NEAT-seq: simultaneous profiling of intra-nuclear proteins, chromatin accessibility and gene expression in single cells
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In this work, we describe NEAT-seq (sequencing of nuclear protein epitope abundance, chromatin accessibility and the transcriptome in single cells), enabling interrogation of regulatory mechanisms spanning the central dogma. We apply this technique to profile CD4 memory T cells using a panel of master transcription factors (TFs) that drive T cell subsets and identify examples of TFs with regulatory activity gated by transcription, translation and regulation of chromatin binding. We also link a noncoding genome-wide association study single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within a GATA motif to a putative target gene, using NEAT-seq data to internally validate SNP impact on GATA3 regulation. NEAT-seq offers a tri-omics tool for profiling nuclear protein abundance along with ATAC-seq and RNA-seq in single cells.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
NEAT-seq enables simultaneous single-cell measurement of nuclear protein abundance, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression by combining oligo-conjugated antibodies with 10X Genomics Multiome. Applied to CD4 memory T cells, it reveals transcription, chromatin-binding, and translational modes of TF regulation and links a non-coding GWAS SNP to GATA3-dependent regulation of TSEN54.
Key findings
- In a human K562/mouse ESC barnyard experiment, NEAT-seq detected median 13,496 and 16,883 RNA UMIs; 4,732 and 5,086 genes; and 26,762 and 26,929 ATAC fragments per cell, respectively, with >4-fold enrichment of GATA1 and OCT4 ADT counts and >2-fold enrichment of SOX2 ADT counts in their respective cell types.
- HTO-based doublet detection enabled in silico removal of almost 50% of doublets, and NEAT-seq ADT data labeled CD4 memory T cell subsets more robustly than RNA data, which required smoothing due to dropout.
- In CD4 memory T cells, the authors identified seven scATAC-seq clusters largely corresponding to scRNA-seq clusters and proposed three TF regulatory modes: transcriptional regulation (RORγT, Tbet), transcriptional expression but requirement of other TFs for chromatin binding (FOXP3), and translational regulation (GATA3).
- GATA3 ADT levels, but not RNA levels, correlated with global GATA3 motif accessibility; candidate post-transcriptional regulators included EEF1G, RPL18, PABPC4, GAB2, and NIBAN1. TF-peak-gene linkages identified GATA3 targets CCR4, CCR8, and IL4R and the RORγT target CCR6, and the GWAS SNP rs62088464 in a GATA motif was linked to TSEN54, with most ATAC reads in high-GATA3-ADT cells mapping to the risk allele.
Methods
- Antibodies were conjugated to barcoded oligos and pre-bound with E. coli ssDNA binding protein (EcoSSB) to improve nuclear protein staining; stained fixed/permeabilized cells were processed with the 10X Genomics Multiome kit for scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq, with HTOs for multiplexing and doublet detection.
- The method was tested in a human K562/mouse ESC barnyard experiment and applied to primary human CD4+CD45RO+ memory T cells using an antibody panel against GATA3, Tbet, RORγT, FOXP3, and Helios.
- Analysis used cellranger-ARC, ArchR, Seurat, chromVAR, Spearman correlations between TF ADT levels and peak accessibility or gene expression, TF-peak-gene linkage identification, GWAS SNP overlap, and allele-specific accessibility testing with a one-sided binomial test.
Limitations
- The paper states that the CD4 memory T cell dataset showed a small reduction in unique ATAC and RNA reads relative to a standard 10X Multiome experiment, similar to other fixed single-cell assays.
- The paper notes that cell fixation increases the doublet rate in droplet-based single-cell technologies, and that SOX2 antibody enrichment was low, with western blot showing specific but relatively weak binding.
- The paper states that uncoupling of TF protein expression and motif accessibility highlights caveats of using motif accessibility alone to infer TF activity; evident from the text, the primary CD4 memory T cell analysis is limited to one TF panel and does not report replication across multiple donors.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 19 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Abstract
Pre-incubating oligo-antibody with EcoSSB dramatically improved correlation between Cy5 antibody signal and GFP levels within the nucleus.
“Pre-incubating the oligo-antibody with EcoSSB dramatically improved correlation between Cy5 antibody signal and GFP levels within the nucleus (Fig. 1a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
NEAT-seq enables simultaneous quantification of nuclear protein epitope abundance, chromatin accessibility, and transcriptome in single cells.
“In this work, we describe NEAT-seq (nuclear protein epitope abundance, chromatin accessibility, and the transcriptome in single cells), enabling interrogation of regulatory mechanisms spanning the central dogma.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“Together, these results demonstrate simultaneous quantification of endogenous nuclear protein abundance, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression in fixed single cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
- Findingown data§ Abstract
EcoSSB improved specificity of cytosolic protein staining.
“EcoSSB similarly improved specificity of cytosolic protein staining (Extended Data Fig. 1d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
GATA1 staining is markedly increased in K562 cells relative to ESCs using a GATA1 antibody linked to a Cy5-modified oligo.
“We observed a marked increase in GATA1 staining in K562 relative to ESCs using a GATA1 antibody linked to the Cy5-modified oligo (Extended Data Fig. 1c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Compared with inCITE-seq, the NEAT-seq approach showed a moderate improvement in staining that was most pronounced at lower protein levels.
“In comparison with the inCITE-seq protocol8, our approach showed a moderate improvement in staining that was most pronounced at lower protein levels (Supplementary Note 2, Extended Data Fig 1e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Chung, H. et al. Joint single-cell measurements of nuclear proteins and RNA in vivo. Nat. Methods 18, 1204–1212 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Abstract
The Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg clusters exhibited high chromatin accessibility at functionally relevant cytokine gene loci, but low or undetectable RNA expression.
“These clusters also exhibited high chromatin accessibility at functionally relevant cytokine gene loci, but low or undetectable RNA expression (Extended Data Fig. 3c-d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Quantification of the conjugated oligo reflected GFP levels within the nucleus.
“We further confirmed that quantification of the conjugated oligo reflected GFP levels within the nucleus by sorting nuclei into 3 populations of increasing GFP abundance for qPCR targeting the conjugated oligo (Extended Data Fig. 1a-b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
The risk allele of rs62088464 preserves the GATA motif.
“The risk allele, which preserves the GATA motif, is associated with decreased pulmonary function26, which can result from inflammatory lung diseases associated with Th2 immune responses27.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
rs62088464 is located within a GATA motif sequence in a GATA3 ADT-associated peak.
“We overlapped peaks in our TF-peak-gene linkages with candidate causal GWAS SNPs25 and identified rs62088464 located within a GATA motif sequence in a GATA3 ADT-associated peak.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Abstract
Within the correlated gene sets were genes known to be enriched or functionally important in the memory T cell subset driven by the transcription factor in question, such as IL4R for GATA3 and CTLA4 for both Helios and FOXP3.
“Within these correlated gene sets were genes known to be enriched or functionally important in the memory T cell subset driven by the TF in question, such as IL4R for GATA3 and CTLA4 for both Helios and FOXP324.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Schmiedel, B. J. et al. Impact of genetic polymorphisms on human immune cell gene expression. Cell 175, 1701–1715.e16 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Abstract
Accessibility at the RORγT and Tbet genes was strongly correlated with measurements of downstream regulatory events.
