CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 453Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leadership, organizational stress, and emotional exhaustion among hospital nursing staff

Stordeur, Sabine, D'Hoore, William, Vandenberghe, Christian·2001·Journal of Advanced Nursing
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01885.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Leadership, organizational stress, and emotional exhaustion among hospital nursing staff Study’s rationale and objectives. We examined the effect of work stressors and head nurses’ transactional and transformational leadership on the levels of emotional exhaustion experienced among their staff. Methodological design and research methods. A questionnaire was sent to all nurses of a university hospital. Usable returns were received from 625 nurses, giving a response rate of 39·2%. Data were treated using correlational analyses and multiple regression. The latter modelled stressors and leadership as predictors of nurses’ reported emotional exhaustion. Measures. Work stressors were assessed using the Nursing Stress Scale (NSS) which comprises 34 items divided into three subscales (referring to stress from the physical, psychological, and social environment), and the role ambiguity (three items) and conflict (three items) scales. Leadership was measured with the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Results. In regression analyses, work stressors as a whole were found to explain 22% of the variance in emotional exhaustion whereas leadership dimensions explained 9% of the variance in that outcome measure. Stress emanating from the physical and social environment, role ambiguity, and active management‐by‐exception leadership were significantly associated with increased levels of emotional exhaustion. Transformational and contingent reward leadership did not influence emotional exhaustion. Limitations. A limitation of this study is that it considered only the emotional exhaustion dimension of burnout. Also, as data were cross‐sectional in nature, conclusions regarding the direction of causality among variables cannot be drawn. Conclusions. This study provided, for the first time, a test of the influence of leadership on burnout among nurses, taking into account the role of work stressors. Future research is needed to examine if the effects reported herein can be replicated using the two other dimensions of burnout (depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01885.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. BassB.M.(1985)Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press New York.
  2. 10.1037//0021-9010.80.4.468 · DOI
  3. HouseR.J.(1977)A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. InLeadership: The Cutting Edge(Hunt J.G. & Larson L.L. eds) Southern Illinois University Press Carbondale IL USA pp. 189–207.
  4. 10.1037//0021-9010.78.6.891 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037//0021-9010.74.4.546 · DOI
  6. 10.1037//0021-9010.81.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
  7. SchneiderB.&GunnarsonS.(1991)Organizational climate and culture: the psychology of the workplace. InApplying Psychology in Business(Jones J.W. Steffy B.D. & Bray D.W. eds) Lexington Books New York pp. 542–551.
  8. Seltzer J., 1989, Transformational leadership: is it a source of more burnout and stress?, Journal of Health and Human Resources Administration, 12, 175
  9. 10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 453

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stordeur, S., D'Hoore, W., & Vandenberghe, C.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08-27
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
533-542
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01885.x
OpenAlex
W2094383137
Cited by
452
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 115 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
emotional exhaustion, burnout, nursing leadership, transactional leadership, transformational leadership, organizational stress, occupational stressors, role ambiguity, role conflict, management by exception, contingent reward, nurse managers, hospital nursing staff
MeSH terms
Adult, Belgium, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Leadership, Male, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Regression Analysis, Role, Social Support, Task Performance and Analysis, Multivariate Analysis, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review