Cited by 267Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsAcademic Writing and Publishing

Evidence-based Guidelines for Controlling pH in Mammalian Live-Cell Culture Systems

Open access
Michl, Johanna, Park, Kyung Chan, Swietach, Pawel·2019·Communications Biology

Abstract

A fundamental variable in culture medium is its pH, which must be controlled by an appropriately formulated buffering regime, since biological processes are exquisitely sensitive to acid–base chemistry. Although awareness of the importance of pH is fostered early in the training of researchers, there are no consensus guidelines for best practice in managing pH in cell cultures, and reporting standards relating to pH are typically inadequate. Furthermore, many laboratories adopt bespoke approaches to controlling pH, some of which inadvertently produce artefacts that increase noise, compromise reproducibility or lead to the misinterpretation of data. Here, we use real-time measurements of medium pH and intracellular pH under live-cell culture conditions to describe the effects of various buffering regimes, including physiological CO 2 /HCO 3 − and non-volatile buffers (e.g. HEPES). We highlight those cases that result in poor control, non-intuitive outcomes and erroneous inferences. To improve data reproducibility, we propose guidelines for controlling pH in culture systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-019-0393-7

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of unstirred medium layers presumably determines the delivery of nutrients/growth factors and the removal of other metabolic waste products such as lactic acid, which can also act to directly and indirectly moderate environmental variation.

    “The effect of unstirred medium layers also presumably determines the delivery of nutrients/growth factors and the removal of other metabolic waste products (e.g., lactic acid), which can also act to directly and indirectly moderate environmental variation (Michl et al., 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Michl et al., 2019

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of research papers rely on nominal set points and fail to directly verify and report environmental parameters.

    “recent assessments show that the majority of research papers rely on nominal set points and fail to directly verify and report environmental parameters (Al-Ani et al., 2018; Michl et al., 2019; Klein et al., 2021b).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Michl et al., 2019

    The Discussion reports that only a small percentage of surveyed cell-culture articles provided necessary information about medium pH and buffering; only a third reported incubator CO2. The Results (“Monitoring culture medium pH under incubation”) also says that medium pH is not routinely monitored. This supports the claim for cell-culture pH, but the paper does not establish it for environmental parameters generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cellular growth of three colorectal cell-lines (NCI-H747, DLD1, Caco2) was optimal at pH 7.4, but when medium pH deviated from 7.4 by >0.3 units all three cell lines exhibited reduced rates of proliferation.

    “Michl and others (2019) showed that cellular growth of three colorectal cell-lines (NCI-H747, DLD1, Caco2) was optimal at pH 7.4, but when medium pH deviated from 7.4 by > 0.3 units all three cell lines exhibited reduced rates of proliferation.”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Michl et al., 2019

    The Results (Stability of CO2/HCO3− buffering, Fig. 2e; page unavailable) report that growth of NCI-H747, DLD1 and Caco2 was optimal near pH 7.4. They say the effect at pH 7.7 varied, with the strongest growth inhibition in NCI-H747; they do not establish a >0.3-unit threshold or explicitly state that all three lines had reduced proliferation beyond it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Titration of acids and bases (including HCl, NaOH, and NVBs) introduces osmolytes (Na+, Cl−) to cell medium and can result in substantial changes to medium osmolarity by >10%.

    “The titration of acids and bases (including HCl, NaOH, and NVBs) introduces osmolytes (Na+, Cl−) to cell medium and can result in substantial changes to medium osmolarity by > 10% (Michl et al., 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Michl et al., 2019

    The Results section (‘Effect of NVBs on the stability of medium pH’) says that titrating non-volatile buffers with HCl or NaOH introduces Na+ and Cl− and can substantially increase osmolality. Its example estimates an increase of approximately 10%, not greater than 10%, so the stated threshold is not established by that passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In batch culture set-ups, researchers often select culture medium that contains a pH indicator dye such as Phenol Red to guide the renewal of cell medium, but medium color changes assessed "by eye" can lead to undetected pH declines.

    “In batch culture set-ups, researchers often select culture medium that contains a pH indicator dye [e.g., Phenol Red (PhR)] to guide the renewal of cell medium, but medium color changes assessed “by eye” can lead to undetected pH declines (Michl et al., 2019).”

    From Toward Best Practices for Controlling Mammalian Cell Culture Environments (2022) · cites this paper as Michl et al., 2019

