compared to placebo) increases the willingness to trust in a dyadic economic game with real monetary stakes 8 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435, 673–676 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Other critics have pointed out that there is no overarching theory to explain the diverse findings resulting from intranasal OT administration 20 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Churchland, P. S. & Winkielman, P. Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: how does it work? What does it mean? Horm. Behav. 61, 392–399 (2012). source
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because animal research has documented that OT is primarily a social bonding hormone that activates socio-emotional neural pathways in the brain 22,23 , we would also expect the effect of OT in humans to be limited to social situations where initiating or establishing partnership is important to realize synergy.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the worry that another person may not reciprocate appears to influence transfers beyond the perceived riskiness of the game 9,10 , i.e., it is not just the risk of losing money but the fear of being cheated (i.e., betrayal aversion) that inhibits the investors' trust.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B. & Zeckhauser, R. Betrayal aversion: evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 294–310 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Fehr, E. On the economics and biology of trust. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7, 235–266 (2009). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“More specifically, Nave and colleagues 21 have raised doubt on the robustness of the oxytocin-trust association, pointing out that six studies failed to replicate the initial findings reported by Kosfeld et al. 8 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Nave, G., Camerer, C. & McCullough, M. Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10, 772–789 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Because animal research has documented that OT is primarily a social bonding hormone that activates socio-emotional neural pathways in the brain 22,23 , we would also expect the effect of OT in humans to be limited to social situations where initiating or establishing partnership is important to realize synergy.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Ross, H. E. & Young, L. J. Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 30, 534–547 (2009). source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Young, L. J. & Wang, Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1048–1054 (2004). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To learn more about the biological basis of trust, researchers have investigated the potential causal link with the hormone oxytocin (OT), a neuropeptide with a central role in regulating social approach and attachment behaviors in many non-human mammals [1][2][3] .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1][2][3]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In an influential paper, Kosfeld et al. (2005) showed that intranasal administration of Oxytocin (OT) increases the transfers made by investors in the trust game -suggesting that OT increases trust in strangers.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. (2005) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We propose that minimal social contact is the cue that enhances the prosocial approach potential of OT and reduces social apprehension, thereby enhancing trust in an environment where approach behavior is a precondition for a mutually advantageous exchange.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To bolster their results, Kosfeld et al. 8 assessed the global difference between all four experimental groups under consideration (trust/Placebo, trust/OT, risk/Placebo, and risk/OT) to ensure a family-wise error of α = 5%.The reported findings correspond to an η² = 0.071 (r = 0.267).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the enormous resonance of the Kosfeld 8 et al. study, the minimal social contact feature of the study has often been overlooked or neglected.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To enhance the saliency of the social context, participants in the trust game had some minimal social (faceto-face) contact with each other in groups prior to playing the game against someone whose exact identity would not be revealed.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our study will overcome these drawbacks because we will recruit a large sample that will enable us to use OLS regression techniques.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“By boosting the dopaminergic signal in the mesolimbic network, OT is thought to enhance the salience of social cues that emphasize the value of approach behavior 7,35,36 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Parizel, P. M. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav. 94, 145–152 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [35] Love, T. M. Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 119, 49–60 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G. & Abu‐Akel, A. The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 194–202 (2016). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, the social contact had to be minimal to avoid elevating trust to a level beyond which no further increase could reasonably be expected after OT administration.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“It turned out that intranasal OT significantly increased coordination on the mutually beneficial alternative strategy, but only if participants first had the opportunity to introduce themselves to the whole group of participants from which one was randomly drawn to become the partner.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Kiyonari, T. Oxytocin and cooperation under conditions of uncertainty: the modulating role of incentives and social information. Horm. Behav. 57, 368–374 (2010). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(ii) Social contact was not intense enough to cause strong feelings of social familiarity, as this might also generate a ceiling effect in trust.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Since the publication of this study, increasing evidence suggests that OT's function is not always consistent with facilitating social approach, but that administering intranasal OT can also lead to parochial, competitive, and envious behaviors and behaviors that appear to be driven by schadenfreude 16,17,32 , which have an anti-social dimension.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] De Dreu, C. K. W. Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: an integrative review and research agenda. Horm. Behav. 61, 419–428 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [17] De Dreu, C. K. W. & Kret, M. E. Oxytocin conditions intergroup relations through upregulated in group empathy, cooperation, conformity, and defense. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 165–173 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. et al. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). Biol. Psychiatry 66, 864–870 (2009). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Note, however, that the tests described in (ii) and (iii) in the Kosfeld study 8 are about comparisons between a trust and a risk game, which differ substantially from the current design which does not have a risk game (i.e., a game played against a computer).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld study 8
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We base our a priori power analysis on the effect size d = 0.514, reported in test (i) of Kosfeld et al. 8 and the requirement of a one-tailed test, which is justified when testing a directional 38 hypothesis.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
- Not checked yetcites [38] Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612 (1992). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to the a priori power analysis presented in detail below and the robustness check reported in Supplementary Information 1 and 2, a sample size of n = 704 will provide a statistical power of more than 95% for all main hypotheses and also exceeds the sample size recommendations of Nave et al.21 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nave et al.21 Nave, G., Camerer, C. & McCullough, M. Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10, 772–789 (2015). source
plainn = 704- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of the six studies that entered the meta-analysis in Nave et al.21 -in addition to the Kosfeld 8 et al. study -four studies had fictional partners [25][26][27][28] , one was completely devoid of human contact with other participants 29 , and participants' previous experience in a dictator game was likely to confound the decision to trust in the sixth study 30 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25][26][27][28]
- Not checked yetcites [29] Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron 58, 639–650 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Barraza, J. A. The physiology of empathy: linking oxytocin to empathic responding. Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. B Sci. Eng. 71, 4537 (2011).