“Accessibility at the RORγT and Tbet genes were strongly correlated with measurements of downstream regulatory events, suggesting that these TFs are regulated transcriptionally (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 5a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract
rs62088464 is located within a GATA motif site.
“We focused on rs62088464, a SNP located within a GATA motif site and for which our donor was heterozygous for the risk allele.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Genes with RNA expression significantly correlated with protein levels of each transcription factor were identified.
“We similarly identified genes with RNA expression significantly correlated with protein levels of each TF (Extended Data Fig. 7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
The donor was heterozygous for the risk allele at rs62088464.
“We focused on rs62088464, a SNP located within a GATA motif site and for which our donor was heterozygous for the risk allele.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
GATA3 showed clear discordance between RNA expression and protein levels across cells.
“The final TF in our panel, GATA3, showed clear discordance between RNA expression and protein levels across cells (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
Paired RNA and protein measurements allowed identification of candidate post-transcriptional regulators of GATA3 by differential expression analysis between cells expressing high GATA3 RNA but low protein versus cells expressing both high GATA3 RNA and protein.
“Our paired RNA and protein measurements also allowed us to identify candidate post-transcriptional regulators of GATA3 by performing differential expression analysis between cells expressing high GATA3 RNA but low protein vs cells expressing both high GATA3 RNA and protein (Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract
For RORγT, Tbet, and GATA3, the correlated scATAC-seq peaks were enriched for the corresponding transcription factor motif.
“For RORgT, Tbet, and GATA3, the correlated scATAC-seq peaks were enriched for the corresponding TF motif (Extended Data Fig. 7a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Abstract
Protein abundance is often challenging to estimate via scRNA-seq data due to post-transcriptional regulation and relatively low RNA capture rates.
“Protein abundance is often challenging to estimate via scRNA-seq data due to post-transcriptional regulation and relatively low RNA capture rates10,11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Grün, D., Kester, L. & van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637–640 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Marinov, G. K. et al. From single-cell to cell-pool transcriptomes: stochasticity in gene expression and RNA splicing. Genome Res. 24, 496–510 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
Directly measuring single-cell protein levels of transcription factors, which are often much more abundant than their encoding transcripts, can link individual transcription factors to regulated enhancers and target genes by correlating changes in TF protein levels to changes in regulatory element accessibility and expression of nearby genes.
“Directly measuring single-cell protein levels of TFs, which are often much more abundant than their encoding transcripts12, can link individual TFs to regulated enhancers and target genes by correlating changes in TF protein levels to changes in regulatory element accessibility and expression of nearby genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Gillespie, M. A. et al. Absolute quantification of transcription factors reveals principles of gene regulation in erythropoiesis. Mol. Cell 78, 960–974.e11 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
Cell fixation increases the doublet rate in droplet-based single cell technologies.
“Because cell fixation increases the doublet rate in droplet-based single cell technologies4, we assayed a mixture of human K562 and mouse ESCs stained using antibodies against mutually exclusive TFs and antibody-linked hashtag oligos14 (HTOs) to assess both doublet identification and specificity of nuclear protein abundance measurements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mimitou, E. P. et al. Scalable, multimodal profiling of chromatin accessibility, gene expression and protein levels in single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00927-2 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
NEAT-seq applied to CD4 memory T cells with a panel of master transcription factors identifies examples of transcription factors with regulatory activity gated by transcription, translation, and regulation of chromatin binding.
“We apply this technique to profile CD4 memory T cells using a panel of master transcription factors (TFs) that drive T cell subsets and identify examples of TFs with regulatory activity gated by transcription, translation, and regulation of chromatin binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Abstract
Transcription factors can bind directly to enhancer elements to modulate target gene expression.
“Since TFs can bind directly to enhancer elements to modulate target gene expression9, measuring their abundance provides critical insight into how these proteins drive gene regulatory states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. M. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 613–626 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Abstract
The lack of concordance between FOXP3 expression and motif accessibility is consistent with previous studies showing that FOXP3 binds to pre-existing accessible enhancers to drive Treg fate.
“The lack of concordance between FOXP3 expression and motif accessibility is consistent with previous studies showing that FOXP3 binds to pre-existing accessible enhancers to drive Treg fate19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Samstein, R. M. et al. Foxp3 exploits a pre-existent enhancer landscape for regulatory T cell lineage specification. Cell 151, 153–166 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
NEAT-seq can measure the molecular consequences of continuous changes in transcription factor levels in a biologically relevant setting for a panel of proteins simultaneously.
“Whereas previous studies investigating dosage-dependent effects of TFs often required building cell lines with a combination of hypomorphic and null alleles30,31 or inducible expression systems32, we demonstrate that NEAT-seq can measure the molecular consequences of continuous changes in TF levels in a biologically relevant setting for a panel of proteins simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Abstract
The specificity of the conjugated SOX2 antibody was tested by western blot and showed specific, if relatively weak, SOX2 binding.
“Due to a low observed enrichment of SOX2 in mESCs vs K562, we tested specificity of the conjugated SOX2 antibody by western blot and observed specific, if relatively weak, SOX2 binding (Extended Data Fig 2i).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Abstract
The specificity of the GATA3 antibody was verified on GATA3-overexpressing cells.
“Due to discordance between GATA3 protein and RNA levels, we verified specificity of our GATA3 antibody on GATA3-overexpressing cells (Extended Data Fig. 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Abstract
The risk allele of rs62088464 is associated with decreased pulmonary function.
“is associated with decreased pulmonary function26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Alkes Group, UKBB summary statistics, https://alkesgroup.broadinstitute.org/ (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
GATA3 translation is regulated by PI3K signaling through mTOR.
“GATA3 translation is regulated by PI3K signaling through mTOR22”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Cook, K. D. & Miller, J. TCR-dependent translational control of GATA-3 enhances Th2 differentiation. J. Immunol. 185, 3209–3216 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract
Deviations from even mixtures of mouse and human cells increase the inferred doublet rate relative to the observed doublet rate.
“deviations from even mixtures will increase the inferred doublet rate relative to the observed doublet rate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
NPC normalization of TF ADT counts is more robust than CLR transformation when cells are primarily positive for only one antibody in the panel, as in the CD4 memory T cells.
“We chose the NPC normalization method because it was more robust than CLR transformation in cases where cells are primarily positive for only one antibody in the panel, as was the case for the CD4 memory T cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract
NEAT-seq provides a new avenue for studying the quantitative effects of epigenetic regulator abundance on both chromatin and gene expression state in primary human samples.
“NEAT-seq provides a new avenue for studying the quantitative effects of epigenetic regulator abundance on both chromatin and gene expression state in primary human samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
These results suggest upregulation of genes that promote translation may play a role in driving GATA3 protein production in the Th2 subset of memory T cells.
“These results suggest upregulation of genes that promote translation may play a role in driving GATA3 protein production in the Th2 subset of memory T cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: GAB2 is a direct activator of PI3K.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
The uncoupling of transcription factor protein expression and motif accessibility highlights caveats of using motif accessibility alone to infer transcription factor activity.
