Spatial epigenome–transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Emerging spatial technologies, including spatial transcriptomics and spatial epigenomics, are becoming powerful tools for profiling of cellular states in the tissue context 1–5 . However, current methods capture only one layer of omics information at a time, precluding the possibility of examining the mechanistic relationship across the central dogma of molecular biology. Here, we present two technologies for spatially resolved, genome-wide, joint profiling of the epigenome and transcriptome by cosequencing chromatin accessibility and gene expression, or histone modifications (H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3) and gene expression on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution. These were applied to embryonic and juvenile mouse brain, as well as adult human brain, to map how epigenetic mechanisms control transcriptional phenotype and cell dynamics in tissue. Although highly concordant tissue features were identified by either spatial epigenome or spatial transcriptome we also observed distinct patterns, suggesting their differential roles in defining cell states. Linking epigenome to transcriptome pixel by pixel allows the uncovering of new insights in spatial epigenetic priming, differentiation and gene regulation within the tissue architecture. These technologies are of great interest in life science and biomedical research.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper presents spatial ATAC–RNA-seq and spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq for genome-wide joint profiling of chromatin accessibility or histone modifications and mRNA on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution. These methods were applied to embryonic and juvenile mouse brain and adult human hippocampus, revealing spatial epigenetic–transcriptional relationships including epigenetic priming and region-specific gene regulation.
Key findings
- In P22 mouse brain with 100 × 100 barcodes, spatial ATAC–RNA-seq yielded a median of 14,284 unique fragments per pixel, with 19% enriched at transcription start sites and 26% in peaks; RNA detected 22,914 genes, averaging 1,073 genes and 2,358 UMIs per pixel.
- Spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq on P22 mouse brain gave median unique fragments per pixel of 10,644 for H3K27me3, 10,002 for H3K27ac and 2,507 for H3K4me3; paired RNA averaged 2,011, 1,513 and 1,329 genes per pixel, respectively.
- Joint clustering of E13 mouse embryo ATAC and RNA identified a new neuronal cluster J10 not readily resolved by single modalities; in P22 mouse brain, 21,417 significant peak-to-gene linkages were detected by ATAC–RNA-seq and 19,468 from H3K27ac CUT&Tag–RNA-seq.
- Region-specific regulation was observed: H3K27me3 anticorrelated with RNA in corpus callosum (for example, Mal, Mag and Car2 low CSS/high RNA; Grin2b and Syt1 high CSS/low RNA), while H3K27ac and H3K4me3 correlated with RNA; potential bivalency/poising was noted for genes such as Ptprz1 and Fnbp1. In human hippocampus, PROX1 was highly expressed in the granule cell layer but showed modest chromatin accessibility.
Methods
- Frozen tissue sections were fixed, subjected to Tn5 transposition for ATAC or antibody-guided pA-Tn5 CUT&Tag, then in-tissue reverse transcription; sequential microfluidic barcode A and B ligation generated 50 × 50 or 100 × 100 pixel grids (2,500 or 10,000 pixels), with separate gDNA and cDNA libraries sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (paired-end, 150 bp).
- Samples included E13 mouse embryo, P21/22 mouse brain and adult human hippocampus from a 31-year-old male; pixel sizes were 50 μm for embryo and human tissue and 20 μm for juvenile mouse brain. Analyses used Signac, Seurat and ArchR, with label transfer to scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq and scCUT&Tag atlases, gene activity score (GAS), chromatin silencing score (CSS), peak-to-gene links, pseudotime and GO enrichment.
- Reproducibility was high: Pearson correlations were r = 0.98 for ATAC and r = 0.98 for RNA in spatial ATAC–RNA-seq, and r = 0.96 for CUT&Tag (H3K27ac) and r = 0.89 for RNA in spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq.
Limitations
- The paper states that low RNA expression despite open chromatin may be due in part to sequencing depth and RNA detection sensitivity, and interprets some such cases as lineage priming.
- The method is near-single-cell, not single-cell: 50-μm pixels contained an average of 25 cells for E10 mouse embryo and 1–9 cells for human hippocampus, while 20-μm pixels contained 1–3 cells in juvenile mouse brain; when more than one cell type was present in a pixel, the major cell type was assigned.
- Evident from the text: the human analysis used one 31-year-old male hippocampus sample, limiting generalizability, and the epigenome–transcriptome relationships are largely correlative rather than causally tested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Most 20-μm pixels contained one to three cells per pixel in juvenile mouse brain.
“Most 20-μm pixels contained one to three cells per pixel in juvenile mouse brain (Supplementary Fig. 1b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
21,417 significant peak-to-gene linkages between regulatory elements and target genes were detected.
“We detected 21,417 significant peak-to-gene linkages between regulatory elements and target genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The loss of chromatin accessibility at the Pax6 and radial glia marker Fabp7 loci preceded downregulation of the corresponding RNAs.
“The loss of chromatin accessibility at the Pax6 and radial glia marker Fabp7 loci preceded downregulation of the corresponding RNAs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CUT&Tag and RNA showed good concordance in spatial patterns.
“These clusters agreed with the anatomical annotation by Nissl staining and showed good concordance between CUT&Tag and RNA in spatial patterns (Fig. 3a–c), which was further confirmed by Belayer34 analysis (Supplementary Fig. 7c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Ma, C., Chitra, U., Zhang, S. & Raphael, B. J. Belayer: modeling discrete and continuous spatial variation in gene expression from spatially resolved transcriptomics. Cell Syst. 13, 786–797 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The CUT&Tag and RNA clusters agreed with anatomical annotation by Nissl staining.
“These clusters agreed with the anatomical annotation by Nissl staining and showed good concordance between CUT&Tag and RNA in spatial patterns (Fig. 3a–c), which was further confirmed by Belayer34 analysis (Supplementary Fig. 7c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Some marker genes (Pax6, Sox2 and Myt1l) were highly accessible in some regions of the embryonic brain but showed modest or low RNA expression.
“Some marker genes (Pax6, Sox2 and Myt1l) were highly accessible in some regions of the embryonic brain but showed modest or low RNA expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Chromatin accessibility GAS and gene expression along the radial glia to neuron trajectory showed dynamic changes in selected marker genes.
“Chromatin accessibility GAS and gene expression along this trajectory showed dynamic changes in selected marker genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In P22 mouse brain, a higher number of ATAC clusters (14) compared with RNA clusters (11) was found.
“we found a higher number of ATAC clusters (14) compared with RNA clusters (11)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A high degree of concordance was observed in spatial cell type distribution as determined by ATAC versus RNA.
“We observed a high degree of concordance in spatial cell type distribution as determined by ATAC versus RNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Radial glia, postmitotic premature neurons and inhibitory interneurons (clusters R8, R6 and R2) were present in the same major clusters as shown in the ATAC analysis (clusters A7 and A6).
“radial glia, postmitotic premature neurons and inhibitory interneurons (clusters R8, R6 and R2) were present in the same major clusters as shown in the ATAC analysis (clusters A7 and A6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq co-profiles transcriptome and H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3 histone modifications in P22 mouse brain.
“Spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq was performed to co-profile transcriptome and H3K27me3 (repressing loci), H3K27ac (activating promoters and/or enhancers) or H3K4me3 (active promoters) histone modifications, respectively, in P22 mouse brain (20-μm pixel size, 100 × 100 barcodes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A new neuronal cluster (J10) was identified in joint clustering analysis of spatial ATAC and RNA data, which was not readily resolved by single modalities alone.
“A new neuronal cluster (J10) was identified in the joint clustering analysis, which was not readily resolved by single modalities alone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Neuronal intermediate progenitor cells (SZNBL), mature oligodendrocytes (MOL), newly formed oligodendrocytes and medium spiny neurons (MSN) shown by the RNA data were enriched in the same regions as identified by the ATAC data.
“neuronal intermediate progenitor cells (SZNBL, included in radial glial-like cells from scATAC-seq30), mature oligodendrocytes (MOL, included in oligodendrocytes from scATAC-seq), newly formed oligodendrocytes (included in immature oligodendrocytes from scATAC-seq) and medium spiny neurons (MSN) shown by the RNA data were enriched in the same regions as identified by the ATAC data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As observed in the embryonic mouse brain, some marker genes with open chromatin accessibility (Sox10, Sox2, Neurod6, Pax6 and Notch1) were either not or lowly expressed.
“As observed in the embryonic mouse brain, some marker genes with open chromatin accessibility (Sox10, Sox2, Neurod6, Pax6 and Notch1) were either not or lowly expressed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Subclasses of excitatory neurons in different layers of cortex (ITL23GL, ITL4GL, ITL5GL, PTGL, NPGL, ITL6GL, CTGL and L6bGL) were clearly identified.
“the subclasses of excitatory neurons in different layers of cortex (ITL23GL, Cortex L2/3; ITL4GL, Cortex L4; ITL5GL, Cortex L5; PTGL, Cortex PT; NPGL, Cortex NP; ITL6GL, Cortex L6; CTGL, Cortex CT; and L6bGL, Cortex L6b) were clearly identified31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Tasic, B. et al. Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas. Nature 563, 72–78 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The detection of a thin layer of SZNBL in the lateral ventricle and vascular leptomeningeal cells (VLMC) in regions with preserved meninges demonstrated a high spatial resolution for the technology in identifying low-abundance cells, even at near-single-cell resolution (for VLMC).
“the detection of a thin layer of SZNBL in the lateral ventricle and vascular leptomeningeal cells (VLMC) in the regions with preserved meninges demonstrated a high spatial resolution for our technology in identifying low-abundance cells, even at near-single-cell resolution (for VLMC)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some potential enhancers with dynamically regulated promoter interactions were found to be enriched in specific clusters such as Dlx1 and Sox2 (cluster A11), Tspan2 (cluster A3) and Adcy5 (cluster A1).
“Some potential enhancers with dynamically regulated promoter interactions were found to be enriched in specific clusters such as Dlx1 and Sox2 (cluster A11), Tspan2 (cluster A3) and Adcy5 (cluster A1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spatial distribution of clusters agreed with the anatomical annotation defined by Nissl staining, reflecting arealization of the juvenile brain.
“Spatial distribution of clusters agreed with the anatomical annotation defined by Nissl staining, reflecting arealization of the juvenile brain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spatial clusters between ATAC and RNA showed concordance in cluster assignment.
“spatial clusters between ATAC and RNA showed concordance in cluster assignment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spatial distribution of ATAC and RNA clusters agrees with tissue histology.
