Cited by 875Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNutritional Studies and DietSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Alcohol and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.

Corrao, Giovanni, Rubbiati, Luca, Bagnardi, Vincenzo, Zambon, Antonella, Poikolainen, Kari·2000·Addiction

Abstract

Objective To estimate parameters of the function relating alcohol consumption with the risk of coronary heart disease and to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the parameter estimates. Methods A search of the epidemiological literature from 1966 to 1998 was performed using several bibliographic databases. Meta-regression models were fitted to evaluate non-linear effects of alcohol intake on the relative risk. The effects of some characteristics of the studies, including an index of their quality, were considered as putative sources of heterogeneity of the estimates. Publication bias was also investigated. Findings Among the 196 initially reviewed articles, 51 were selected. Since qualitative characteristics of the studies were significant sources of heterogeneity, the pooled dose-response functions were based on the 28 cohort studies with higher quality. Risk decreased from 0 to 20 g/day (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.83); there was evidence of a protective effect up to 72 g/day (RR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.00) and increased risk above > or = 89 g/day (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.11). Lower protective effects and harmful effects were found in women, in men living in countries outside the Mediterranean area and in studies where fatal events were used as the outcome. Evidence of publication bias for moderate intakes and of heterogeneity of the estimates across studies for higher intakes were found. Conclusions The degree of protection from moderate doses of alcohol should be r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.951015056.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corrao, G., Rubbiati, L., Bagnardi, V., Zambon, A., & Poikolainen, K.
Affiliations
University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
95
Issue
10
Pages
1505-1523
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1979209029
Cited by
875
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 58
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
alcohol consumption, coronary artery disease, dose-response relationship, moderate drinking, protective effect of alcohol, publication bias, study quality, sex differences, Mediterranean countries, drinking patterns
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Coronary Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematical Computing, Regression Analysis, Research Design, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Publication Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review