Cited by 196Infection Control and VentilationDental Research and COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

The size and culturability of patient-generated SARS-CoV-2 aerosol

Open access
Santarpia, Joshua L., Herrera, Vicki L., Rivera, Danielle N., Ratnesar-Shumate, Shanna, Reid, St. Patrick, Ackerman, Daniel N., Denton, Paul W., Martens, Jacob W. S. +6 more·2022·Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aerosol transmission of COVID-19 is the subject of ongoing policy debate. Characterizing aerosol produced by people with COVID-19 is critical to understanding the role of aerosols in transmission. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the presence of virus in size-fractioned aerosols from six COVID-19 patients admitted into mixed acuity wards in April of 2020. METHODS: Size-fractionated aerosol samples and aerosol size distributions were collected from COVID-19 positive patients. Aerosol samples were analyzed for viral RNA, positive samples were cultured in Vero E6 cells. Serial RT-PCR of cells indicated samples where viral replication was likely occurring. Viral presence was also investigated by western blot and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by rRT-PCR in all samples. Three samples confidently indicated the presence of viral replication, all of which were from collected sub-micron aerosol. Western blot indicated the presence of viral proteins in all but one of these samples, and intact virions were observed by TEM in one sample. SIGNIFICANCE: Observations of viral replication in the culture of submicron aerosol samples provides additional evidence that airborne transmission of COVID-19 is possible. These results support the use of efficient respiratory protection in both healthcare and by the public to limit transmission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41370-021-00376-8

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Viral minimum physical size is da > 0.1 μm.

    “particle sizes smaller than the minimum pathogen physical size (viral [da > 0.1 µm] [44,45] and bacterial [da > 1 µm] [46]) were assumed to be non-infectious”

    From Comparative Mask Protection against Inhaling Wildfire Smoke, Allergenic Bioaerosols, and Infectious Particles (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results and Discussion report infectious SARS-CoV-2 in submicron aerosol particles, but give no minimum virion size or 0.1 µm aerodynamic-diameter cutoff. Searches for 0.1 µm and virion diameter found no passage establishing that threshold or saying smaller particles are non-infectious. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through inhalation of virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.

    “Laboratory, field, modelling, and case studies have shown that airborne transmission through the inhalation of a virus-laden aerosol is important, if not dominant, for COVID-19.119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santarpia, J. L., Herrera, V. L., Rivera, D. N., Ratnesar-Shumate, S., Reid, S. P., Ackerman, D. N., Denton, P. W., Martens, J. W. S., Fang, Y., Conoan, N., Callahan, M. V., Lawler, J. V., Brett-Major, D. M., & Lowe, J. J.
Affiliations
  • National Strategic Research Institute (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Santarpia, Joshua L.
Venue
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Published
2021-08-18
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
706-711
ISSN
  • 1559-0631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-064X
OpenAlex
W3194845932
Cited by
196
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 19
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalCommons@UNMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2032135)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, airborne transmission, aerosol size distribution, size-fractionated aerosols, viral replication, submicron aerosols, viral RNA, viral proteins, virus particles, respiratory protection, hospital wards
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets, Humans, RNA, Viral, Viral Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review