Cited by 295Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Nutritional preferences of human gut bacteria reveal their metabolic idiosyncrasies

Tramontano, Melanie, Andrejev, Sergej, Pruteanu, Mihaela, Klünemann, Martina, Kuhn, Michael, Galardini, Marco, Jouhten, Paula, Zelezniak, Aleksej +4 more·2018·Nature Microbiology

Abstract

Bacterial metabolism plays a fundamental role in gut microbiota ecology and host-microbiome interactions. Yet the metabolic capabilities of most gut bacteria have remained unknown. Here we report growth characteristics of 96 phylogenetically diverse gut bacterial strains across 4 rich and 15 defined media. The vast majority of strains (76) grow in at least one defined medium, enabling accurate assessment of their biosynthetic capabilities. These do not necessarily match phylogenetic similarity, thus indicating a complex evolution of nutritional preferences. We identify mucin utilizers and species inhibited by amino acids and short-chain fatty acids. Our analysis also uncovers media for in vitro studies wherein growth capacity correlates well with in vivo abundance. Further value of the underlying resource is demonstrated by correcting pathway gaps in available genome-scale metabolic models of gut microorganisms. Together, the media resource and the extracted knowledge on growth abilities widen experimental and computational access to the gut microbiota.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41564-018-0123-9

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tramontano, M., Andrejev, S., Pruteanu, M., Klünemann, M., Kuhn, M., Galardini, M., Jouhten, P., Zelezniak, A., Zeller, G., Bork, P., Typas, A., & Patil, K. R.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Typas, Athanasios
  • Patil, Kiran Raosaheb
Venue
Nature Microbiology
Published
2018-03-19
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
514-522
ISSN
2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791571994
Cited by
295
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
gut microbiota, bacterial growth characteristics, nutritional preferences, chemically defined medium, mucin utilization, amino acid inhibition, short-chain fatty acids, host-microbiome interactions, genome-scale metabolic models, bacterial metabolism
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Amino Acids, Bacteria, Culture Media, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Humans, Mucins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review