Cited by 31Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsCellular transport and secretion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 28 of the 58 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Alzheimer's Disease Gene SORL1 Regulates Lysosome Function in Human Microglia

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The SORL1 gene encodes the sortilin‐related receptor protein SORLA, a sorting receptor that regulates endo‐lysosomal trafficking of various substrates. Loss of function variants in SORL1 are causative for Alzheimer's disease ( AD ) and decreased expression of SORLA has been repeatedly observed in human AD brains. SORL1 is highly expressed in the central nervous system, including in microglia, the tissue‐resident immune cells of the brain. Loss of SORLA leads to enlarged lysosomes in hiPSC‐derived microglia‐like cells (hMGLs). However, how SORLA deficiency contributes to lysosomal dysfunction in microglia and how this contributes to AD pathogenesis is not known. In this study, we show that loss of SORLA results in decreased lysosomal degradation and lysosomal enzyme activity due to altered trafficking of lysosomal enzymes in hMGLs. Phagocytic uptake of fibrillar amyloid beta 1–42 and synaptosomes is increased in SORLA‐deficient hMGLs, but due to reduced lysosomal degradation, these substrates aberrantly accumulate in lysosomes. An alternative mechanism of lysosome clearance, lysosomal exocytosis, is also impaired in SORL1 ‐deficient microglia, which may contribute to an altered immune response. Overall, these data suggest that SORLA has an important role in the proper trafficking of lysosomal hydrolases in hMGLs, which is critical for microglial function. This further substantiates the microglial endo‐lysosomal network as a potential novel pathway through which SORL1 may increase AD risk and contribute to the development of AD . Additionally, our findings may inform the development of novel lysosome and microglia‐associated drug targets for AD .

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Loss of SORL1/SORLA in human iPSC-derived microglia-like cells impairs trafficking of lysosomal enzymes from the trans-Golgi network to lysosomes, reducing lysosomal degradation and causing accumulation of phagocytosed fibrillar Aβ and synaptosomes. SORL1-deficient microglia also show impaired lysosomal exocytosis and blunted cytokine responses, implicating microglial lysosome dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease risk.

Key findings

  • SORL1 KO hMGLs show decreased lysosomal degradation by DQ-BSA pulse-chase at all time points versus WT; chloroquine abrogates degradation in both genotypes, and BSA-594/FITC-dextran uptake is increased, indicating reduced degradation rather than reduced uptake. These experiments used two isogenic clones per genotype and N = 18 independent replicates.
  • Intracellular activity of HEXB, Cathepsin B, and Cathepsin D is reduced in SORL1 KO hMGLs without changes in total protein or pro/mature forms; CTSD reduction was independently confirmed in a second hMGL differentiation protocol. Enzyme activity assays used N = 12 independent replicates.
  • Lysosomal enzymes show increased colocalization with TGN38 and decreased colocalization with LAMP1 in SORL1 KO hMGLs; CIMPR protein levels are reduced and CIMPR–LAMP1 colocalization is decreased, with no change in CIMPR–TGN38 colocalization. Colocalization analyses used N = 20 independent replicates.
  • SORL1 KO hMGLs accumulate fibrillar Aβ 1–42 and synaptosomes in LAMP1-positive lysosomes, show increased phagocytic uptake and increased surface TREM2/P2Y6, and have reduced lysosomal exocytosis (surface LAMP1 and extracellular enzyme activity) plus blunted cytokine secretion, including reduced IL-6 after calcimycin and reduced responses to LPS/IFNγ.