“Spatial distribution of these clusters agrees with tissue histology”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A cohort of genes was found whose expression rapidly declined during spatial pseudotime but whose chromatin accessibility was maintained throughout pseudotime or declined only at very late stages.
“We also found a cohort of genes whose expression rapidly declined during spatial pseudotime but whose chromatin accessibility was maintained throughout pseudotime or declined only at very late stages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study developed spatial ATAC-RNA-seq and spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq for co-profiling of genome-wide chromatin accessibility or histone modifications in conjunction with whole transcriptome on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution.
“We developed spatial ATAC–RNA-seq and spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq (applied to H3K27me3, H3K27ac and H3K4me3) for co-profiling of genome-wide chromatin accessibility or histone modifications in conjunction with whole transcriptome on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution (available for spatial browsing, see ‘Data availability’).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MOL, a thin layer of ependymal cells, MSN and excitatory neurons were enriched in the same spatial regions identified by CUT&Tag (H3K27ac and H3K4me3).
“MOL, a thin layer of ependymal cells, MSN and excitatory neurons were enriched in the same spatial regions identified by CUT&Tag (H3K27ac and H3K4me3) (Extended Data Fig. 7g,h, top).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the RNA data, the study detected distinct clusters with unique marker genes such as PROX1 and BCL11B enriched in cluster R4 (GCL).
“For the RNA data, we also detected distinct clusters with unique marker genes (Fig. 5a,d) such as PROX1 and BCL11B enriched in cluster R4 (GCL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Integration of the study ATAC data with scATAC-seq data from human brain samples and the study RNA data with adult human brain snRNA-seq data showed dominant cell identities and states.
“We also conducted integration of our ATAC data and scATAC-seq data from human brain samples42 (Fig. 5b), and our RNA data with adult human brain snRNA-seq data43, to show the dominant cell identities and states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [42] Corces, M. R. et al. Single-cell epigenomic analyses implicate candidate causal variants at inherited risk loci for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Nat. Genet. 52, 1158–1168 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Franjic, D. et al. Transcriptomic taxonomy and neurogenic trajectories of adult human, macaque, and pig hippocampal and entorhinal cells. Neuron 110, 452–469 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The study also observed H3K4me3 or H3K27ac and H3K27me3 co-occupancy in several gene loci in the corpus callosum.
“We also observed H3K4me3 or H3K27ac and H3K27me3 co-occupancy in several gene loci in this tissue region (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In contrast to corpus callosum, only a limited number of genes positive for both H3K27me3 and RNA were found in these regions.
“In contrast to corpus callosum, only a limited number of genes positive for both H3K27me3 and RNA were found in these regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Integration with the corresponding juvenile CNS scRNA-seq atlas allowed label transfer to assign transcriptional cell types to the spatial location of epigenetic identities/states.
“Integration with the corresponding juvenile CNS scRNA-seq atlas32 allowed for label transfer to assign transcriptional cell types to the spatial location of epigenetic identities/states (Extended Data Fig. 7g,h, bottom).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Zeisel, A. et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Some of these genes, such as Ptprz1 and Fnbp1, also presented higher levels of H3K27me3 and RNA.
“Some of these genes, such as Ptprz1 and Fnbp1, also presented higher levels of H3K27me3 and RNA (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Label transfer of scRNA-seq data with paired RNA data from the same tissue section clearly showed cell identities in clusters C0, C1 and C3.
“In particular for spatial H3K27me3, whereas integration with scCUT&Tag could not clearly show the identity of several clusters in the epigenomic modalities (clusters C0, C1 and C3), label transfer of scRNA-seq data with paired RNA data from the same tissue section clearly showed cell identities in these clusters (Fig. 3a,d and Extended Data Fig. 7f), highlighting the power of combining CUT&Tag and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Integration and co-embedding of spatial CUT&Tag and scCUT&Tag data showed that the epigenetic states in the study data for H3K27me3, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 agreed with the corresponding projection in scCUT&Tag.
“Integration and co-embedding of spatial CUT&Tag and scCUT&Tag data36,37 (Fig. 3d,e and Extended Data Fig. 7a) showed that the epigenetic states in our data for H3K27me3, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 agreed with the corresponding projection in scCUT&Tag.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 825–835 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [37] Bartosovic, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Cux2 showed high GAS in cluster C9 (H3K27ac) and cluster C6 (H3K4me3).
“Cux2 showed high GAS in cluster C9 (H3K27ac) and cluster C6 (H3K4me3), indicating enrichment of excitatory neurons5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study found a small subset of genes with higher levels of both H3K27me3 and RNA in the corpus callosum, such as Ptprz1.
“We also found a small subset of genes (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 8; GO for quadrant I) with higher levels of both H3K27me3 and RNA in the corpus callosum, such as Ptprz1, a marker of oligodendrocyte precursor cells38,39 (Extended Data Fig. 9g), which might indicate transcriptional poising of some of these genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nav3 and Sncb, with low levels of H3K27me3 in both the cortex and striatum, were expressed in the cortex but not the striatum.
“Nav3 and Sncb, with low levels of H3K27me3 in both the cortex and striatum, were expressed in the former but not the latter (Extended Data Fig. 9h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The corresponding RNA clusters showed concordant region-specific signatures.
“The corresponding RNA clusters also showed concordant region-specific signatures (Fig. 3a–c and Supplementary Fig. 6), as exemplified by Cux2 in cortical layer 2/3 excitatory neurons (cluster R5 (H3K27me3 paired), cluster R5 (H3K27ac paired) and cluster R6 (H3K4me3 paired)), Fezf2 in cortical layer 5 excitatory neurons (cluster R1 (H3K27me3 paired), cluster R1 (H3K27ac paired), cluster R1 (H3K4me3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study also observed strong anticorrelation with a cohort of genes involved in neuronal processes being activated or repressed in a region-specific manner.
“We also observed strong anticorrelation with a cohort of genes involved in neuronal processes being activated or repressed in a region-specific manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fezf2 was depleted for H3K27me3 (cluster C1) in this layer.
“Fezf2 was depleted for H3K27me3 (cluster C1) in this layer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
H3K27me3 was depleted at Cux2 in the same region (cluster C3).
“By contrast, H3K27me3 was depleted at Cux2 in the same region (cluster C3) (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mal showed the highest activity or expression in the corpus callosum for ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me3 and paired RNA.
“For instance, Mal showed the highest activity or expression in the corpus callosum for ATAC, H3K27ac, H3K4me3 and paired RNA (Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genes such as Mal, Mag and Car2 with low CSS and high RNA expression correspond to GO biological processes such as myelination and regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation.
“Genes such as Mal, Mag and Car2 with low CSS and high RNA expression correspond to GO biological processes such as myelination and regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation (Extended Data Fig. 9a–c and Supplementary Fig. 8; GO for quadrant IV).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In oligodendrocyte-abundant corpus callosum, the study observed a robust anticorrelation between H3K27me3 and RNA.
“For example, in oligodendrocyte-abundant corpus callosum we observed a robust anticorrelation between H3K27me3 and RNA (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For spatial H3K27me3, integration with scCUT&Tag could not clearly show the identity of several clusters (C0, C1 and C3).
“In particular for spatial H3K27me3, whereas integration with scCUT&Tag could not clearly show the identity of several clusters in the epigenomic modalities (clusters C0, C1 and C3), label transfer of scRNA-seq data with paired RNA data from the same tissue section clearly showed cell identities in these clusters (Fig. 3a,d and Extended Data Fig. 7f), highlighting the power of combining CUT&Tag and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genes such as Grin2b and Syt1 with high CSS and low RNA expression are related to neuronal processes such as synaptic transmission and neurotransmitter release.
“By contrast, genes such as Grin2b and Syt1 with high CSS and low RNA expression are related to neuronal processes such as synaptic transmission and neurotransmitter release (Extended Data Fig. 9d,e and Supplementary Fig. 8; GO for quadrant II).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The opposite pattern was observed for genes such as Ablim2 and Gng7.
“The opposite pattern was observed for genes such as Ablim2 and Gng7 (Extended Data Fig. 9h).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
GAS of Fezf2 was high in cluster C8 (H3K27ac) and cluster C7 (H3K4me3), corresponding to the deeper layer of the cortex.
“GAS of Fezf2 (a marker gene for cortical layer 5) was high in cluster C8 (H3K27ac) and cluster C7 (H3K4me3), corresponding to the deeper layer of the cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Car2 presented H3K27me3 occupancy in the cortical layers, in contrast to the corpus callosum and the striatum.
“Car2, a marker gene expressed in oligodendrocytes and abundant in the corpus callosum, presented H3K27me3 occupancy in the cortical layers, in contrast to the corpus callosum and, surprisingly, the striatum (Extended Data Fig. 9c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study identified a total of 19,468 significant peak-to-gene linkages from spatial CUT&Tag (H3K27ac)-RNA-seq.
“To directly infer interactions between genome-wide gene expression and the corresponding enhancers across all clusters, we identified a total of 19,468 significant peak-to-gene linkages from spatial CUT&Tag (H3K27ac)–RNA-seq (Supplementary Fig. 7a,b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cux2 was observed in cortical layers 2/3, corresponding to superficial layers in the cortex.
“Cux2 was observed in cortical layers 2/3, corresponding to superficial layers in the cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Linking epigenome to transcriptome pixel by pixel allows uncovering new insights in spatial epigenetic priming, differentiation and gene regulation within the tissue architecture.
“Linking epigenome to transcriptome pixel by pixel allows the uncovering of new insights in spatial epigenetic priming, differentiation and gene regulation within the tissue architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The insert size distributions of chromatin accessibility and histone modification fragments were consistent with captured nucleosomal fragments in all tissues.
“the insert size distributions of chromatin accessibility (spatial ATAC–RNA-seq) and histone modification (spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq, H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3) fragments were consistent with the captured nucleosomal fragments in all tissues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The distinct patterns observed between spatial epigenome and spatial transcriptome suggest differential roles in defining cell states.
“suggesting their differential roles in defining cell states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The paper presents two technologies for spatially resolved, genome-wide, joint profiling of the epigenome and transcriptome by cosequencing chromatin accessibility and gene expression, or histone modifications (H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3) and gene expression on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution.
“Here, we present two technologies for spatially resolved, genome-wide, joint profiling of the epigenome and transcriptome by cosequencing chromatin accessibility and gene expression, or histone modifications (H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3) and gene expression on the same tissue section at near-single-cell resolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Integration of spatial RNA data and the juvenile CNS scRNA-seq atlas allowed for visualization of dominant transcriptional cell types in tissue.
