Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A high-resolution picture of kinship practices in an Early Neolithic tomb

Fowler, Chris, Olalde, Iñigo, Cummings, Vicki, Armit, Ian, Büster, Lindsey, Cuthbert, Sarah, Rohland, Nadin, Cheronet, Olivia, Pinhasi, Ron, Reich, David·2022·Nature
DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04241-4PMC PMC8896835
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-04241-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Brace, S. et al. Ancient genomes indicate population replacement in Early Neolithic Britain. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 765–771 (2019). · DOI
  2. Olalde, I. et al. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555, 190–196 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cassidy, L. M. et al. A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society. Nature 582, 384-388 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Mittnik, A. et al. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366, 731–734 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Yaka, R. et al. Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes. Curr. Biol. 31, 2455-2468.e18 (2021). · DOI
  6. Amorim, C. E. G. et al. Understanding 6th-century barbarian social organization and migration through paleogenomics. Nat. Commun. 9, 3547 (2018). · DOI
  7. Sánchez-Quinto, F. et al. Megalithic tombs in western and northern Neolithic Europe were linked to a kindred society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 9469–9474 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Scheib, C. L. et al. East Anglian early Neolithic monument burial linked to contemporary Megaliths. Ann. Hum. Biol. 46, 145–149 (2019). · DOI
  9. Schneider, D. M. A Critique of the Study of Kinship (Univ. Michigan Press, 1984). · DOI
  10. Carsten, J. After Kinship (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003). · DOI
  11. Brück, J. Ancient DNA, kinship and relational identities in Bronze Age Britain. Antiquity 95, 228–237 (2021). · DOI
  12. Meadows, J., Barclay, A. & Bayliss, A. A short passage of time: the dating of the hazleton long cairn revisited. Cambridge Archaeol. J. 17, 45–64 (2007). · DOI
  13. Rowley-Conwy, P. & Legge, T. in The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe (eds. Fowler, C., Hofmann, D. & Harding, J.) 429–446 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).
  14. Cuthbert, G. S. Enriching the Neolithic: the Forgotten People of the Barrows. PhD thesis, Univ. Exeter (2019).
  15. Hedges, R., Saville, A. & O’Connell, T. Characterizing the diet of individuals at the Neolithic chambered tomb of Hazleton North, Gloucestershire, England, using stable isotopic analysis. Archaeometry 50, 114–128 (2008). · DOI
  16. Charlton, S. et al. New insights into Neolithic milk consumption through proteomic analysis of dental calculus. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 11, 6183–6196 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Neil, S., Evans, J., Montgomery, J. & Scarre, C. Isotopic evidence for residential mobility of farming communities during the transition to agriculture in Britain. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150522 (2016). · DOI
  18. Smith, M. & Brickley, M. People of the Long Barrows: Life, Death and Burial in Earlier Neolithic Britain (The History Press, 2009).
  19. Surowiec, A., Snyder, K. T. & Creanza, N. A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180077 (2019). · DOI
  20. Fowler, C. Social arrangements: kinship, descent and affinity in the mortuary architecture of Early Neolithic Britain and Ireland. Archaeol. Dialogues (in the press).
  21. Stone, L. & King, D. E. Kinship and Gender: An Introduction (Routledge, 2018). · DOI
  22. Robb, J. What can we really say about skeletal part representation, MNI and funerary ritual? A simulation approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. Reports 10, 684–692 (2016). · DOI
  23. Rohland, N., Glocke, I., Aximu-Petri, A. & Meyer, M. Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2447–2461 (2018). · DOI
  24. Gansauge, M. T., Aximu-Petri, A., Nagel, S. & Meyer, M. Manual and automated preparation of single-stranded DNA libraries for the sequencing of DNA from ancient biological remains and other sources of highly degraded DNA. Nat. Protoc. 15, 2279–2300 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Weissensteiner, H. et al. HaploGrep 2: mitochondrial haplogroup classification in the era of high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W58-W63 (2016). · DOI
  27. van de Loosdrecht, M. et al. Pleistocene North African genomes link Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African human populations. Science 360, 548–552 (2018). · DOI
  28. Busing, F. M. T. A., Meijer, E. & Van Der Leeden, R. Delete- m Jackknife for Unequal m. Stat. Comput. 9, 3–8 (1999). · DOI
  29. Williams, C. et al. A rapid, accurate approach to inferring pedigrees in endogamous populations. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.965376 (2020). · DOI
  30. Kong, A. et al. Fine-scale recombination rate differences between sexes, populations and individuals. Nature 467, 1099–1103 (2010). · DOI
  31. Cassidy, L. M. et al. Neolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 368–373 (2016). · DOI
  32. Biagini, S. A. et al. People from Ibiza: an unexpected isolate in the Western Mediterranean. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 27, 941–951 (2019). · DOI
  33. Ringbauer, H., Novembre, J. & Steinrücken, M. Parental relatedness through time revealed by runs of homozygosity in ancient DNA. Nat. Commun. 12, 5425 (2021). · DOI

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Fowler, C., Olalde, I., Cummings, V., Armit, I., Büster, L., Cuthbert, S., Rohland, N., Cheronet, O., Pinhasi, R., & Reich, D.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-12-22
Volume
601
Issue
7894
Pages
584-587
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/s41586-021-04241-4
PMC
PMC8896835
Cited by
169
References
12
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review