Cited by 700Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Astrogliosis

Open access
Sofroniew, Michael V.·2015·Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Abstract

In addition to their many functions in the healthy central nervous system (CNS), astrocytes respond to CNS damage and disease through a process called astrogliosis. For many decades, astrogliosis was sparsely studied and enigmatic. This article examines recent evidence supporting a definition of astrogliosis as a spectrum of heterogeneous potential changes in astrocytes that occur in a context-specific manner as determined by diverse signaling events that vary with the nature and severity of different CNS insults. Astrogliosis is associated with essential beneficial functions, but under specific circumstances can lead to harmful effects. Potential dysfunctions of astrocytes and astrogliosis are being identified that can contribute to, or be primary causes of, CNS disorders, leading to the notion of astrocytopathies. A conceptual framework is presented that allows consideration of normally occurring and dysfunctional astrogliosis and their different roles in CNS disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/cshperspect.a020420

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 109 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sofroniew, M. V.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sofroniew, Michael V.
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
Published
2014-11-07
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
a020420
ISSN
1943-0264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4239346618
Cited by
695
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
astrocyte activation, astrocytes, astrocytopathy, central nervous system injury, central nervous system disorders, astrocyte dysfunction
MeSH terms
Astrocytes, Cell Communication, Cell Movement, Central Nervous System, Central Nervous System Diseases, Cicatrix, Models, Biological, Mutation, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review