“Integration of spatial RNA data and the juvenile CNS scRNA-seq atlas32 allowed for visualization of dominant transcriptional cell types in tissue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Zeisel, A. et al. Molecular architecture of the mouse nervous system. Cell 174, 999–1014 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
GREAT analysis verified strong concordance between gene regulatory pathways and anatomical annotation.
“GREAT analysis22 further verified the strong concordance between gene regulatory pathways and anatomical annotation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] McLean, C. Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The chromatin state of neural cells distal to the ventricle corresponds to a more differentiated neuronal state.
“suggesting that the chromatin state of neural cells distal to the ventricle corresponds to a more differentiated neuronal state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Joint multiomics profiles improve spatial cell type mapping.
“This result highlights the value of using joint multiomics profiles to improve spatial cell type mapping26.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Zhu, C. et al. Joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse brain. Nat. Methods 18, 283–292 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The use of multiple omics information allows more robust cell type identification.
“which verified the use of multiple omics information for more robust cell type identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
At E13 mouse embryo stage, chromatin accessibility may not allow discrimination of all cell types defined by transcriptional profiles.
“suggesting that, at this stage of development, chromatin accessibility may not allow discrimination of all cell types defined by transcriptional profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
GREAT analysis confirmed that the major pathways correlated with tissue functions in different anatomical regions.
“GREAT analysis confirmed that the major pathways correlated with tissue functions in different anatomical regions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sox2 was examined simultaneously for chromatin accessibility, gene expression, putative enhancers and TF motif enrichment, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of gene regulation dynamics.
“Sox2 was examined simultaneously for chromatin accessibility, gene expression, putative enhancers and TF motif enrichment, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of gene regulation dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The high concordance in spatial cell type distribution suggests a general congruence between chromatin accessibility and transcriptome in defining cell identities in tissue.
“suggesting a general congruence between chromatin accessibility and transcriptome in defining cell identities in tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Joint profiling of ATAC and RNA facilitates inferring the gene regulatory landscape by searching correlated peak accessibility and gene expression.
“Joint profiling of ATAC and RNA facilitates inferring the gene regulatory landscape by searching correlated peak accessibility and gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Co-profiling of the epigenome and transcriptome facilitates investigation of the correlation between accessible peaks and expressed genes pixel by pixel in the tissue context.
“Co-profiling of the epigenome and transcriptome facilitates investigation of the correlation between accessible peaks and expressed genes pixel by pixel in the tissue context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The elevated chromatin accessibility at earlier stages for genes such as Dcx and Tubb3 suggests lineage priming of these genes in expression.
“suggesting lineage priming of these genes in expression10,27.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential identified by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. Cell 183, 1103–1116 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Meijer, M. et al. Epigenomic priming of immune genes implicates oligodendroglia in multiple sclerosis susceptibility. Neuron 110, 1193–1210 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The peaks obtained from spatial ATAC data are consistent with the ENCODE E13.5 ATAC-seq reference.
“the peaks obtained from our spatial ATAC data are also consistent with the ENCODE reference”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The higher number of ATAC clusters compared with RNA clusters in P22 mouse brain indicates terminal differentiation of most major cell types in the juvenile brain relative to embryo, which consists of many undifferentiated or multipotent cell states.
“indicating terminal differentiation of most major cell types in the juvenile brain relative to that in embryo, which consists of many undifferentiated or multipotent cell states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The high accessibility but modest or low RNA expression of Pax6, Sox2 and Myt1l may indicate lineage priming of these genes in embryonic brain development.
“which may indicate lineage priming10,27 of these genes in embryonic brain development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential identified by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. Cell 183, 1103–1116 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Meijer, M. et al. Epigenomic priming of immune genes implicates oligodendroglia in multiple sclerosis susceptibility. Neuron 110, 1193–1210 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The enrichment of potential enhancers in specific clusters indicates the ability of spatial ATAC-RNA-seq to identify key regulatory regions for target genes.
“indicating the ability of spatial ATAC–RNA-seq to identify the key regulatory regions for target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Spatial patterns of TF motif enrichment (Dnajc21, Pax6, Sox2, Sox4 and Mef2c) provided further insights into the TF regulators visualized in tissue.
“Spatial patterns of TF motif enrichment (Dnajc21, Pax6, Sox2, Sox4 and Mef2c) provided further insights into the TF regulators33 visualized in tissue”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Kartha, V. K. et al. Functional inference of gene regulation using single-cell multi-omics. Cell Genom. 2, 100166 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The neuronal lineage might retain the potential to acquire an oligodendrocyte identity even when it has already migrated away from the ventricular zone in the embryonic brain.
“suggesting that the neuronal lineage might retain the potential to acquire an oligodendrocyte identity even when it has already migrated away from the ventricular zone in the embryonic brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Correlation analysis with organ-specific ENCODE E13.5 RNA-seq reference data showed high concordance.
“correlation analysis with organ-specific ENCODE E13.5 RNA-seq reference data, which showed high concordance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Combining CUT&Tag and RNA-seq in the same tissue section more accurately identifies cell types or states.
“highlighting the power of combining CUT&Tag and RNA-seq (spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq) in the same tissue section to more accurately identify cell types or states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
High Cux2 GAS in clusters C9 and C6 indicates enrichment of excitatory neurons.
“Cux2 showed high GAS in cluster C9 (H3K27ac) and cluster C6 (H3K4me3), indicating enrichment of excitatory neurons5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Lu, T., Ang, C. E. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell 185, 4448–4464 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Tspan2 enrichment and depletion in corpus callosum is associated with oligodendrocyte lineage development.
“Tspan2 was enriched in cluster C4 (H3K27ac) and cluster C1 (H3K4me3) but depleted in cluster C5 (H3K27me3) in corpus callosum, associated with oligodendrocyte lineage development (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher levels of both H3K27me3 and RNA in some corpus callosum genes might indicate transcriptional poising.
“which might indicate transcriptional poising of some of these genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
High chromatin silencing score indicates repressed gene expression because of the transcriptional repression function of H3K27me3.
“High CSS indicates repressed gene expression because of the transcriptional repression function of H3K27me3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Wu, S. J. et al. Single-cell CUT&Tag analysis of chromatin modifications in differentiation and tumor progression. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 819–824 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Mechanisms other than Polycomb-mediated H3K27me3 deposition might be involved in the transcriptional repression of these genes in different areas of the CNS.
“Thus, mechanisms other than Polycomb-mediated H3K27me3 deposition might be involved in the transcriptional repression of these genes in different areas of the CNS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The integrated dataset of spatial ATAC/CUT&Tag and scATAC-seq/scCUT&Tag data, after clustering, showed a good match between the two datasets.
“The obtained integrated dataset was clustered, showing a good match between our spatial ATAC/CUT&Tag and scATAC-seq/scCUT&Tag data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The integrated dataset of spatial RNA and scRNA-seq data, after clustering, showed a good match between the two datasets.
“The obtained integrated dataset was clustered, showing a good match between our spatial RNA and scRNA-seq data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- May combine two claims. 46
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenUsing a 100 × 100 barcode scheme, the mapping area covers nearly the entire hemisphere of a P22 mouse brain coronal section.
“Using a 100 × 100 barcode scheme, the mapping area covers nearly the entire hemisphere of a P22 mouse brain coronal section.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq for H3K27me3, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 on mouse P21/22 brains yielded median unique fragments per pixel of 10,644, 10,002 and 2,507, respectively, with TSS overlap of 12%, 17% and 67% and peak overlap of 12%, 21% and 54%.
“we obtained a median of 10,644 (H3K27me3), 10,002 (H3K27ac) and 2,507 (H3K4me3) unique fragments per pixel, of which 12% (H3K27me3), 17% (H3K27ac) and 67% (H3K4me3) overlapped with transcription start site regions and 12% (H3K27me3), 21% (H3K27ac) and 54% (H3K4me3) were located in peaks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the RNA data of spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq, 25,881 (H3K27me3), 23,415 (H3K27ac) and 22,731 (H3K4me3) genes were detected with an average of 2,011, 1,513 and 1,329 genes per pixel and 4,734, 3,580 and 2,885 UMIs per pixel, respectively.
“For the RNA data, 25,881 (H3K27me3), 23,415 (H3K27ac) and 22,731 (H3K4me3) genes were detected with an average of 2,011 (H3K27me3), 1,513 (H3K27ac) and 1,329 (H3K4me3) genes per pixel (4,734 (H3K27me3), 3,580 (H3K27ac) and 2,885 (H3K4me3) UMIs per pixel, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the P22 mouse brain sample, a median of 14,284 unique fragments per pixel was obtained, of which 19% were enriched in transcription start site regions and 26% located in peaks.
“From this sample we obtained a median of 14,284 unique fragments per pixel, of which 19% were enriched in the transcription start site regions and 26% located in peaks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor 50-μm pixel size, an average of 25 cells was obtained for E10 mouse embryo and between one and nine cells for human hippocampus.
“For the 50-μm pixel size we obtained an average of 25 cells for E10 mouse embryo1 and between one and nine cells for human hippocampus3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in yissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues. Nature 609, 375–383 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpatial epigenome and spatial transcriptome identified highly concordant tissue features but also distinct patterns.
“Although highly concordant tissue features were identified by either spatial epigenome or spatial transcriptome we also observed distinct patterns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor the RNA portion of spatial ATAC-RNA-seq, a total of 22,914 genes were detected, with an average of 1,073 genes and 2,358 UMIs per pixel.
“For the RNA portion a total of 22,914 genes were detected, with an average of 1,073 genes and 2,358 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) per pixel (spatial ATAC–RNA-seq)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationImmature oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocytes were observed in cluster A3 corresponding to corpus callosum; a thin layer of radial glia-like cells was found in the lateral ventricle, medium spiny neurons (D1MSN and D2MSN) in striatum and inhibitory neurons in the lateral septal nucleus based on chromatin accessibility.
“we observed immature oligodendrocytes and oligodendrocytes in cluster A3 corresponding to corpus callosum. A thin layer of radial glia-like cells was found in the lateral ventricle, medium spiny neurons (D1MSN and D2MSN) in striatum and inhibitory neurons in the lateral septal nucleus30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Li, Y. E. et al. An atlas of gene regulatory elements in adult mouse cerebrum. Nature 598, 129–136 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study identified 13 and 15 specific clusters for H3K27me3 and RNA, 12 and 13 clusters for H3K27ac and RNA, and 11 and 12 clusters for H3K4me3 and RNA, respectively.
