Cited by 413Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Studying individual differences in human adolescent brain development

Open access
Foulkes, Lucy, Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne·2018·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of social, psychological and biological development. During adolescence, relationships with others become more complex, peer relationships are paramount and social cognition develops substantially. These psychosocial changes are paralleled by structural and functional changes in the brain. Existing research in adolescent neurocognitive development has focused largely on averages, but this obscures meaningful individual variation in development. In this Perspective, we propose that the field should now move toward studying individual differences. We start by discussing individual variation in structural and functional brain development. To illustrate the importance of considering individual differences in development, we consider three sources of variation that contribute to neurocognitive processing: socioeconomic status, culture and peer environment. To assess individual differences in neurodevelopmental trajectories, large-scale longitudinal datasets are required. Future developmental neuroimaging studies should attempt to characterize individual differences to move toward a more nuanced understanding of neurocognitive changes during adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-018-0078-4

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The human brain undergoes substantial and protracted development across adolescence.

    “Extensive research using brain imaging has shown that the human brain undergoes substantial and protracted development across adolescence. 122”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [122]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foulkes, L., & Blakemore, S.-J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2018-02-05
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
315-323
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2791610189
Cited by
413
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 25
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
individual differences, adolescent brain development, neurocognitive development, socioeconomic status, cultural influences on development, peer environment, neurodevelopmental trajectories, longitudinal neuroimaging, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Child, Culture, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Social Class, Adolescent Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review