Cited by 272Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 258 of the 258 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular and epigenetic drivers of stem cell ageing

Ermolaeva, Maria, Neri, Francesco, Ori, Alessandro, Rudolph, K. Lenhard·2018·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

Adult tissue stem cells have a pivotal role in tissue maintenance and regeneration throughout the lifespan of multicellular organisms. Loss of tissue homeostasis during post-reproductive lifespan is caused, at least in part, by a decline in stem cell function and is associated with an increased incidence of diseases. Hallmarks of ageing include the accumulation of molecular damage, failure of quality control systems, metabolic changes and alterations in epigenome stability. In this Review, we discuss recent evidence in support of a novel concept whereby cell-intrinsic damage that accumulates during ageing and cell-extrinsic changes in ageing stem cell niches and the blood result in modifications of the stem cell epigenome. These cumulative epigenetic alterations in stem cells might be the cause of the deregulation of developmental pathways seen during ageing. In turn, they could confer a selective advantage to mutant and epigenetically drifted stem cells with altered self-renewal and functions, which contribute to the development of ageing-associated organ dysfunction and disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-018-0020-3

Cites

258 of 258 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 258 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Ermolaeva, M., Neri, F., Ori, A., & Rudolph, K. L.
Affiliations
Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Ermolaeva, Maria
  • Neri, Francesco
  • Rudolph, K. Lenhard
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
594-610
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W2805636495
Cited by
272
References
258
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
stem cell aging, epigenetic drift, stem cell niche, tissue homeostasis, age-related diseases, stem cell self-renewal, organ dysfunction
MeSH terms
Animals, Homeostasis, Humans, Stem Cells, Cellular Senescence, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review