Methods

  • Isogenic hiPSC line CV (male, APOE ε3/ε4) was genome-edited with CRISPR/Cas9 to generate SORL1 KO lines; two WT and two SORL1 KO clones were differentiated into hMGLs using a modified McQuade et al. protocol, with key findings validated in a second Dolan et al. protocol.
  • Assays included flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry/confocal colocalization (Manders coefficient via JACOP/ImageJ), western blotting, DQ-BSA pulse-chase, lysosomal enzyme activity assays, phagocytosis of fibrillar Aβ, oligomeric Aβ, and synaptosomes, uptake assays, surface LAMP1 lysosomal exocytosis measurements, ELISAs, and MSD V-PLEX cytokine panels.
  • Statistics used Shapiro–Wilk normality testing, parametric two-tailed unpaired t tests, one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison tests, significance at p < 0.05, and GraphPad Prism; figure legends report N = 4–20 independent replicates depending on assay.

Limitations

  • Stated: in vitro 2D hiPSC-derived microglia cultured in isolation without neurons or astrocytes may not capture physiological brain complexity, and their inflammatory response and morphology may be altered; future work should use transplanted hMGLs or organoid models and examine interactions with other AD risk factors.
  • Evident: the study does not directly test whether SORLA binds CIMPR or define the precise PACS1-dependent mechanism in microglia; only two isogenic clones per genotype were used; several conclusions rely on colocalization and flow-based readouts; and no in vivo validation is presented.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.70009

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

28 of 58 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    SORL1 is highly expressed in the central nervous system, including in microglia.

    “SORL1 is highly expressed in the central nervous system, including in microglia, the tissue‐resident immune cells of the brain.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “While SORL1 mRNA is highly expressed in microglia, even more so than in neurons and astrocytes (Lee et al. 2023; Olah et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al. 2023 source
    • cites Olah et al. 2018 source

      The Introduction identifies microglia as resident immune cells of the central nervous system, but that does not establish SORL1 expression. Searches for “SORL1” and “sortilin related receptor” found no passage in our copy stating that SORL1 is highly expressed in the CNS or in microglia. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zhang et al. 2016 source

      The Results section on transcriptomes of purified brain cell types describes microglial gene-expression data, but it does not report SORL1 expression. Searches for SORL1 and its receptor name found no passage in our copy establishing that it is highly expressed in the CNS or in microglia; the indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Loss-of-function variants in SORL1 are causative for Alzheimer's disease.

    “Loss of function variants in SORL1 are causative for Alzheimer's disease (ad)”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
      “Genetic, epidemiological, and functional studies have now cumulatively and unequivocally established SORL1 as a gene that increases the risk for ad”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Holstege et al. 2017, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kunkle et al. 2017 source

      The ‘Variants in Known EOAD Genes’ section reports a SORL1 frameshift variant in two sisters, one with Alzheimer’s disease and one with mild cognitive impairment. The Discussion calls SORL1 a risk factor, while Table 1 lists the frameshift variant’s clinical significance as undetermined; the paper does not establish that SORL1 loss-of-function variants cause Alzheimer’s disease. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Lambert et al. 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Decreased expression of SORLA has been repeatedly observed in human AD brains.

    “decreased expression of SORLA has been repeatedly observed in human ad brains”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “Loss of SORLA expression has been observed in ad brains in the early stages of the disorder (Dodson et al. 2006; Scherzer et al. 2004; Thonberg et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dodson et al. 2006 source

      The Abstract and the section on LR11 expression in human tissue report reduced LR11/SorLA expression in sporadic AD brains, consistent with an earlier observation noted in the Discussion. But the Abstract also reports no reduction in familial AD brains, so the unqualified claim about human AD brains is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Scherzer et al. 2004 source
    • cites Thonberg et al. 2017 source

      The Results (Neuropathology and immunohistochemistry; page unavailable) report reduced SORL1 staining in the brains of two affected family members. The reduction was relative to both controls and sporadic AD cases; the paper does not establish that decreased SORLA expression has been repeatedly observed across human AD brains. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    SORLA binds to retromer.

    “SORLA binds to retromer (Fjorback et al. 2012), which regulates the retrograde transport of the cation‐independent mannose‐6‐phosphate receptor (CIMPR) through the mannose‐6‐phosphate‐dependent pathway (M6P) (Arighi et al. 2004; Cui et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fjorback et al. 2012 source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    There are several mechanisms by which SORLA-related trafficking can affect pro-inflammatory responses that are important in AD.