“The uncoupling of TF protein expression and motif accessibility highlights the caveats of using motif accessibility alone to infer TF activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract
For perfectly even mixtures of mouse and human cells, the inferred doublet rate is twice the observed doublet rate.
“For perfectly even mixtures of mouse and human cells, the inferred doublet rate will be twice the observed doublet rate”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Abstract
Both antibody concentrations showed specific staining of the targeted transcription factor in the appropriate cell type.
“Both antibody concentrations showed specific staining of the targeted TF in the appropriate cell type, as shown in Extended Data Fig. 4b-c.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Abstract
For Helios, binding may result in chromatin compaction rather than accessibility, as recently observed in mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells.
“For Helios, binding may result in chromatin compaction rather than accessibility, as was recently observed in mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Cova, G. et al. Helios represses megakaryocyte priming in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20202317 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 24
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractHTO staining allowed clear separation between positive and negative HTO staining, enabling stringent cutoffs and identification of droplets positive for more than one hashing oligo, enabling in silico removal of almost 50% of doublets.
“Clear separation between positive and negative HTO staining allowed us to set stringent cutoffs and identify droplets that were positive for more than one hashing oligo, enabling in silico removal of almost 50% of doublets (Fig. 1c-d, Extended Data Fig. 2a-d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractAntibody-based protein measurements for each transcription factor showed clear enrichment in the cell type that the transcription factor is known to drive and provided more robust detection of target transcription factors compared to RNA data.
“Our antibody-based protein measurements for each TF showed clear enrichment in the cell type that the TF is known to drive and provided more robust detection of target TFs compared to our RNA data (Fig. 2c,d, Extended Data Fig. 4a-c)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractFragment length distribution and average TSS enrichment were comparable to bulk ATAC-seq libraries.
“The fragment length distribution and average TSS enrichment were also comparable to bulk ATAC-seq libraries (Extended Data Fig. 2e-f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractSeven clusters were identified in the CD4 memory T cell population using scATAC-seq, which largely corresponded to clusters identified using scRNA-seq.
“We identified seven clusters in the population using scATAC-seq, which largely corresponded to clusters identified using scRNA-seq (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 3a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractTn5 insertions in peaks were highly correlated with bulk data (r=0.90) and RNA-seq data was moderately correlated (r=0.67), with similar RNA correlation for standard 10X Multiome data.
“Tn5 insertions in peaks were highly correlated with bulk data (r=0.90) and RNA-seq data was moderately correlated (r = 0.67), with a similar RNA correlation value observed for standard 10X Multiome data (Extended Data Fig. 2g-h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractFor human and mouse singlets, median RNA UMIs were 13,496 and 16,883; genes were 4,732 and 5,086; and ATAC fragments were 26,762 and 26,929 per cell, respectively.
“For human and mouse singlets, we detected a median of 13,496 and 16,883 RNA UMIs; 4,732 and 5,086 genes; and 26,762 and 26,929 ATAC fragments per cell, respectively (Fig. 1e-g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractGATA1 and OCT4 ADT counts were >4-fold enriched and SOX2 ADT counts were >2-fold enriched in their respective cell types.
“Importantly, we observed >4-fold enrichment of GATA1 and OCT4 antibody-derived tag (ADT) counts and >2-fold enrichment of SOX2 ADT counts in their respective cell types (Fig. 1h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the CD4 memory T cell dataset, there was a small reduction in unique ATAC and RNA reads detected relative to a standard 10X Multiome experiment, similarly observed in other fixed single cell assays.
“In this dataset, we observed a small reduction in unique ATAC and RNA reads detected relative to a standard 10X Multiome experiment, which was similarly observed in other fixed single cell assays (Supplementary Tables 1-3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractFor FOXP3 and Helios, motifs were not enriched in correlated peaks, consistent with earlier observations that these transcription factors are not correlated with global changes in motif accessibility.
“For FOXP3 and Helios, motifs were not enriched in correlated peaks, consistent with our earlier observations that these TFs are not correlated with global changes in motif accessibility (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractMost ATAC-seq reads in cells expressing high GATA3 ADT levels mapped to the risk allele, while little difference was observed in cells with lower GATA3 ADT levels.
“Indeed, we observed that most ATAC-seq reads in cells expressing high GATA3 ADT levels mapped to the risk allele, while little difference was observed in cells with lower GATA3 ADT levels (Fig. 3j).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the CD4 memory T cell experiment, normalizing TF ADT counts to total ADT counts or using raw ADT counts produced results very similar to NPC normalization.
“We observed very similar results when normalizing to total ADT counts or just using raw ADT counts (Extended Data Fig S4a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractGATA3 ADT levels, but not RNA levels, were correlated with global changes in GATA3 motif accessibility.
“The ADT levels, but not RNA levels, were correlated with global changes in GATA3 motif accessibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractSmoothing of signal across neighboring cells in the UMAP was necessary for identification of cell types using RNA-seq data due to high dropout rates, while unsmoothed ADT data were sufficient to clearly label cell types.
“smoothing of signal across neighboring cells in the UMAP was necessary for identification of cell types using RNA-seq data due to high dropout rates, while unsmoothed ADT data were sufficient to clearly label cell types (Extended Data Fig. 4a, d-e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ AbstractAmong the top upregulated genes were EEF1G, RPL18, PABPC4, GAB2, and NIBAN1.
“Among the top upregulated genes were several core translation regulators, including the elongation factor EEF1G, large ribosome subunit RPL18, and poly-A binding protein PABPC4, along with more indirect regulators such as GAB2 and NIBAN121 (Fig. 2e, Extended Data fig. 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ AbstractIn the barnyard experiment, RNA-seq reads showed greater cross-cell read contamination than ATAC-seq reads, particularly from mouse transcripts that were highly abundant in non-cell droplets.
“For RNA-seq reads we observed greater cross-cell read contamination, particularly from mouse transcripts which had high abundance in non-cell droplets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractFOXP3 and Helios exhibited strong correlation between gene accessibility, RNA, and protein abundance but had differing patterns of motif accessibility.
“FOXP3 and Helios exhibited strong correlation between gene accessibility, RNA, and protein abundance but had differing patterns of motif accessibility, suggesting that their expression is regulated transcriptionally but presence of the protein does not result in increased chromatin accessibility at motif sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractThe risk allele is associated with increased TSEN54 expression in GTEx data and TSEN54 was the gene most strongly associated with the risk allele in various tissues.
“Similarly, the risk allele is associated with increased TSEN54 expression in GTEx data and TSEN54 was the gene most strongly associated with the risk allele in various tissues (Extended Data Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AbstractCandidate direct target genes were significantly enriched for GO terms related to T cell function and included canonical surface markers for the corresponding cell type: among GATA3 targets were Th2 markers CCR4, CCR8, and IL4R, and among RORγT targets was the Th17 marker CCR6.
“The candidate direct target genes were significantly enriched for GO terms related to T cell function and included canonical surface markers for the corresponding cell type: Among the GATA3 targets were Th2 markers CCR4, CCR8, and IL4R, and among RORγT targets was the Th17 marker, CCR6 (Fig. 3c-f, Extended Data Fig. 7c-e, 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractTbet, GATA3, RORγT, FOXP3, and Helios drive Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg cell fate respectively.
