Cited by 300Coconut Research and ApplicationsFood Nutrient Composition and Product DevelopmentFood Science and Nutritional Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 113 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Coconut water uses, composition and properties: a review

Open access
Prades, Alexia, Dornier, Manuel, Diop, Nafissatou, Pain, Jean-Pierre·2012·Fruits

Abstract

The product. Coconut water (Cocos nucifera L.) is an ancien t tropical beverage whose popularity on the international market has been continuously increasing in recent years. Uses. Besides its various traditional uses, this refreshing liqu id extracted from the coconut fruit has recently been described as a "sport beverage" and has drawn the attention of manufacturers as a natural functional drink. Composition. Coconut water has a low matter content (2% to 5% wet basis), mainly comprising sugars and minerals. Quality criteria, such as the water per nut ratio, Total Soluble Solids (TSS), total sugar per nut, and [reducing sugars / total sugars] ratio, are good indicators for estimating the suitability of coconut cultivars for the production of coconut water. Regarding these criteria, dwarf varieties are the most suitable cultivars to obtain a tasty product. Properties. The quality of coconut water can not only be attributed to sugars and minerals because it also has a typical flavour and some original properties. Although many authors have cited medicinal uses or growth-promoting activities, only a few publications have clearly identified the components responsible for these properties. Discussion. Results of former and recent investigations are discussed. Finally, suggestions are made for further research to increase our knowledge of this original tropical juice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1051/fruits/2012002

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

5 of 113 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 101 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The literature data from different studies on coconut water composition are comparable enough to be combined and analysed together.

    “To summarise knowledge of the ripening process, we computed and analysed these results (figures 2, 3).”
    “To obtain exhaustive information on the components of coconut water, data from nine articles representing 48 accessions of coconut palms and 42 different varieties were analysed (table V).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 6-7 month stage is the most palatable stage for drinking coconut water.

    “This stage of maturity is also claimed by many authors to be the most palatable for drinking coconut water.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The enzymes polyphenoloxydase and peroxydase are responsible for the discoloration frequently observed in coconut water.

    “These enzymes are assumed to be responsible for the discoloration (pink, yellow or brown) frequently observed in coconut water.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most of the original properties of coconut water are due to minor components such as minerals, volatile aromatic molecules, polyols or small peptides.

    “Most of the original properties of coconut water are due to minor components such as minerals, volatile aromatic molecules, polyols or small peptides.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coconut water is considered to be a natural medicine in different civilisations.

    “As coconut water is considered to be a natural medicine in different civilisations, it was screened to identify defense peptides with bactericidal properties [86].”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Mature-water solids range conflicts with table mean

    Minor

    The prose places the dry matter of mature coconut water at 5%-6%, but Table I gives a mean total-solids content of 4.5 g/100 mL for mature coconut water, below that range.

  • Sucrose and reducing sugars exceed total sugars for Malayan Tall

    Minor

    Table I reports 5.1 g/100 mL of sucrose and 2.9 g/100 mL of reducing sugars for Malayan Tall. These distinct sugar components sum to 8.0 g/100 mL, exceeding the reported total sugars of 4.4 g/100 mL.