    “As aberrant lysosome function can negatively impact the neuroimmune response of microglia (Quick et al. 2023; Van Acker et al. 2021), our data, along with that of Ovesen et al., suggests that there are several mechanisms by which SORLA‐related trafficking can affect pro‐inflammatory responses that are important in ad.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Quick et al. 2023 source
    • cites Van Acker et al. 2021 source
    • cites Ovesen et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    SORLA interacts with the retromer complex and shuttles proteins between the TGN, endosomes, and the cell surface.

    “It interacts with the multi‐protein assembly retromer and shuttles proteins between TGN, endosomes, and the cell surface (Fjorback et al. 2012; Jacobsen et al. 2001, 1996; Willnow and Andersen 2013; Yamazaki et al. 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fjorback et al. 2012 source
    • cites Jacobsen et al. 2001, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Identification of AD risk genes highly expressed in microglia by GWAS supports the idea that dysfunctional microglia may contribute to onset and/or progression of AD.

    “Identification of ad risk genes highly expressed in microglia by genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) further supports the idea that dysfunctional microglia may contribute to onset and/or progression of ad (Maninger et al. 2024; McQuade and Blurton‐Jones 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maninger et al. 2024 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites McQuade and Blurton‐Jones 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Impaired degradation leads to lysosomal stress and could prompt cells to rid themselves of undigested cargo via other mechanisms.

    “Impaired degradation leads to lysosomal stress and could prompt cells to rid themselves of undigested cargo via other mechanisms (Domingues et al. 2024; Wang, Telpoukhovskaia, et al. 2018; Zhong et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Domingues et al. 2024 source

      The Results section (‘Exocytosis is involved in cellular response to lysosomal injury’; page unavailable) reports that impaired lysophagy in cells with damaged lysosomes increased lysosomal exocytosis, supporting an alternative disposal route. The paper does not show that impaired degradation itself causes lysosomal stress or that the material expelled is undigested cargo; it studies the disposal of damaged lysosomes and secretion of lysosomal contents. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wang, Telpoukhovskaia, et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Zhong et al. 2023 source

      The Introduction describes lysosomal exocytosis as a way to release lysosomal contents, and the Results and discussion report that it helps U-loaded HK-2 cells expel uranium and damaged lysosomes. The paper does not establish that impaired degradation causes lysosomal stress or prompts this response; it studies uranium-induced lysosomal damage and exocytosis. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    SORL1 encodes SORLA, a sorting receptor that regulates endo-lysosomal trafficking of various substrates.

    “The SORL1 gene encodes the sortilin‐related receptor protein SORLA, a sorting receptor that regulates endo‐lysosomal trafficking of various substrates.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “SORLA is a hybrid receptor that belongs to both the LDLR and the VPS10p receptor family. It interacts with the multi‐protein assembly retromer and shuttles proteins between TGN, endosomes, and the cell surface (Fjorback et al. 2012; Jacobsen et al. 2001, 1996; Willnow and Andersen 2013; Yamazaki et al. 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fjorback et al. 2012 source

      The Introduction identifies SORL1 as the gene encoding sorLA and describes sorLA as a sorting receptor that binds and regulates APP trafficking. The Discussion describes its endosome-to-Golgi transport, but our copy does not establish that sorLA regulates trafficking of various substrates; its substantive findings concern APP. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Jacobsen et al. 2001, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Loss of SORLA causes endo-lysosomal defects in neurons, including in endosomal recycling, autophagy, and lysosome function, resulting in increased secretion of toxic Aβ species and impaired synaptic activity.