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kosfeld et al. 8 were forced to use non-parametric tests in their study because their sample did not comply with assumptions made in parametric tests.Specifically, the smallest sample size in testing (i)-(iii) was n=29.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
plainn = 29- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed study will be carried out with the approval of the Medical Ethics Commissions of the Universities of Antwerp and Magdeburg.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We deliberately collect information about these behaviors immediately after the experiment (i.e., after participants have been paid) so that they have no incentive to lie.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adding these two covariates will also reduce the standard errors in our treatment estimates -thus allowing sharper estimates -and correct for potential imbalances in the samples that occur through imperfect randomization.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Hypothesis testing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This stratification ensures that the distribution of individuals' SVOs will be the same in each treatment condition.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A final criterion is participants' understanding of the trust game instructions.We will check this by letting them compute the monetary payoffs for both players in two hypothetical examples of the trust game.Both examples need to be solved correctly to be included in the data analyses.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Measuring trust with a single decision (rather than averaging several consecutive decisions) has the advantage that it prevents hedge betting and may thus encourage intuitive thinking, which is the decision making type OT is most likely to influence, 7,47 rather than complicated deliberation.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Parizel, P. M. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav. 94, 145–152 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [47] MacDonald, K. S. Sex, receptors, and attachment: a review of individual factors influencing response to oxytocin. Front. Neurosci. 6, 194 (2013). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total sample size 244 Actual Power 0.802”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Analysis -Step 1
plainn = 122- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“SVO is a relatively stable personality feature describing a person's intrinsic willingness to behave prosocially 48 , that has been found to predict trusting decisions 49 and sensitivity to social cues 50 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Van Zijl., F. V. W., Timman, R. & Datema, F. R. Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolary. 274, 2469–2476 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Lipan, M. J. & Most, S. P. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast. Surg. 15, 358–361 (2013). source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Teixeira, R. U. F., Zappelini, C. E. M., Oliveira, L. G., Basile, L. C. G. & Costa, E. A. Correlation between the peak nasal inspiratory flow and the visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after using a nasal decongestant. Int. Arch. Otorhinolary. 15, 156–162 (2011).
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such inter-individual differences might introduce excessive noise in the data which could obscure the results.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four treatment conditions (no contact/Placebo, no contact/OT, minimal social contact/Placebo, minimal social contact/OT) but randomization will be stratified based on participants' social value orientation (SVO) which will be measured during registration two weeks prior to the experiment with an online survey.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Effect size d 0.320”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Analysis -Step 1
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 3
plainn = 29- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To guarantee anonymity, their names will from then on be replaced by a self-made, retrievable code through which they can be identified during the remainder of the study.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Experimental procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“OT/placebo administration will be double blind following a randomized block design (with a block corresponding to a session).”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We do not plan to include social value orientation 48 as a covariate because we control for SVO via stratified randomization.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Hypothesis testing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“First, the main motivation for the study is to replicate the Kosfeld et al. 8 study, which was conducted only with males.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kosfeld et al. 8
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent study investigating the dose dependency of oxytocin reports that a dose of 24 IU OT is more effective in triggering an amygdala response and eliciting fear reduction compared to either lower (12 IU) or higher (48 IU) doses 51 , although this contradicts an earlier study in which 8 IU was found to be the most effective 52 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Spray administration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Hsu, H. C. et al. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study. Clin. Otolaryngol. 42, 53–59 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If participants are rated as non-compliant with the rules for self-administration (category 5) or the self-administration is judged as problematic by the supervisor (category 4) the participant is ruled out from data analysis.