Cited by 412Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCell Image Analysis Techniques

Live-cell imaging of dendritic spines by STED microscopy

Open access
Nägerl, U. Valentin, Willig, Katrin I., Hein, Birka, Hell, Stefan W., Bonhoeffer, Tobias·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Time lapse fluorescence imaging has become one of the most important approaches in neurobiological research. In particular, both confocal and two-photon microscopy have been used to study activity-dependent changes in synaptic morphology. However, the diffraction-limited resolution of light microscopy is often inadequate, forcing researchers to complement the live cell imaging strategy by EM. Here, we report on the first use of a far-field optical technique with subdiffraction resolution to noninvasively image activity-dependent morphological plasticity of dendritic spines. Specifically we show that time lapse stimulated emission depletion imaging of dendritic spines of YFP-positive hippocampal neurons in organotypic slices outperforms confocal microscopy in revealing important structural details. The technique substantially improves the quantification of morphological parameters, such as the neck width and the curvature of the heads of spines, which are thought to play critical roles for the function and plasticity of synaptic connections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0810028105

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neck diameters of spines located at 0-10 μm depth were originally measured to be on average ~40% reduced compared to confocal imaging.

    “Neck diameters of spines located at 0–10 μm depth were originally measured to be on average ~40% reduced compared to confocal imaging (Nägerl et al., 2008),”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Nägerl et al., 2008

  • The first STED images of spines in organotypical slices expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a sparse subset of neurons were published in 2008.

    “The first STED images of spines in organotypical slices expressing yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in a sparse subset of neurons were published in 2008 (Nägerl et al., 2008).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Nägerl et al., 2008

  • Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures undergo key developmental steps similar to in vivo, including synapse maturation.

    “Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures are known to undergo key developmental steps similar to those observed in vivo, including synapse maturation28–31, and have been previously used to study ramified microglia function32.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nägerl, U. V., Willig, K. I., Hein, B., Hell, S. W., & Bonhoeffer, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-12-02
Volume
105
Issue
48
Pages
18982-18987
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1978431686
Cited by
412
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 32
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
dendritic spines, STED microscopy, live-cell imaging, time-lapse fluorescence imaging, synaptic plasticity, hippocampal neurons, sub-diffraction resolution, dendritic spine morphology, spinal curvature, confocal microscopy comparison
MeSH terms
Animals, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neuronal Plasticity, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review