“Our antibody panel targeted TFs that drive Th1 (Tbet), Th2 (GATA3), Th17 (RORγT), and Treg (FOXP3 and Helios) cell fate17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Fang, D. & Zhu, J. Dynamic balance between master transcription factors determines the fates and functions of CD4 T cell and innate lymphoid cell subsets. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1861–1876 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractNEAT-seq data internally validate GATA3-specific regulation of a non-coding GWAS SNP within a GATA motif and link it to a putative target gene.
“We also link a non-coding GWAS SNP within a GATA motif to a putative target gene, using NEAT-seq data to internally validate GATA3-specific regulation of SNP impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractPrimary human CD4 memory T cells are composed of distinct T cell subsets driven by known master transcription factors.
“We next applied NEAT-seq to profile primary human CD4 memory T cells composed of distinct T cell subsets driven by known master TFs, providing a diverse system for dissecting the regulatory mechanisms upstream and downstream of these TFs16.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Sallusto, F. & Lanzavecchia, A. Heterogeneity of CD4+ memory T cells: functional modules for tailored immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 39, 2076–2082 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractThe observation of high accessibility and low RNA at cytokine loci is suggestive of epigenetic priming, consistent with the primed status of memory T cells.
“This observation is suggestive of epigenetic priming, where transcription is absent but the gene locus is accessible and poised for transcriptional activation, and is consistent with the primed status of memory T cells18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Barski, A. et al. Rapid recall ability of memory T cells is encoded in their epigenome. Sci. Rep. 7, 39785 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractRORγT and Tbet are regulated transcriptionally.
“suggesting that these TFs are regulated transcriptionally”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractThe gene linked to the peak containing rs62088464 encodes TSEN54, a gene with significantly enriched expression in the sputum of patients with type-2 airway inflammation.
“The gene linked to the peak containing this SNP encodes TSEN54, a gene with significantly enriched expression in the sputum of patients with type-2 airway inflammation28,29 (Fig. 3g-i).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Peters, M. C. et al. A transcriptomic method to determine airway immune dysfunction in T2-high and T2-low asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 199, 465–477 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Singh, D. et al. COPD patients with chronic bronchitis and higher sputum eosinophil counts show increased type-2 and PDE4 gene expression in sputum. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 25, 905–918 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractTF-peak-gene linkages could be used to interpret the effects of non-coding GWAS SNPs on transcription factor activity and connect the SNPs to putative target genes.
“We also reasoned that these TF-peak-gene linkages could be used to interpret the effects of non-coding GWAS SNPs on TF activity and connect the SNPs to putative target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ AbstractNIBAN1 phosphorylates EIF4EBP1 to allow assembly of the initiation complex.
“which, like NIBAN1, phosphorylates EIF4EBP1 to allow assembly of the initiation complex23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Sonenberg, N. & Hinnebusch, A. G. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136, 731–745 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractThe data suggest three distinct modes of regulation in the transcription factor panel: transcriptional regulation, transcriptional regulation of expression but requirement of other transcription factors for chromatin binding, and translational regulation.
“By comparing the TF gene locus chromatin accessibility, RNA expression, protein abundance, and genome-wide TF binding motif accessibility across cells for each TF assayed, our data suggest three distinct modes of regulation in our TF panel.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“Together, our results suggest three regulatory mechanisms used to modulate activity of the TFs in our panel: transcriptional regulation, as demonstrated by concordant RNA, protein, and motif accessibility patterns (RORγT, and Tbet); transcriptional regulation of expression but requirement of other TFs for chromatin binding (FOXP3); and translational regulation (GATA3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ AbstractDecreased pulmonary function can result from inflammatory lung diseases associated with Th2 immune responses.
“which can result from inflammatory lung diseases associated with Th2 immune responses27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Gieseck, R. L., Wilson, M. S. & Wynn, T. A. Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 62–76 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ AbstractTF activity can be predicted by measuring differences in TF motif accessibility across cells using chromVAR.
“We can also predict TF activity by measuring differences in TF motif accessibility across cells using chromVAR39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nat. Methods 14, 975–978 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractGATA3 binds the risk allele sequence to activate the regulatory element and drive expression of TSEN54, and this binding is disrupted with the protective allele.
“Together, these results suggest that GATA3 binds the risk allele sequence to activate the regulatory element and drive expression of TSEN54 and that this binding is disrupted with the protective allele.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractThese observations are consistent with post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms restricting GATA3 protein expression in memory T cells, which could only be uncovered with the addition of protein quantification.
“These observations are consistent with post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms restricting GATA3 protein expression in memory T cells, which could only be uncovered with the addition of protein quantification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractFOXP3 and Helios expression is regulated transcriptionally but presence of the protein does not result in increased chromatin accessibility at motif sites.
“suggesting that their expression is regulated transcriptionally but presence of the protein does not result in increased chromatin accessibility at motif sites”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractThe capacity to link nuclear protein levels to epigenetic and transcriptional status provides a powerful approach for studying mechanisms of gene regulation.
“Since nuclear proteins encompass many proteins involved in gene regulation, the capacity to link nuclear protein levels to epigenetic and transcriptional status provides a powerful approach for studying mechanisms of gene regulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantification of nuclear gene regulatory proteins along with chromatin accessibility profiling and RNA-seq has not been demonstrated.
“However, quantification of nuclear gene regulatory proteins along with chromatin accessibility profiling and RNA-seq has not been demonstrated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
GAB2 is a direct activator of PI3K.
“while GAB2 is a direct activator of PI3K.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Levels of the nuclear pore complex are relatively constant across cells.
“since we expected that levels of the nuclear pore complex should be relatively constant across cells”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NEAT-seq co-profiles nuclear protein epitopes, chromatin accessibility and transcriptome in single cells.
“Incorporating even more modalities is NEAT-seq80, which co-profiles the abundance of nuclear protein epitopes, chromatin accessibility and the transcriptome in single cells.”