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Spray administration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Second, we know from the previous literature that sex-specific gonadal steroids influence OT-receptor binding in the brain, and that intranasal oxytocin can affect the behavior of males and females differently, even in opposite directions 40 .”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Exclusion criteria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. & McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10, 122–142 (1995). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The latter study, however, made use of a Breath Powered device for OT administration which is likely to have increased absorption significantly.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Spray administration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Ten Velden, F. S., Daughters, K. & De Dreu, C. K. W. Oxytocin promotes intuitive rather than deliberated cooperation with the in‐group. Horm. Behav. 92, 164–171 (2017). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trust and risk measures will serve as control variables when testing the primary (a priori) hypotheses (described in the next section), while the other variables will serve as moderators in further exploratory analyses.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Experimental procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, this questionnaire will query participants' beliefs regarding the treatment they received (OT versus placebo) which allows us to test the possibility of a placeboeffect.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Experimental procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Actual power 0.951”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites G*Power 3.1.9.2 28
plainn = 83- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sessions 6-11, participants were guided immediately to their cubicles upon arrival.This minimizes the contact with other participants before the experiment and increases our control over subjects social contacts.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This complete lack of verbal interaction caused a strange and akward situation that was associated with reduced investments.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
plaincorrelationaln = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, a number of questions assess participants' feelings of connectedness with others, which can be used to test if the minimal social contact and no contact condition differed in this respect.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Experimental procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They will also fill out the MDMS questionnaire for a second time.This will enable us to check for mood changes following nasal spray administration.”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Experimental procedures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
OT's effect on trust does not differ between participants from Magdeburg and Antwerp.
“We pool the data obtained in Magdeburg and Antwerp because there is no a priori reason to expect that OT would affect individuals from these two locations differently.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“recent studies have highlighted the potential of intranasally administered oxytocin to increase interpersonal trust behavior in participants with a low disposition to trust.[ 46 , 47 ]”
From Loneliness and the Social Brain: How Perceived Social Isolation Impairs Human Interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [47]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Generally, effect sizes of studies using intranasal oxytocin seem to be smaller than initially assumed99, a finding that is also reflected in unsuccessful attempts to replicate earlier findings of oxytocin effects on trust100,101 and mind-reading in healthy populations102.”
From Randomized clinical trial shows no substantial modulation of empathy-related neural activation by intranasal oxytocin in autism (2021) · cites this paper as [101]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Study sample and determination of sample size
“with α = .05,β = .95,and a one-tailed ttest”
§ A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust > Additional information
“Power (1-β error prob) | 0.95”
Citations
Cites
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
Fischbacher, U. (2007) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 · Cited by 9,524
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690
Self-citationNew Effect Size Rules of Thumb
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009) · Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods · doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 · Cited by 3,254
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00465-7 · Cited by 2,091
Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Domes, G., Kirsch, P., & Heinrichs, M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3044 · Cited by 1,688
Oxytocin Modulates Neural Circuitry for Social Cognition and Fear in Humans
Kirsch, P., Esslinger, C., Chen, Q., Mier, D., Lis, S., Siddhanti, S., Gruppe, H., Mattay, V. S., Gallhofer, B., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3984-05.2005 · Cited by 1,639
Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002 · Cited by 1,581
The neurobiology of pair bonding.
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1327 · Cited by 1,523
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Barraza, J. A. The physiology of empathy: linking oxytocin to empathic responding. Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. B Sci. Eng. 71, 4537 (2011).
- Teixeira, R. U. F., Zappelini, C. E. M., Oliveira, L. G., Basile, L. C. G. & Costa, E. A. Correlation between the peak nasal inspiratory flow and the visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after using a nasal decongestant. Int. Arch. Otorhinolary. 15, 156–162 (2011).
