Cited by 137Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Gluten and casein free diets in autism: A study of the effects on food choice and nutrition

Cornish, E.·2002·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in possible dietary involvement in the aetiology and treatment of Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Research has focused on the physiological and behavioural effects of dietary change but has not examined the effect of exclusion diets on nutritional intake. AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine whether the removal of major dietary staples placed children with autism at risk of nutrient deficiency and compares their food choice with ASD children not following gluten and/or casein free diets. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to parents of children aged 3-16 years, diagnosed with ASD belonging to the National Autistic Society in Leicestershire and southern Derbyshire. Detailed dietary information and a 3-day food diary were collected. The sample size was small: those using gluten/casein free diets (n = 8) and those not following diet (n = 29). RESULTS: Nutrient intakes fell below the Lower Reference Nutrient Intake (LRNI) in 12 children (32%) for zinc, calcium, iron, vitamin A, vitamin B12 and riboflavin in the nondiet group and four children (50%) for zinc and calcium in the diet group. Fruit and vegetable intakes were higher and cereal, bread and potato consumption were lower in those children using gluten and/or casein free diets. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the energy, protein and micronutrient intakes were found between the two groups of children. A longitudinal prospective study is suggested to examine whether differences in food choice are the result of dietary intervention or the prerequisite for the successful application of diet in this special group of children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2002.00372.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornish, E.
Corresponding author
Cornish, E.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
261-269
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2099067235
Cited by
137
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
gluten-free diet, casein-free diet, autism spectrum disorder, nutrient intake, micronutrient deficiency, zinc, calcium, iron, vitamin B12, riboflavin, vitamin A, fruit and vegetable intake, cereal consumption, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Caseins, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Food Preferences, Glutens, Humans, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Surveys and Questionnaires, Diet Records, Nutrition Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review