From The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics (2023) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · see citing works
clusterProfiler: an R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y., & He, Q.-Y. (2012) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0118 · Cited by 36,259 · see citing works
Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data
Stuart, T., Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Hafemeister, C., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., Hao, Y., Stoeckius, M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 · Cited by 15,453 · see citing works
Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools
Danecek, P., Bonfield, J., Liddle, J., Marshall, J., Ohan, V., Pollard, M., Whitwham, A., Keane, T., McCarthy, S., Davies, R. M., et al. (2021) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · Cited by 15,314 · see citing works
Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44385 · Cited by 5,846 · see citing works
Regulation of Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms and Biological Targets
Sonenberg, N., & Hinnebusch, A. G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042 · Cited by 3,304 · see citing works
Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells
Stoeckius, M., Hafemeister, C., Stephenson, W., Houck-Loomis, B., Chattopadhyay, P. K., Swerdlow, H., Satija, R., & Smibert, P. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4380 · Cited by 3,098 · see citing works
Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control
Spitz, F., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3207 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
Recovering Gene Interactions from Single-Cell Data Using Data Diffusion
van Dijk, D., Sharma, R., Nainys, J., Yim, K., Kathail, P., Carr, A. J., Burdziak, C., Moon, K. R., Chaffer, C. L., Pattabiraman, D., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
Determination and Inference of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Sequence Specificity
Weirauch, M. T., Yang, A. W. H., Albu, M., Coté, A. G., Montenegro‐Montero, A., Drewe, P., Najafabadi, H. S., Lambert, S. A., Mann, I. K., Cook, K. B., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4401 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
Self-citationT Helper 17 Lineage Differentiation Is Programmed by Orphan Nuclear Receptors RORα and RORγ
Yang, X. O., Pappu, B. P., Nurieva, R., Akimzhanov, A., Kang, H. S., Chung, Y., Ma, L., Shah, B., Panopoulos, A. D., Schluns, K. S., et al. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.016 · Cited by 1,605 · see citing works
Chromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single-Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin
Ma, S., Zhang, B., LaFave, L. M., Earl, A. S., Chiang, Z., Hu, Y., Ding, J., Brack, A., Kartha, V. K., Tay, T., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.056 · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis
Gieseck, R. L., Wilson, M. S., & Wynn, T. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.90 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Stoeckius, M., Zheng, S., Houck-Loomis, B., Hao, S., Yeung, B. Z., Mauck, W. M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1603-1 · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
Monaco, G., Lee, B., Xu, W., Mustafah, S., Hwang, Y. Y., Carré, C., Burdin, N., Visan, L., Ceccarelli, M., Poidinger, M., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.041 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms on Human Immune Cell Gene Expression
Schmiedel, B. J., Singh, D., Madrigal, A., Valdovino-Gonzalez, A. G., White, B. M., Zapardiel-Gonzalo, J., Ha, B., Altay, G., Greenbaum, J. A., McVicker, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.022 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics
Grün, D., Kester, L., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2930 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Mimitou, E. P., Lareau, C. A., Chen, K. Y., Zorzetto-Fernandes, A. L., Hao, Y., Takeshima, Y., Luo, W., Huang, T.-S., Yeung, B. Z., Papalexi, E., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00927-2 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Mimitou, E. P., Cheng, A., Montalbano, A., Hao, S., Stoeckius, M., Legut, M., Roush, T., Herrera, A., Papalexi, E., Ouyang, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0392-0 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies regulatory programs in mixed-phenotype acute leukemia
Granja, J. M., Klemm, S., McGinnis, L. M., Kathiria, A. S., Mezger, A., Corces, M. R., Parks, B., Gars, E., Liedtke, M., Zheng, G. X. Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0332-7 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-citationFoxp3 Exploits a Pre-Existent Enhancer Landscape for Regulatory T Cell Lineage Specification
Samstein, R. M., Arvey, A., Josefowicz, S. Z., Peng, X., Reynolds, A., Sandstrom, R., Neph, S., Sabo, P., Kim, J. M., Liao, W., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.053 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
From single-cell to cell-pool transcriptomes: Stochasticity in gene expression and RNA splicing
Marinov, G. K., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schroth, G. P., Gertz, J., Myers, R. M., & Wold, B. J. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.161034.113 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Ramesh, R., Kozhaya, L., McKevitt, K., Djuretic, I. M., Carlson, T. J., Quintero, M. A., McCauley, J. L., Abreu, M. T., Unutmaz, D., & Sundrud, M. S. (2014) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20130301 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Lohman, T. M., & Overman, L. B. (1985) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)83663-3 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Heterogeneity of CD4<sup>+</sup> memory T cells: Functional modules for tailored immunity
Sallusto, F., & Lanzavecchia, A. (2009) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200939722 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
A Balancing Act: MDA5 in Antiviral Immunity and Autoinflammation
Dias, A. G., Sampaio, N. G., & Rehwinkel, J. (2018) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2018.08.007 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Cano-Gamez, K., Soskic, B., Roumeliotis, T. I., So, E., Smyth, D. J., Baldrighi, M., Willé, D., Nakic, N., Esparza-Gordillo, J., Larminie, C. G. C., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15543-y · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Swanson, E., Lord, C., Reading, J., Heubeck, A. T., Genge, P. C., Thomson, Z., Weiss, M. D., Li, X.-J., Savage, A. K., Green, R. R., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.63632 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Chromatin remodelling complex dosage modulates transcription factor function in heart development
Takeuchi, J., Lou, X., Alexander, J. M., Sugizaki, H., Delgado-Olguı́n, P., Holloway, A. K., Mori, A., Wylie, J. N., Munson, C., Zhu, Y., et al. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1187 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Bujalowski, W. M., & Lohman, T. M. (1986) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00372a003 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Affar, E. B., Gay, F., Shi, Y. G., Liu, H., Huarte, M., Wu, S., Li, E., Li, E., & Shi, Y. (2006) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.26.9.3565-3581.2006 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Fang, D., & Zhu, J. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20170494 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
A Transcriptomic Method to Determine Airway Immune Dysfunction in T2-High and T2-Low Asthma
Peters, M. C., Ringel, L., Dyjack, N., Herrin, R., Woodruff, P. G., Rios, C., O’Connor, B., Fahy, J. V., & Seibold, M. A. (2019) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201807-1291oc · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Motokura, T., Keyomarsi, K., Kronenberg, H. M., & Arnold, A. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)88717-3 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Joint single-cell measurements of nuclear proteins and RNA in vivo
Chung, H., Parkhurst, C. N., Magee, E. M., Phillips, D., Habibi, E., Chen, F., Yeung, B. Z., Waldman, J., Artis, D., & Regev, A. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01278-1 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
A combined approach for single-cell mRNA and intracellular protein expression analysis
Reimegård, J., Tarbier, M., Danielsson, M., Schuster, J., Baskaran, S., Panagiotou, S., Dahl, N., Friedländer, M. R., & Gallant, C. J. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02142-w · Cited by 129 · see citing works
OASL—a new player in controlling antiviral innate immunity
Zhu, J., Ghosh, A., & Sarkar, S. N. (2015) · Current Opinion in Virology · doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2015.01.010 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Gillespie, M. A., Palii, C. G., Sanchez-Taltavull, D., Shannon, P., Longabaugh, W. J. R., Downes, D. J., Sivaraman, K., Espinoza, H. M., Hughes, J. R., Price, N. D., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.031 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Bivariate Genomic Footprinting Detects Changes in Transcription Factor Activity
Baek, S., Goldstein, I., & Hager, G. L. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.003 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Gerlach, J. P., van Buggenum, J. A. G., Tanis, S. E. J., Hogeweg, M., Heuts, B. M. H., Muraro, M. J., Elze, L., Rivello, F., Rakszewska, A., van Oudenaarden, A., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37977-7 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Molineux, I. J., Pauli, A., & Gefter, M. L. (1975) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/2.10.1821 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Kawabe, T., Jankovic, D. L., Kawabe, S., Huang, Y., Lee, P., Yamane, H., Zhu, J., Sher, A., Germain, R. N., & Paul, W. E. (2017) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aam9304 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
