Cited by 501Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

MAFG-driven astrocytes promote CNS inflammation

Open access
Wheeler, Michael A., Clark, Iain C., Tjon, Emily C., Li, Zhaorong, Zandee, Stephanie E. J., Couturier, Charles P., Watson, Brianna R., Scalisi, Giulia +14 more·2020·Nature

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS 1. Astrocytes contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis 2, but little is known about the heterogeneity of astrocytes and its regulation. Here we report the analysis of astrocytes in multiple sclerosis and its preclinical model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) by single-cell RNA sequencing in combination with cell-specific Ribotag RNA profiling, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (ATAC-seq), chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing (ChIP-seq), genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and in vivo CRISPR-Cas9-based genetic perturbations. We identified astrocytes in EAE and multiple sclerosis that were characterized by decreased expression of NRF2 and increased expression of MAFG, which cooperates with MAT2α to promote DNA methylation and represses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory transcriptional programs. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signalling in astrocytes drives the expression of MAFG and MAT2α and pro-inflammatory transcriptional modules, contributing to CNS pathology in EAE and, potentially, multiple sclerosis. Our results identify candidate therapeutic targets in multiple sclerosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-1999-0

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ScRNAseq and snRNAseq are becoming established as valuable tools to gain insight into basal and reactive-astrocyte heterogeneity.

    “ScRNAseq and snRNAseq are becoming established as valuable tools to gain insight into basal94 and reactive-astrocyte heterogeneity (Fig. 1e)40,78,95.”

    From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

    The ‘scRNA-seq analysis of astrocytes in EAE’ section reports that scRNA-seq identified several astrocyte subpopulations during CNS inflammation, supporting its value for studying reactive-astrocyte heterogeneity. The cited paper does not establish the corresponding point for snRNA-seq. The sentence cites a different source for basal heterogeneity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Single-cell and single-nucleus RNAseq studies in mouse models and human brains of chronic neurodegenerative diseases have unraveled numerous stage-dependent transcriptomic states in HD, AD, and MS that do not clearly comply with A1-A2 profiles.

    “For example, single-cell and single-nucleus RNAseq (scRNAseq and snRNAseq, respectively) studies in mouse models and human brains of chronic neurodegenerative diseases have unraveled numerous stage-dependent transcriptomic states in HD74, AD75,78, and MS40 that do not clearly comply with A1–A2 profiles.”

    From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classical knockout-, knockdown-, or CRISPR-based approaches to inactivate gene expression are available to gain insight into the impact on disease of a given pathway within previously identified astrocyte subsets.

    “Classical knockout-, knockdown-, or CRISPR-based approaches to inactivate gene expression are available to gain insight into the impact on disease of a given pathway within previously identified astrocyte subsets40.”

    From Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [40]

    The paper identifies astrocyte subpopulations by scRNA-seq (scRNA-seq analysis of astrocytes in EAE) and uses Nfe2l2 knockdown, astrocyte-directed CRISPR–Cas9 inactivation, and an astrocyte-specific Csf2rb knockout to examine effects on EAE (NRF2 in astrocytes suppresses EAE; MAFG drives pathogenic astrocytes; GM-CSF boosts pathogenic astrocytes; pages unavailable). These perturbations targeted astrocytes generally, not specifically the previously identified subpopulations, so the subset-specific part of the claim is not established. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The outcome of activating a signaling pathway may depend on the upstream stimuli or priming caused by previous exposure to other stimuli, perhaps through epigenetic control.