    “Studies investigating the role of SORLA in ad pathogenesis have extensively focused on neurons and revealed that loss of SORLA causes endo‐lysosomal defects in neurons, specifically in endosomal recycling, autophagy, and lysosome function, ultimately resulting in increased secretion of toxic Aβ species and impaired synaptic activity in neurons (Andersen et al. 2022; Hung et al. 2021; Knupp et al.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Andersen et al. 2022 source

      The Introduction and Discussion describe SORLA-dependent endosomal recycling and link reduced SORLA activity to increased Aβ production; the Results report enlarged neuronal endosomes in SORL1-deficient minipigs. Our copy does not establish defects in autophagy or lysosome function or characterize the increased Aβ as toxic. In the Results section on 21-month-old minipigs, the authors report no decrease in a PET measure of neuronal synaptic activity, while cautioning that few animals were studied. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hung et al. 2021 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports disrupted endosomal trafficking in SORL1-deficient human neurons and, with complete loss, lysosome dysfunction and impaired autophagy. The Results report increased extracellular Aβ40 and Aβ42, but do not establish that these peptides caused impaired synaptic activity. The copy does not specifically demonstrate an endosomal-recycling defect or report impaired synaptic activity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Knupp et al. 2020 source

      The Introduction and the section on APP trafficking report enlarged endosomes and altered APP transport in SORL1-deficient neurons. The APP-processing section reports increased secretion of Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42. The paper does not establish the claimed defects in autophagy, lysosome function, or synaptic activity, nor does it test whether the secreted Aβ is toxic; its trafficking findings also do not specifically establish impaired endosomal recycling. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Depletion of SORLA in neurons leads to enlarged early endosomes, impairments in endo-lysosomal trafficking, changes in gene expression, and impaired neuronal function.

    “Recent work from our group and others has shown that depletion of SORLA in neurons leads to enlarged early endosomes, impairments in endo‐lysosomal trafficking, changes in gene expression, and impaired neuronal function (Hung et al. 2021; Knupp et al. 2020; Lee et al. 2023; Mishra et al. 2023, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hung et al. 2021 source

      The Results section on early endosome enlargement and lysosome dysfunction reports enlarged early endosomes after SORL1 loss and endosomal and lysosomal defects after complete loss, supporting those parts of the claim in human neurons. The passages found do not establish changes in gene expression or impaired neuronal function; the Results section on APP processing instead reports no difference in APP mRNA expression. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Knupp et al. 2020 source

      The Results sections on endosome size and APP trafficking (page numbers unavailable) report enlarged early endosomes and altered endo-lysosomal trafficking in SORL1-deficient neurons. The passages do not establish the attributed changes in gene expression or impaired neuronal function; searches for those outcomes found no supporting results in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Lee et al. 2023 source

      The Introduction reports impaired endosomal trafficking after SORL1 loss in iPSC-derived neurons, and the Results report enlarged early endosomes and altered gene expression. The Results also show increased Aβ and phosphorylated tau, but the passages do not establish impaired neuronal function as a consequence of SORL1 depletion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    LE is a calcium-regulated process that expels lysosomal contents into the extracellular space.

    “LE is a calcium‐regulated process that expels lysosomal contents into the extracellular space (Buratta et al. 2020; Tancini et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buratta et al. 2020 source
    • cites Tancini et al. 2020 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Calcimycin-related secretion of IL-1β levels was unaffected in SORL1 KO hMGLs, although intracellular protein levels of IL-1β were reduced.

    “Calcimycin‐related secretion of IL1‐β levels was unaffected in SORL1 KO hMGLs, although intracellular protein levels of IL1‐β were reduced (Figure S6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The hiPSC model system has enabled a detailed investigation and provided evidence of the cell autonomous role of SORL1 in regulating microglial lysosome function.

    “Nevertheless, our hiPSC model system has enabled a detailed investigation and provided evidence of the cell autonomous role of SORL1 in regulating microglial lysosome function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Calcimycin-induced LE can release IL-1β and IL-6, with the IL-6 response being reduced in SORL1 KO hMGLs.