- Jeffreys, H. The Theory of Probability (Oxford Univ. Press, 1961).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–140 of 140
Paul, S., Verma, J., & Mehan, S. (2026) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/j.npep.2026.102597 · Cited by 1
Multilevel dynamics of the brain, hormones, mind, and behavior in social human-robot interaction
Topoglu, Y., Krüeger, F., Joshi, S., Rothstein, N. J., Franke, A. A., Li, X., Gratch, J. S., de Visser, E. J., & Ayaz, H. (2026) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aec1762 · Cited by 1
Shou, Q., Nishina, K., & Takagishi, H. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.020 · Cited by 1
Mueller, C., Spindler, M., Caspers, S., & Hurlemann, R. (2021) · Masterclass in neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86630-3_2 · Cited by 1
Theoretical and Practical Neuroscience Tools for Neurosurgery
Beffara, B., Veyrie, M., Desmurget, M., Mottolèse, C., Szathmári, A., Rocco, F. D., Cristofori, I., & Beuriat, P.-A. (2025) · Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90762-3_11 · Cited by 1
Oxytocin increases trust in humans with a low disposition to trustPreprint
Vogt, B., Bengart, P., Declerck, C., & Fehr, E. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.01.679711 · Cited by 1
Self-citationKoppel, L. (2020) · Linköping University medical dissertations · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-171082
Sullivan, G. A. (2021) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
Neuropathological Level of Trust
Krüeger, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.021
Brudner, E. G., Karousatos, A. J., Fareri, D. S., & Delgado, M. R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.010 · Cited by 4
Neuropsychological Level of Trust
(2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.007
Krüeger, F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770880.017
Neuromodulatorische Einflüsse auf das Wohlbefinden: Dopamin und Oxytocin
Kirsch, P., & Ditzen, B. (2022) · Psychotherapie: Praxis · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63821-7_4
Investigation of whether oxytocin and trust play a role in placebo effects of marketing actionsPreprint
Schelski, D. S., Scheele, D., Schmidt, L., Hurlemann, R., Weber, B., & Plaßmann, H. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.01.518177
Die Rolle des Oxytocinsystems für die Entstehung der Depression
Sanwald, S., Kammer, T., Montag, C., & Kiefer, M. (2023) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/a-1986-5990
Does oxytocin enhance pro-social behaviors?
Espinosa, R. (2023) · Peer Community In Registered Reports · doi:10.24072/pci.rr.100344
Neuroendocrinology of Human Cooperation and Parental Care
Rilling, J. K. (2024) · Masterclass in neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51112-7_3
Ethical Issues Regarding (Neuro-)Enhancement
Schöne-Seifert, B., Stier, M., & Talbot, D. (2025) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-2274-0_37
Social Behavior: Rituals and Social Bonding
Charles, S. J., & van Mulukom, V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_1176-1
Li, Z., Xu, M., Huang, S., & Yang, A. (2025) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105819
The methods and value of measuring choice processes in economics experiments
Brocas, I., Camerer, C., Carrillo, J. D., & Krajbich, I. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/bs.hbem.2025.09.007
How factors of the therapeutic alliance interact with oxytocin neurotransmission in psychotherapy
Eckert, M., & Schandro, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1659841
Gillath, O., & Vrtička, P. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009381949.016 · Cited by 1
Espinosa, R. (2025) · Peer Community In Registered Reports · doi:10.24072/pci.rr.101136.rev12
Kroll, C., Schruers, K. R. J., Viechtbauer, W., Vingerhoets, C., Seidel, L., Riedl, A. M., & Hernaus, D. (2026) · Peer Community In Registered Reports · doi:10.24072/pci.rr.101136.ar1
Espinosa, R. (2026) · Peer Community In Registered Reports · doi:10.24072/pci.rr.101136
Espinosa, R. (2025) · Peer Community In Registered Reports · doi:10.24072/pci.rr.101136.rev11
Rewiring connection: The role of oxytocin in interactive media behavior
Marciano, L., Kubzansky, L. D., Montag, C., Bickham, D. S., Rich, M., & Becker, B. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106625 · Cited by 1
Kroll, C., Leibold, N. K., Vingerhoets, C., Kenis, G., van den Hove, D., Riedl, A. M., Schruers, K. R. J., & Hernaus, D. (2026) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107815
Guillou, L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ae82c1b9z888cz4296za25bz952248b9ad8b
Music and trust formation: a scoping review of neurobiological convergence and research priorities
Guanque, C., Huang, S., Wang, X., Lei, X., Zhai, K., Han, C., & Krüeger, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1731470
Deilhaug, E., Moerkerke, M., Sartorius, A. M., Kang, H., Kildal, E. S.-M., Walle, K. M., Elvsåshagen, T., Westlye, L. T., Nærland, T., Andreassen, O. A., et al. (2026) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70334
Winters, C., Gorssen, W., Ulbrich, S. E., & Goumon, S. (2026) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107950
de Courten, B., & Wallace, R. K. (2026) · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000484
Oxytocin increases trust in men low in dispositional trust
Vogt, B., Bengart, P., Declerck, C. H., & Fehr, E. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2602655123
Self-citationNiazi, S. K. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16080847
Jurek, B., Winter, J. J., & Quintana, D. S. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1938379
Bayat, D., Pour, F. Z. S., Wu, Y., & Krüeger, F. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.107026
Roles of hormones in social interactions
Votinov, M. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34080-2.00002-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., Pauwels, L., Vogt, B., & Fehr, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Fehr, Ernst
- Venue
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Published
- 2020-06-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 646-655
- ISSN
- 2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3033625555
- Semantic Scholar
- e8679506f7797f30e9aec3b00d06145627bbb626
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 23.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- Universität Zürich
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Keywords
- oxytocin, trust, trust game, intranasal administration, social contact, disposition to trust
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Reproducibility of Results, Trust, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review