Cited by 261Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer Cells and Metastasis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NOTUM from Apc-mutant cells biases clonal competition to initiate cancer

Open access

Abstract

The tumour suppressor APC is the most commonly mutated gene in colorectal cancer. Loss of Apc in intestinal stem cells drives the formation of adenomas in mice via increased WNT signalling 1, but reduced secretion of WNT ligands increases the ability of Apc-mutant intestinal stem cells to colonize a crypt (known as fixation)2. Here we investigated how Apc-mutant cells gain a clonal advantage over wild-type counterparts to achieve fixation. We found that Apc-mutant cells are enriched for transcripts that encode several secreted WNT antagonists, with Notum being the most highly expressed. Conditioned medium from Apc-mutant cells suppressed the growth of wild-type organoids in a NOTUM-dependent manner. Furthermore, NOTUM-secreting Apc-mutant clones actively inhibited the proliferation of surrounding wild-type crypt cells and drove their differentiation, thereby outcompeting crypt cells from the niche. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of NOTUM abrogated the ability of Apc-mutant cells to expand and form intestinal adenomas. We identify NOTUM as a key mediator during the early stages of mutation fixation that can be targeted to restore wild-type cell competitiveness and provide preventative strategies for people at a high risk of developing colorectal cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-03525-z

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Flanagan, D. J., Pentinmikko, N., Luopajärvi, K., Willis, N. J., Gilroy, K., Raven, A. P., Mcgarry, L., Englund, J. I., Webb, A. T., Scharaw, S., Nasreddin, N., Hodder, M. C., Ridgway, R. A., Minnee, E., Sphyris, N., Gilchrist, E., Najumudeen, A. K., Romagnolo, B., Perret, C., Williams, A. C., Clevers, H., Nummela, P., Lähde, M., Alitalo, K., Hietakangas, V., Hedley, A., Clark, W., Nixon, C., Kirschner, K., Jones, E. Y., Ristimäki, A., Leedham, S. J., Fish, P. V., Vincent, J.-P., Katajisto, P., & Sansom, O. J.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Alzheimer’s Research UK (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Katajisto, Pekka
  • Sansom, Owen J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-06-02
Volume
594
Issue
7863
Pages
430-435
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3165366231
Cited by
255
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 22
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (FC001002, FC001204, 206314/Z/17/Z, 206341/Z/17/Z)
  • Francis Crick Institute (10204)
  • Cancer Research UK (27144, S_4098, 17721, FC001204, 21139)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/R017247/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
notum, APC mutation, colorectal cancer, clonal competition, mutation fixation, Wnt signaling, Wnt antagonists, intestinal stem cells, intestinal adenoma, organoids, tumour suppressor, colorectal cancer prevention
MeSH terms
Cell Competition, Adenoma, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Esterases, Female, Humans, Ligands, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mutation, Organoids, Stem Cells, Colorectal Neoplasms, Culture Media, Conditioned, Genes, APC, Disease Progression, Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein, Cell Proliferation, Wnt Proteins, Mice, Wnt Signaling Pathway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review