    “To complicate things further, the outcome of activating a signaling pathway may depend on the upstream stimuli82 or priming caused by previous exposure to other stimuli97, perhaps through epigenetic control40.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. [1]Reich DS, Lucchinetti CF & Calabresi PA Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med 378, 169– 180 (2018). 29320652 PMC6942519
  2. [2]Baecher-Allan C, Kaskow BJ & Weiner HL Multiple sclerosis: mechanisms and immunotherapy. Neuron 97, 742– 768 (2018). 29470968
  3. [3]Allen NJ & Lyons DA Glia as architects of central nervous system formation and function. Science 362, 181– 185 (2018). 30309945 PMC6292669
  4. [5]Colonna M & Butovsky O Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Immunol 35, 441– 468 (2017). 28226226 PMC8167938
  5. [6]Fontana A, Fierz W & Wekerle H Astrocytes present myelin basic protein to encephalitogenic T-cell lines. Nature 307, 273– 276 (1984). 6198590
  6. [7]Ousman SS Protective and therapeutic role for αB-crystallin in autoimmune demyelination. Nature 448, 474– 479 (2007). 17568699
  7. [8]Sun D & Wekerle H Ia-restricted encephalitogenic T lymphocytes mediating EAE lyse autoantigen-presenting astrocytes. Nature 320, 70– 72 (1986). 2419764
  8. [9]Wheeler MA & Quintana FJ Regulation of astrocyte functions in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med 9, a029009 (2019). 29358321 PMC6314073
  9. [10]Liddelow SA & Barres BA Reactive astrocytes: production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity 46, 957– 967 (2017). 28636962
  10. [11]Rothhammer V Microglial control of astrocytes in response to microbial metabolites. Nature 557, 724– 728 (2018). 29769726 PMC6422159
  11. [12]Rothhammer V Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat. Med 22, 586– 597 (2016). 27158906 PMC4899206
  12. [13]Wheeler MA Environmental control of astrocyte pathogenic activities in CNS inflammation. Cell 176, 581– 596.e18 (2019). 30661753 PMC6440749
  13. [15]Stubbington MJT, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A & Teichmann SA Single-cell transcriptomics to explore the immune system in health and disease. Science 358, 58– 63 (2017). 28983043 PMC5654495
  14. [16]Tanay A & Regev A Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism. Nature 541, 331– 338 (2017). 28102262 PMC5438464
  15. [17]Jäkel S Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543– 547 (2019). 30747918 PMC6544546
  16. [18]Jordão MJC Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation. Science 363, eaat7554 (2019). 30679343
  17. [22]Ajami B Single-cell mass cytometry reveals distinct populations of brain myeloid cells in mouse neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration models. Nat. Neurosci 21, 541– 551 (2018). 29507414 PMC8629134
  18. [24]Chao C-C Metabolic control of astrocyte pathogenic activity via cPLA2-MAVS. Cell 179, 1483– 1498.e22 (2019). 31813625 PMC6936326
  19. [25]Macosko EZ Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202– 1214 (2015). 26000488 PMC4481139
  20. [26]Cuadrado A Therapeutic targeting of the NRF2 and KEAP1 partnership in chronic diseases. Nat`. Rev. Drug Discov 18, 295– 317 (2019). 30610225
  21. [27]Mayo L Regulation of astrocyte activation by glycolipids drives chronic CNS inflammation. Nat. Med 20, 1147– 1156 (2014). 25216636 PMC4255949
  22. [28]Katoh Y Methionine adenosyltransferase II serves as a transcriptional corepressor of Maf oncoprotein. Mol. Cell 41, 554– 566 (2011). 21362551
  23. [29]Lin CC & Edelson BT New insights into the role of IL-1β in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol 198, 4553– 4560 (2017). 28583987 PMC5509030
  24. [30]Valentin-Torres A Sustained TNF production by central nervous system infiltrating macrophages promotes progressive autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroinflammation 13, 46 (2016). 26906225 PMC4763407
  25. [32]Katsuoka F & Yamamoto M Small Maf proteins (MafF, MafG, MafK): history, structure and function. Gene 586, 197– 205 (2016). 27058431 PMC4911266
  26. [33]Shavit JA Impaired megakaryopoiesis and behavioral defects in mafG-null mutant mice. Genes Dev. 12, 2164– 2174 (1998). 9679061 PMC317009
  27. [34]Raghunath A Antioxidant response elements: discovery, classes, regulation and potential applications. Redox Biol. 17, 297– 314 (2018). 29775961 PMC6007815
  28. [35]Fang M, Ou J, Hutchinson L & Green MR The BRAF oncoprotein functions through the transcriptional repressor MAFG to mediate the CpG Island Methylator phenotype. Mol. Cell 55, 904– 915 (2014). 25219500 PMC4170521
  29. [38]Ponomarev ED GM-CSF production by autoreactive T cells is required for the activation of microglial cells and the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol 178, 39– 48 (2007). 17182538
  30. [39]Croxford AL The cytokine GM-CSF drives the inflammatory signature of CCR2+ monocytes and licenses autoimmunity. Immunity 43, 502– 514 (2015). 26341401
  31. [40]Lake BB Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat. Biotechnol 36, 70– 80 (2018). 29227469 PMC5951394
  32. [42]Apetoh L The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nat. Immunol 11, 854– 861 (2010). 20676095 PMC2940320
  33. [45]Aziz A, Soucie E, Sarrazin S & Sieweke MH MafB/c-Maf deficiency enables selfrenewal of differentiated functional macrophages. Science 326, 867– 871 (2009). 19892988
  34. [47]Gandhi R Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces human type 1 regulatory T cell-like and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol 11, 846– 853 (2010). 20676092 PMC2929008
  35. [48]Huynh JL Epigenome-wide differences in pathology-free regions of multiple sclerosis-affected brains. Nat. Neurosci 17, 121– 130 (2014). 24270187 PMC3934491
  36. [52]Garcia AD, Doan NB, Imura T, Bush TG & Sofroniew MV GFAP-expressing progenitors are the principal source of constitutive neurogenesis in adult mouse forebrain. Nat. Neurosci 7, 1233– 1241 (2004). 15494728
  37. [53]Madisen L A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci 13, 133– 140 (2010). 20023653 PMC2840225
  38. [54]Sanz E Cell-type-specific isolation of ribosome-associated mRNA from complex tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13939– 13944 (2009). 19666516 PMC2728999