    Reported 4.4 · recomputed 8

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Ediriweera, 2003, Cocoinfo Int., 10, 11
  2. Pieris, 1971, Oléagineux, 26, 383
  3. Batugal P.A., Ramanatha Rao V., Bong C., Promoting multi-purpose uses and competitiveness of the coconut, in: Batugal P.A., Ramanatha Rao V., Bong C.E. (Eds.), IPGRI, Chumphon, Thailand, 1996.
  4. Steiner, 2008, Ernähr., 32, 513
  5. Osazuwa, 1989, Niger. J. Palms Oil Seeds, 10–11, 91
  6. Rethinam, 2001, Indian Coconut J., 32, 2
  7. De Carvalho, 2006, Semin.: Ciênc. Agrar., 27, 437
  8. da Kumar, 1990, Indian Coconut J., 21, 14
  9. Alaban, 1962, Philipp. Agric., 45, 490
  10. De Gallardo, 1971, Philipp. J. Sci., 100, 41
  11. Sierra, 1976, Philipp. J. Coconut Stud., 1, 11
  12. Anith, 2009, Current Sci., 97, 1647
  13. Jayalekshmy, 1986, J. Food Sci. Technol., 23, 203
  14. Dupaigne, 1971, Fruits, 26, 625
  15. Thampan, 2004, Indian Coconut J., 35, 6
  16. Lapitan, 1983, Philipp. Agric., 66, 144
  17. Pue, 1992, Sci. New Guin., 18, 81
  18. Del Rosario, 1984, Trans. the Natl. Acad. Sci. Technol., 6, 127
  19. Chavalittamrong, 1982, Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 13, 427
  20. Anzaldo, 1985, Philipp. J. Coconut Stud., 10, 31
  21. Uphade, 2008, Int. J. Chem. Sci., 6, 2052
  22. Shivashankar, 1991, J. Plant. Crops., 19, 102
  23. Campos, 1996, Philipp. J. Coconut Stud., 20, 487
  24. Jirovetz, 2003, Ernähr., 27, 300
  25. Dhamodaran S., Ratnambal M.J., Chempakam B., Pillai R.V., Viraktamath B.C., Evaluation of tendernut water in coconut cultivars, in: Nair M.K., Khan H.H., Gopalasundaram P., Bhaskana Rao E.N.V. (Eds.), Advances in Coconut Research and Development, ISOCRAD II Oxford & IBH Publ. Co. PVT Ltd., New Delhi, India, 1993.
  26. Wang, 2008, J. Fruit Sci., 25, 601
  27. Apshara, 2007, Indian Coconut J., 38, 20
  28. Kwiatkowski, 2008, Int. J. Food Agric. Environ., 6, 102
  29. De Kruijff, 1906, Bull. Dép. Agric. Indes Néerl., 4, 1
  30. Nathanael, 1952, Ceylon Coconut Q., 3, 193
  31. Lahille, 1920, Bull. Écon . Indoch., 140, 1
  32. Assa, 2007, Agron. Afr., 19, 41
  33. Ranasinghe, 2009, Indian Coconut J., 51, 18
  34. Nadanasabapathy, 1999, Indian J. Agric. Sci., 69, 750
  35. Samsudeen, 2006, Indian Coconut J., 36, 10
  36. Wazir S.K.S., Technologies on environment-friendly young tender coconuts, in: Proc. Cocotech Meeting, APCC, Manila, Philipp., 1997.
  37. Ouvrier, 1984, Oléagineux, 39, 263
  38. Assa, 2006, Sci. Nat., 3, 113
  39. Anurag, 2007, Indian Coconut J., 37, 22
  40. Radenahmad, 2009, Histol. Histopathol., 24, 667
  41. Prakash, 2008, NutraCos, 7, 6
  42. Costa, 2006, Rev. Bras. Armaz., 31, 95
  43. Enonuya, 1988, Niger. J. Palms Oil Seeds, 9, 48
  44. Sison, 1977, Philipp. J. Coconut Stud., 11, 39
  45. Diop N., Caractérisation physico-chimique de l’eau de la noix de coco verte ( Cocos nucifera L.) et essais de stabilisation par techniques membranaires, ENSIA-SIARC, Master thesis, Montpellier, France, 2005, 132 p.
  46. Kikuda A.T., Tadini C.C., Fernandes R., Modelo de primeira ordem multicomponente para inativação térmica em processo descontínuo da peroxidase e polifenoloxidase presentes na água de coco verde ( Cocos nucifera L.), in: CBCTA A.d.X. (Ed.), XVIII Cong. Bras. Ciênc. Tecnol. Alim., Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 300

Metadata

Authors
Prades, A., Dornier, M., Diop, N., & Pain, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • UMR QualiSud (FR)
  • Institut Agro Montpellier (FR)
  • Institut de Technologie Alimentaire (SN)
Venue
Fruits
Published
2012-03
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
87-107
ISSN
  • 0248-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1625-967X
OpenAlex
W2051937794
Cited by
284
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fruits (publishedVersion)
  • Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food Science and Nutritional Studies
Keywords
coconut water, nutritional composition, physicochemical properties, bioactive compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review