Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled study

Mahncke, Henry W., Connor, Bonnie B., Appelman, Jed, Ahsanuddin, Omar N., Hardy, Joseph L., Wood, Richard A., Joyce, Nicholas M., Boniske, Tania, Atkins, Sharona M., Merzenich, Michael M.·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0605194103
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Normal aging is associated with progressive functional losses in perception, cognition, and memory. Although the root causes of age-related cognitive decline are incompletely understood, psychophysical and neuropsychological evidence suggests that a significant contribution stems from poorer signal-to-noise conditions and down-regulated neuromodulatory system function in older brains. Because the brain retains a lifelong capacity for plasticity and adaptive reorganization, dimensions of negative reorganization should be at least partially reversible through the use of an appropriately designed training program. We report here results from such a training program targeting age-related cognitive decline. Data from a randomized, controlled trial using standardized measures of neuropsychological function as outcomes are presented. Significant improvements in assessments directly related to the training tasks and significant generalization of improvements to nonrelated standardized neuropsychological measures of memory (effect size of 0.25) were documented in the group using the training program. Memory enhancement appeared to be sustained after a 3-month no-contact follow-up period. Matched active control and no-contact control groups showed no significant change in memory function after training or at the 3-month follow-up. This study demonstrates that intensive, plasticity-engaging training can result in an enhancement of cognitive function in normal mature adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0605194103

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. H. M. Fillit R. N. Butler A. W. O’Connell M. S. Albert J. E. Birren C. W. Cotman W. T. Greenough P. E. Gold A. F. Kramer L. H. Kuller et al. 77 681–696 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1212/WNL.56.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01417.x · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1468-1331.1999.660645.x · DOI
  5. M. M. Merzenich, W. M. Jenkins The Adaptable Brain, ed S. Levy-Reiner (Library of Congress, Washington, DC) Vol. II, 37–50 (1999).
  6. M. M. Merzenich, W. M. Jenkins Memory Concepts, ed P. Andersen (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 437–453 (1993).
  7. 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1071 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1031 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/378071a0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.270.5234.305 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.1048 · DOI
  12. 10.1152/jn.1990.63.1.82 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1212/WNL.47.2.508 · DOI · Paper page
  14. H. W. Mahncke, A. Bronstone, M. M. Merzenich Reprogramming the Brain, eds A. R. Møller, S. B. Chapman, S. G. Lomber (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 81–110 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/3-211-27577-0_12 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00123-3 · DOI
  17. P. Tallal, S. Miller, W. Jenkins, M. Merzenich Foundations of Reading, ed B. Blachman (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 71–88 (1996).
  18. M. M. Merzenich, P. Tallal, B. Peterson, S. L. Miller, W. M. Jenkins Neuroplasticity: Building a Bridge from the Laboratory to the Clinic, eds J. Grafman, Y. Cristen (Springer, New York), pp. 169–187 (1998).
  19. M. M. Merzenich, S. Miller, W. Jenkins, G. Saunders, A. Protopapas, B. Peterson, P. Tallal Basic Neural Mechanisms in Cognition and Language, ed C. Euler (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp. 143–172 (1998).
  20. ; Scientific Learning Improved Reading Skills by Students in the Dallas Independent School District Who Used Fast ForWard(r) Products (Scientific Learning, Oakland, CA, MAPS for Learning: Educator Reports. (2005).
  21. ; Scientific Learning Improved Reading Skills by Students in the United Independent School District Who Used Fast ForWard(r) Products (Scientific Learning, Oakland, CA, MAPS for Learning: Educator Reports. (2005).
  22. 10.1073/pnas.0030098100 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00414-5 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020007 · DOI
  25. 10.1891/0739-6686.17.1.219 · DOI
  26. J. A. Yesavage Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. Suppl. 1, 185–190 (1989).
  27. 10.1080/13607860120101077 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/00019442-200407000-00007 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.538 · DOI
  30. 10.1097/00002093-200101000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1109/86.712220 · DOI
  32. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3771-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/cercor/9.3.264 · DOI
  34. D. Wechsler Wechsler Text of Adult Reading (Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, TX, 2001).
  35. 10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Mahncke, H. W., Connor, B. B., Appelman, J., Ahsanuddin, O. N., Hardy, J. L., Wood, R. A., Joyce, N. M., Boniske, T., Atkins, S. M., & Merzenich, M. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-08-15
Volume
103
Issue
33
Pages
12523-12528
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.0605194103
Cited by
502
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.