Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mature clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats RNA (crRNA) length is measured by a ruler mechanism anchored at the precursor processing site

Hatoum-Aslan, Asma, Maniv, Inbal, Marraffini, Luciano A.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Precise RNA processing is fundamental to all small RNA-mediated interference pathways. In prokaryotes, clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) loci encode small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that protect against invasive genetic elements by antisense targeting. CRISPR loci are transcribed as a long precursor that is cleaved within repeat sequences by CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins. In many organisms, this primary processing generates crRNA intermediates that are subject to additional nucleolytic trimming to render mature crRNAs of specific lengths. The molecular mechanisms underlying this maturation event remain poorly understood. Here, we defined the genetic requirements for crRNA primary processing and maturation in Staphylococcus epidermidis . We show that changes in the position of the primary processing site result in extended or diminished maturation to generate mature crRNAs of constant length. These results indicate that crRNA maturation occurs by a ruler mechanism anchored at the primary processing site. We also show that maturation is mediated by specific cas genes distinct from those genes involved in primary processing, showing that this event is directed by CRISPR/Cas loci.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1112832108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134123 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1179555 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrg2749 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.03.005 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1159689 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1101/gad.1742908 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1192272 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nsmb.2042 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nsmb.2019 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nsmb.2043 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1104144108 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1102716108 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nature09523 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1261/rna.1246808 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature08703 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/305709a0 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90399-V · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.str.2010.11.014 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.043 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1121638 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/1745-6150-6-38 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07265.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90101-H · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hatoum-Aslan, A., Maniv, I., & Marraffini, L. A.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-12-12
Volume
108
Issue
52
Pages
21218-21222
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
185
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review