Cited by 673Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Functional boundaries in the human cerebellum revealed by a multi-domain task battery

Open access
King, Maedbh, Hernandez-Castillo, Carlos R., Poldrack, Russell A., Ivry, Richard B., Diedrichsen, Jörn·2019·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

There is compelling evidence that the human cerebellum is engaged in a wide array of motor and cognitive tasks. A fundamental question centers on whether the cerebellum is organized into distinct functional subregions. To address this question, we employed a rich task battery designed to tap into a broad range of cognitive processes. During four functional MRI sessions, participants performed a battery of 26 diverse tasks comprising 47 unique conditions. Using the data from this multi-domain task battery, we derived a comprehensive functional parcellation of the cerebellar cortex and evaluated it by predicting functional boundaries in a novel set of tasks. The new parcellation successfully identified distinct functional subregions, providing significant improvements over existing parcellations derived from task-free data. Lobular boundaries, commonly used to summarize functional data, did not coincide with functional subdivisions. The new parcellation provides a functional atlas to guide future neuroimaging studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-019-0436-x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, M., Hernandez-Castillo, C. R., Poldrack, R. A., Ivry, R. B., & Diedrichsen, J.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Diedrichsen, Jörn
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2019-07-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1371-1378
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2955632554
Cited by
673
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 17
FWCI
37.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54mh091657-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U54-MH091657)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS105839, R01NS092079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
human cerebellum, functional parcellation, cerebellar cortex
MeSH terms
Atlases as Topic, Brain Mapping, Cerebellar Cortex, Cerebellum, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review