TCR-Dependent Translational Control of GATA-3 Enhances Th2 Differentiation
Cook, K. D., & Miller, J. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902544 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Sokolik, C., Liu, Y., Bauer, D. P., McPherson, J., Broeker, M., Heimberg, G., Qi, L. S., Sivak, D. A., & Thomson, M. W. (2015) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.08.001 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ortiz, B. D., Krensky, A. M., & Nelson, P. J. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.1.202 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Functions of Single-Strand DNA-Binding Proteins in DNA Replication, Recombination, and Repair
Marceau, A. H. (2012) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-032-8_1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Hosono, K., Noda, S., Shimizu, A., Nakanishi, N., Ohtsubo, M., Shimizu, N., & Minoshima, S. (2010) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.05.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Siegfried, A., Berchtold, S., Manncke, B., Deuschle, E., Reber, J., Ott, T., Weber, M., Kalinke, U., Hofer, M. J., Hatesuer, B., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1203305 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Identification of Novel Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cell (NFAT)-associated Proteins in T Cells
Gabriel, C. H., Groß, F., Karl, M., Stephanowitz, H., Hennig, A. F., Weber, M., Gryzik, S., Bachmann, I., Hecklau, K., Wienands, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.739326 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Characterization of Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins from Mycobacteria
Reddy, M. S., Guhan, N., & Muniyappa, K. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m103523200 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Sun, G. D., Kobayashi, T., Abe, M., Tada, N., Adachi, H., Shiota, A., Totsuka, Y., & Hino, O. (2007) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.06.021 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Rapid Recall Ability of Memory T cells is Encoded in their Epigenome
Barski, A., Cuddapah, S., Kartashov, A. V., Liu, C., Imamichi, H., Yang, W., Peng, W., Lane, H. C., & Zhao, K. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39785 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Single-cell intracellular epitope and transcript detection reveals signal transduction dynamics
Rivello, F., van Buijtenen, E., Matuła, K., van Buggenum, J. A. G. L., Vink, P. M., van Eenennaam, H., Mulder, K. W., & Huck, W. T. S. (2021) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100070 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
SINGH, S. P., Zhang, H. H., Tsang, H., Gardina, P. J., Myers, T. G., Nagarajan, V., Lee, C. H., & Farber, J. M. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1401093 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
PICS2: next-generation fine mapping via probabilistic identification of causal SNPs
Taylor, K. E., Ansel, K. M., Marson, A., Criswell, L. A., & Farh, K. K. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab122 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Marusina, A. I., Ono, Y., Merleev, A. A., Shimoda, M., Ogawa, H., Wang, E. A., Kondo, K., Olney, L. P., Luxardi, G., Miyamura, Y., et al. (2016) · Journal of Autoimmunity · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2016.11.001 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Singh, D., Bassi, M., Balzano, D., Lucci, G., Emirova, A., Anna Nandeuil, M., Jellema, G., Afolabi, E. K., Leaker, B., Kornmann, O., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.16146 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Saka, S. K., Xie, W., Goldaracena, I., Kohman, R. E., Yin, P., & Church, G. M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/274456 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Helios represses megakaryocyte priming in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
Cova, G., Taroni, C., Deau, M.-C., Cai, Q., Mittelheisser, V., Philipps, M., Jung, M., Cerciat, M., Le Gras, S., Thibault-Carpentier, C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20202317 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis
Hao, Y., Stuart, T., Kowalski, M. H., Choudhary, S., Hoffman, P., Hartman, A., Srivastava, A., Molla, G., Madad, S., Fernandez-Granda, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y · Cited by 5,631 · see citing works
Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics
Vandereyken, K., Sifrim, A., Thienpont, B., & Voet, T. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00580-2 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics
Baysoy, A., Bai, Z., Satija, R., & Fan, R. (2023) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00615-w · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Spatial epigenome–transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues
Zhang, D., Deng, Y., Kukanja, P., Agirre, E., Bartosovic, M., Dong, M., Ma, C., Ma, S., Su, G., Bao, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05795-1 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Gene regulatory network inference in the era of single-cell multi-omics
Badia-i-Mompel, P., Wessels, L., Müller‐Dott, S., Trimbour, R., Flores, R. O. R., Argelaguet, R., & Sáez-Rodríguez, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00618-5 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Single-cell proteomics enabled by next-generation sequencing or mass spectrometry
Bennett, H. M., Stephenson, W., Rose, C. M., & Darmanis, S. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01791-5 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Characterizing cis-regulatory elements using single-cell epigenomics
Preissl, S., Gaulton, K. J., & Ren, B. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00509-1 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Advances in single-cell omics and multiomics for high-resolution molecular profiling
Lim, J., Park, C., Kim, M., Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, D.-S. (2024) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01186-2 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Tumor heterogeneity: preclinical models, emerging technologies, and future applications
Proietto, M., Crippa, M., Damiani, C., Pasquale, V., Sacco, E., Vanoni, M., & Gilardi, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1164535 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
An efficient CRISPR–Cas12a promoter editing system for crop improvement
Zhou, J., Liu, G., Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Tang, X. D., Li, L., Jia, X., Guo, Y., Wu, Y., Han, Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-023-01384-2 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
A foundation model of transcription across human cell types
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08391-z · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Oelen, R., de Vries, D. H., Brugge, H., Gordon, M. G., Vochteloo, M., Ye, C., Westra, H.-J., Franke, L., & van der Wijst, M. G. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30893-5 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Xu, W. Q., Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Hong, N., Zhang, Q., Wang, X. J., Hu, Y., Song, K., Jin, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01601-4 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Single cell cancer epigenetics
Casado-Peláez, M., Bueno-Costa, A., & Esteller, M. (2022) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2022.06.005 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Le, J., Dian, Y., Zhao, D., Guo, Z., Luo, Z., Chen, X., Zeng, F., & Deng, G. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02426-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ober-Reynolds, B., Wang, C., Ko, J. M., Rios, E. J., Aasi, S. Z., Davis, M. M., Oro, A. E., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01445-4 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent advances in the field of single-cell proteomics
Petrosius, V., & Schoof, E. M. (2022) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101556 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
GAGE-seq concurrently profiles multiscale 3D genome organization and gene expression in single cells
Zhou, T., Zhang, R., Jia, D., Doty, R. T., Munday, A. D., Gao, D., Xin, L., Abkowitz, J. L., Duan, Z., & Ma, J. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01745-3 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Droplet-based single-cell joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptomes
Xie, Y., Zhu, C., Wang, Z., Tastemel, M., Chang, L., Li, Y. E., & Ren, B. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01060-1 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hansen, T. J., & Hodges, E. C. (2022) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.276766.122 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Tissue-specific enhancer–gene maps from multimodal single-cell data identify causal disease alleles
Sakaue, S., Weinand, K., Isaac, S., Dey, K. K., Jagadeesh, K. A., Kanai, M., Watts, G. F. M., Zhu, Z., Accelerating Medicines Partnership® RA/SLE Program and Network, Albrecht, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01682-1 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Artificial neural networks enable genome-scale simulations of intracellular signaling
