Cited by 1,872Infection Control and VentilationCOVID-19 impact on air qualityIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Aerodynamic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Two Wuhan Hospitals

Open access
Liu, Yuan, Ning, Zhi, Chen, Yu, Guo, Ming, Liu, Yingle, Gali, Nirmal Kumar, Sun, Li, Duan, Yusen +8 more·2020·Nature

Abstract

The ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly on a global scale. Although it is clear that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmitted through human respiratory droplets and direct contact, the potential for aerosol transmission is poorly understood 1-3. Here we investigated the aerodynamic nature of SARS-CoV-2 by measuring viral RNA in aerosols in different areas of two Wuhan hospitals during the outbreak of COVID-19 in February and March 2020. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosols that was detected in isolation wards and ventilated patient rooms was very low, but it was higher in the toilet areas used by the patients. Levels of airborne SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the most public areas was undetectable, except in two areas that were prone to crowding; this increase was possibly due to individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the crowd. We found that some medical staff areas initially had high concentrations of viral RNA with aerosol size distributions that showed peaks in the submicrometre and/or supermicrometre regions; however, these levels were reduced to undetectable levels after implementation of rigorous sanitization procedures. Although we have not established the infectivity of the virus detected in these hospital areas, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 may have the potential to be transmitted through aerosols. Our results indicate that room ventilation, open space, sanitization of protective apparel, and proper use and disinfection of toilet areas can effectively limit the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosols. Future work should explore the infectivity of aerosolized virus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2271-3

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of particles and their evaporated nuclei generated through human expiration activities have sizes varying from 0.05 to 500 μm.

    “Related investigations have shown that the majority of particles and their evaporated nuclei generated through human expiration activities have sizes varying from 0.05 to 500 μm [12–16].”

    From The protective performance of reusable cloth face masks, disposable procedure masks, KN95 masks and N95 respirators: Filtration and total inward leakage (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The results (Nature, p. 559) report size ranges for SARS-CoV-2 aerosols collected in two hospitals, not for the majority of particles generated by human expiration. A search for evaporated nuclei and the claimed 0.05–500 μm range found no passage in our copy that establishes that range. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Ning, Z., Chen, Y., Guo, M., Liu, Y., Gali, N. K., Sun, L., Duan, Y., Cai, J., Westerdahl, D., Liu, X., Xu, K., Ho, K.-F., Kan, H., Fu, Q., & Lan, K.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Ning, Zhi
  • Chen, Yu
  • Ho, Kin-fai
  • Kan, Haidong
  • Fu, Qingyan
  • Lan, Ke
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
582
Issue
7813
Pages
557-560
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3018334611
Cited by
1,872
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 201 · 2022: 359 · 2021: 582 · 2020: 500 · 2019: 1
FWCI
231.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wuhan University
  • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
  • Eurostars
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › COVID-19 impact on air quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, airborne transmission, aerosol size distribution, indoor ventilation, sanitization, crowding, healthcare workers
MeSH terms
Bathroom Equipment, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aerosols, China, Crowding, Disinfection, Hospitals, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Masks, Medical Staff, Patients, Pneumonia, Viral, RNA, Viral, Social Isolation, Ventilation, Workplace, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review