Cited by 721Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics

Grün, Dominic, Kester, Lennart, van Oudenaarden, Alexander·2014·Nature Methods

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics has recently emerged as a powerful technology to explore gene expression heterogeneity among single cells. Here we identify two major sources of technical variability: sampling noise and global cell-to-cell variation in sequencing efficiency. We propose noise models to correct for this, which we validate using single-molecule FISH. We demonstrate that gene expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells depends on the culture condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2930

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grün, D., Kester, L., & van Oudenaarden, A.
Affiliations
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2014-04-20
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
637-640
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1981641790
Cited by
721
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 9
FWCI
23.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
noise models, single-cell RNA sequencing, technical variability, sampling noise, sequencing efficiency, cell-to-cell variability, gene expression heterogeneity, single-molecule FISH, mouse embryonic stem cells, culture conditions, biological variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Models, Biological, Transcription Factors, Observer Variation, Selection Bias, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review