Blockchain-based efficient privacy preserving and data sharing scheme of content-centric network in 5G
Abstract
Now, the authors’ life is full of vast amount of information, the era of information has arrived. So the content‐centric networks face severe challenges in dealing with a huge range of content requests, bringing protection and sharing concerns of the content. How to protect information in the network efficiently and securely for the upcoming 5G era has become a problem. The authors propose a scheme based on a blockchain to solve the privacy issues in content‐centric mobile networks for 5G. The authors implement the mutual trust between content providers and users. Besides, the openness and tamper‐resistant of the blockchain ledger ensure the access control and privacy of the provider. With the help of a miner, selected from users, the authors can maintain the public ledger expediently. Also, in return, the authors share the interesting data with low overhead, network delay and congestion, and then achieve green communication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are two different methods to detect these diseases, involving the usage of artificial neural networks (ANN) and Bayesian networks (BN) to show such specifics for disease diagnosis/classification.
“There are two different methods to detect these diseases, involving the usage of artificial neural networks (ANN) and Bayesian networks (BN) to show such specifics for disease diagnosis/classification.”
From Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health (2021) · cites this paper as Fan et al. 2018
Blockchain-based cloud computing enables decentralization of cloud/edge 5G networks, removing centralized control at the core network and offering a decentralized fair agreement via blockchain consensus.
“The concept of blockchain-based cloud computing enables decentralization of cloud/edge 5G networks [64], [78] which gets rid of centralized control at the core network and offers a decentralized fair agreement with blockchain consensus platform.”
From Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey (2020) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146 · see citing works
Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data
Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. R. (2006) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/1180405.1180418 · Cited by 5,092 · see citing works
Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. '. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops · doi:10.1109/spw.2015.27 · Cited by 2,617 · see citing works
Li, M., Yu, S., Zheng, Y. R., Ren, K., & Lou, W. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.97 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake
King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012) · Cited by 984 · see citing works
Design considerations for a 5G network architecture
Agyapong, P. K., Iwamura, M., Staehle, D., Kieß, W., & Benjebbour, A. (2014) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2014.6957145 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Security Analysis of SHA-256 and Sisters
Gilbert, H., & Handschuh, H. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24654-1_13 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Panda: Public Auditing for Shared Data with Efficient User Revocation in the Cloud
Wang, B., Li, B., & Li, H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2013.2295611 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationSomani, U., Lakhani, K., & Mundra, M. (2010) · International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC) · doi:10.1109/pdgc.2010.5679895 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Blockchain Thinking : The Brain as a Decentralized Autonomous Corporation [Commentary]
Swan, M. (2015) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2015.2494358 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Big data privacy issues in public social media
Smith, M., Szongott, C., Henne, B., & von Voigt, G. (2012) · 2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST) · doi:10.1109/dest.2012.6227909 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Securing electronic medical records using attribute-based encryption on mobile devices
Akinyele, J. A., Pagano, M. W., Green, M., Lehmann, C. U., Peterson, Z. N. J., & Rubin, A. D. (2011) · Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices · doi:10.1145/2046614.2046628 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Public auditing for shared data with efficient user revocation in the cloud
Wang, B., Li, B., & Li, H. (2013) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2013.6567101 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationDAC-MACS: Effective data access control for multi-authority cloud storage systems
Yang, K., Jia, X., Ren, K., et al. (2013) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2013.6567100 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Joint Caching and Pricing Strategies for Popular Content in Information Centric Networks
Hajimirsadeghi, M., Mandayam, N. B., & Reznik, A. (2017) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2017.2672161 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Toward content-centric privacy in ICN
Ion, M., Zhang, J., & Schooler, E. M. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2486001.2491717 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Role‐based and time‐bound access and management of EHR data
Zhang, R., Liu, L., & Xue, R. (2013) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.817 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Secure, efficient and revocable data sharing scheme for vehicular fogs
Fan, K., Wang, J., Wang, X., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-017-0562-8 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationA Secure Self-Destruction Scheme with IBE for the Internet Content Privacy
Xiong, J. (2014) · Chinese Journal of Computers · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Privacy Access Control Model for Aggregated e-Health Services
Hung, P. C. K., & Zheng, Y. (2007) · doi:10.1109/edocw.2007.24 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Anonymous Role-Based Access Control on E-Health Records
Zhou, X., Liu, J., Liu, W., et al. (2016) · ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIA CCS) · doi:10.1145/2897845.2897871 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain for internet of things: a survey
Dai, H.-N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2920987 · Cited by 1,246 · see citing works
MedBlock: Efficient and Secure Medical Data Sharing Via Blockchain
Fan, K., Wang, S., Ren, Y., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Self-citationParmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2882 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102693 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Blockchain for smart communities: applications, challenges and opportunities
Aggarwal, S., Chaudhary, R., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.018 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
A Secure Federated Learning Framework for 5G Networks
Liu, Y., Peng, J., Kang, J., Iliyasu, A. M., Niyato, D., & El-Latif, A. A. A. (2020) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.01.1900525 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health
Tagde, P., Tagde, S., Bhattacharya, T., Tagde, P., Chopra, H., Akter, R., Kaushik, D., & Rahman, M. H. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-16223-0 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Blockchain envisioned uav networks: challenges, solutions, and comparisons
Mehta, P., Gupta, R., & Tanwar, S. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.023 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
A survey on optimization techniques for edge artificial intelligence (ai)
Surianarayanan, C., Lawrence, J. J., Chelliah, P. R., Prakash, E., & Hewage, C. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031279 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fan, K., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Li, H., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Xidian University (CN)
- Xi’an University (CN)
- Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Wide Band‐Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices Xidian University 2 South Taibai Road Xi'an People's Republic of China
- Corresponding author
- Fan, Kai
- Venue
- IET Communications
- Published
- 2018-02-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-532
- ISSN
- 1751-8628 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8636
- OpenAlex
- W2765226969
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 34.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IET Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Keywords
- blockchain, content-centric networking, 5G, privacy preservation, data sharing, access control, content providers, public ledger, green communication, network latency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