“We identified 13 and 15 specific clusters for H3K27me3 and RNA, 12 and 13 clusters for H3K27ac and RNA and 11 and 12 clusters for H3K4me3 and RNA, respectively (Fig. 3a–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMonocle2 pseudotime analysis showed a bifurcation in chromatin accessibility but not in RNA expression; one path led to regions close to the ventricular zone and the other terminated in regions distal to the ventricular zone.
“Monocle2 pseudotime analysis showed a bifurcation in chromatin accessibility but not in RNA expression; one path led to regions close to the ventricular zone (green pixels, Extended Data Fig. 3d,e) and the other terminated in regions distal to the ventricular zone (blue pixels).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChromatin accessibility of marker genes identified major regions such as striatum (Pde10a and Adcy5, cluster A1), corpus callosum (Sox10, Mbp and Tspan2, cluster A3), cortex (Mef2c, Neurod6 and Nrn1, clusters A0 and A4; Cux2, cluster A4) and lateral ventricle (Dlx1, Pax6, Notch1 and Sox2, cluster A11).
“Chromatin accessibility of marker genes identified major regions such as striatum (Pde10a and Adcy5, markers of medium spiny neurons, cluster A1), corpus callosum (Sox10, Mbp and Tspan2, markers of oligodendroglia, cluster A3), cortex (Mef2c, Neurod6 and Nrn1, clusters A0 and A4, markers of excitatory neurons; Cux2, cluster A4) and lateral ventricle (Dlx1, Pax6, Notch1 and Sox2, markers of ependym”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpatial ATAC-RNA-seq on E13 mouse embryo identified eight major ATAC clusters and 14 RNA clusters.
“Spatial ATAC–RNA-seq on E13 mouse embryo identified eight major ATAC clusters and 14 RNA clusters”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGenes involved in neuronal identity, axonogenesis and synapse organization, such as Dcx and Tubb3, showed increased expression in spatial pseudotime but chromatin accessibility at their loci was already elevated at earlier stages.
“genes involved in neuronal identity, axonogenesis and synapse organization (GO Myt1l to Dnm3 in Extended Data Fig. 3a), such as Dcx and Tubb3, showed increased expression in spatial pseudotime but chromatin accessibility at their loci was already elevated at earlier stages”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRadial glia (neural stem/progenitor cells) were observed predominantly in the ventricular layer, and differentiated cell types such as postmitotic premature neurons and inhibitory interneurons were enriched in regions distant from the ventricular layer.
“radial glia (neural stem/progenitor cells) were observed predominantly in the ventricular layer, and differentiated cell types such as postmitotic premature neurons and inhibitory interneurons were enriched in those regions distant from the ventricular layer”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpatial RNA clusters showed region-specific gene expression such as striatum (Pde10a, cluster R2, medium spiny neurons), corpus callosum (Mbp and Tspan2, cluster R5, oligodendroglia) and cortex (Mef2c, clusters R0 and R1, excitatory neurons).
“Spatial RNA clusters also showed region-specific gene expression such as striatum (Pde10a, cluster R2, medium spiny neurons), corpus callosum (Mbp and Tspan2, cluster R5, oligodendroglia) and cortex (Mef2c, clusters R0 and R1, excitatory neurons)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSatb2 showed the highest activity in clusters C8 and C9 (H3K27ac) and C6 and C7 (H3K4me3), but the lowest CSS in clusters C1 and C3 (H3K27me3) in the cortical layer.
“Satb2 showed the highest activity in clusters C8 and C9 (H3K27ac) and C6 and C7 (H3K4me3), but the lowest CSS in clusters C1 and C3 (H3K27me3) in the cortical layer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the superficial cortical layer, genes for GABAergic regulation of synaptic transmission were enriched in H3K27me3 whereas glutamatergic synapse transmission genes had high expression and low H3K27me3.
“For instance, in the superficial cortical layer, genes for GABAergic regulation of synaptic transmission were enriched in H3K27me3 whereas glutamatergic synapse transmission genes had high expression and low H3K27me3 (Supplementary Figs. 9b, 10b and 11b; GOs for striatum, superficial and deeper cortical layers).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTF motifs (NEUROD1 and SNAI1) and their spatial patterns were visualized in different tissue regions, and positive TF regulators were identified.
“TF motifs (NEUROD1 and SNAI1) and their spatial patterns were visualized in different tissue regions, and positive TF regulators were identified (Extended Data Fig. 10b,c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese techniques were applied to comapping of embryonic and juvenile mouse brain, as well as adult human brain.
“These techniques were applied to comapping of embryonic and juvenile mouse brain, as well as adult human brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study identified seven and eight major clusters for ATAC and RNA, respectively, and the spatial pattern agreed with major anatomical landmarks in adult human brain hippocampal formation.
“We identified seven and eight major clusters for ATAC and RNA, respectively, and the spatial pattern agreed with major anatomical landmarks (Fig. 5a)3, including specific marker genes (Fig. 5d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPROX1 is highly expressed in GCL but showed modest chromatin accessibility.
“For example, PROX1, a signature gene defining granule neuron identity during pyramidal neuron fate selection44, is indeed highly expressed in GCL but showed modest chromatin accessibility (Fig. 5d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataATAC cluster A4 represents the granule cell layer (THY1, BCL11B) and cluster A6 corresponds to the choroid plexus.
“The ATAC cluster A4 represents the granule cell layer (GCL) (THY1, BCL11B) and cluster A6 corresponds to the choroid plexus (Fig. 5a,d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTspan2 was enriched in cluster C4 (H3K27ac) and cluster C1 (H3K4me3) but depleted in cluster C5 (H3K27me3) in corpus callosum.
“Tspan2 was enriched in cluster C4 (H3K27ac) and cluster C1 (H3K4me3) but depleted in cluster C5 (H3K27me3) in corpus callosum, associated with oligodendrocyte lineage development (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThese genes are involved in oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination and other processes such as protein catabolism and localization.
“These genes are involved in oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination and other processes such as protein catabolism and localization (Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGpr88, a marker gene of MSN, was enriched in striatum for ATAC, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 but with low CSS in striatum for H3K27me3.
“Gpr88, a marker gene of MSN, was enriched in striatum for ATAC, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 but with low CSS in striatum for H3K27me3 (Extended Data Fig. 9f).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study observed enrichment of MOL within the corpus callosum, a thin layer of ependymal cells in the lateral ventricle, excitatory neurons in cerebral cortex and MSN in the striatum.
“For example, we observed an enrichment of MOL within the corpus callosum, a thin layer of ependymal cells in the lateral ventricle, excitatory neurons in cerebral cortex and MSN in the striatum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe study demonstrated either ATAC or CUT&Tag in conjunction with RNA for spatial multiomics mapping.
“We have demonstrated either ATAC or CUT&Tag in conjunction with RNA for spatial multiomics mapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn general H3K4me3 and H3K27ac showed high correlations, with their signals anticorrelated with H3K27me3.
“In general H3K4me3 and H3K27ac showed high correlations, with their signals anticorrelated with H3K27me3 (Fig. 4e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGranule cells were detected in the GCL, CA neurons were enriched in CA3-4 regions and VLMC were strongly distinguished in choroid plexus as opposed to other regions.
“Granule cells (GC) were detected in the GCL, cornu ammonis (CA) neurons were enriched in CA3–4 regions and VLMC were strongly distinguished in choroid plexus as opposed to other regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSpatial epigenome-transcriptome cosequencing yielded two layers of spatial omics information directly in tissue, with data quality similar to that previously obtained by single modalities.
“Spatial epigenome–transcriptome cosequencing yielded two layers of spatial omics information directly in tissue, with data quality similar to that previously obtained by single modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClustering of CSS or GAS based on different modifications resolved all major tissue regions and identified region-specific marker gene modifications.
“Clustering of CSS or GAS based on different modifications resolved all major tissue regions (Fig. 3a–c and Supplementary Fig. 6) and identified region-specific marker gene modifications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn contrast to H3K27me3, the study observed a robust correlation between RNA and the activating marks H3K4me3 or H3K27ac in the corpus callosum, with genes highly expressed and with high deposition in these two modalities regulating processes in oligodendroglia.
“In contrast to H3K27me3, we observed a robust correlation between RNA and activating marks H3K4me3 or H3K27ac in the corpus callosum, with genes highly expressed and with high deposition in these two modalities regulating processes in oligodendroglia (Fig. 4b,c and Supplementary Fig. 12; GO for H3K27ac quadrant I and H3K4me3 quadrant I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe serpentine channel design allows simultaneous processing of five tissue samples, each mapped for 10,000 pixels.
“The serpentine channel design allows simultaneous processing of five tissue samples, each mapped for 10,000 pixels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent spatial technologies capture only one layer of omics information at a time, precluding examination of mechanistic relationships across the central dogma.
“However, current methods capture only one layer of omics information at a time, precluding the possibility of examining the mechanistic relationship across the central dogma of molecular biology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [1] Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in yissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues. Nature 609, 375–383 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Chen, A. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185, 1777–1792 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Lu, T., Ang, C. E. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell 185, 4448–4464 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle-cell multiomics allows uncovering mechanisms of gene regulation across different omics layers but lacks spatial information, which is crucial to understanding cellular function in tissue.
“Single-cell multiomics allows uncovering of the mechanisms of gene regulation across different omics layers6–9 but lacks spatial information, which is crucial to understanding cellular function in tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [6] Allaway, K. C. et al. Genetic and epigenetic coordination of cortical interneuron development. Nature 597, 693–697 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Chen, S., Lake, B. B. & Zhang, K. High-throughput sequencing of the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility in the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1452–1457 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Cao, J. et al. Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells. Science 361, 1380–1385 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Trevino, A. E. et al. Chromatin and gene-regulatory dynamics of the developing human cerebral cortex at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 5053–5069 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe authors developed spatially resolved, genome-wide comapping of the epigenome and transcriptome by simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and mRNA expression (spatial ATAC-RNA-seq), or histone modifications and mRNA expression (spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq; applied to H3K27me3, H3K27ac or H3K4me3) on the same tissue section at the cellular level via deterministic cobarcoding.
“we developed spatially resolved, genome-wide comapping of the epigenome and transcriptome by simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and messenger RNA expression (spatial assay for transposase-accessible chromatin and RNA using sequencing (spatial ATAC–RNA-seq)), or histone modifications and mRNA expression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues. Nature 609, 375–383 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationComputational methods can integrate data from multiple omics but cannot readily uncover mechanistic links between different omics layers.