    The Results section, “Monitoring culture medium pH under incubation” (page unavailable), says Phenol Red is routinely included to assess medium acidity and that assessment can be done ‘by eye,’ while absorbance provides a more quantitative reading. It also warns that medium pH is not routinely monitored despite possible acid production. It does not say that visual assessment guides medium renewal in batch cultures or establish that it leads to undetected pH declines. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [2]Srivastava J Barber DL Jacobson MP Intracellular pH sensors: design principles and functional significance Physiology (Bethesda) 2007 22 30 39 17289928
  2. [3]Schonichen A Webb BA Jacobson MP Barber DL Considering protonation as a posttranslational modification regulating protein structure and function Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2013 42 289 314 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102349 23451893 PMC4041481 · DOI
  3. [4]White Katharine A. Ruiz Diego Garrido Szpiech Zachary A. Strauli Nicolas B. Hernandez Ryan D. Jacobson Matthew P. Barber Diane L. Cancer-associated arginine-to-histidine mutations confer a gain in pH sensing to mutant proteins Science Signaling 2017 10 495 eaam9931 10.1126/scisignal.aam9931 28874603 PMC6022362 · DOI
  4. [5]Roos A Boron WF Intracellular pH Physiol. Rev. 1981 61 296 434 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.2.296 7012859 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Eagle H Buffer combinations for mammalian cell culture Science 1971 174 500 503 10.1126/science.174.4008.500 5110427 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Leem CH Vaughan-Jones RD Out-of-equilibrium pH transients in the guinea-pig ventricular myocyte J. Physiol 1998 509 Pt 2 471 485 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.471bn.x 9575296 PMC2230975 · DOI
  7. [8]Boron WF Regulation of intracellular pH Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2004 28 160 179 10.1152/advan.00045.2004 15545345 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Price PJ Best practices for media selection for mammalian cells In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2017 53 673 681 10.1007/s11626-017-0186-6 28726187 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Pamies D Good cell culture practice for stem cells and stem-cell-derived models ALTEX 2017 34 95 132 27554434
  10. [12]Pamies D Advanced good cell culture practice for human primary, stem cell-derived and organoid models as well as microphysiological systems ALTEX 2018 35 353 378 10.14573/altex.1710081 29697851 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Geraghty RJ Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research Br. J. Cancer 2014 111 1021 1046 10.1038/bjc.2014.166 25117809 PMC4453835 · DOI
  12. [14]Clark WM Lubs HA The colorimetric determination of hydrogen ion concentration and its applications in bacteriology: III J. Bacteriol. 1917 2 191 236 16558741 PMC378704
  13. [16]Vinnakota KC Kushmerick MJ Point: muscle lactate and H(+) production do have a 1:1 association in skeletal muscle J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2011 110 1487 1489 10.1152/japplphysiol.01506.2010 21212251 · DOI
  14. [17]Vichai V Kirtikara K Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening Nat. Protoc. 2006 1 1112 1116 10.1038/nprot.2006.179 17406391 · DOI
  15. [18]Eagle H The effect of environmental pH on the growth of normal and malignant cells J. Cell. Physiol. 1973 82 1 8 10.1002/jcp.1040820102 4354070 · DOI
  16. [19]Ferguson WJ Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research Anal. Biochem 1980 104 300 310 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90079-2 7446957 · DOI
  17. [20]Damaghi M Chronic acidosis in the tumour microenvironment selects for overexpression of LAMP2 in the plasma membrane Nat. Commun. 2015 6 8752 10.1038/ncomms9752 26658462 PMC4682176 · DOI
  18. [21]Wilmes A Towards optimisation of induced pluripotent cell culture: extracellular acidification results in growth arrest of iPSC prior to nutrient exhaustion Toxicol. In Vitro 2017 45 445 454 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.07.023 28821352 · DOI
  19. [22]Erecinska M Deas J Silver IA The effect of pH on glycolysis and phosphofructokinase activity in cultured cells and synaptosomes J. Neurochem. 1995 65 2765 2772 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65062765.x 7595576 · DOI
  20. [23]Hu X Chao M Wu H Central role of lactate and proton in cancer cell resistance to glucose deprivation and its clinical translation Signal. Transduct.Target Ther. 2017 2 16047 10.1038/sigtrans.2016.47 29263910 PMC5661620 · DOI
  21. [25]Clapham DE Calcium signaling Cell 2007 131 1047 1058 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 18083096 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [26]Thomas RC Cell growth factors. Bicarbonate and pHi response Nature 1989 337 601 10.1038/337601a0 2918896 · DOI
  23. [27]Buckler KJ Vaughan-Jones RD Application of a new pH-sensitive fluoroprobe (carboxy-SNARF-1) for intracellular pH measurement in small, isolated cells Pflugers Arch. 1990 417 234 239 10.1007/BF00370705 2084617 · DOI
  24. [28]Thomas JA Buchsbaum RN Zimniak A Racker E Intracellular pH measurements in Ehrlich ascites tumor cells utilizing spectroscopic probes generated in situ Biochemistry 1979 18 2210 2218 10.1021/bi00578a012 36128 · DOI
  25. [29]Wilding JL Bodmer WF Cancer cell lines for drug discovery and development Cancer Res. 2014 74 2377 2384 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2971 24717177 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [32]Hutchinson L Kirk R High drug attrition rates—where are we going wrong? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011 8 189 190 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.34 21448176 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [33]Hanrahan JW Tabcharani JA Inhibition of an outwardly rectifying anion channel by HEPES and related buffers J. Membr. Biol. 1990 116 65 77 10.1007/BF01871673 1695687 · DOI
  28. [35]Stea A Nurse CA Contrasting effects of HEPES vs HCO3(−)-buffered media on whole-cell currents in cultured chemoreceptors of the rat carotid body Neurosci. Lett. 1991 132 239 242 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90310-P 1784426 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michl, J., Park, K. C., & Swietach, P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Swietach, Pawel
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2019-04-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
144-144
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941723371
Cited by
267
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (723997)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
mammalian cell culture, intracellular pH, HEPES, reproducibility, reporting guidelines, acid-base chemistry
MeSH terms
Animals, Bicarbonates, Buffers, Culture Media, HEPES, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Intracellular Fluid, Laboratories, Mammals, Research Personnel, Sodium Chloride, Cell Culture Techniques, Caco-2 Cells, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review