Cited by 29Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Bullying fosters interpersonal distrust and degrades adolescent mental health as predicted by Social Safety Theory

Open access
Tsomokos, Dimitris I., Slavich, George M.·2024·Nature Mental Health

Abstract

Social Safety Theory predicts that socially threatening experiences such as bullying degrade mental health partly by fostering the belief that others cannot be trusted. Here we tested this prediction by examining how peer bullying in childhood impacted adolescent mental health, and whether this effect was mediated by interpersonal distrust and several other commonly studied mediators-namely diet, sleep and physical activity-in 10,000 youth drawn from the UK's Millennium Cohort Study. Youth bullied in childhood developed more internalizing, externalizing and total mental health problems in late adolescence, and this effect was partially mediated by interpersonal distrust during middle adolescence. Indeed, adolescents who developed greater distrust were approximately 3.5 times more likely to subsequently experience clinically significant mental health problems than those who developed less distrust. Individual and school-based interventions aimed at reducing the negative impact of bullying on mental health may thus benefit from bolstering youths' sense of trust in others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44220-024-00203-7

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have provided evidence for a link between depression and interpersonal distrust in middle adolescence, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (ages 14 to 17).

    “Furthermore, recent studies have provided evidence for a link between depression and interpersonal distrust in middle adolescence, both cross-sectionally [52] and longitudinally [53] (ages 14 to 17).”

    From Adolescent social media use and psychiatric outcomes: a longitudinal mediation analysis via interpersonal distrust, sleep, and self-image. (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results and Structural equation models sections report a longitudinal association between interpersonal distrust at age 14 and mental health difficulties at age 17. But the Mental health difficulties (age 17) section identifies the outcomes as emotional, peer, conduct and attentional problems, not depression specifically; the Discussion says the authors knew of no studies investigating distrust and depression in adolescence. This source supports the longitudinal, broader-mental-health part of the claim, not a depression-specific link. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The role of social media use in the formation of maladaptive social safety schemas (e.g., indexed via interpersonal distrust) has not been addressed in any age group.

    “However, the role of social media use in the formation of maladaptive social safety schemas (e.g. indexed via interpersonal distrust [53]) has not been addressed in any age group, even though there is mixed evidence on the association between social media use and perceived social support in adults [60–63].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]15. Blascovich J & Mendes WB in Handbook of Social Psychology Vol. 1, 5th edn 194-227 (John Wiley & Sons, 2010).
  2. [59]59. Yan Z & Kirsch P in The Neurobiology of Trust (ed. Krueger F) 315-337 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsomokos, D. I., & Slavich, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Slavich, George M.
Venue
Nature Mental Health
Published
2024-02-13
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
328-336
ISSN
2731-6076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391779712
Cited by
29
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH103443)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
bullying, peer victimization, interpersonal distrust, adolescent mental health, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, mediation, diet, sleep, physical activity, childhood bullying, late adolescence, school-based intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review