“Although computational methods can integrate data from multiple omics10, they cannot readily uncover the mechanistic links between different omics layers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential identified by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. Cell 183, 1103–1116 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPreviously, deterministic barcoding in tissue for spatial omics sequencing was developed for spatially resolved comeasurement of the transcriptome and a panel of proteins, and recently realized in the 10X Visium platform.
“Previously we developed deterministic barcoding in tissue for spatial omics sequencing for spatially resolved comeasurement of the transcriptome and a panel of proteins1, and recently it was also realized in the 10X Visium platform11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in yissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Ben-Chetrit, N. et al. Integration of whole transcriptome spatial profiling with protein markers. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01536-3 (2023). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpatial epigenomics, transcriptomics and proteomics emerged recently but most capture only one layer of omics information.
“Spatial epigenomics, transcriptomics and proteomics emerged recently1–5 but most of these can capture only one layer of the omics information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [1] Liu, Y. et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in yissue. Cell 183, 1665–1681 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues. Nature 609, 375–383 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Chen, A. et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185, 1777–1792 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Lu, T., Ang, C. E. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell 185, 4448–4464 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationIntegration of single-cell ATAC-seq mouse brain atlas data with spatial ATAC-seq data facilitated identification of all major cell types, and label transfer was used to assign cell types to spatial locations where the epigenetic state may control specific cell type formation.
“Integration of single-cell ATAC-seq mouse brain atlas data30 with spatial ATAC-seq data facilitated identification of all major cell types, and label transfer was then used to assign cell types to spatial locations where the epigenetic state may control specific cell type formation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Li, Y. E. et al. An atlas of gene regulatory elements in adult mouse cerebrum. Nature 598, 129–136 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenA microchip with 100 serpentine microchannels was developed to barcode 100 × 100 or, in total, 10,000 pixels per tissue section and up to five samples per chip.
“We developed a microchip with 100 serpentine microchannels to barcode 100 × 100 or, in total, 10,000 pixels per tissue section and up to five samples per chip”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSpatial ATAC-RNA-seq can be used to decipher the gene regulation mechanism and spatiotemporal dynamics during tissue development.
“Thus, our spatial ATAC–RNA-seq can be used to decipher the gene regulation mechanism and spatiotemporal dynamics during tissue development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCorrelation analysis between replicates showed high reproducibility (r = 0.98 for ATAC, r = 0.98 for RNA in spatial ATAC-RNA-seq, r = 0.96 for CUT&Tag (H3K27ac), r = 0.89 for RNA in spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq).
“Correlation analysis between replicates showed high reproducibility (r = 0.98 for ATAC, r = 0.98 for RNA in spatial ATAC–RNA-seq, r = 0.96 for CUT&Tag (H3K27ac), r = 0.89 for RNA in spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThis potential H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalency may reflect transcriptional poising.
“As mentioned above, this potential H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalency may reflect transcriptional poising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth ATAC and RNA can readily resolve all major tissue features in the human hippocampal formation, but spatial cosequencing of epigenome and transcriptome may provide new insights into dynamic gene regulation mechanisms that cannot be realized by single modalities.
“In general, both ATAC and RNA can readily resolve all major tissue features in this region, but spatial cosequencing of epigenome and transcriptome may provide new insights into the dynamic gene regulation mechanism that cannot be realized by single modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe higher levels of both H3K27me3 and RNA could also be due in part to the presence in proximity of both oligodendrocyte precursor cells expressing Ptprz1 and mature oligodendrocytes where Ptprz1 is repressed in the corpus callosum.
“This could also be due in part to the presence in proximity of both oligodendrocyte precursor cells (expressing Ptprz1) and mature oligodendrocytes (where Ptprz1 is repressed) in the corpus callosum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese technologies allow examination of spatiotemporal dynamics and genome-wide gene regulation mechanisms in the tissue context.
“These technologies allow us to examine spatiotemporal dynamics and genome-wide gene regulation mechanisms in the tissue context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPROX1 is a signature gene defining granule neuron identity during pyramidal neuron fate selection.
“PROX1, a signature gene defining granule neuron identity during pyramidal neuron fate selection44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationATAC/H3K27me3/H3K27ac Nano-CUT&Tag analysis of oligodendroglial differentiation in the juvenile brain showed two waves of H3K27me3 repression during this process.
“These results are in accordance with ATAC/H3K27me3/H3K27ac Nano-CUT&Tag analysis37 of oligodendroglial differentiation in the juvenile brain, which showed two waves of H3K27me3 repression during this process37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Bartosovic, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFor H3K27ac and H3K4me3, active genes should correspond to high gene activity score.
“For H3K27ac and H3K4me3, active genes should correspond to high GAS2,13 (Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science 375, 681–686 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nat. Genet. 53, 403–411 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA biological replicate was performed on P21 mouse brain.
“A biological replicate was also performed on P21 mouse brain (Extended Data Fig. 8; 20-μm pixel size, 50 × 50 barcodes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPtprz1 is a marker of oligodendrocyte precursor cells.
“such as Ptprz1, a marker of oligodendrocyte precursor cells38,39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Marques, S. et al. Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Science 352, 1326–1329 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Marques, S. et al. Transcriptional convergence of oligodendrocyte lineage progenitors during development. Dev. Cell 46, 504–517 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe modest chromatin accessibility of PROX1 might be attributed to a minimal demand for synthesis of new PROX1 transcripts in postmitotic mature granule cells, and is thus not required to maintain an active open chromatin state.
“This might be attributed to a minimal demand for synthesis of new PROX1 transcripts in postmitotic mature granule cells, and is thus not required to maintain an active open chromatin state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll procedures described were approved by the local committee for ethical experiments on laboratory animals in Sweden.
“All procedures described were approved by the local committee for ethical experiments on laboratory animals in Sweden (Stockholms Norra Djurförsöksetiska nämnd, nos. 1995/2019 and 7029/2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll experimental procedures were conducted following European directive no. 2010/63/EU, local Swedish directive no. L150/SJVFS/2019:9, Saknr no. L150 and Karolinska Institutet complementary guidelines for procurement and use of laboratory animals, no. Dnr. 1937/03-640.
“All experimental procedures were conducted following European directive no. 2010/63/EU, local Swedish directive no. L150/SJVFS/2019:9, Saknr no. L150 and Karolinska Institutet complementary guidelines for procurement and use of laboratory animals, no. Dnr. 1937/03-640.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenHuman brain tissue collection was conducted with New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board approval, and informed consent was obtained from next of kin.
“Brain tissue collection was conducted with New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board approval, and informed consent obtained from next of kin who agreed to donate the brains and participate in psychological autopsy interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The selected tissues (E13 mouse embryo, P21/22 mouse brain, adult human hippocampus) are representative models for studying spatial epigenome–transcriptome relationships in mammalian tissues.
“We applied these techniques to embryonic and juvenile mouse brain, as well as adult human brain hippocampus, to dissect epigenetic and transcriptional states and their role in the regulation of cell types dynamics in tissue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
As of the time of the study, current technologies had not been able to perform unbiased genome-wide comapping of epigenome and transcriptome on the same tissue section at the cellular level.
“As of today, current technologies have not been able to perform unbiased genome-wide comapping of epigenome and transcriptome on the same tissue section at the cellular level.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To comprehensively understand the mechanism of gene regulation, different layers of omics information need to be profiled simultaneously.
“However, to comprehensively understand the mechanism of gene regulation, different layers of omics information need to be profiled simultaneously.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spatial ATAC-RNA-seq and spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq achieve co-profile of epigenome and transcriptome.
“the group extended this approach to spatial ATAC-RNA-seq and spatial assay of cleavage under targets and tagmentation and RNA sequencing (spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq) [86], which achieve co-profile of epigenome and transcriptome”
From Single-cell sequencing to multi-omics: technologies and applications (2024) · cites this paper as [86]
DBiT-seq has been extended to spatial co-profiling of mRNA and hundreds of proteins, and transcriptome and epigenome.
“Recently, DBiT-seq has further demonstrated its versatility by spatial co-profiling of mRNA transcriptome and hundreds of cellular proteins as part of spatial CITE-seq126 and of transcriptome and epigenome as part of spatial ATAC–RNA-seq127, spatial CUT&Tag–RNA-seq127 and (reported in a preprint) SPARC-seq128.”