Nilsson, A., Peters, J. M., Meimetis, N., Bryson, B. D., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30684-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Simultaneous single-cell analysis of 5mC and 5hmC with SIMPLE-seq
Bai, D., Zhang, X., Xiang, H., Guo, Z., Zhu, C., & Yi, C. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02148-9 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Microtechnologies for single-cell and spatial multi-omics
Deng, Y., Bai, Z., & Fan, R. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00084-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The chromatin landscape of pathogenic transcriptional cell states in rheumatoid arthritis
Weinand, K., Sakaue, S., Nathan, A., Jonsson, A. H., Zhang, F., Watts, G. F. M., Suqri, M. A., Zhu, Z., Accelerating Medicines Partnership Program: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (AMP RA/SLE) Network, Albrecht, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48620-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Progress in single-cell multimodal sequencing and multi-omics data integration
Wang, X. J., Wu, X., Hong, N., & Jin, W. (2023) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-023-01092-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Graph neural networks for single-cell omics data: a review of approaches and applications
Li, S., Hua, H., & Chen, S. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf109 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The Advancement and Application of the Single-Cell Transcriptome in Biological and Medical Research
Huang, K., Xu, Y., Feng, T., Lan, H., Ling, F., Xiang, H., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology13060451 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Li, S., Schmid, K., de Vries, D. H., Korshevniuk, M., Losert, C., Oelen, R., van Blokland, I. V., Groot, H. E., Swertz, M. A., van der Harst, P., et al. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02897-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Functional analysis of cell plasticity using single-cell technologies
Qin, X., & Tape, C. J. (2024) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2024.01.006 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Single-Cell Multi-Omics: Insights into Therapeutic Innovations to Advance Treatment in Cancer
Guan, A., & Quek, C. Y. J. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26062447 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Endothelial TDP-43 depletion disrupts core blood–brain barrier pathways in neurodegeneration
Omar, O. M., Kimble, A. L., Ashok, C., Tyburski, J. D., Pandey, S., Wu, Q., Reese, B., Jellison, E. R., Hao, B., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01914-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Functional characterization of human genomic variation linked to polygenic diseases
Fabo, T., & Khavari, P. A. (2023) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.02.014 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Morris, J. A., Sun, J. S., & Sanjana, N. E. (2023) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xu, J., Huang, D., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202307835 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Loers, J. U., & Vermeirssen, V. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae382 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Mapping enhancer–gene regulatory interactions from single-cell data
Sheth, M. U., Qiu, W., Ma, X. R., Gschwind, A. R., Jagoda, E., Tan, A. S., Galante, J., Ray, J., Amgalan, D., Einarsson, H., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02695-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Microfluidics-based single cell analysis: from transcriptomics to spatiotemporal multi-omics
Cao, J., Chen, X., Huang, S., Shi, W., Fan, Q., Gong, Y., Peng, Y., Wu, L., & Yang, C. J. (2022) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2022.116868 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Paul, S., Xie, S., Yao, X., & Dey, A. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11142225 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Phospho-seq: integrated, multi-modal profiling of intracellular protein dynamics in single cells
Blair, J. D., Hartman, A., Zenk, F. L., Wahle, P., Brancati, G., Dalgarno, C., Treutlein, B., & Satija, R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56590-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
scTrends: A living review of commercial single-cell and spatial 'omic technologies
Jonghe, J. D., Opzoomer, J. W., Vilas‐Zornoza, A., Nilges, B. S., Crane, P., Vicari, M., Lee, H., Lara‐Astiaso, D., Groß, T., Morf, J., et al. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100723 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Mapping the developmental trajectory of human astrocytes reveals divergence in glioblastoma
Sojka, C., Wang, H. V., Bhatia, T. N., Li, Y., Chopra, P., Sing, A., Voss, A. J., King, A. T., Wang, F., Joseph, K., et al. (2025) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-024-01583-9 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Applications of single-cell technologies in drug discovery for tumor treatment
Liu, B., Hu, S., & Wang, X. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110486 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Microfluidic single‐cell multiomics analysis
Xu, X., Zhang, Q., Li, M., Lin, S., Liang, S., Cai, L., Zhu, H., Su, R. J., & Yang, C. J. (2022) · Open Research (University of Surrey) · doi:10.1002/viw.20220034 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Transcriptome data are insufficient to control false discoveries in regulatory network inference
Kernfeld, E. M., Keener, R., Cahan, P., & Battle, A. J. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.07.006 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Current and future perspectives of single-cell multi-omics technologies in cardiovascular research
Tan, W. L. W., Seow, W. Q., Zhang, A., Rhee, S., Wong, W. H., Greenleaf, W. J., & Wu, J. C. (2023) · Nature Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1038/s44161-022-00205-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationDiao, N., Hou, J., Peng, X., Wang, Y., He, A., Gao, H., Yang, L., Guo, P., Wang, J., & Han, D. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202406330 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Wu, R., Veličković, M., & Burnum-Johnson, K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103174 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Xiong, X., Wang, X., Liu, C., Shao, Z.-M., & Yu, K. (2024) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-024-00654-1 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Turkalj, S., Jakobsen, N. A., Groom, A., Metzner, M., Riva, S. G., Gur, E., Usukhbayar, B., Salazar, M. A., Hentges, L. D., Mickute, G., et al. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.012 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Li, W., Xiang, B., Yang, F., Rong, Y., Yin, Y., Yao, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad391 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The role of single-cell genomics in human genetics
Sreenivasan, V. K. A., Balachandran, S., & Spielmann, M. (2022) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108588 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Advances in Microfluidic Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Spatial Transcriptomics
Sun, Y., Yu, N., Zhang, J., & Yang, B. (2025) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi16040426 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, T., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Chu, L., Li, J., An, H., Wan, P., Xu, D., et al. (2023) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108162 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Key Considerations on CITE‐Seq for Single‐Cell Multiomics
Song, H.-W., Martin, J., Shi, X., & Tyznik, A. J. (2025) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202400011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Slide-tags: scalable, single-nucleus barcoding for multi-modal spatial genomicsPreprint
Russell, A. J. C., Weir, J. A., Nadaf, N. M., Shabet, M., Kumar, V., Kambhampati, S., Raichur, R., Marrero, G. J., Liu, S., Balderrama, K. S., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.01.535228 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Concepts and new developments in droplet-based single cell multi-omics
Chow, A., & Lareau, C. A. (2024) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.07.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Droplet-based single-cell sequencing: Strategies and applications
Shang, Y., Wang, Z., Xi, L., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Feng, Y., Wang, J., Wu, Q., Xiang, X., Chen, M., et al. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108454 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Han, X., Wang, B., Situ, C., Qi, Y., Zhu, H., Li, Y., & Guo, X. (2023) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002369 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Bacterial phenotypic heterogeneity through the lens of single-cell RNA sequencing
Walls, A. W., & Rosenthal, A. Z. (2024) · Transcription · doi:10.1080/21541264.2024.2334110 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Single-cell epigenomics and proteomics methods integrated in multiomics
Bi, H., & Weng, X. (2024) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.11.014 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Advances in the joint profiling technologies of 5mC and 5hmC
He, B., Yao, H., & Yi, C. (2024) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d4cb00034j · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Chromatin Landscape of Pathogenic Transcriptional Cell States in Rheumatoid ArthritisPreprint