    “We observed that calcimycin‐induced LE can release IL‐1β and IL‐6, with the IL‐6 response being reduced in SORL1 KO hMGLs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Immunocytochemistry confirmed decreased lysosomal degradation in SORL1 KO hMGLs compared to WT hMGLs.

    “we observed decreased lysosomal degradation in SORL1 KO hMGLs as compared to WT hMGLs (Figure 1D–F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    SORLA has an important role in the proper trafficking of lysosomal hydrolases in hMGLs, which is critical for microglial function.

    “Overall, these data suggest that SORLA has an important role in the proper trafficking of lysosomal hydrolases in hMGLs, which is critical for microglial function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Chloroquine abrogated lysosomal degradation of DQ-Red-BSA in both WT and SORL1 KO hMGLs, validating the degradation assays.

    “Inhibiting lysosome proteolysis with the lysosomotropic reagent chloroquine abrogated lysosomal degradation of DQ‐Red‐BSA in both WT and SORL1 KO hMGLs (Figure 1B), validating our degradation assays.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationcitation

    SORL1 and related pathways are novel therapeutic targets for AD.

    “This data, along with recent work describing a role of SORLA in sorting neuroimmune receptors (Ovesen et al. 2024), adds to a growing body of work highlighting SORL1 and related pathways as novel therapeutic targets for ad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ovesen et al. 2024 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Loss of normal SORL1 function leads to mis-trafficking of lysosomal enzymes and impairment of critical lysosomal functions, including substrate degradation and lysosomal exocytosis.

    “Loss of normal SORL1 function leads to mis‐trafficking of lysosomal enzymes and impairment of critical lysosomal functions, including substrate degradation and LE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Microglia migrate to and cluster around Aβ plaques but are unable to eliminate these toxic deposits from the brain.

    “Collective evidence from murine models and post‐mortem human ad brain tissue has revealed that microglia migrate to and cluster around Aβ plaques (Akiyama et al. 1999; Bolmont et al. 2008; Itagaki et al. 1989; Meyer‐Luehmann et al. 2008; Stalder et al. 1999) but are unable to eliminate these toxic deposits from the brain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Akiyama et al. 1999 source
    • cites Bolmont et al. 2008 source
    • cites Itagaki et al. 1989 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    SORLA is a hybrid receptor that belongs to both the LDLR and VPS10p receptor family.

    “SORLA is a hybrid receptor that belongs to both the LDLR and the VPS10p receptor family.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Impairment in enzyme trafficking leads to inefficient lysosomal degradation and accumulation of phagocytosed fibrillar Aβ1-42 and synaptosomes in lysosomes.

    “This impairment in enzyme trafficking leads to inefficient lysosomal degradation and accumulation of phagocytosed fibrillar Aβ 1–42 and synaptosomes in lysosomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    SORL1 KO hMGLs show reduced LE as evidenced by reduced LAMP1 localization on the plasma membrane and reduced enzyme activity in the conditioned medium of hMGLs after treatment with a stimulus.

    “We found that SORL1 KO hMGLs show reduced LE as evidenced by reduced LAMP1 localization on the plasma membrane and reduced enzyme activity in the conditioned medium of hMGLs after treatment with a stimulus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In response to acute stress, LE can be used to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, bypassing the slower, more conventional secretory pathway.

    “Interestingly, in response to acute stress, LE can be used to release pro‐inflammatory cytokines, bypassing the slower, more conventional secretory pathway (Aiello et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aiello et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    SORL1 KO cell lines were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 with gRNAs selected to minimize off-target effects.

    “guide RNAs (gRNAs) to SORL1 were generated using the Zhang Lab CRISPR Design website at MIT (http://zlab.bio/guide‐design‐resources) and selected to minimize off‐target effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Chloroquine treatment decreased lysosomal enzyme activity for HEXB, CTSD, and CTSB in both WT and SORL1 KO hMGLs.