From The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
Cites
Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data
Hao, Y., Hao, S., Andersen-Nissen, E., Mauck, W. M., Zheng, S., Butler, A., Lee, M. J., Wilk, A. J., Darby, C., Zagar, M., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.12.335331 · Cited by 15,508 · see citing works
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174 · see citing works
Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314 · see citing works
The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses
Stelzer, G., Rosen, N., Plaschkes, I., Zimmerman, S., Twik, M., Fishilevich, S., Stein, T. I., Nudel, R., Lieder, I., Mazor, Y., et al. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.5 · Cited by 5,550 · see citing works
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982 · see citing works
GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions
McLean, C. Y., Bristor, D., Hiller, M., Clarke, S. L., Schaar, B. T., Lowe, C. B., Wenger, A. M., & Bejerano, G. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1630 · Cited by 4,502 · see citing works
The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis
Cao, J., Spielmann, M., Qiu, X., Huang, X., Ibrahim, D. M., Hill, A. J., Zhang, F., Mundlos, S., Christiansen, L., Steemers, F. J., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x · Cited by 4,490 · see citing works
La Manno, G., Soldatov, R., Zeisel, A., Braun, E., Hochgerner, H., Petukhov, V., Lidschreiber, K., Kastriti, M. E., Lönnerberg, P., Furlan, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0414-6 · Cited by 4,118 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular Architecture of the Mouse Nervous System
Zeisel, A., Hochgerner, H., Lönnerberg, P., Johnsson, A., Memic, F., van der Zwan, J., Häring, M., Braun, E., Borm, L. E., La Manno, G., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.021 · Cited by 2,995 · see citing works
The Glial Nature of Embryonic and Adult Neural Stem Cells
Kriegstein, A., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600 · Cited by 2,475 · see citing works
Otte, C., Gold, S. M., Penninx, B. W., Pariante, C. M., Etkin, A., Fava, M., Mohr, D. C., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.65 · Cited by 2,269 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays
Chen, A., Liao, S., Cheng, M., Ma, K., Wu, L., Lai, Y., Qiu, X., Yang, J., Xu, J., Hao, S., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003 · Cited by 1,784 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A., & Satija, R. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5 · Cited by 1,769 · see citing works
Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Graybuck, L. T., Smith, K. A., Nguyen, T. N., Bertagnolli, D., Goldy, J., Garren, E., Economo, M. N., Viswanathan, S., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 · Cited by 1,746 · see citing works
chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4401 · Cited by 1,680 · see citing works
ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis
Granja, J. M., Corces, M. R., Pierce, S. E., Bagdatli, S. T., Choudhry, H., Chang, H. Y., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00790-6 · Cited by 1,392 · see citing works
Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system
Marques, S., Zeisel, A., Codeluppi, S., van Bruggen, D., Mendanha Falcão, A., Xiao, L., Li, H., Häring, M., Hochgerner, H., Romanov, R. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf6463 · Cited by 1,246 · see citing works
Self-citationChromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single-Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin
Ma, S., Zhang, B., LaFave, L. M., Earl, A. S., Chiang, Z., Hu, Y., Ding, J., Brack, A., Kartha, V. K., Tay, T., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.056 · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Sequencing via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue
Liu, Y., Yang, M., Deng, Y., Su, G., Enninful, A., Guo, C. C., Tebaldi, T., Zhang, D., Kim, D., Bai, Z., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.026 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Self-citationJoint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells
Cao, J., Cusanovich, D. A., Ramani, V., Aghamirzaie, D., Pliner, H. A., Hill, A. J., Daza, R. M., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Packer, J. S., Christiansen, L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0730 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
High-throughput sequencing of the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility in the same cell
Chen, S., Lake, B. B., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0290-0 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Microscopic examination of spatial transcriptome using Seq-Scope
Cho, C.-S., Xi, J., Si, Y., Park, S.-R., Hsu, J.-E., Kim, M., Jun, G., Kang, H. M., & Lee, J. H. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.010 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues
Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M., & Castelo-Branco, G. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00869-9 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Self-citationTrevino, A. E., Müller, F., Andersen, J., Sundaram, L., Kathiria, A., Shcherbina, A., Farh, K., Chang, H. Y., Pașca, A. M., Kundaje, A., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.039 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues
Deng, Y., Bartosovic, M., Ma, S., Zhang, D., Kukanja, P., Xiao, Y., Su, G., Liu, Y., Qin, X., Rosoklija, G. B., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05094-1 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Self-citationTrevino, A. E., Müller, F., Andersen, J., Sundaram, L., Kathiria, A. S., Shcherbina, A., Farh, K., Chang, H. Y., Pașca, A. M., Kundaje, A., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.12.29.424636 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei
Takei, Y., Yun, J., Zheng, S., Ollikainen, N., Pierson, N. G., White, J. A., Shah, S., Thomassie, J., Suo, S., Eng, C.-H. L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03126-2 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Spatial-CUT&Tag: Spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level
Deng, Y., Bartosovic, M., Kukanja, P., Zhang, D., Liu, Y., Su, G., Enninful, A., Bai, Z., Castelo-Branco, G., & Fan, R. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg7216 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Self-citationCorces, M. R., Shcherbina, A., Kundu, S., Gloudemans, M. J., Frésard, L., Granja, J. M., Louie, B. H., Eulalio, T., Shams, S., Bagdatli, S. T., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00721-x · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Franjic, D., Skarica, M., Ma, S., Arellano, J. I., Tebbenkamp, A. T. N., Choi, J., Xu, C., Li, Q., Morozov, Y. M., Andrijevic, D., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.036 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Self-citationJoint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse brain
Zhu, C., Zhang, Y., Li, Y. E., Lucero, J., Behrens, M. M., & Ren, B. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01060-3 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Transcriptional Convergence of Oligodendrocyte Lineage Progenitors during Development
Marques, S., van Bruggen, D., Vanichkina, D. P., Floriddia, E. M., Munguba, H., Väremo, L., Giacomello, S., Falcão, A. M., Meijer, M., Björklund, Å. K., et al. (2018) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.07.005 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Self-citationConservation and divergence of cortical cell organization in human and mouse revealed by MERFISH
Fang, R., Xia, C., Close, J. L., Zhang, M., He, J., Huang, Z., Halpern, A. R., Long, B., Miller, J. A., Lein, E. S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm1741 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Functional inference of gene regulation using single-cell multi-omics
Kartha, V. K., Duarte, F. M., Hu, Y., Ma, S., Chew, J. G., Lareau, C. A., Earl, A., Burkett, Z. D., Kohlway, A. S., Lebofsky, R., et al. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100166 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegration of whole transcriptome spatial profiling with protein markers
Ben‐Chetrit, N., Niu, X., Swett, A. D., Sotelo, J., Jiao, M. S., Stewart, C. M., Potenski, C. J., Mielinis, P., Roelli, P., Stoeckius, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01536-3 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Single-cell CUT&Tag analysis of chromatin modifications in differentiation and tumor progression
Wu, S. J., Furlan, S. N., Mihalas, A. B., Kaya-Okur, H. S., Feroze, A. H., Emerson, S. N., Zheng, Y., Carson, K., Cimino, P. J., Keene, C. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00865-z · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues
Lu, T., Ang, C. E., & Zhuang, X. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.035 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
An atlas of gene regulatory elements in adult mouse cerebrum
Li, Y. E., Preissl, S., Hou, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, K., Qiu, Y., Poirion, O. B., Li, B., Chiou, J., Liu, H., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03604-1 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Amador‐Arjona, A., Cimadamore, F., Huang, C., Wright, R., Lewis, S., Gage, F. H., & Terskikh, A. V. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421480112 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areasPreprint
Tasic, B., Yao, Z., Smith, K. A., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/229542 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Polony gels enable amplifiable DNA stamping and spatial transcriptomics of chronic pain
Fu, X., Sun, L., Dong, R., Chen, J. Y., Silakit, R., Condon, L. F., Lin, Y., Lin, S., Palmiter, R. D., & Gu, L. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.021 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays.
Chen, A., Liao, S., Cheng, M., Ma, K., Wu, L. L., Lai, Y., Qiu, X., Yang, J., Xu, J., Hao, S., et al. (2022) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag
Bartosovic, M., & Castelo-Branco, G. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01535-4 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationProx1 expression patterns in the developing and adult murine brain
Lavado, A., & Oliver, G. C. (2006) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.21024 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Chen, A. F., Parks, B., Kathiria, A. S., Ober-Reynolds, B., Goronzy, J. J., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01461-y · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Chromatin potential identified by shared single cell profiling of RNA and chromatinPreprint
Ma, S., Zhang, B. M., LaFave, L. M., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.17.156943 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationGenetic and epigenetic coordination of cortical interneuron development
Allaway, K. C., Gabitto, M. I., Wapinski, O. L., Saldi, G.-A., Wang, C., Bandler, R. C., Wu, S. J., Bonneau, R., & Fishell, G. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03933-1 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Medin co-aggregates with vascular amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease
Wagner, J., Degenhardt, K., Veit, M., Louros, N. N., Konstantoulea, K., Skodras, A., Wild, K., Liu, P., Obermüller, U., Bansal, V., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05440-3 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
ST Pipeline: an automated pipeline for spatial mapping of unique transcripts
Navarro, J. F., Sjöstrand, J., Salmén, F., Lundeberg, J., & Ståhl, P. L. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx211 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Epigenomic priming of immune genes implicates oligodendroglia in multiple sclerosis susceptibility
Meijer, M., Agirre, E., Kabbe, M., van Tuijn, C. A., Heskol, A., Zheng, C., Mendanha Falcão, A., Bartosovic, M., Kirby, L., Calini, D., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.034 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationPhosphorylation of microtubule‐associated protein tau by AMPK‐related kinases
Yoshida, H., & Goedert, M. (2011) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07523.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Spatially mapped single-cell chromatin accessibility
Thornton, C. A., Mulqueen, R. M., Torkenczy, K. A., Nishida, A., Lowenstein, E. G., Fields, A. J., Steemers, F. J., Zhang, W. H., McConnell, H. L., Woltjer, R. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21515-7 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Gómez‐López, S., Wiskow, O., Favaro, R., Nicolis, S. K., Price, D. J., Pollard, S. M., & Smith, A. G. (2011) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.21201 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Chen, J., Lambo, M. E., Ge, X., Dearborn, J. T., Liu, Y., McCullough, K. B., Swift, R. G., Tabachnick, D. R., Tian, L., Noguchi, K., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.009 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationDiacou, R., Zhao, Y., Zheng, D., Cvekl, A., & Liu, W. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.106 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Spatial multi-omics sequencing for fixed tissue via DBiT-seq
Su, G., Qin, X., Enninful, A., Bai, Z., Deng, Y., Liu, Y., & Fan, R. (2021) · STAR Protocols · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100532 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, J.-Y., Lambo, M. E., Ge, X., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.12.17.423095 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Novel SOX2 partner-factor domain mutation in a four-generation family
Mihelec, M., Abraham, P., Gibson, K., Krowka, R., Susman, R., Storen, R., Chen, Y., Donald, J. A., Tam, P., Grigg, J., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.79 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Expanding the mutation and phenotype spectrum of MYH3-associated skeletal disorders
Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Hallgrímsdóttir, S., Zuo, Y., Li, X., Batkovskyte, D., Liu, S., Lindelöf, H., Wang, S., Hammarsjö, A., et al. (2022) · npj Genomic Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41525-021-00273-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationMa, C., Chitra, U., Zhang, S., & Raphael, B. J. (2022) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2022.09.002 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Inference of Gene Regulation using Single-Cell Multi-OmicsPreprint
Kartha, V. K., Duarte, F. M., Hu, Y., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.28.453784 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Huang, D.-F., Lee, C.-Y., Chou, M.-Y., Yang, T.-Y., Cao, X., Hsiao, Y.-H., Wu, R.-N., Lien, C., Huang, Y., Huang, H., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2203632119 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Spatially mapped single-cell chromatin accessibilityPreprint
Thornton, C. A., Mulqueen, R. M., Nishida, A., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/815720 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics
Vandereyken, K., Sifrim, A., Thienpont, B., & Voet, T. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00580-2 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics
Baysoy, A., Bai, Z., Satija, R., & Fan, R. (2023) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-023-00615-w · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Self-citationBressan, D., Battistoni, G., & Hannon, G. J. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abq4964 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Gene regulatory network inference in the era of single-cell multi-omics
Badia-i-Mompel, P., Wessels, L., Müller‐Dott, S., Trimbour, R., Flores, R. O. R., Argelaguet, R., & Sáez-Rodríguez, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00618-5 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal omics for biology and medicine
Liu, L., Chen, A., Li, Y., Mulder, J., Heyn, H., & Xu, X. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.040 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Slide-tags enables single-nucleus barcoding for multimodal spatial genomics
Russell, A. J. C., Weir, J. A., Nadaf, N. M., Shabet, M., Kumar, V., Kambhampati, S., Raichur, R., Marrero, G. J., Liu, S., Balderrama, K. S., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06837-4 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Deciphering spatial domains from spatial multi-omics with SpatialGlue