Weinand, K., Sakaue, S., Nathan, A., Jonsson, A., Zhang, F., Watts, G., Zhu, Z., Rao, D. A., Anolik, J., Brenner, M., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.04.07.536026 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhou, T., Zhang, R., Jia, D., Doty, R. T., Munday, A. D., Gao, D., Xin, L., Abkowitz, J. L., Duan, Z., & Ma, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.20.549578 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The multicellular compartmentation of plant specialized metabolism
Shen, X., Guan, Z., Zhang, C., Yan, Z., & Sun, C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2024.102616 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Single-Cell Molecular Barcoding to Decode Multimodal Information Defining Cell States
Kim, I. S. (2023) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.14348/molcells.2023.2168 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Fu, Y., Li, M., Wu, S., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2026) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-026-08685-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
HALO: hierarchical causal modeling for single cell multi-omics data
Mao, H. H., Jia, M., Di, M. E., Valenzi, E., Cai, X. T., Singh, H., Lafyatis, R., Zhang, K., & Benos, P. V. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63921-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Decoding Human Biology and Disease Using Single-Cell Omics Technologies
Shi, Q., Chen, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2023.06.003 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
scMLC: an accurate and robust multiplex community detection method for single-cell multi-omics data
Chen, Y., Zheng, R., Liu, J., & Li, M. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae101 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Dorans, E., Jagadeesh, K. A., Dey, K. K., & Price, A. L. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02220-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Pregizer, S. K., Vreven, T., Mathur, M., & Robinson, L. N. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1176856 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Beyond single cells: microfluidics empowering multiomics analysis
Tian, T., Lin, S., & Yang, C. J. (2023) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-023-05028-4 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
SIGNAL-seq: Multimodal Single-cell Inter- and Intra-cellular Signalling AnalysisPreprint
Opzoomer, J. W., O’Sullivan, R., Sufi, J., Madsen, R. R., Qin, X., Basiarz, E., & Tape, C. J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581433 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Falquet, M., Su, Z., Wyss, T., Ercolano, G., Trabanelli, S., & Jandus, C. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107728 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Molecular circuits for genomic recording of cellular events
Chen, W., & Choi, J. (2025) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2025.04.004 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A pre-trained large generative model for translating single-cell transcriptomes to proteomes
Liu, L., Li, W., Wang, F., Li, Y., Huang, L.-K., Wong, K., Yang, F., & Yao, J. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01528-z · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Decoding the blueprints of embryo development with single-cell and spatial omics
Liu, C. X., Li, X., Hu, Q., Jia, Z., Ye, Q., Wang, X., Zhao, K., Liu, L., & Wang, M. (2025) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2025.01.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cell-Type Resolved Insights into the Cis-Regulatory Genome of NAFLD
Dam, T. V., Toft, N. I., & Grøntved, L. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11050870 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
High-capacity sample multiplexing for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling
Booth, G. T., Daza, R. M., Srivatsan, S. R., McFaline‐Figueroa, J. L., Gladden, R. G., Mullen, A. C., Furlan, S. N., Shendure, J., & Trapnell, C. (2023) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-023-09832-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Single-cell multiomics: a new frontier in drug research and development
Ma, J., Dong, C. F., He, A., & Xiong, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Drug Discovery · doi:10.3389/fddsv.2024.1474331 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
scGDCC: Graph-based Dual Contrastive Calibration for Single Cell MultiOmics Clustering
Tao, H., Sun, X., Chen, Y., Li, M., & Zheng, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822576 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Revealing new biology from multiplexed, metal-isotope-tagged, single-cell readouts
Baskar, R., Kimmey, S. C., & Bendall, S. C. (2022) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2022.01.012 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Chen, K. Y., Takeshima, Y., Zorzetto-Fernandes, A. L., Makino, K., Kibayashi, T., Hata, M., Ichiyama, K., Croteau, J. D., Taylor, K., & Sakaguchi, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.11.632564 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Mapping transcriptional responses to cellular perturbation dictionaries with RNA fingerprintingPreprint
Grabski, I. N., Lee, J., Blair, J. D., Dalgarno, C., Mascio, I., Bradu, A., Knowles, D. A., & Satija, R. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.19.676866 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Machine learning predictions surpass individual mRNAs as a proxy of single-cell protein expression
Fisher, J., Wood, O., Bullers, S. J., Murray, L., Li, L., & Jackson, M. A. (2026) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-026-04083-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yang, C., Jin, Y., & Yin, Y. (2024) · Life Medicine · doi:10.1093/lifemedi/lnae015 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fortmann, S. D., Frey, B. F., Hanumanthu, V. S., Liu, S., Goldsborough, A. S., Kilchrist, K. V., Ferrell, P. B., Weaver, C. T., Grant, M. B., & Welner, R. S. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.13.528370 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Blair, J. D., Bradu, A., Dalgarno, C., Grabski, I. N., & Satija, R. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.08.27.672635 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
An expanded role for single-cell chemical genomics profiling in drug discovery
Wyatt, A., Hoffer-Hawlik, K., Giglio, R. M., Azizi, E., & McFaline‐Figueroa, J. L. (2026) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20253273 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Toward global representation in single-cell genomics
Shahin, T., Bolatbay, D., & Idaghdour, Y. (2026) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2026.02.008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Single-cell technologies for multimodal omics measurements
Bai, D., & Zhu, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Systems Biology · doi:10.3389/fsysb.2023.1155990 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wasney, M., & Pott, S. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-2899-7_12 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Artificial neural networks enable genome-scale simulations of intracellular signalingPreprint
Nilsson, A., Peters, J. M., Bryson, B. D., & Lauffenburger, D. A. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.24.461703 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sequencing-based methods for single-cell multi-omics studies
Qin, S., Liu, S., & Weng, X. (2023) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-023-1793-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Recent progress in co-detection of single-cell transcripts and proteins
Huang, S., Fan, Q., Wang, Y., Huang, Z., Shi, W., Gong, Y., Yang, T., Wang, J., Wu, L., & Yang, C. J. (2023) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-023-5924-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Discovering mechanisms of human genetic variation and controlling cell states at scale
Frenkel, M. P. C., & Raman, S. (2024) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2024.03.010 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
He, L., Wang, W., Dang, K., Zhang, W., Ye, K., Wang, H., Huang, Y., & Zhao, X. (2025) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2025.118418 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lyu, J., Xu, X., & Chen, C. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.22.609222 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
InTraSeq: A Multimodal Assay that Uncovers New Single-Cell Biology and Regulatory MechanismsPreprint
Ariss, M. M., Huang, L., Ding, X., Sheth, S., Levy, T., Fisher, J., Loebelenz, J., Arlotta, K. J., Dixon, K. O., Polakiewicz, R., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5284652/v1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, A. F., Parks, B., Kathiria, A. S., Ober-Reynolds, B., Goronzy, J. J., & Greenleaf, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greenleaf, William J.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-553
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- PMC
- PMC11192021
- OpenAlex
- W4225287808
- Semantic Scholar
- eb381b263ca20a3cb5aed48ee44dd0331fb26d6d
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG007735, UM1HG009442)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM135996)
- United States Department of Commerce | National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI057266)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- single-cell multi-omics, chromatin accessibility, single-cell transcriptome, memory CD4+ T cells, master transcription factors, transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, GATA3, GATA motif, single nucleotide polymorphisms, T cell differentiation
- MeSH terms
- Chromatin, Nuclear Proteins, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review