    “Chloroquine treatment was used as a negative control in enzyme activity assays and, as expected, resulted in decreased lysosomal enzyme activity for all the enzymes (Figure 2A–C).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    All data represent multiple hiPSC clones: two WT and two SORL1 KO, with at least six independent experiments per clone.

    “All data presented in this study represent multiple hiPSC clones. This includes two clones for WT hMGLs and two clones for SORL1 KO hMGLs. All data represent at least six independent experiments (called replicates) per clone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    A crucial aspect of the normal phagocytic process in SORL1 KO hMGLs is impaired, leading to intracellular accumulation of fAβ and synaptosomes.

    “While we observe increased phagocytic uptake of both fAβ and synaptosomes, these substrates were not degraded; therefore, a crucial aspect of the normal phagocytic process in SORL1 KO hMGLs is impaired, leading to their intracellular accumulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two isogenic clones per genotype and nine independent replicates per clone per genotype (N=18) were used for DQ-BSA experiments.

    “Two isogenic clones per genotype (WT and SORL1 KO) and nine independent replicates (three differentiations and three technical replicates per differentiation) per clone per genotype (N = 18 independent replicates) were used for these experiments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    SORLA may play a role in maintaining the number of receptors at the cell surface required for phagocytosis, and its absence causes aberrant localization of these receptors.

    “suggesting that SORLA may play a role in maintaining the number of receptors at the cell surface required for phagocytosis, and its absence causes aberrant localization of these receptors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Experimental data were tested for normal distributions using Shapiro-Wilk; parametric tests were used; significance defined as p < 0.05.

    “Experimental data were tested for normal distributions using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Normally distributed data were analyzed using parametric two‐tailed unpaired t tests, one‐way ANOVA tests, or two‐way ANOVA tests. Significance was defined as a value of p < 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All four clones (two WT and two SORL1 KO) were shown to have normal karyotypes.

    “All four clones were shown to have normal karyotypes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Depletion of SORLA results in altered protein expression and intracellular localization of CIMPR, contributing to dysfunctional trafficking of lysosomal enzymes in SORL1 KO hMGLs.

    “Overall, these data demonstrate that depletion of SORLA results in altered protein expression and intracellular localization of the trafficking protein CIMPR, contributing to dysfunctional trafficking of lysosomal enzymes observed in SORL1 KO hMGLs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All cell lines are routinely karyotyped and tested for mycoplasma.

    “All cell lines are routinely karyotyped by Diagnostic Cytogenetics Inc. (Seattle, WA) and tested for mycoplasma (MycoAlert).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine release upon SORL1 depletion may occur through conventional secretory routes from the TGN to the cell surface.

    “Furthermore, the depletion of SORL1 may decrease the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines either through conventional secretory routes from the TGN to the cell surface or by impairing LE, as observed in our study and others (Ovesen et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All microscopy and image processing were performed under blind conditions.

    “All microscopy and image processing were performed under blind conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    SORLA is known to regulate receptor protein homeostasis at the cell surface by modulating intracellular sorting of receptors to the TGN and endo-lysosomal compartments.

    “SORLA is known to regulate receptor protein homoeostasis at the cell surface by modulating intracellular sorting of receptors to the TGN and endo‐lysosomal compartments (Pietilä et al. 2019; Schmidt et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pietilä et al. 2019 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

    • cites Schmidt et al. 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    CIMPR is a key receptor that traffics lysosomal enzymes from the TGN to the lysosomes.

    “The CIMPR is a key receptor that traffics lysosomal enzymes from the TGN to the lysosomes (Braulke and Bonifacino 2009; Braulke et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Braulke and Bonifacino 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Braulke et al. 2023 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Loss of SORLA causes mistrafficking of lysosomal enzymes, leading to impaired lysosomal degradation and accumulation of substrates in lysosomes.

