Cited by 422Primate Behavior and EcologyNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Cellular scaling rules for primate brains.

Open access
Herculano-Houzel, Suzana, Collins, Christine E., Wong, Peiyan, Kaas, Jon H.·2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Primates are usually found to have richer behavioral repertoires and better cognitive abilities than rodents of similar brain size. This finding raises the possibility that primate brains differ from rodent brains in their cellular composition. Here we examine the cellular scaling rules for primate brains and show that brain size increases approximately isometrically as a function of cell numbers, such that an 11x larger brain is built with 10x more neurons and approximately 12x more nonneuronal cells of relatively constant average size. This isometric function is in contrast to rodent brains, which increase faster in size than in numbers of neurons. As a consequence of the linear cellular scaling rules, primate brains have a larger number of neurons than rodent brains of similar size, presumably endowing them with greater computational power and cognitive abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0611396104

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because EQ is sensitive to the species included and the human brain conforms to primate scaling rules, the authors suggested that great apes such as orangutans and gorillas have bodies much larger than expected for primates of their brain size, rather than humans having a larger brain than expected.

    “we have suggested that, rather than humans having a larger brain than expected, it is the great apes such as orangutans and, more notably, gorillas that have bodies that are much larger than expected for primates of their brain size (Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007).”

    From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Absolute brain mass and number of neurons must be considered because the exceeding number of neurons in a large brain should be larger than in a smaller brain of the same EQ.

    “Absolute brain mass and number of neurons, left out of the encephalization equation, must clearly be taken into consideration, since the “exceeding number of neurons” in a large brain should necessarily be larger than that in a smaller brain of same EQ (Herculano-Houzel, 2007).”

    From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel, 2007

    The ‘Implications for Volume Comparisons Across Orders’ section says that comparisons of brain size should consider neuronal counts directly, not just brain volume. The paper also relates larger primate brain structures to greater numbers of neurons. It does not address encephalization quotient (EQ) or establish that a larger brain has more ‘exceeding’ neurons than a smaller brain with the same EQ; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In mammals, the pallium accounts for most of total brain volume, but the cerebellum houses a large majority of brain neurons.

    “This markedly contrasts with the situation found in mammals, in which the pallium accounts for most of total brain volume, but the cerebellum houses a large majority of brain neurons (32–39)”

    From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [33]

    The “Fractional Distribution of MBR and Neurons” section reports that the cerebral cortex makes up most brain mass while the cerebellum contains most brain neurons in the primates examined. The claim extends that finding to mammals generally, which this evidence does not establish. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Primate brain size grows approximately isometrically with neuron number, with no systematic change in neuronal density or in the non-neuronal-to-neuronal ratio as brain size increases.

    “primate brain size increases approximately isometrically as a function of neuron number, with no systematic change in neuronal density or in the non-neuronal/neuronal ratio with increasing brain size”

    From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Herculano-Houzel et al., 2007

  • Like in mammals, the proportion of nonneuronal cells is very small in the cerebellum, varying between 12% and 19% in songbirds and between 14% and 19% in parrots, but, in contrast to mammals, nonneuronal cells also constitute a minor cellular fraction in the telencephalon, representing 21-40% of cells in songbirds and 31-43% of cells in parrots.

    “Like in mammals (32–39, 46), the proportion of nonneuronal cells is very small in the cerebellum, varying between 12% and 19% in songbirds and between 14% and 19% in parrots, but, in contrast to mammals, nonneuronal cells also constitute a minor cellular fraction in the telencephalon, representing 21–40% of cells in songbirds and 31–43% of cells in parrots”

    From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mullen RJ, Buck CR, Smith AM (1992) Development (Cambridge, UK) 116:201-211.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herculano-Houzel, S., Collins, C. E., Wong, P., & Kaas, J. H.
Affiliations
  • *Departamento de Anatomia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaas, Jon H.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2007-02-27
Volume
104
Issue
9
Pages
3562-3567
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2033231119
Cited by
422
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
21.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY002686, EY002686)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS016446)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
primate brain, brain size scaling, neuron number, non-neuronal cells, isometric scaling, rodent brain, cognitive ability
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Indoles, Neurons, Organ Size, Primates, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review