Cited by 196Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPrimate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolution

Metabolic constraint imposes tradeoff between body size and number of brain neurons in human evolution

Open access
Fonseca-Azevedo, Karina, Herculano-Houzel, Suzana·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Despite a general trend for larger mammals to have larger brains, humans are the primates with the largest brain and number of neurons, but not the largest body mass. Why are great apes, the largest primates, not also those endowed with the largest brains? Recently, we showed that the energetic cost of the brain is a linear function of its numbers of neurons. Here we show that metabolic limitations that result from the number of hours available for feeding and the low caloric yield of raw foods impose a tradeoff between body size and number of brain neurons, which explains the small brain size of great apes compared with their large body size. This limitation was probably overcome in Homo erectus with the shift to a cooked diet. Absent the requirement to spend most available hours of the day feeding, the combination of newly freed time and a large number of brain neurons affordable on a cooked diet may thus have been a major positive driving force to the rapid increased in brain size in human evolution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1206390109

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fonseca-Azevedo, K., & Herculano-Houzel, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Instituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional, 04023-900, São Paulo, Brazil
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
109
Issue
45
Pages
18571-18576
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2098413526
Cited by
196
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12
FWCI
65.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Neurociência Translacional
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
brain size, body size, metabolic constraints, meal timing, cooking, Homo erectus, human evolution, great apes, brain evolution, primate brain size
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cell Count, Diet, Biological Evolution, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Neurons, Organ Size, Primates, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review