Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure of iPSC-derived human microglia to brain substrates enables the generation and manipulation of diverse transcriptional states in vitro

Dolan, Michael-John, Therrien, Martine, Jereb, Saša, Kamath, Tushar, Gazestani, Vahid, Atkeson, Trevor, Marsh, Samuel E., Goeva, Aleksandrina, Lojek, Neal M., Murphy, Sarah, White, Cassandra M., Joung, Julia, Liu, Bingxu, Limone, Francesco, Eggan, Kevin, Hacohen, Nir, Bernstein, Bradley E., Glass, Christopher K., Leinonen, Ville, Blurton-Jones, Mathew, Zhang, Feng, Epstein, Charles B., Macosko, Evan Z., Stevens, Beth·2023·Nature Immunology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Microglia, the macrophages of the brain parenchyma, are key players in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. These cells adopt distinct transcriptional subtypes known as states. Understanding state function, especially in human microglia, has been elusive owing to a lack of tools to model and manipulate these cells. Here, we developed a platform for modeling human microglia transcriptional states in vitro. We found that exposure of human stem-cell-differentiated microglia to synaptosomes, myelin debris, apoptotic neurons or synthetic amyloid-beta fibrils generated transcriptional diversity that mapped to gene signatures identified in human brain microglia, including disease-associated microglia, a state enriched in neurodegenerative diseases. Using a new lentiviral approach, we demonstrated that the transcription factor MITF drives a disease-associated transcriptional signature and a highly phagocytic state. Together, these tools enable the manipulation and functional interrogation of human microglial states in both homeostatic and disease-relevant contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41590-023-01558-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Salter, M. W. & Stevens, B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 23, 1018–1027 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Dorman, L. C. et al. A type I interferon response defines a conserved microglial state required for effective phagocytosis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.29.441889 (2023). · DOI
  4. Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Mathys, H. et al. Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 21, 366–380 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Belhocine, S. et al. Context-dependent transcriptional regulation of microglial proliferation. Glia 70, 572–589 (2022). · DOI
  7. Paolicelli, R. C. et al. Microglia states and nomenclature: a field at its crossroads. Neuron 110, 3458–3483 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mancuso, R. et al. Stem-cell-derived human microglia transplanted in mouse brain to study human disease. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 2111–2116 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  9. He, Y. et al. RNA sequencing analysis reveals quiescent microglia isolation methods from postnatal mouse brains and limitations of BV2 cells. J. Neuroinflammation 15, 153 (2018).
  10. Maes, M. E., Colombo, G., Schulz, R. & Siegert, S. Targeting microglia with lentivirus and AAV: recent advances and remaining challenges. Neurosci. Lett. 707, 134310 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Abud, E. M. et al. iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron 94, 278–293.e9 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hasselmann, J. et al. Development of a chimeric model to study and manipulate human microglia in vivo. Neuron 103, 1016–1033.e10 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gazestani, V. H. et al. Early Alzheimer’s disease pathology in human cortex is associated with a transient phase of distinct cell states. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.03.543569 (2023). · DOI
  14. Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell 177, 1873–1887.e17 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Liddelow, S. A., Marsh, S. E. & Stevens, B. Microglia and astrocytes in disease: dynamic duo or partners in crime? Trends Immunol. 41, 820–835 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Zhou, Y. et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 26, 131–142 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Goujon, C. et al. Characterization of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVSM/human immunodeficiency virus type 2 Vpx function in human myeloid cells. J. Virol. 82, 12335–12345 (2008). · DOI
  19. Liu, B. et al. An efficient lentiviral CRISPRi approach to silence genes in primary human monocytes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.424242 (2020). · DOI
  20. Joung, J. et al. A transcription factor atlas of directed differentiation. Cell 186, 209–229.e26 (2023). · DOI
  21. Serrano-Pozo, A., Das, S. & Hyman, B. T. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 20, 68–80 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sandoe, J. & Eggan, K. Opportunities and challenges of pluripotent stem cell neurodegenerative disease models. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 780–789 (2013). · DOI
  23. Wu, M. et al. Conditional gene knockout and reconstitution in human iPSCs with an inducible Cas9 system. Stem Cell Res. 29, 6–14 (2018). · DOI
  24. Fagerlund, I. et al. Microglia-like cells promote neuronal functions in cerebral organoids. Cells 11, 124 (2021). · DOI
  25. Popova, G. et al. Human microglia states are conserved across experimental models and regulate neural stem cell responses in chimeric organoids. Cell Stem Cell 28, 2153–2166.e6 (2021). · DOI
  26. Lehrman, E. K. et al. CD47 protects synapses from excess microglia-mediated pruning during development. Neuron 100, 120–134.e6 (2018). · DOI
  27. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kim, K. et al. Cyclophilin A protects HIV-1 from restriction by human TRIM5α. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 2044–2051 (2019). · DOI
  30. Xu, H. et al. Transcriptional atlas of intestinal immune cells reveals thatneuropeptide α-CGRP modulates group 2 innate lymphoid cell responses. Immunity 51, 696–708.e9 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Smillie, C. S. et al. Intra- and inter-cellular rewiring of the human colon during ulcerative colitis. Cell 178, 714–730.e22 (2019). · DOI
  33. Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/060012 (2021). · DOI
  34. Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016). · DOI
  35. Suo, S. et al. Revealing the critical regulators of cell identity in the mouse cell atlas. Cell Rep. 25, 1436–1445.e3 (2018). · DOI
  36. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
  37. Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa078 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Ross-Innes, C. S. et al. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature 481, 389–393 (2012). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dolan, M.-J., Therrien, M., Jereb, S., Kamath, T., Gazestani, V., Atkeson, T., Marsh, S. E., Goeva, A., Lojek, N. M., Murphy, S., White, C. M., Joung, J., Liu, B., Limone, F., Eggan, K., Hacohen, N., Bernstein, B. E., Glass, C. K., Leinonen, V., Blurton-Jones, M., Zhang, F., Epstein, C. B., Macosko, E. Z., & Stevens, B.
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2023-07-27
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1382-1390
ISSN
  • 1529-2908
  • 1529-2916
Cited by
185
References
32
Language
en
Funders
  • Alzheimer’s Association (ADSF-21-831114-C)
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • Gouvernement du Canada | Instituts de Recherche en Santé du Canada | CIHR Skin Research Training Centre

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review