Cited by 1,200Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressNF-κB Signaling PathwaysRedox biology and oxidative stress

Dissecting molecular cross-talk between Nrf2 and NF-κB response pathways

Open access
Wardyn, Joanna D., Ponsford, Amy H., Sanderson, Christopher M.·2015·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

In most tissues, cells are exposed to frequent changes in levels of oxidative stress and inflammation. Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) are the two key transcription factors that regulate cellular responses to oxidative stress and inflammation respectively. Pharmacological and genetic studies suggest that there is functional cross-talk between these two important pathways. The absence of Nrf2 can exacerbate NF-κB activity leading to increased cytokine production, whereas NF-κB can modulate Nrf2 transcription and activity, having both positive and negative effects on the target gene expression. This review focuses on the potentially complex molecular mechanisms that link the Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways and the importance of designing more effective therapeutic strategies to prevent or treat a broad range of neurological disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst20150014

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wardyn, J. D., Ponsford, A. H., & Sanderson, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Sanderson, Christopher M.
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
621-626
ISSN
  • 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8752
OpenAlex
W2133584350
Cited by
1,200
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 139 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemical Society Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (096564/Z/11/Z)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (1222890, BB/J014516/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
Keywords
Nrf2, NF-κB, oxidative stress, inflammation, cytokine production, neurological disorders, treatment options
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Signal Transduction, Cytokines, NF-kappa B, Oxidative Stress, NF-E2-Related Factor 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review