Cited by 416Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Improvement of Cognitive Function by Mental and/or Individualized Aerobic Training in Healthy Elderly Subjects

Fabre, C., Chamari, K., Mucci, P., Massé-Biron, J., Préfaut, C.·2002·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aerobic and mental training on cognitive function and to determine if the association of the two techniques shows better results. Thirty-two healthy elderly subjects (60 - 76 years) were assigned to one of four groups: aerobic training, mental training, combined aerobic and mental training and a control group. All subjects took two cognitive tests and an incremental exercise test before and after the training period. The intensity of exercise was individualized at the heart rate corresponding to the ventilatory threshold of each subject. After two months, the control group showed no alteration in physiological and cognitive variables. After the training period, the results showed a significant improvement in VO(2)max (F = 4.45, DF = 1, p < 0.05) of 12 % and 11 % in aerobic training and combined aerobic and mental training groups, respectively. Logical memory (F = 4.31, DF = 1, p < 0.05), as well as paired associates learning scores (F = 5.47, DF = 1, p < 0.05) and memory quotient (F = 6.52, DF = 1, p < 0.01) were significantly improved in the three trained groups. The mean difference in memory quotient between pre and post training was significantly higher in the combined aerobic and mental training group compared to aerobic training or mental training groups (F = 11.60, DF = 3, p < 0.001). We conclude that the specific aerobic training and mental training used in this study could induce the same degree of improvement in cog…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2002-33735

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabre, C., Chamari, K., Mucci, P., Massé-Biron, J., & Préfaut, C.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital (QA)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2002-08
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
415-421
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W1977466344
Cited by
416
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université de Montpellier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
aerobic exercise, mental training, cognitive function, older adults, concurrent training, memory, logical memory, paired-associate learning, memory quotient, ventilatory threshold, heart rate, VO2max, exercise training
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Cognition, Humans, Middle Aged, Physical Education and Training, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review