    “We show that loss of SORLA causes mistrafficking of lysosomal enzymes, leading to impaired lysosomal degradation and accumulation of substrates in lysosomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    How SORLA deficiency contributes to lysosomal dysfunction in microglia and how this contributes to AD pathogenesis is not known.

    “However, how SORLA deficiency contributes to lysosomal dysfunction in microglia and how this contributes to ad pathogenesis is not known.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The impact of loss of SORLA function specifically in microglia is not well-studied, rendering understanding of SORLA's role in AD risk incomplete.

    “While SORL1 mRNA is highly expressed in microglia, even more so than in neurons and astrocytes (Lee et al. 2023; Olah et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2016), the impact of loss of SORLA function specifically in microglia is not well‐studied, rendering our understanding of the role of SORLA in ad risk incomplete at best.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Microglia are key effectors of pathogenic protein clearance and maintenance of neuronal health and brain homeostasis, positioning them at the center of cellular responses in AD pathogenesis.

    “Microglia, tissue‐resident phagocytes of the brain, are key effectors of pathogenic protein clearance and maintenance of neuronal health and brain homeostasis in general, positioning this brain cell type at the center of cellular responses in ad pathogenesis and making it an attractive target for new ad therapies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SORL1 KO hMGLs used in this study are a valid model for SORL1 loss in human microglia, with no confounding off-target effects from the genetic manipulation.

    “Two isogenic clones per genotype (WT and SORL1 KO) and six independent replicates (two differentiations and threetechnical replicates per differentiation) per clone per genotype (N = 12 independent replicates) were used”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The in vitro hMGLs recapitulate key aspects of human microglia biology sufficiently for the study's conclusions.

    “Characterization of these hMGLs showed no difference in expression of microglia‐specific markers between WT and SORL1 KO cells (Figure S2A).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Loss of SORL1 is observed in the early stages of AD.

    “Since the loss of SORL1 is observed in the early stages of ad, hypofunctional microglia with depleted SORLA may initially contribute to ad pathogenesis through lysosome dysfunction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SORL1 is a potent AD risk factor.

    “Our data identify a previously unexplored cell‐type‐specific mechanism through which SORL1 can regulate the endo‐lysosomal pathway beyond its well‐established function as a sorting receptor for APP in neurons, illustrating the importance of exploring this multifaceted sorting receptor and potent ad risk factor as a therapeutic target for ad.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • IL-6 result points to the Cathepsin D panel

    Minor

    The text cites Figure 6F for the decrease in released IL-6, whereas the Figure 6 caption identifies panel F as extracellular Cathepsin D activity and panels G and J as IL-6 measurements.

  • Substrate-uptake statement cites receptor-localization figures

    Minor

    The discussion cites Figure S5 for increased internalization of transferrin, fibrillar Aβ, and synaptosomes, but the results assign Figure S5 to receptor surface localization and total receptor protein levels; uptake is assigned to Figure S4.

  • Western blots have fewer replicates than the stated minimum

    Minor

    The statistical methods say all data represent at least six independent experiments per clone, but the Figure 2 caption specifies only two replicates per clone for its western blots.

  • Direction of SORLA's effect on phagocytosis is reversed

    Minor

    The results state that SORLA may increase phagocytosis by increasing surface localization of phagocytic receptors. Elsewhere, the paper says it is the loss of SORLA that increases receptor surface localization and phagocytic uptake.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, S., Morshed, N., Sidhu, S. B., Kinoshita, C., Stevens, B., Jayadev, S., & Young, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Jessica E.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-04-04
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
1329-1348
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W4409182557
Cited by
31
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 10
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (23AARG‐1022491)
  • National Institute on Aging (5T32AG222‐30, 1F32AG079666‐01, R01 AG062148, P30 AG066509, R01 AG AG080585)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
SORL1, SorLA, Alzheimer's disease, microglia, lysosomal function, endolysosomal trafficking, lysosomal exocytosis, amyloid-beta 42, synaptosomes, phagocytosis, lysosomal degradation, lysosomal dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review