Cited by 723Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Functions and Memory

Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory

Open access
Morrison, Alexandra B., Chein, Jason M.·2011·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

A growing body of literature shows that one's working memory (WM) capacity can be expanded through targeted training. Given the established relationship between WM and higher cognition, these successful training studies have led to speculation that WM training may yield broad cognitive benefits. This review considers the current state of the emerging WM training literature, and details both its successes and limitations. We identify two distinct approaches to WM training, strategy training and core training, and highlight both the theoretical and practical motivations that guide each approach. Training-related increases in WM capacity have been successfully demonstrated across a wide range of subject populations, but different training techniques seem to produce differential impacts upon the broader landscape of cognitive abilities. In particular, core WM training studies seem to produce more far-reaching transfer effects, likely because they target domain-general mechanisms of WM. The results of individual studies encourage optimism regarding the value of WM training as a tool for general cognitive enhancement. However, we discuss several limitations that should be addressed before the field endorses the value of this approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WM training transfer to untrained tasks is limited.

    “The limited transfer of WM training to untrained tasks has long constrained its applications (Morrison & Chein, 2011; Zhao et al., 2022).”

    From The asymmetry of working memory training transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Morrison & Chein, 2011

    The ‘Lack of consistency in experimental methods and findings’ section reports both successful and failed transfer to untrained cognitive-control and fluid-intelligence tasks, supporting the view that transfer is limited or uncertain. The paper does not establish the broader historical claim that limited transfer has long constrained WM training’s applications; it also reports some successful transfer. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the behavioral level, transfer effects could be expected in potentially related cognitive functions and lead to enhanced performance in a variety of tasks that, although untrained, share the same cognitive mechanism as the targeted trained processes.

    “Similarly, at the behavioral level, transfer effects could be expected in potentially related cognitive functions, and lead to enhanced performance in a variety tasks that, although untrained, share the same cognitive mechanism than the targeted trained processes (Morrison and Chein, 2011).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Morrison and Chein, 2011

  • Current training studies range from 2 to 14 weeks.

    “Second, the present training schedule covered 2 weeks, which is in the lower end of the range of the current training studies (from 2 to 14 weeks; Morrison and Chein, 2011).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Morrison and Chein, 2011

  • Many studies that reported near and far transfer effects are called into question due to small sample sizes and problematic control procedures.

    “Although other studies have reported near and far transfer effects, many are called into question due to small sample sizes and problematic control procedures (for thorough discussion see [53–55]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Chein, Jason M.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2010-11-17
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
46-60
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2053464314
Cited by
723
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 45
FWCI
44.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, working memory capacity, strategy training, core training, transfer effects, cognitive enhancement, domain-general mechanisms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attention, Child, Cognition, Humans, Intelligence, Judgment, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Practice, Psychological, Serial Learning, Transfer, Psychology, Verbal Learning, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review