  39. [57]Jaitin DA Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science 343, 776– 779 (2014). 24531970 PMC4412462
  40. [58]Feng H, Zhang X & Zhang C mRIN for direct assessment of genome-wide and gene-specific mRNA integrity from large-scale RNA-sequencing data. Nat. Commun 6, 7816 (2015). 26234653 PMC4523900
  41. [59]Zhang X Comparative analysis of droplet-based ultra-high-throughput single-cell rna-seq systems. Mol. Cell 73, 130– 142.e135 (2019). 30472192
  42. [61]Stuart T Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888– 1902.e21 (2019). 31178118 PMC6687398
  43. [62]Finak G MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015). 26653891 PMC4676162
  44. [63]Becht E Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat. Biotechnol 37, 38– 44 (2018). 30531897
  45. [65]Qiu X Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat. Methods 14, 309– 315 (2017). 28114287 PMC5330805
  46. [66]Qiu X Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979– 982 (2017). 28825705 PMC5764547
  47. [69]Sanjana NE, Shalem O & Zhang F Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783– 784 (2014). 25075903 PMC4486245
  48. [70]Chen S Genome-wide CRISPR screen in a mouse model of tumor growth and metastasis. Cell 160, 1246– 1260 (2015). 25748654 PMC4380877
  49. [71]Lee Y, Messing A, Su M & Brenner M GFAP promoter elements required for region-specific and astrocyte-specific expression. Glia 56, 481– 493 (2008). 18240313
  50. [72]Wang T Gene essentiality profiling reveals gene networks and synthetic lethal interactions with oncogenic Ras. Cell 168, 890– 903.e815 (2017). 28162770 PMC5445660
  51. [73]Rothhammer V Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulation suppresses pathogenic astrocyte activation and chronic progressive CNS inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2012– 2017 (2017). 28167760 PMC5338419
  52. [74]Yates A Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D710– D716 (2016). 26687719 PMC4702834
  53. [75]Ovcharenko I Mulan: multiple-sequence local alignment and visualization for studying function and evolution. Genome Res. 15, 184– 194 (2005). 15590941 PMC540288
  54. [76]van Galen P A multiplexed system for quantitative comparisons of chromatin landscapes. Mol. Cell 61, 170– 180 (2016). 26687680 PMC4707994
  55. [77]Untergasser A Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115 (2012). 22730293 PMC3424584
  56. [78]Foo LC Purification of rat and mouse astrocytes by immunopanning. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc 2013, 421– 432 (2013). 23637363
  57. [79]Esmonde-White C Distinct function-related molecular profile of adult human A2B5+ pre-oligodendrocytes versus mature oligodendrocytes. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 78, 468– 479 (2019). 31058285
  58. [82]Dhaeze T CD70 defines a subset of proinflammatory and CNS-pathogenic TH1/TH17 lymphocytes and is overexpressed in multiple sclerosis. Cell. Mol. Immunol 16, 652– 665 (2019). 30635649 PMC6804668
  59. [84]Moffitt JR High-throughput single-cell gene-expression profiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11046– 11051 (2016). 27625426 PMC5047202
  60. [85]Moffitt JR Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region. Science 362, eaau5324 (2018). 30385464 PMC6482113
  61. [86]Soumillon M, Cacchiarelli D, Semrau S, van Oudenaarden A & Mikkelsen TS Characterization of directed differentiation by high-throughput single-cell RNA-Seq. Preprint at 10.1101/003236v1 (2014). · DOI
  62. [87]Trombetta JJ Preparation of single-cell RNA-seq libraries for next generation sequencing. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol 107, 4.22.1– 4.22.17 (2014). 24984854 PMC4338574
  63. [90]ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57– 74 (2012). 22955616 PMC3439153
  64. [91]Zhang Y Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008). 18798982 PMC2592715
  65. [92]Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY & Greenleaf WJ Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213– 1218 (2013). 24097267 PMC3959825
  66. [93]Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY & Greenleaf WJ ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol 109, 21.29.1– 21.29.9 (2015). PMC4374986 25559105
  67. [94]Langmead B & Salzberg SL Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357– 359 (2012). 22388286 PMC3322381
  68. [96]Mootha VK PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet 34, 267– 273 (2003). 12808457
  69. [98]Kuleshov MV Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90– W97 (2016). 27141961 PMC4987924
  70. [99]Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X & Thomas PD PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D419– D426 (2019). 30407594 PMC6323939

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheeler, M. A., Clark, I. C., Tjon, E. C., Li, Z., Zandee, S. E. J., Couturier, C. P., Watson, B. R., Scalisi, G., Alkwai, S., Rothhammer, V., Rotem, A., Heyman, J. A., Thaploo, S., Sanmarco, L. M., Ragoussis, J., Weitz, D. A., Petrecca, K., Moffitt, J. R., Becher, B., Antel, J. P., Prat, A., & Quintana, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre (CA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Quintana, Francisco J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-02-12
Volume
578
Issue
7796
Pages
593-599
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3006566345
Cited by
501
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 38 · 2012: 1
FWCI
47.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA207021, P30CA006516)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI093903, R56AI093903, R01AI126880)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS101790, R01NS102807, R21NS087867)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, astrocytes, MAFG, Nrf2, DNA methylation, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, neuroinflammation, astrocyte heterogeneity, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Astrocytes, Central Nervous System, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Methionine Adenosyltransferase, Multiple Sclerosis, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Sequence Analysis, RNA, DNA Methylation, MafG Transcription Factor, NF-E2-Related Factor 2, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review