Cited by 381Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Global regulatory logic for specification of an embryonic cell lineage

Open access
Oliveri, Paola, Tu, Qiang, Davidson, Eric H.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Explanation of a process of development must ultimately be couched in the terms of the genomic regulatory code. Specification of an embryonic cell lineage is driven by a network of interactions among genes encoding transcription factors. Here, we present the gene regulatory network (GRN) that directs the specification of the skeletogenic micromere lineage of the sea urchin embryo. The GRN now includes all regulatory genes expressed in this lineage up to late blastula stage, as identified in a genomewide survey. The architecture of the GRN was established by a large-scale perturbation analysis in which the expression of each gene in the GRN was cut off by use of morpholinos, and the effects on all other genes were measured quantitatively. Several cis -regulatory analyses provided additional evidence. The explanatory power of the GRN suffices to provide a causal explanation for all observable developmental functions of the micromere lineage during the specification period. These functions are: ( i ) initial acquisition of identity through transcriptional interpretation of localized maternal cues; ( ii ) activation of specific regulatory genes by use of a double negative gate; ( iii ) dynamic stabilization of the regulatory state by activation of a feedback subcircuit; ( iv ) exclusion of alternative regulatory states; ( v ) presentation of a signal required by the micromeres themselves and of two different signals required for development of adjacent endomesodermal lineages; and ( vi ) lineage-specific activation of batteries of skeletogenic genes. The GRN precisely predicts gene expression responses and provides a coherent explanation of the biology of specification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0711220105

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In sea urchins, a Class-specific evolutionary modification caused the acquisition of an embryonic skeleton not present in other echinoderms.

    “One example of a subcircuit-level co-option event has been discovered in sea urchins, in which a Class-specific evolutionary modification has caused the acquisition of an embryonic skeleton not present in other echinoderms.”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Oliveri et al., 2008

    The paper describes the skeletogenic micromere lineage in modern sea urchins (Introduction, p. 1), and the Results (p. 2) show a late gastrula with a forming skeleton. It does not establish that a class-specific evolutionary modification or subcircuit co-option caused the skeleton’s acquisition, or compare its presence with other echinoderms. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A comparison of regulatory gene expression in embryonic and adult skeletogenic precursor cells revealed a large overlap at least at the nodes of these GRNs, which very likely extends also to the linkages between them.

    “A comparison of regulatory gene expression in embryonic and adult skeletogenic precursor cells revealed a large overlap at least at the nodes of these GRNs which very likely extends also to the linkages between them (Gao and Davidson, 2008; Oliveri et al., 2008).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Oliveri et al., 2008

    The introduction (p. 1) describes a GRN for embryonic skeletogenic micromeres and says the study does not include processes after gastrulation. The Results (pp. 4–6) describe regulatory genes and linkages in that embryonic lineage, but the passages found do not compare embryonic and adult precursor cells or assess overlap in their GRN nodes or linkages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The gene regulatory network underlying the specification and differentiation of the micromere lineage is known.

    “The gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying the specification and differentiation of this lineage is now known.”
  • GRNs are composed of multiple sub-circuits, each accomplishing a parsed regulatory task.

    “GRNs are composed of multiple sub-circuits, that is, the individual regulatory tasks into which a process can be parsed are each accomplished by a given GRN sub-circuit1–4.”

    From Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks (2010) · cites this paper as [1]

  • The sea urchin skeletogenic lineage GRN portion contains 24 regulatory genes and several signalling genes, plus downstream differentiation genes.

    “This portion of the network contains 24 regulatory genes and several signalling genes, as well as a sampling of downstream differentiation genes”

    From Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks (2010) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]Wilt FH, Ettensohn CA (2007) Morphogenesis and Biomineralization of the Sea Urchin Larval Endoskeleton (Wiley, Weinheim, Germany).
  2. [13]Croce J, et al. (2008) Maternal determinants in the vegetal cortex are required to activate the sea urchin endomesoderm gene regulatory network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveri, P., Tu, Q., & Davidson, E. H.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Oliveri, Paola
  • Davidson, Eric H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
105
Issue
16
Pages
5955-5962
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2032074345
Cited by
381
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 26
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01hd037105-20)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 61005, R01GM061005)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01-HD037105, HD37105)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
gene regulatory networks, sea urchin embryo, transcription factors, feedback loops, endomesoderm, developmental gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Skeleton, Genome, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Lineage, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review