Long, Y., Ang, K. S., Sethi, R., Liao, S., Heng, Y., van Olst, L., Ye, S., Zhong, C., Xu, H., Zhang, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02316-4 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationCellCharter reveals spatial cell niches associated with tissue remodeling and cell plasticity
Varrone, M., Tavernari, D., Santamaria‐Martínez, A., Walsh, L. A., & Ciriello, G. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01588-4 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer
Huang, Q., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Bao, W., Xue, C., Li, X., Dong, S., Dong, Z., & Hu, S. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02243-6 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Single-cell sequencing to multi-omics: technologies and applications
Wu, X., Yang, X., Dai, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhu, J., Guo, H., & Yang, R. (2024) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-024-00643-4 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“…this approach to spatial ATAC-RNA-seq and spatial assay of cleavage under targets and tagmentation and RNA sequencing (spatial CUT&Tag-RNA-seq) [86], which achieve co-profile of epigenome and transcriptome, as well as spatial co-indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes for multi-omics mapping…”
MethodDecoding the tumor microenvironment with spatial technologies
Walsh, L. A., & Quail, D. F. (2023) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-023-01678-9 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
The Epigenetic Hallmarks of Cancer
Esteller, M., Dawson, M. A., Kadoch, C., Rassool, F. V., Jones, P. A., & Baylin, S. B. (2024) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0296 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Spatial oncology: Translating contextual biology to the clinic
Gong, D. H., Arbesfeld-Qiu, J. M., Perrault, E. N., Bae, J. W., & Hwang, W. L. (2024) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.09.001 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
SODB facilitates comprehensive exploration of spatial omics data
Yuan, Z., Pan, W., Zhao, X., Zhao, F., Xu, Z., Li, X., Zhao, Y. C., Zhang, M. Q., & Yao, J. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01773-7 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
A brain cell atlas integrating single-cell transcriptomes across human brain regions
Chen, X., Huang, Y., Huang, L., Huang, Z., Hao, Z.-Z., Xu, L., Xu, N., Li, Z., Mou, Y., Ye, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03150-z · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Multi-omics strategies for biomarker discovery and application in personalized oncology
Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., Gao, Y., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-025-00340-0 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Spatial multi-omics: novel tools to study the complexity of cardiovascular diseases
Kießling, P., & Kuppe, C. (2024) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-024-01282-y · Cited by 108 · see citing works
O’Connor, L. M., O’Connor, B. A., Lim, S. B., Zeng, J., & Lo, C. H. (2023) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2023.06.011 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Drug resistance in cancer: molecular mechanisms and emerging treatment strategies
Li, J., Hu, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Fang, Y., Qu, L., Lin, A., Luo, P., Jiang, A., et al. (2025) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-025-00352-w · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationLe, J., Dian, Y., Zhao, D., Guo, Z., Luo, Z., Chen, X., Zeng, F., & Deng, G. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02426-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Serine synthesis sustains macrophage IL-1β production via NAD+-dependent protein acetylation
Wang, C., Chen, Q., Chen, S., Fan, L., Gan, Z., Zhao, M., Shi, L., Bin, P., Yang, G., Zhou, X., et al. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.002 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
An Overview of the Epigenetic Modifications in the Brain under Normal and Pathological Conditions
Lossi, L., Castagna, C., & Merighi, A. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25073881 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Quantitative characterization of cell niches in spatially resolved omics data
Birk, S., Bonafonte-Pardàs, I., Feriz, A. M., Boxall, A. R., Agirre, E., Memi, F., Maguza, A., Yadav, A., Armingol, E., Fan, R., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02120-6 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationResolving tissue complexity by multimodal spatial omics modeling with MISO
Coleman, K., Schroeder, A., Loth, M., Zhang, D., Park, J. H., Sung, J.-Y., Blank, N., Cowan, A. J., Qian, X., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02574-2 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial dynamics of brain development and neuroinflammation
Zhang, D., Kirby, L. A., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Song, M., Wang, L., Wang, L., Kanatani, S., Jimenez-Beristain, T., Dang, Y., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09663-y · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrofluidic Biochips for Single‐Cell Isolation and Single‐Cell Analysis of Multiomics and Exosomes
Wang, C., Qiu, J., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Yu, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Han, L. G. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202401263 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Multi-omics approaches to decipher the interactions of nanoparticles and biological systems
Wang, Y., Xiao, Z., Wang, Z., Lee, D., Ma, Y., Wilhelm, S., Wang, H., Kim, B. Y. S., & Jiang, W. (2024) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-024-00264-4 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Exploring the untapped potential of single‐cell and spatial omics in plant biology
Nobori, T. (2025) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.70220 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Multiplexed spatial mapping of chromatin features, transcriptome and proteins in tissues
Guo, P., Mao, L., Chen, Y., Lee, C. N., Cardilla, A., Li, M., Bartošovič, M., & Deng, Y. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02576-0 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial transcriptomics in development and disease
Zhou, R., Yang, G., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-023-00144-0 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Enablers and challenges of spatial omics, a melting pot of technologies
Alexandrov, T., Sáez-Rodríguez, J., & Saka, S. K. (2023) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202110571 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Mapping the topography of spatial gene expression with interpretable deep learning
Chitra, U., Arnold, B. J., Sarkar, H., Sanno, K., Ma, C., Lopez-Darwin, S. L., & Raphael, B. J. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02503-3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationSchäfer, P. S. L., Dimitrov, D., Villablanca, E. J., & Sáez-Rodríguez, J. (2024) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-024-01768-2 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Cooperative integration of spatially resolved multi-omics data with COSMOS
Zhou, Y., Xiao, X., Dong, L., Tang, C., Xiao, G., & Xu, L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55204-y · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Jing, S., Wang, H.-Q., Lin, P., Yuan, J., Tang, Z., & Li, H. (2025) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-00857-1 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Qian, J., Shao, X., Bao, H., Yin, F., Guo, W., Li, C., Li, A., Hua, H., & Fan, X. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57029-9 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Mapping cancer biology in space: applications and perspectives on spatial omics for oncology
Lee, S., Kim, G., Lee, J., Lee, A. C., & Kwon, S. (2024) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-024-01941-z · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Cell-type deconvolution methods for spatial transcriptomics
Gaspard-Boulinc, L., Gortana, L., Walter, T., Barillot, E., & Cavalli, F. M. G. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-025-00845-y · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Zhu, J., Pang, K., Hu, B., He, R., Wang, N., Jiang, Z., Ji, P., & Zhao, F. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01906-4 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Spatial genomics: mapping human steatotic liver disease
Matchett, K. P., Paris, J., Teichmann, S. A., & Henderson, N. C. (2024) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-024-00915-2 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Cut&tag: a powerful epigenetic tool for chromatin profiling
Fu, Z., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., zheng, S., Zong, L., & Li, P. (2023) · Epigenetics · doi:10.1080/15592294.2023.2293411 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Spatial integration of multi-omics single-cell data with SIMO
Yang, P., Jin, K., Yao, Y., Jin, L., Shao, X., Li, C., Lu, X., & Fan, X. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56523-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of spatial transcriptomics data alignment and integration
Khan, M. A., Arslanturk, S., & Drăghici, S. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf536 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Muscle aging and sarcopenia: The pathology, etiology, and most promising therapeutic targets
Grima-Terrén, M., Campanario, S., Ramírez‐Pardo, I., Cisneros, A., Hong, X., Perdiguero, E., Serrano, A. L., Isern, J., & Muñoz‐Cánoves, P. (2024) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2024.101319 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Advances in spatial transcriptomics and its application in the musculoskeletal system
Wang, H., Cheng, P., Wang, J., Lv, H., Han, J., Hou, Z., Xu, R., & Chen, W. (2025) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-025-00429-w · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Benchmarking single-cell multi-modal data integrations
Fu, S., Wang, S.-G., Si, D., Li, G., Gao, Y., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02737-9 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Microtechnologies for single-cell and spatial multi-omics
Deng, Y., Bai, Z., & Fan, R. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00084-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, D., Kirby, L. A., Lin, Y., Song, M., Wang, L., Wang, L., Kanatani, S., Jimenez-Beristain, T., Dang, Y., Zhong, M., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.28.605493 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging
Rajbhandari, P., Neelakantan, T. V., Hosny, N., & Stockwell, B. R. (2024) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2023.11.003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Seq-Scope: Repurposing Illumina sequencing flow cells for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics
Kim, Y., Cheng, W., Cho, C.-S., Hwang, Y., Si, Y., Park, A., Schrank, M., Hsu, J.-E., Anacleto, A., Xi, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01065-0 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Technical challenges of studying early human development
Rugg‐Gunn, P. J., Moris, N., & Tam, P. (2023) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.201797 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Unlocking the power of spatial omics with AI
Coleman, K., Schroeder, A. R., & Li, M. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02363-x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Spatial omics advances for in situ RNA biology
Ren, J., Luo, S., Shi, H., & Wang, X. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.08.002 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Li, H., Bao, S., Farzad, N., Qin, X., Fung, A. A., Zhang, D., Bai, Z., Tao, B., & Fan, R. (2025) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-025-01145-9 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationCellNEST reveals cell–cell relay networks using attention mechanisms on spatial transcriptomics
Zohora, F. T., Paliwal, D., Figueroa, E. F., Li, J., Gao, T., Notta, F., & Schwartz, G. W. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02721-3 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Genomics of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder
Owen, M. J., Bray, N. J., Walters, J., & O’Donovan, M. C. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-025-00843-0 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Spatial joint profiling of DNA methylome and transcriptome in tissues
Lee, C. N., Fu, H., Cardilla, A., Zhou, W., & Deng, Y. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09478-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationGiotto Suite: a multiscale and technology-agnostic spatial multiomics analysis ecosystem
Chen, J. G., Chávez, J., O’Brien, M., Xu, J., Ruiz, E. C., Wang, W., Amin, I., Sheridan, J. P., Shin, S. C., Hasyagar, S. V., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02817-w · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Technology Facilitates Cancer Research
Wang, Q., Zhi, Y., Zi, M., Mo, Y., Wang, Y., Liao, Q., Zhang, S., Gong, Z., Wang, F., Zeng, Z., et al. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202302558 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
From morphology to single-cell molecules: high-resolution 3D histology in biomedicine
Xu, X., Su, J., Zhu, R., Li, K., Zhao, X., Fan, J., & Mao, F. (2025) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-025-02240-x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Bonev, B., Castelo‐Branco, G., Chen, F., Codeluppi, S., Corces, M. R., Fan, J., Heiman, M., Harris, K., Inoue, F., Kellis, M., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01806-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvancing biological understanding of cellular senescence with computational multiomics
Li, S., Agudelo Garcia, P. A., Aliferis, C., Becich, M. J., Calyeca, J., Cosgrove, B. D., Elisseeff, J., Farzad, N., Fertig, E. J., Glass, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02314-y · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationSANTO: a coarse-to-fine alignment and stitching method for spatial omics
Li, H., Lin, Y., He, W., Han, W., Xu, X., Xu, C., Gao, E., Zhao, H., & Gao, X. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50308-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Large-scale neurophysiology and single-cell profiling in human neuroscience
Lee, A. T., Chang, E. F., Paredes, M. F., & Nowakowski, T. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07405-0 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Mechanisms and technologies in cancer epigenetics
Sherif, Z. A., Ogunwobi, O. O., & Ressom, H. W. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1513654 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Enninful, A., Zhang, Z., Klymyshyn, D., Ingalls, M. H., Yang, M., Zong, H., Bai, Z., Farzad, N., Su, G., Baysoy, A., et al. (2026) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02948-0 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial tumor biopsy with fluorescence PCR microneedle array
Zhang, X., Chen, G., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100538 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A practical guide to spatial transcriptomics
Valihrach, L., Žucha, D., Abaffy, P., & Kubista, M. (2024) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2024.101276 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Li, B., Bao, F., Hou, Y., Li, F., Li, H., Deng, Y. C., & Dai, Q. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50837-5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBrain aging and rejuvenation at single-cell resolution
Sun, E., Nagvekar, R., Pogson, A. N., & Brunet, A. (2025) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.12.007 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Single-Cell Multi-Omics: Insights into Therapeutic Innovations to Advance Treatment in Cancer
Guan, A., & Quek, C. Y. J. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26062447 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Harnessing transposable elements for plant functional genomics and genome engineering.
Tao, X.-Y., Feng, S.-L., Yuan, L., Li, Y.-J., Li, X.-J., Guan, X.-Y., Chen, Z.-H., & Xu, S. (2025) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2025.03.007 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Tian, R., Xue, Z., Chen, Y., Qi, Y., Zhang, J., Yuan, J., Ruan, D., Lin, J., Liu, J., Wang, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63915-z · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal multi-omics: exploring molecular landscapes in aging and regenerative medicine
Chu, L.-X., Wang, W.-J., Gu, X.-P., Wu, P., Gao, C., Zhang, Q., Wu, J., Jiang, D.-W., Huang, J.-Q., Ying, X.-W., et al. (2024) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-024-00537-4 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The epigenetic landscape of fate decisions in T cells
Jay, A., Pondevida, C. M., & Vahedi, G. (2025) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-025-02113-x · Cited by 31 · see citing works
From tissue architecture to clinical insights: Spatial transcriptomics in solid tumor studies
Sharma, A., Raut, S. S., Shukla, A., Gupta, S., Mishra, A., & Singh, A. (2025) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.seminoncol.2025.152389 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics: background, technologies, applications, and challenges
Duhan, L., Kumari, D., Naime, M., Parmar, V. S., Chhillar, A. K., Dangi, M., & Pasrija, R. (2024) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-024-09553-y · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Mechanical rejuvenation of senescent stem cells and aged bone via chromatin remodeling
Liu, X., Ye, Y., Li, Z., Liao, L., & Wei, Q. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68387-3 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Epigenetics in obesity: Mechanisms and advances in therapies based on natural products
Chen, P., Wang, Y., Chen, F., & Zhou, B. (2024) · Pharmacology Research & Perspectives · doi:10.1002/prp2.1171 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Development and application of transcriptomics technologies in plant science
Wang, H., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, G., Tan, C., & Ye, L. (2024) · Crop Design · doi:10.1016/j.cropd.2024.100057 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Benchmarking of spatial transcriptomics platforms across six cancer typesPreprint
Cervilla, S., Grases, D., Perez, E., Real, F. X., Musulén, E., Aprea, J., Esteller, M., & Porta‐Pardo, E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.21.593407 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Are we there yet? Exploring astrocyte heterogeneity one cell at a time
O’Dea, M. R., & Hasel, P. (2024) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24621 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
scTrends: A living review of commercial single-cell and spatial 'omic technologies
Jonghe, J. D., Opzoomer, J. W., Vilas‐Zornoza, A., Nilges, B. S., Crane, P., Vicari, M., Lee, H., Lara‐Astiaso, D., Groß, T., Morf, J., et al. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100723 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Wang, R., Hastings, W. J., Saliba, J. G., Bao, D., Huang, Y., Maity, S., Ahmad, O. M. K., Hu, L., Wang, S., Fan, J., et al. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c11505 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tan, Y., Qin, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, L., Li, B., Nice, E. C., Zhang, Y., & Jing, J. (2025) · MedComm – Oncology · doi:10.1002/mog2.70009 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-Parameter Spatial Multi-Omics through Histology-Anchored Integration
Liu, Y.-H., Wang, C.-Y., Wang, Z.-K., Chen, L., Li, Z., Song, J.-N., Zou, Q., Gao, R., Qian, B.-Z., Feng, X., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02926-6 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBelchikov, N., Hsu, J., Li, X. J., Jarroux, J., Hu, W., Joglekar, A., & Tilgner, H. (2024) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.279640.124 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Gene regulatory landscape of cerebral cortex folding
Singh, A. P., Del-Valle-Anton, L., Romero, C. D. J., Zhang, Z., Ortuño, E. F., Mahesh, A., Espinós, A., Soler, R., Cárdenas, A., Fernández, V., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn1640 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Unified molecular approach for spatial epigenome, transcriptome, and cell lineages
Huang, Y., Belk, J. A., Zhang, R., Weiser, N. E., Chiang, Z., Jones, M. G., Mischel, P. S., Buenrostro, J. D., & Chang, H. Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2424070122 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Dissecting mammalian reproduction with spatial transcriptomics
Zhang, X., Cao, Q., Rajachandran, S., Grow, E. J., Evans, M., & Chen, H. (2023) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmad017 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypes in atherosclerosis
Lambert, J., & Jørgensen, H. F. (2024) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.119085 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Nun Study: Insights from 30 years of aging and dementia research
Clarke, K. M., Etemadmoghadam, S., Danner, B., Corbett, C., Ghaseminejad-Bandpey, A., Dopler, M. B., Parker‐Garza, J., Alhneif, M., Babu, S., Ogunbona, O. B., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14626 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dissecting endothelial cell heterogeneity with new tools
Zhong, J., Gao, R., Zhang, X., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Ma, J., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Cell Regeneration · doi:10.1186/s13619-025-00223-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationCharting the tumor microenvironment with spatial profiling technologies
Toninelli, M., Rossetti, G., & Pagani, M. (2023) · Trends in cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2023.08.004 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mosaic integration of spatial multi-omics with SpaMosaic
Yan, X., Ang, K. S., Ang, K. S., van Olst, L., Edwards, A., Watson, T., Zheng, R., Zhang, D., Fan, R., Li, M., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02573-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationSalma, M., Andrieu‐Soler, C., Deleuze, V., & Soler, É. (2023) · Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2023.102745 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Unravelling tumour spatiotemporal heterogeneity using spatial multimodal data
Zuo, C., Zhu, J., Zou, J., & Chen, L. (2025) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.70331 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Miao, J., Li, J., Xin, J., Tu, J.-J., Ge, M., Qi, J., Zhou, X., Zhu, Y., Yang, C., & Lin, Z. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63418-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Deconvolution of cell types and states in spatial multiomics utilizing TACIT
Huynh, K., Tyc, K. M., Matuck, B. F., Easter, Q. T., Pratapa, A., Kumar, N. V., Pérez, P., Kulchar, R. J., Pranzatelli, T. J. F., de Souza, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58874-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cui, C., Cui, F., Zou, Q., Zhang, Z., & Jia, L. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102583 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, D., Deng, Y., Kukanja, P., Agirre, E., Bartosovic, M., Dong, M., Ma, C., Ma, S., Su, G., Bao, S., Liu, Y., Xiao, Y., Rosoklija, G. B., Dwork, A. J., Mann, J. J., Leong, K. W., Boldrini, M., Wang, L., Haeussler, M., Raphael, B. J., Kluger, Y., Castelo-Branco, G., & Fan, R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Yale Cancer Center (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Princeton University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts (MK)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deng, Yanxiang
- Fan, Rong
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-03-15
- Volume
- 616
- Issue
- 7955
- Pages
- 113-122
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC10076218
- OpenAlex
- W4324344255
- Semantic Scholar
- bde8da8ff6a896af73232add8cdb5f49a044ecc1
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 172 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 59 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 42.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Li Ka Shing Foundation
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer
- Göran Gustafssons Stiftelser
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 794689)
- Cancerfonden (190394 Pj, 2019-)
- Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning (JUB2019)
- Karolinska Institutet
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2019–0107)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-01360)
- National Institutes of Health (1u01ca294514-01, 1rf1mh128876-01)
- National Institute on Aging (U54AG076043, U54AG079759)
- National Institute of Mental Health (RF1 MH128876, RM1MH132648)
- National Cancer Institute (U01 CA294514, UH3CA257393, UG3CA257393, U24CA248453, R01CA245313, U54CA274509)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK106857)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- spatial epigenomics, spatial transcriptomics, chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me3, single-cell resolution, mouse brain, human brain, cell dynamics, gene expression regulation, epigenetic priming, tissue structure
- MeSH terms
- Epigenome, Aging, Animals, Brain, Chromatin, Gene Expression Regulation, Histones, Humans, Mammals, Organ Specificity, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Epigenomics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review